Advertisement

The European Commission as a Policy Actor

  • Elina Brutschin
Chapter

Abstract

In Chapter 3, the reader is introduced to the Commission’s formal powers such as agenda setting as well as informal powers such as making use of policy networks, based on the insights from previous studies. One of the key explanatory factors that is mentioned across different studies of European policymaking in the energy sector is the concern over energy security that is assumed to motivate further integration. Different gas security environments are then proposed to be used in the subsequent analysis of gas policies: 1980–2000 with high levels of gas security and 2000–2010s with low levels of gas security. Tracing the Commission’s entrepreneurship across different environments allows for more systematic insights into successful strategies.

Keywords

European Commission EU policymaking EU theories Formal and informal policy instruments 

Bibliography

  1. Aalto, P., & Korkmaz Temel, D. (2014). European energy security: Natural gas and the integration process. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 52(4), 758–774. http://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12108.Google Scholar
  2. Andoura, S., & Vinois, J.-A. (2015). From the European energy community to the energy union. A policy proposal for the short and long term. http://www.institutdelors.eu/media/energyunion-andouravinois-jdi-jan15.pdf?pdf=ok. Accessed September 2016.
  3. Ang, B.W., Choong, W.L., & Ng, T.S. (2015). Energy security: Definitions, dimensions and indexes. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 42, 1077–1093. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.10.064.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baldwin, D.A. (1997). The concept of security. Review of International Studies, 23(01), 5–26. http://doi.org/null.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brutschin, E. (2013). Dynamics in EU policy-making: The liberalization of the European gas market. Bibliothek der Universität Konstanz: Konstanz.Google Scholar
  6. Cherp, A., & Jewell, J. (2014). The concept of energy security: Beyond the four As. Energy Policy, 75, 415–421. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2014.09.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Commission of the European Communities. (1972b). Medium-term prospects and guidelines in the Community gas sector (No. SEC(72) 3182 final). http://aei.pitt.edu/39012/1/A3898.pdf. Accessed September 2016.
  8. Eikeland, P.O. (2011). The third internal energy market package: New power relations among member states, EU Institutions and non-state actors? JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 49(2), 243–263.Google Scholar
  9. European Community Information Service. (1967). Europe and Energy. http://aei.pitt.edu/36484/1/A2490.pdf. Accessed September 2016.
  10. European Parliament. (2016). Briefing European parliamentary research service intergovernmental agreements in the field of energy. http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/BRIE/2016/579082/EPRS_BRI(2016)579082_EN.pdf. Accessed September 2016.
  11. Haghighi, S.S. (2007). Energy security: The external legal relations of the European union with major oil and gas supplying countries. Bloomsbury Publishing.Google Scholar
  12. Herweg, N. (2015). Explaining European agenda-setting using the multiple streams framework: The case of European natural gas regulation. Policy Sciences, 1–21. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-015-9231-z.Google Scholar
  13. Jegen, M., & Mérand, F. (2014). Constructive ambiguity: Comparing the EU’s energy and defence policies. West European Politics, 37(1), 182–203. http://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2013.818325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lubell, H. (1961). Security of supply and energy policy in Western Europe. World Politics, 13(3), 400–422. http://doi.org/10.2307/2009482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Maltby, T. (2013). European Union energy policy integration: A case of European Commission policy entrepreneurship and increasing supranationalism. Energy Policy, 55, 435–444. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.12.031.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Matlary, J.H. (1997). Energy policy in the European union. Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  17. Mayer, S. (2008). Path dependence and commission activism in the evolution of the European Union’s external energy policy. Journal of International Relations and Development, 11(3), 251–278. http://doi.org/10.1057/jird.2008.12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Naurin, D., & Lindahl, R. (2008). East-North-South: Coalition-building in the council before and after Enlargement. In D. Naurin & H. Wallace (Eds.), Unveiling the council of the European union (pp. 64–78). Palgrave Macmillan, UK.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Nye, J. S. (1982). Energy and security in the 1980s. World Politics, 35(1), 121–134. http://doi.org/10.2307/2010282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Padgett, S. (1992). The single European energy market: The politics of realization. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 30(1), 53–76. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.1992.tb00418.x.Google Scholar
  21. Pollack, M. A. (1997). Delegation, agency, and agenda setting in the European Community. International Organization, 51(01), 99–134. http://doi.org/10.1162/002081897550311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Proedrou, F. (2012). EU Energy security in the gas sector. Ashgate.Google Scholar
  23. Schmidt, S.K. (1998). Commission activism: Subsuming telecommunications and electricity under European competition law. Journal of European Public Policy, 5(1), 169–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Schubert, S.R., Pollak, J., & Kreutler, M. (2016). Energy policy of the European Union. Macmillan Education.Google Scholar
  25. Secretariat of the Commission of the European Communities. (1968). First guidelines for a community energy policy. http://aei.pitt.edu/5134/1/5134.pdf. Accessed September 2016.
