Skip to main content

‘How Do You Solve a Problem Like Maria?’ Troubling the Psy-gaze in the Qualitative Analysis and Representation of Educational Subjects’

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 996 Accesses

Abstract

My Ph.D. thesis aims to trouble hegemonic understandings of academic ‘underachievement’ by considering the complexity of the discourses that constitute primary school students’ academic subjectivities. It was apparent from a conversation with my thesis supervisors about the initial draft of an analysis chapter of an interview with one of my research participants, ‘Maria’, that despite my articulation of the poststructuralist underpinnings of the thesis, I had unreflexively defaulted to psychologising discourses in the analysis. This included engaging in the production of Maria’s biography as a singularly situated real story about her, through ‘triangulating’ her own, her teacher’s and her mother’s stories about her. Moreover, my own positionality in terms of how I engaged with Maria, the power relations between myself and her, and my motivation for conducting the interview, remained invisible and unchallenged. In this paper, I wrestle with the question of how we can know our research participants, and map the journey of ‘representing’ ‘Maria’ and the pitfalls that were encountered along the way.

‘The master, who at first appears to be “external” to the slave, reemerges as the slaves own’s conscience’ (Butler 1997, p. 3).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bansel, P. (2011). Becoming academic: A reflection on doctoral candidacy. Studies in Higher Education, 36(5), 543–556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baxter, J. (2002). Competing discourses in the classroom: A post-structuralist discourse analysis of girls’ and boys’ speech in public contexts. Discourse & Society, 13(6), 827–842.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burman, E. (1994). Deconstructing developmental psychology. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, J. (1997). The psychic life of power: Theories in subjection. California: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi, J.-a. (2006). Doing poststructural ethnography in the life history of dropouts in South Korea: Methodological ruminations on subjectivity, positionality and reflexivity. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 19(4), 435–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Code, L. (1987). Epistemic responsibility. Hanover/New Hampshire: University Press of New England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, B. (2004). Introduction: Poststructuralist lines of flight in Australia. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 17(1), 3–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, B., & Harre, R. (1999). Chapter 3: Positioning and personhood. In R. Harre & L. van Langenhove (Eds.), Positioning theory. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G. (1992). What is a disposatif? In T. J. Armstrong (Ed.), Michael Foucault philosopher (pp. 159–168). New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drake, P. (2010). Grasping at methodological understanding: A cautionary tale from insider research. International Journal of Research Method in Education, 33 (1), 85–99.Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings 1972–1977. London: Harvester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1983). The subject and power. In P. Rabinow & H. Dreyfus (Eds.), Michel Foucault: Beyond structuralism and hermeneutics (2nd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1988). Technologies of the self. In L. H. Martin, H. Gutman, & P. H. Hutton (Eds.), Technologies of the self: A seminar with Michel Foucault. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1994). Aesthetics: Method and epistemology. In J. D. Faubion (Ed.), Power: Essential works of Foucault 1954–1984. London: Penguin Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1997). The ethics of the concern for self as a practice of freedom. In P. Rabinow (Ed.), Michel Foucault: Ethics, subjectivity and the truth, the essential works of Michel Foucault 1954–1984 (Vol. 1). London: Penguin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox, A., & Allan, J. (2014). Doing reflexivity: Moments of unbecoming and becoming. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 37(1), 101–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laws, C., & Davies, B. (2000). Poststructuralist theory in practice: Working with “behaviourally disturbed” children. Qualitative Studies in Education, 13(3), 205–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McInerney, D. M. (2014). Educational psychology: Constructing learning. Sixth Australian Edition. Frenchs Forest: Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parkes, R. J., Gore, J. M., & Amosa, W. (2010). Poststructuralism as social justice pedagogy. In T. Chapman & N. Hobbel (Eds.), Social justice pedagogy across the curriculum: The practice of freedom. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petersen, E., & Millei, Z. (2015). Psy-disciplinary cogs in the teacher education machine. Knowledge Cultures, 3(2), 127–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petersen, E., & O’Flynn, G. (2007). Neoliberal technologies of subject formation: A case study of the Duke of Edinburgh’s Award scheme. Critical Studies in Education, 48(2), 197–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, N. (1989). Governing the soul: The shaping of the private self. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheman, N. (1993). Engenderings: Constructions of knowledge, authority and privilege. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skeggs, B. (1997). Formations of class and gender. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skeggs, B. (2002). Techniques for telling the reflexive self. In T. May (Ed.), Qualitative research in action (pp. 349–374). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sondergaard, D. M. (2002). Poststructuralist approaches to empirical analysis. Qualitative Studies in Education, 15(2), 187–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • St. Pierre, E. A., & Pillow, W. S. (1999). Working the ruins. Feminist poststructural theory and methods in education. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stronach, I., & MacLure, M. (1997). Educational research undone. The postmodern embrace. Buckingham/Philadelphia: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walkerdine, V. (1990). Schoolgirl fictions. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2016 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Wilson-Wheeler, M. (2016). ‘How Do You Solve a Problem Like Maria?’ Troubling the Psy-gaze in the Qualitative Analysis and Representation of Educational Subjects’. In: Bendix Petersen, E., Millei, Z. (eds) Interrupting the Psy-Disciplines in Education. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-51305-2_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-51305-2_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-137-51304-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-51305-2

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics