Skip to main content

Changes in Labour Market Policies, the Gender Model and Social Inequality: Institutional Dualization Revisited

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Welfare State Transformations and Inequality in OECD Countries

Part of the book series: Transformations of the State ((TRST))

Abstract

Drawing on the theory of institutional dualization, this chapter analyzes changes in labour market policies and collective bargaining with respect to their gendered outcomes. Additionally, to explain the emerging gender model, it highlights institutional complementarities with respect to family policy reform. Such institutional complementarities, as exemplified by the German model, are identified as incentives for a modernized male breadwinner model. These incentives compensate for labour market risks at the household level. Thus, patterns of social inequality cannot be deduced from employment status only but must be related to a particular family form. The increasing social polarization in Germany therefore reflects in the increasing poverty of single-parent and other single-earner households as compared with dual full-time earners, with this polarization most accentuated between the high- and low-qualified.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    I am very grateful to Jan Giese and Sonja Kittelsen for their help editing the text.

    Conceptually, institutional dualization differentiates between process (dualization), output (institutional dualism) and outcome (divide) (Emmenegger et al. 2012).

  2. 2.

    The data source for the following numbers and Fig. 10.1 is the German Socio-Economic Panel (GSOEP). The calculations are based on working age population, excluding apprentices. Fixed-term part-time and part-time employees are summed up as part-time. Calculations were generously performed by Tim Schröder.

  3. 3.

    The following proportions of atypical employment are relatively higher than in figure 10 because they do not relate to persons of working age but only to employed persons.

  4. 4.

    This refers to the share of employees who are covered by collective bargaining in relation to all employees.

  5. 5.

    If the focus is on only coupled households with children younger than 18, the figure is about 70 per cent (Keller 2013).

References

  • Arbeitgeberverbände. 2013. Die Realität am deutschen Arbeitsmarkt. Fakten statt Zerrbilder. Berlin: BDA. Accessed November 2, 2015. http://www.arbeitgeber.de/www/arbeitgeber.nsf/id/DE_Flexible_Beschaeftigungsformen

  • Artus, Ingrid. 2010. Interessenhandeln jenseits der Norm: Ein deutsch-französischer Vergleich betrieblicher Interessenvertretung in peripheren und prekären Wirtschaftssegmenten. Industrielle Beziehungen 17(4): 317–344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bahle, Thomas, Bernhard Ebbinghaus, and Claudia Göbel. 2015. Familien am Rande der Erwerbsgesellschaft. Nomos: Baden-Baden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berninger, Ina, and Irene Dingeldey. 2013. Familieneinkommen als neue Normalität? WSI-Mitteilungen 66(3): 182–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bispinck, Reinhard, and Thorsten Schulten. 2011. Trade Union Responses to Precarious Employment in Germany. WSI-Diskussionspapier 178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boll, Christina, Hendrik Hüning, Julian Leppin, and Johannes Puckelwald. 2015. Potenzielle Auswirkungen des Mindestlohnes auf den Gender Pay Gap in Deutschland. Accessed November 2, 2015. http://www.hwwi.org/uploads/tx_wilpubdb/HWWI_Policy_Paper_89_final.pdf,date

  • Bosch, Gerhard and Thorsten Kalina. 2015. Die Mittelschicht in Deutschland unter Druck. IAQ Report No. 4. Accessed November 2, 2015. www.iaq.uni-due.de/iaq-report/2015/report2015-04.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Brenke, Karl, and Markus M. Grabka. 2011. Schwache Lohnentwicklung im letzten Jahrzehnt. DIW Wochenbericht 78(45): 3–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bundesministerium Für Familie, Soziales, Frauen Und Jugend. 2015. Fünfter Bericht zur Evaluation des Kinderförderungsgesetzes (KiföG-Bericht 2015). Accessed November 2, 2015. http://www.bmfsfj.de/RedaktionBMFSFJ/Broschuerenstelle/Pdf-Anlagen/Kif_C3_B6G-F_C3_BCnfter-Bericht-zur-Evaluation-des-Kinderf_C3_B6rderungsgesetzes,property=pdf,bereich=bmfsfj,sprache=de,rwb=true.pdf

  • Cantillon, Bea. 2011. The Paradox of the Social Investment State: Growth, Employment and Poverty in the Lisboa Era. Journal of European Social Policy 21(5): 432–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connolly, Julie, and Gillian Whitehouse. 2010. Understanding Women’s Employment Patterns within and between Nations: An Assessment of Conceptual Frameworks. In The Annual Conference of The Australian Sociological Association, eds. Selvaraj Velayutham, Norbert Ebert, and Sheila Watkins. Australia: The Australian Sociological Association 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daly, Mary. 2011. What Adult Worker Model? A Critical Look at Recent Social Policy Reform in Europe from a Gender and Family Perspective. Social Politics 1(18): 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dingeldey, Irene. 2001. European Tax Systems and their Impact on Family Employment Patterns. Journal of Social Policy 30(4): 653–672.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2011. Der aktivierende Wohlfahrtsstaat. Governance der Arbeitsmarktpolitik in Dänemark, Großbritannien und Deutschland. Frankfurt: Campus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doeringer, Peter B., and Michael J. Piore. 1971. Internal Labour Markets and Manpower Analysis. Lexington, MA: Heath.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dölling, Irene. 2003. Zwei Wege gesellschaftlicher Modernisierung. Geschlechtervertrag und Geschlechterarrangements in Ostdeutschland in gesellschafts-/modernisierungs-theoretischer Perspektive. In Achsen der Differenz. Gesellschaftstheorie und feministische Kritik II, eds. Knapp Gudrun-Axeli and Wetterer Angelika. Münster: Westfälisches Dampfboot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dustmann, Christian, Johannes Ludsteck, and Ute Schönberg. 2009. Revisiting the German Wage Structure. Quarterly Journal of Economics CXXIV(2): 843–881.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ebert, Andreas, and Tatjana Fuchs. 2012. Haushalt, Familie und soziale Nahbeziehungen. In Berichterstattung zur soziökonomischen Entwicklung in Deutschland. Teilhabe im Umbruch, ed. Bartelheimer Peter, and Kädtler Jürgen. Wiesbaden: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eichhorst, Werner. 2015. The Unexpected Appearance of a New German Model. British Journal of Industrial Relations 53(1): 49–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eichhorst, Werner and Peter Marx. 2009a. From the Dual Apprenticeship System to a Dual Labour Market? The German High-Skill Equilibrium and the Service Economy. IZA Discussion Paper No. 4220: 1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eichhorst, Werner and Paul Marx. 2009b. Reforming German Labour Market Institutions: A Dual Path to Flexibility. IZA Discussion Paper No. 4100: 1–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eichhorst, Werner, Paul Marx, and Verena Tobsch. 2015. Non-standard Employment Across Occupations in Germany: The Role of Replaceability and Labour Market Flexibility. In Non-standard Employment in Post-Industrial Labour Markets. An Occupational Perspective, ed. Werner Eichhorst, and Paul Marx. Cheltemham, UK/Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emmenegger, Patrick, Silja Häusermann, Bruno Palier, and Martin Seeleib-Kaiser (ed). 2012. The Age of Dualization. The Changing Face of Inequality in Deindustrializing Societies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esping-Andersen, Gosta (ed). 1996. Welfare States in Transition. National Adaptions in Global Economies. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1999. Social Foundations of Postindustrial Economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Estévez-Abe, Margarita. 2005. Gender Bias in Skills and Social Policies: The Varieties of Capitalism Perspective on Sex Segregation. Social Politics 12(2): 180–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • George, Roman. 2011. Niedriglohn und Geschlecht im europäischen Vergleich. WSI Mitteilungen 64(10): 548–555.