  26. Wolfers, A. (1952). “National Security” as an ambiguous symbol. Political Science Quarterly, 67(4), 481–502. http://doi.org/10.2307/2145138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Yergin, D. (2006). Ensuring energy security. Foreign Affairs, 85(2), 69–82. http://doi.org/10.2307/20031912.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Bailer, S. (2014). An agent dependent on the EU member states? The determinants of the European commission’s legislative success in the European Union. Journal of European Integration, 36(1), 37–53. http://doi.org/10.1080/07036337.2013.809342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Bickerton, C. J., Hodson, D., & Puetter, U. (2015). The new intergovernmentalism: European integration in the post-maastricht era: The new intergovernmentalism. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 53(4), 703–722. http://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12212.Google Scholar
  30. Blauberger, M., & Weiss, M. (2013). “If you can”t beat me, join me!’ How the Commission pushed and pulled member states into legislating defence procurement. Journal of European Public Policy, 20(8), 1120–1138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Buess, M. (2015). Accountable and under control? Explaining Governments’ selection of management board representatives. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 53(3), 493–508. http://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12200.Google Scholar
  32. Copeland, P., & James, S. (2014). Policy windows, ambiguity and commission entrepreneurship: Explaining the relaunch of the European union’s economic reform agenda. Journal of European Public Policy, 21(1), 1–19. http://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2013.800789 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. De Mesquita, B. B., & Smith, A. (2010). Leader survival, revolutions, and the nature of Government finance. American Journal of Political Science, 54(4), 936–950. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2010.00463.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Dehousse, R. (2008). Delegation of powers in the European union: The need for a multi-principals model. West European politics, 31(4), 789–805. http://doi.org/10.1080/01402380801906072.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Eberlein, B. (2008). The making of the European energy market: The interplay of Governance and Government. Journal of Public Policy, 28(1), 73–92. http://doi.org/10.1017/S0143814X08000780.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Egeberg, M., & Trondal, J. (2011). EU-level agencies: New executive centre formation or vehicles for national control? Journal of European Public Policy, 18(6), 868–887. http://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2011.593314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Egeberg, M., Trondal, J., & Vestlund, N. M. (2015). The quest for order: Unravelling the relationship between the European commission and European union agencies. Journal of European Public Policy, 22(5), 609–629. http://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2014.976587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Eising, R. (2002). Policy learning in embedded negotiations: Explaining EU electricity liberalization. International Organization, 56(1), 85–120. http://doi.org/10.1162/002081802753485142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Garrett, G., & Tsebelis, G. (1996). An institutional critique of intergovernmentalism. International Organization, 50(2), 269–299. http://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300028563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Geden, O., & Fischer, S. (2008). Die Energie- und Klimapolitik der Europäischen Union. Saarbrücken: Nomos.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Hix, S. (1999). The political system of the European union. New York, NY: St. Martin’s Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kingdon, J. W. (1986). Agendas, alternatives, and public policies. New York: Pearson Education, Limited.Google Scholar
  43. Kirchner, E., & Berk, C. (2010). European energy security co-operation: Between Amity and Enmity. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 48(4), 859–880. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2010.02077.x.Google Scholar
  44. Laffan, B. (1997). From policy entrepreneur to policy manager: The challenge facing the European commission. Journal of European Public Policy, 4(3), 422–438. http://doi.org/10.1080/13501769780000081.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. McGowan, F. (1989). The single energy market and energy policy: Conflicting agendas? Energy Policy, 17(6), 547–553. http://doi.org/10.1016/0301-4215(89)90134-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Mintrom, M., & Norman, P. (2009). Policy entrepreneurship and policy change. Policy Studies Journal, 37(4), 649–667. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2009.00329.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Nugent, N., & Rhinard, M. (2016). Is the European commission really in decline? JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 54(5). http://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12358.Google Scholar
  48. Peterson, J. (1995). Decision-making in the European union: Towards a framework for analysis. Journal of European Public Policy, 2(1), 69–93. http://doi.org/10.1080/13501769508406975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Pointvogl, A. (2009). Perceptions, realities, concession–What is driving the integration of European energy policies? Energy Policy, 37(12), 5704–5716. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.08.035.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Pollak, J., & Slominski, P. (2011). Liberalizing the EU’s energy market: Hard and soft power combined. In G. Falkner (Eds.), The EU decision traps: Comparing Policies (pp. 92–110). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Ruffing, E. (2015). Agencies between two worlds: information asymmetry in multilevel policy-making. Journal of European Public Policy, 22(8), 1109–1126. http://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2015.1011198 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Schmidt, S. K. (2000). Only an agenda setter? The European Commission’s power over the council of ministers. European Union Politics, 1(1), 37–61. http://doi.org/10.1177/1465116500001001003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Zahariadis, N. (2008). Ambiguity and choice in European public policy. Journal of European Public Policy, 15(4), 514–530. http://doi.org/10.1080/13501760801996717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Commission of the European Communities. (1972a). The Community Energy Policy. http://aei.pitt.edu/52345/1/A7223.pdf. Accessed September 2016.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Elina Brutschin
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of International RelationsWebster Vienna Private UniversityViennaAustria

Personalised recommendations