Skip to main content

Philosophical Perspectives on Different Kinds of Inequalities

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Transformations of the State ((TRST))

Abstract

The author addresses from a philosophical point of view the normative question of which forms of inequality the modern state in general—and the welfare state in particular—seeks, and ought to seek, to transform. This article distinguishes four requirements of equality that states must generally fulfil: formal, proportional, moral and relational equality. Welfare systems in particular should set a ‘social minimum’ below which no individual is allowed to fall as a result of poverty, illness and so on, and, in addition, should promote greater equality of resources among citizens in order to avoid economic inequalities that result from operations of the market economy, since inequalities that do not derive from self-chosen options are to be rejected as unjust.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Anderson, Elizabeth. 1999. What is the Point of Equality? Ethics 109(2): 287–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle. 1984. In The Complete Works of Aristotle, ed. J. Barnes. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arneson, Richard J. 1989. Equality and Equal Opportunity for Welfare. Philosophical Studies 56 (1): 77–93. Reprinted in Equality. Selected Readings, eds. L. Pojman and R. Westmoreland. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997, 229–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, Anthony B. 2015. Inequality: What Can Be Done? Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, Peter A., and Volker H. Schmidt. 2004. Welche Gleichheit, welche Ungleichheit? Grundlagen der Ungleichheitsforschung. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Castles, Francis, Stephan Leibfried, Jane Lewis, Herbert Obinger, and Christopher Pierson (ed). 2010. Oxford Handbook of the Welfare State. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, Gerald.A. 1989. On the Currency of Egalitarian Justice. Ethics 99(4): 906–944.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dworkin, Ronald M. 1977. Taking Rights Seriously. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dworkin, Ronald. 2000. Sovereign Virtue: The Theory and Practice of Equality. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feinberg, Joel. 1970. Doing and Deserving. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forst, Rainer. 2011. The Right to Justification: Elements of a Constructivist Theory of Justice. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fourie, Carina, Fabian Schuppert, and Ivo Wllimann-Helmer, eds. 2015. Social Equality. On What It Means to Be Equals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2013. Justification and Critique: Towards a Critical Theory of Politics. Translated by Ciaran Cronin. Cambridge: Polity Press, 17–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, Jürgen. 1996. Between Facts and Norms. Translated by William Rehg. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurst, Charles E. 2016. Social Inequality: Forms, Causes, and Consequences, 8th edn. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, Thomas Humphrey. 1950. Citizenship and Social Class and Other Essays. London: Pluto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, David. 1997. Equality and Justice. Ratio 10(3): 222–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, Martha C. 2011. Creating Capabilities: The Human Development Approach. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill, Martin. 2007. What Should Egalitarians Believe? Philosophy and Public Affairs 36(2): 119–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pierson, Christopher. 1998. Beyond the Welfare State? The New Political Economy of Welfare. Oxford: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piketty, Thomas. 2014. Capital in the Twenty-First Century. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rae, Douglas W. 1981. Equalities. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, John. (1971) 1999. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press (1999 rev. final edn).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, John. 1993. Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2001. Justice as Fairness: A Restatement. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scanlon, Thomas. 1996. The Diversity of Objections to Inequality. In The Lindley Lectures. Lawrence: University of Kansas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scanlon, Thomas M. 1998. What We Owe to Each Other. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheffler, Samuel. 2003. What is Egalitarianism? Philosophy and Public Affairs 31(1): 5–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2005. Choice, Circumstances and the Value of Equality. Politics, Philosophy & Economics 4(1): 5–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Temkin, Larry S. 1986. Inequality. Philosophy and Public Affairs 15 (2): 99–121. Reprinted in Equality. Selected Readings, eds. L. Pojman and R. Westmoreland. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997, 75–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tugendhat, Ernst. 1993. Vorlesungen über Ethik. Suhrkamp: Frankfurt am Main.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vlastos, Gregory. 1962. Justice and Equality. In Equality. Selected Readings, ed. L. Pojman, and R. Westmoreland, 120–133. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walzer, Michael. 1983. Spheres of Justice: A Defence of Pluralism and Equality. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westen, Peter. 1990. Speaking of Equality: An Analysis of the Rethorical Force of Equality in Moral and Legal Discourse. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, Bernard. 1973. The Idea of Equality. In Equality. Selected Readings, ed. L. Pojman, and R. Westmoreland, 91–102. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolff, Jonathan. 1998. Fairness, Respect, and the Egalitarian Ethos. Philosophy and Public Affairs 27(2): 97–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, Iris Marion. 1990. Justice and the Politics of Difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stefan Gosepath .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2016 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gosepath, S. (2016). Philosophical Perspectives on Different Kinds of Inequalities. In: Wulfgramm, M., Bieber, T., Leibfried, S. (eds) Welfare State Transformations and Inequality in OECD Countries. Transformations of the State. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-51184-3_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-51184-3_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-137-51183-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-51184-3

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics