Abstract
In previous chapters, we researched the various types of hakwons and the life of students in elementary hakwons to high school hakwons. Moreover, we reviewed the positive and negative aspects in hakwon education. In this chapter, I would like to present the possible theme dealing with hakwon education as a promising upcoming realm of curriculum studies worldwide based on experiences in Korea. There are several possible research topics for curriculum studies in hakwon education that could be studied more in depth. I propose six research topics on hakwon/shadow education for curriculum studies: (1) hakwon/shadow education and ecology of education; (2) hakwon/shadow education on child development; (3) individualization; (4) students’ lived experience at hakwons; (5) hakwon educators; and (6) curriculum and teaching strategies of hakwons.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Aspinall, R., & Roesgaard, M. H. (2008). Japanese education and the cram school business: Functions, challenges and perspectives of the Juku. The Journal of Japanese Studies, 34(1), 121–125.
Barrow, D. D., & Lochan, S. (2010). Education in a hidden marketplace: Monitoring of private tuition; Private supplementary tutoring in Central Asia: New opportunities and burdens; Confronting the shadow education system: What government policies for what private tutoring? Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 41(1), 153–155.
Bergman, R. (2004). Caring for the ethical ideal: Nel Noddings on moral education. Journal of Moral Education, 33(2), 149–162.
Bray, M. (2013). Benefits and tensions of shadow education: Comparative perspectives on the roles and impact of private supplementary tutoring in the lives of Hong Kong students. Journal of International and Comparative Education, 2(1), 18–30.
Bray, M., & Kobakhidze, M. N. (2015). Evolving ecosystems in education: The nature and implications of private supplementary tutoring in Hong Kong. PROSPECTS, 45(4), 465–481.
Bray, M., & Kwo, O. (2014). Regulating private tutoring for public good: Policy options for supplementary education in Asia. Bangkok: UNESCO.
Bray, M., & Lykins, C. (2012). Shadow education private supplementary tutoring and its implications for policy makers in Asia. Mandaluyong: Asian Development Bank.
Britzman, D. P. (1989). Who has the floor?: Curriculum, teaching, and student teacher’s struggles for voice. Curriculum Inquiry, 19(summer), 143–162.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1976). The experimental ecology of education. Educational Researcher, 5(9), 5–15.
Bullough, R., Jr. (1989). First year teacher: A case study. New York: Teachers College Press.
Bullough, R., Jr., & Knowles, J. G. (1990). Becoming a teacher: Struggles of a second career beginning teacher. Qualitative Studies in Education, 3(2), 101–112.
Cho, J. S. (2015). Where are Korean bright students at school studying?: Qualitative case study on currere of an Einstein hakwon for smart students. Master’s Dissertation, Jinju National University of Education.
Dang, H. A. (2008). Private tutoring in Vietnam: An investigation of its causes and impacts with policy implications. Saarbrücken: VDM Verlag Dr. Muller.
Dean, A. V., & Kolitch, E. (1997). Unmaking good-girlism: Re-inventing ourselves through mathematics and writing. Journal of Curriculum Theorizing, 13(4), 13–19.
Doll Jr., W. E. (2012). Pragmatism, post-modernism, and complexity theory: The ‘fascinating imaginative realm’ of William E. Doll, Jr. (D. Trueit, ed.). New York: Routlege.
Goodson, I. F. (1992). Studying teachers’ lives: An emergent field of inquiry. In I. F. Goodson (Ed.), Studying teachers’ lives (pp. 1–17). London: Routledge.
Gough, N. (2003). Thinking globally in environment education: Implications for internationalizing curriculum inquiry. In W. Pinar (Ed.), International handbook of curriculum research (pp. 53–72). Mahwah: Erlbaum.
Grumet, M. (1988). Bitter milk: Women and teaching. Amberst: University of Massachusetts Press.
Huang, H. M. (2004). Effects of cram schools on children’s mathematics learning. In L. Fan, N. Y. Wong, J. Cai, & S. Li (Eds.), How Chinese learn mathematics: Perspectives from insiders (pp. 282–304). Singapore: World Scientific Publishing.
Hynevych, et al. (2006). Education in a hidden marketplace: Monitoring of private tutoring. Budapest: Education Support Program (ESP) of the Open Society Institute.
James, C. E. (2002). Achieving desire: Narrative of a black male teacher. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 15(2), 171–186.
Jung, C. G. (1983). The essential Jung. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Jung, J. H. (2015). The concept of care in curriculum studies: Juxtaposing currere and hakbeolism. London: Routledge.
Kalikova, S., & Rakhimzhanova, Z. (2009). Private tutoring in Kazakhstan. In I. Silova (Ed.), Private supplementary tutoring in Central Asia: New opportunities and burdens (pp. 93–118). Paris: UNESCO International Institute for Educational Planning (IIEP).
Kim, Y. C. (2008). Rather let students study in ‘Hakwons’. Seoul: Briends.
Kim, Y. C., & Kim, P. S. (2012). Hakwon does not die; fathers die: Secrets of Korean education that Obama did not know. Paju: Academy Press.
Kim, Y. C., & Kim, P. S. (2015). The best hakwons top 7. Paju: Academy Press.
Kim, Y. C., Jung, J. H., & Lee, Y. M. (2003). Ugly duckling: First year elementary school teachers’ lives. Seoul: Mooneunsa.
Kincheloe, J. (1991). Teachers as researchers: Qualitative inquiry as a path to empowerment. London: The Falmer Press.
Kobakhidze, M. N. (2014). Corruption risks of private tutoring: Case of Georgia. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 34(4), 455–475.
Kuan, P. Y. (2011). Effects of cram schooling on mathematics performance: Evidence from junior high students in Taiwan. Comparative Education Review, 55(3), 342–368.
Kwok, P. L. Y. (2010). Demand intensity, market parameters and policy responses towards demand and supply of private supplementary tutoring in China. Asia Pacific Education Review, 11(1), 49–58.
Lao, R. (2014). Analyzing the Thai state policy on private tutoring: the prevalence of the market discourse. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 34(4), 476–491.
Lee, C. Y. (2010). Case study about hakwon teachers’ educational culture (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from Korea University.
Miller, J. L. (1990). Creating spaces and finding voices: Teachers collaborating for empowerment. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Neumann, A. (1998). On experience, memory knowing: A post Holocaust (auto)biography. Curriculum Inquiry, 28(4), 425–442.
Noddings, N. (2002). Educating moral people: A caring alternative to character education. New York: Teachers College Press.
Park, C. M., Min, S. E., & Kim, Y. C. (2015). Elementary students’ educational experiences and meaning toward hakwon education. Journal for Qualitative Inquiry, 1(1), 85–126.
Pinar, W. (1974). Curere: Toward reconceptualization. In J. Jelinek (Ed.), Basic problems in modern education (pp. 147–171). Tempe: Arizona State University, College of Education.
Pinar, W. (Ed.). (1975). Curriculum theorizing: The reconceptualists. Berkeley: McCutchan.
Pinar, W. F. (1994). Autobiography, politics, and sexuality: Essays in curriculum theory 1972–1992. New York: Peter Lang.
Pinar, W. F. (2011). The character of curriculum studies: Bildung, currere, and the recurring question of the subject. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Pinar, W. F. (2015a). Educational experience as lived: Knowledge, history, alterity. New York: Routledge.
Pinar, W. P. (Ed.). (2015b). Curriculum studies in India: Intellectual histories, present circumstances. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Pinar, W. F., Reynolds, W. M., Slattery, P., & Taubman, P. M. (1995). Understanding curriculum: An introduction to the study of historical and contemporary curriculum discourses. New York: Peter Lang.
Pinar, W., & Grumet, M. (1976). Toward a poor curriculum. Dubuque: Kendall/Hunt.
Schubert, W., & Ayers, W. (Eds.). (1992). Teacher lore: Learning from our own experience. New York: Longman.
Sriprakash, A., Proctor, H., Hu, B. (2015). Visible pedagogic work: Parenting, private tutoring and educational advantage in Australia. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, (August) 37(3), 1–16.
Statistics Korea. (2014). Survey on expenses for sagyoyook. Seoul: Statistics Korea.
Statistics Korea. (2016). The survey of private education expenses for elementary school to high school. Seoul: National Statistics Korea.
Taubman, P. M. (2009). Teaching by numbers. New York: Routledge.
Trent, J. (2015, August). Constructing professional identities in shadow education: Perspectives of private supplementary educators in Hong Kong. Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 15(2), 1–16.
Zhang, W. (2014). The demand for shadow education in China: Mainstream teachers and power relations. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 34(4), 436–454.
Zhou, M., & Kim, S. S. (2006). Community forces, social capital, and educational achievement: The case of supplementary education in the Chinese and Korean immigrant communities. Harvard Educational Review, 76(1), 1–29.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2016 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kim, Y.C. (2016). Hakwon Education as a Worldwide Curriculum Question. In: Shadow Education and the Curriculum and Culture of Schooling in South Korea. Curriculum Studies Worldwide. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-51324-3_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-51324-3_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-51323-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-51324-3
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)