Abstract
My Ph.D. thesis aims to trouble hegemonic understandings of academic ‘underachievement’ by considering the complexity of the discourses that constitute primary school students’ academic subjectivities. It was apparent from a conversation with my thesis supervisors about the initial draft of an analysis chapter of an interview with one of my research participants, ‘Maria’, that despite my articulation of the poststructuralist underpinnings of the thesis, I had unreflexively defaulted to psychologising discourses in the analysis. This included engaging in the production of Maria’s biography as a singularly situated real story about her, through ‘triangulating’ her own, her teacher’s and her mother’s stories about her. Moreover, my own positionality in terms of how I engaged with Maria, the power relations between myself and her, and my motivation for conducting the interview, remained invisible and unchallenged. In this paper, I wrestle with the question of how we can know our research participants, and map the journey of ‘representing’ ‘Maria’ and the pitfalls that were encountered along the way.
‘The master, who at first appears to be “external” to the slave, reemerges as the slaves own’s conscience’ (Butler 1997, p. 3).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Bansel, P. (2011). Becoming academic: A reflection on doctoral candidacy. Studies in Higher Education, 36(5), 543–556.
Baxter, J. (2002). Competing discourses in the classroom: A post-structuralist discourse analysis of girls’ and boys’ speech in public contexts. Discourse & Society, 13(6), 827–842.
Burman, E. (1994). Deconstructing developmental psychology. London: Routledge.
Butler, J. (1997). The psychic life of power: Theories in subjection. California: Stanford University Press.
Choi, J.-a. (2006). Doing poststructural ethnography in the life history of dropouts in South Korea: Methodological ruminations on subjectivity, positionality and reflexivity. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 19(4), 435–453.
Code, L. (1987). Epistemic responsibility. Hanover/New Hampshire: University Press of New England.
Davies, B. (2004). Introduction: Poststructuralist lines of flight in Australia. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 17(1), 3–9.
Davies, B., & Harre, R. (1999). Chapter 3: Positioning and personhood. In R. Harre & L. van Langenhove (Eds.), Positioning theory. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers Inc.
Deleuze, G. (1992). What is a disposatif? In T. J. Armstrong (Ed.), Michael Foucault philosopher (pp. 159–168). New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Drake, P. (2010). Grasping at methodological understanding: A cautionary tale from insider research. International Journal of Research Method in Education, 33 (1), 85–99.Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. London: Penguin.
Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings 1972–1977. London: Harvester.
Foucault, M. (1983). The subject and power. In P. Rabinow & H. Dreyfus (Eds.), Michel Foucault: Beyond structuralism and hermeneutics (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Foucault, M. (1988). Technologies of the self. In L. H. Martin, H. Gutman, & P. H. Hutton (Eds.), Technologies of the self: A seminar with Michel Foucault. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.
Foucault, M. (1994). Aesthetics: Method and epistemology. In J. D. Faubion (Ed.), Power: Essential works of Foucault 1954–1984. London: Penguin Group.
Foucault, M. (1997). The ethics of the concern for self as a practice of freedom. In P. Rabinow (Ed.), Michel Foucault: Ethics, subjectivity and the truth, the essential works of Michel Foucault 1954–1984 (Vol. 1). London: Penguin Press.
Fox, A., & Allan, J. (2014). Doing reflexivity: Moments of unbecoming and becoming. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 37(1), 101–112.
Laws, C., & Davies, B. (2000). Poststructuralist theory in practice: Working with “behaviourally disturbed” children. Qualitative Studies in Education, 13(3), 205–221.
McInerney, D. M. (2014). Educational psychology: Constructing learning. Sixth Australian Edition. Frenchs Forest: Pearson Education.
Parkes, R. J., Gore, J. M., & Amosa, W. (2010). Poststructuralism as social justice pedagogy. In T. Chapman & N. Hobbel (Eds.), Social justice pedagogy across the curriculum: The practice of freedom. London: Routledge.
Petersen, E., & Millei, Z. (2015). Psy-disciplinary cogs in the teacher education machine. Knowledge Cultures, 3(2), 127–145.
Petersen, E., & O’Flynn, G. (2007). Neoliberal technologies of subject formation: A case study of the Duke of Edinburgh’s Award scheme. Critical Studies in Education, 48(2), 197–211.
Rose, N. (1989). Governing the soul: The shaping of the private self. London: Routledge.
Scheman, N. (1993). Engenderings: Constructions of knowledge, authority and privilege. London: Routledge.
Skeggs, B. (1997). Formations of class and gender. London: Sage.
Skeggs, B. (2002). Techniques for telling the reflexive self. In T. May (Ed.), Qualitative research in action (pp. 349–374). London: Sage.
Sondergaard, D. M. (2002). Poststructuralist approaches to empirical analysis. Qualitative Studies in Education, 15(2), 187–204.
St. Pierre, E. A., & Pillow, W. S. (1999). Working the ruins. Feminist poststructural theory and methods in education. New York: Routledge.
Stronach, I., & MacLure, M. (1997). Educational research undone. The postmodern embrace. Buckingham/Philadelphia: Open University Press.
Walkerdine, V. (1990). Schoolgirl fictions. London: Verso.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2016 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Wilson-Wheeler, M. (2016). ‘How Do You Solve a Problem Like Maria?’ Troubling the Psy-gaze in the Qualitative Analysis and Representation of Educational Subjects’. In: Bendix Petersen, E., Millei, Z. (eds) Interrupting the Psy-Disciplines in Education. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-51305-2_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-51305-2_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-51304-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-51305-2
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)