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottfried, Heidi. 2013. Gender, Work, and Economy. Unpacking the Global Economy. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottschall, Karin, and Tim Schröder. 2013. Familienlohn: Entstehung und Erosion einer wirkmächtigen Normierung von Lohneinkommen und geschlechtsspezifischer Arbeitsteilung. WSI Mitteilungen 66(3): 161–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, Peter A., and David Soskice (ed). 2001. Varieties of Capitalism. The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassel, Anke. 2014. The Paradox of Liberalization—Understanding Dualism and the Recovery of the German Political Economy. British Journal of Industrial Relations 52(1): 57–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hemerijck, Anton. 2012. Two or Three Waves of Welfare State Transformation? In Towards a Social Investment Welfare State? Ideas, Policies and Challenges, ed. Nathalie Morel, Bruno Palier, and Joakim Palme. Bristol: The Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henninger, Annette, Christine Wimbauer, and Rosine Dombrowski. 2008. Geschlechtergleichheit oder “exklusive Emanzipation”? Ungleichheitssoziologische Implikationen der aktuellen familienpolitischen Reformen. Berliner Journal für Soziologie 18(1): 99–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirdman, Yvonne. 1998. State Policy and Gender Contracts: The Swedish Experience. In Women, Work and the Family in Europe, ed. Eileen Drew, Ruth Emerek, and Evelyn Mahon. London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hook, Jennifer L. 2015. Incorporating ‘Class’ into Work-Family Arrangements: Insights from and for Three Worlds. Journal for European Social Policy 25(1): 14–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keller, Matthias. 2013. Vereinbarkeit von Familie und Beruf. Ergebnisse des Mikrozensus 2012. In Wirtschaft und Statistik. Wiesbaden: Statistisches Bundesamt, 862–883.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knijn, Trudie, and Ilona Ostner. 2002. Commodification and De-Commodification. In Contested Concepts in Gender and Social Politics, ed. Barbara Hobson, Jane Lewis, and Birte Siim. Cheltenham/Northampton: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knittel, Tilmann, Melanie Henkel, Katharina Poschmann, and Michael Steiner. 2012. Ausgeübte Erwerbstätigkeit von Müttern. Erwerbstätigkeit, Erwerbsumfang und Erwerbsvolumen 2010. Berlin: Bundesministerium für Familie, Senioren, Frauen und Jugend.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knuth, Matthias. 2011. Widersprüchliche Dynamiken im deutschen Arbeitsmarkt. WSI Mitteilungen 11: 580–587.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kroos, Daniela, and Karin Gottschall. 2012. Dualization and Gender in Social Services: The Role of the State in Germany and France. In The Age of Dualization. The Changing Face of Inequality in Deindustrializing Societies, ed. Patrick Emmenegger, Silja Häusermann, Bruno Palier, and Martin Seeleib-Kaiser. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehweß-Lietzmann, René. 2012. Flexible Employment, Poverty and the Household. Transfer:European Journal of Labour and Research 18(1): 69–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leschke, Janine, Günther Schmid, and Dorit Griga. 2006. On the Marriage of Flexibility and Security: Lessons from the Hartz-Reforms in Germany. WZB Discussion Paper SP I 2006-108: 1–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, Jane. 2001. The Decline of the Male Breadwinner Model: Implications for Work and Care. Social Politics 8(2): 152–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morel, Natalie, Bruno Palier, and Joakim Palme. 2012. Towards a Social Investment Welfare State? Ideas, Policies and Challanges. Bristol: Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. 2012. Einkommensungleichheit. Die OECD in Zahlen und Fakten 2011–2012: Wirtschaft, Umwelt, Gesellschaft. Accessed November 2, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264125469-31-de

  • O’Reilly, Jaqueline, and Tiziana Nazio. 2013. Challenging the Balkanization of Gender Contracts. In Woman in Austerity, ed. Maria Karamessini, and Jill Rubery. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oschmiansky, Frank, and Jürgen Kühl. 2011. Mindestlohn. Accessed November 2, 2015. http://www.bpb.de/politik/innenpolitik/arbeitsmarktpolitik/55329/mindestlohn:download

  • Palier, Bruno, and Kathleen Thelen. 2010. Institutionalizing Dualism: Complementarities and Change in France and Germany. Politics & Society 38(1): 119–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfau-Effinger, Birgit. 1999. Welfare Regimes and the Gender Division of Labour. In Working Europe. Reshaping European Employment Systems, ed. Jens Christiansen, Pertti Koistinen, Anne Kovalainen, et al., 69–96. Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfau-Effinger, Birgit, and Maike Smid. 2011. Differences in Women’s Employment Patterns and Family Policies: Eastern and Western Germany. Community, Work & Family 14(2): 217–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubery, Jill. 2009. How Gendering the Varieties of Capitalism Requires a Wider Lens. Social Politics 16(2): 192–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubery, Jill, Mark Smith, and Colette Fagan. 1998. Women and European Employment. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schröder, Martin. 2009. Integrating Welfare and Production Typologies: How Refinements of the Varieties of Capitalism Approach Call for a Combination of Welfare Typologies. Journal of Social Policy 38(1): 19–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schuler, Katharina. 2015. 8.50? Nicht für alle. Accessed November 2, 2015. http://www.zeit.de/wirtschaft/2014-12/mindestlohn-januar-ausnahmen

  • Schulten, Thorsten, and Reiner Bispinck. 2014. Wages, Collective Bergaining and Economic Develeopment in Germany. Towards a More Expansive and Solidaristic Development? Diskussionspapier (191), 9/2014: 1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sengenberger, Werner. 1978. Arbeitsmarktstruktur. Ansätze zu einem Modell des segmentierten Arbeitsmarktes. Frankfurt: Campus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solga, Heike. 2014. Education, Economic Inequality and the Promises of the Social Investment State. Socio Economic Review 12: 269–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soskice, David. 2005. Varieties of Capitalism and Cross-National Gender Differences. Social Politics 12(2): 170–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spiegel Online. 2015. Urteil aus Karlsruhe: Bundesrichter kippen Betreuungsgeld. Accessed November 2, 2015. http://www.spiegel.de/politik/deutschland/betreuungsgeld-in-karlsruhe-bundesverfassungsgericht-kippt-zuschuss-a-1044570.html

  • Statistisches Bundesamt. 2009. Niedrigeinkommen und Erwerbstätigkeit. Accessed November 2, 2015. https://www.destatis.de/DE/PresseService/Presse/Pressekonferenzen/2009/Erwerbstaetigkeit/begleitheft_Erwerbstaetigkeit.pdf?__blob=publicationFile

  • ———. 2015a. Statistiken der Kinder-und Jugendhilfe. Kinder und tätige Personen in Tageseinrichtungen und in öffentlich geförderter Kindertagespflege am 01.03.2015. Wiesbaden: Statistisches Bundesamt.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2015b. Öffentliche Sozialleistungen. Beendete: Statistik zum Elterngeld.

    Google Scholar 

  • Streeck, Wolfgang. 2009. Flexible Employment, Flexible Families and the Socialization of Reproduction. MPIFG Working Paper 09/13: 1–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Streeck, Wolfgang, and Kathleen Thelen. 2005. Introduction: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies. In Beyond Continuity. Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies, ed. Wolfgang Streeck, and Kathleen Thelen. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thelen, Kathleen. 2012. Varieties of Capitalism: Trajectories of Liberalization and the New Politics of Social Solidarity. Annual Review of Political Science 15: 137–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trappe, Heike, Matthias Pollmann-Schult, and Christian Schmitt. 2015. The Rise and Decline of the Male Breadwinner Model: Institutional Underpinnings and Future Expectations. European Sociological Review 31(2): 230–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vandenbroucke, Frank, and Koen Vleminckx. 2011. Disappointing Poverty Trends: Is the Social Investment State to Blame? Journal of European Social Policy 21(5): 450–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WSI-Tarifarchiv. 2015. Statistisches Taschenbuch Tarifpolitik 2015. Accessed November 2, 2015. http://www.boeckler.de/52614_53488.htm

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Irene Dingeldey .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2016 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dingeldey, I. (2016). Changes in Labour Market Policies, the Gender Model and Social Inequality: Institutional Dualization Revisited. In: Wulfgramm, M., Bieber, T., Leibfried, S. (eds) Welfare State Transformations and Inequality in OECD Countries. Transformations of the State. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-51184-3_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-51184-3_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-137-51183-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-51184-3

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics