Abstract
In the seminal book Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison (1977) French philosopher Michel Foucault described how the psy-disciplines—his collective term for psychiatry, psychology, psycho-analysis and other psycho-therapies—became entangled in new forms of government. 18th and 19th century liberal Europe was faced with the challenge of governing the population to ensure morality and order, but in ways that also guaranteed the freedom of individuals and a free economy. Expertise, including the social sciences, psy-disciplines, economics, statistics etc., came to provide solutions for this challenge by producing scientific knowledges about persons, society and the economy (Foucault 1988). The emerging psy-disciplines helped to make sense of individuals ‘as speaking, living, working individuals’ and also provided avenues for these individuals to understand, form and regulate themselves according to these scientific discourses (Foucault 1994: 281). In this way, expertise enabled a shift from coercive control into ‘the conduct of conduct’ and practices of self-formation. Psy-disciplines in this way are ‘technologies of the social’ (Fendler 2001), rather than simply scientific areas amassed following simple rules and propositions internal to scientific discovery. As Michel Foucault indicated, and, as has since been elaborated by Nikolas Rose (1998, 1999), among others, educational institutions and actors have been, and continue to be, central to the continuation of the psy-disciplines, their knowledges and practice, which often emerge and operate as natural, inevitable, ethical and liberating.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Billington, T. (1996). Pathologizing children: Psychology in education and acts of government. In E. Burman, G. Aitken, A. Aldred, R. Allwood, T. Billington, G. Goldberg, A. Gordo Lopez, C. Heenan, D. Marks, & S. Warner (Eds.), Psychology discourse practice: From regulation to resistance. London: Taylor and Francis Ltd.
Brown, S. D., & Stenner, P. (2009). Psychology without foundations: History, philosophy and psychosocial theory. London: Sage. Burman, E. (1994). Deconstructing developmental psychology. London: Routledge.
Cannella, G. S. (1997). Deconstructing early childhood education: Social justice and revolution. New York: Peter Lang.
Dreyfus, H. L., & Rabinow, P. (1982). Michel Foucault. Beyond structuralism and hermeneutics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Fendler, L. (2001). Educating flexible souls: The construction of subjectivity through developmentality and interaction. In K. Hultqvist & G. Dahlberg (Eds.), Governing the child in the new millennium (pp. 119–142). New York/London: RoutledgeFalmer.
Foucault, M. (1988). The political technology of individuals. In L. M. Martin, H. Guttman, & P. H. Hutton (Eds.), Technologies of the self: A seminar with Michel Foucault (pp. 145–162). London: Tavistock Publications.
Foucault, M. (1994). The ethics of the concern for the self as a practice of freedom (R. Hurley, Trans.). In P. Rabinow (Ed.), Michel Foucault ethics subjectivity and truth (Vol. One, pp. 281–302). London: Allen Lane/The Penguin Press.
Foucault, M. (2007). Security, territory, population: Lectures at the College de France, 1977–1978. Houndmills/Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Füredi, F. (2004). Therapy culture: Cultivating vulnerability in an uncertain age. Milton Park: Routledge.
Graham, L. J. (2007). Out of sight, out of mind/out of mind, out of site: Schooling and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 20(5), 585–602.
Graham, L. J. (2008). From ABCs to ADHD: The role of schooling in the construction of behaviour disorder and production of disorderly objects. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 12(1), 7–33.
Harwood, V. (2006). Diagnosing ‘disorderly’ children: A critique of behaviour disorder discourses. London: Routledge.
Harwood, V. (2010). Mobile asylums: Psychopathologisation as a personal, portable psychiatric prison. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 31(4), 437–451.
Harwood, V., & Allen, J. (2014). Psychopathology at school: Theorizing mental disorders. Milton Park: Routledge.
Henriques, J., Hollway, W., Urwin, C., Venn, C., & Walkerdine, V. (Eds.). (1984). Changing the subject: Psychology, social regulation and subjectivity. London/New York: Methuen.
Hook, D. (2007). Foucault, psychology and the analytics of power. London/New York: Palgrave.
Hultqvist, K. (1997). Changing rationales for governing the child: A historical perspective on the emergence of the psychological child in the context of preschool – Notes on a study in progress. Childhood, 4(4), 405–424.
Hultqvist, K., & Dahlberg, G. (Eds.). (2001). Governing the child in the new millennium. New York: RoutledgeFalmer.
Ingleby, D. (1985). Professionals as socializers: The ‘psy complex’. Research in law, deviance and social control, 7 (79), 109.Laws, C. (2011) Poststructuralism at work with marginalised children. Sharjah: Bentham Science Publishers Ltd.
Laws, C., & Davies, B. (2000). Poststructuralist theory in practice: Working with “behaviourally disturbed” children. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 13(3), 205–221.
MacLure, M., Jones, L., Holmes, R., & MacRae, C. (2012). Becoming a problem: Behaviour and reputation in the early years classroom. British Educational Research Journal, 38(3), 447–471.
McLeod, J. (2000). Subjectivity and schooling in a longitudinal study of secondary students. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 21(4), 501–521.
Meredyth, D., & Tyler, D. (Eds.). (1993). Child and citizen: Genealogies of schooling and subjectivity. Griffith University QLD Australia: Special Publication of the Institute for Cultural Policy Studies, Faculty of Humanities, Griffith University.
Millei, Z., & Joronen, M. (2016). The (bio) politicization of neuroscience in Australian early years policies: fostering brain-resources as human capital. Journal of Education Policy, 31(4), 389–404.
Millei, Z., & Petersen, B. E. (2015). Complicating ‘student behaviour’: Exploring the discursive constitution of ‘learner subjectivities’. Emotional & Behavioural Difficulties, 20(1), 20–34.
Millei, Z., Griffiths, T. G., & Parkes, R. J. (Eds.). (2010). Re-theorizing discipline in education: Problems, politics, and possibilities. New York: Peter Lang.
Nisbet, J. (2005). What is educational research? Changing perspectives through the 20th century. Research Papers in Education, 20(1), 25–44.
Olson, D. R., & Bruner, J. S. (1996). Folk psychology and folk pedagogy. In D. R. Olson & N. Torrance (Eds.), The handbook of education and human development: New models of learning, teaching and schooling. Cambridge: Blackwell.
Petersen, B. E., & Millei, Z. (2015). Psychological cogs in the education machine. Knowledge Cultures, Special issue on Re-claiming the past and re-conceptualising the present of educational psychology. Knowledge Cultures, 3(2), 127–145.
Popkewitz, T. (1998). Struggling for the soul: The politics of schooling and the construction of the teacher. New York: Teachers College Press.
Popkewitz, T., & Brennan, M. (1998). Foucault’s challenge: Discourse, knowledge, and power in education. New York/London: Teachers College, Columbia University.
Rimke, H. M. (2000). Governing citizens through self-help literature. Cultural Studies, 14(1), 61–78.
Rose, N. (1985). The psychological complex: Psychology, politics, and society in England, 1869–1939. London/Boston: Routledge/Kegan Paul.
Rose, N. (1996). Governing ‘advanced’ liberal democracies. In A. Barry, T. Osborne & N. Rose (Eds.), Foucault and political reason: Liberalism, neo-liberalism and rationalities of government (pp. 37–64). London: UCL Press.
Rose, N. (1998). Inventing our selves: Psychology, power and personhood. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.
Rose, N. (1999). Governing the soul: The shaping of the private self. New York: Routledge.
Rose, N. S., & Abi-Rached, J. M. (2013). Neuro: The new brain sciences and the management of the mind. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Staunæs, D. (2011). Governing the potentials of life itself? Interrogating the promises in affective educational leadership. Journal of Educational Administration and History, 43(3), 227–247.
Walkerdine, V. (1994). Psychology, post-modernity and the popular.PSYCHOLOGIST-LEICESTER. 7(61–61).Walkerdine, V. (1993). Beyond developmentalism? Theory & Psychology, 3(4), 451–469.Wright, K. (2011). The rise of the therapeutic society. Washington: New Academia Publishing.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2016 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Petersen, E.B., Millei, Z. (2016). Introduction. In: Bendix Petersen, E., Millei, Z. (eds) Interrupting the Psy-Disciplines in Education. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-51305-2_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-51305-2_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-51304-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-51305-2
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)