Skip to main content

Abstract

Social constructionism proposes that how we understand and perceive the world is a product of how the world is represented or produced through language, and depends upon the culture and times that we live in. Our knowledge and understanding are therefore not absolute or final, but instead are framed by ‘discourses’ which often reflect the ideas of powerful groups in society, acting to disadvantage less powerful groups and individuals. Nonetheless, because discourse is time and culture specific, it can change over time, often producing social transformations. This chapter critiques mainstream psychology from a social constructionism perspective, using research examples to illustrate how some of the ideas that inform mainstream approaches can be interrogated and challenged. It also outlines key features of social constructionist research, using two specific research studies to illustrate these features. The chapter concludes with a brief discussion of recent theoretical trends and issues in social constructionism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Allport, F. H. (1924). Social psychology. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armistead, N. (1974). Reconstructing social psychology. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burkitt, I. (2014). Emotions and social relations. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burr, V. (2015). Social constructionism (3rd ed.). London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Burr, V., & Butt, T. (1999). Psychological distress and post-modern thought. In D. Fee (Ed.), Pathology and the postmodern: Mental illness as discourse and experience (pp. 186–206). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cherry, F. (1995). The stubborn particulars of social psychology: Essays on the research process. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clair, R. P. (1998). Organizing silence: A world of possibilities. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cromby, J. (2012). Narrative, discourse, psychotherapy—neuroscience? In A. Lock & T. Strong (Eds.), Discursive perspectives in therapeutic practice (pp. 288–307). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dick, P. (2013). The politics of experience: A discursive psychology approach to understanding different accounts of workplace sexism. Human Relations, 66(5), 645–669.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dick, P. (2015). To see ourselves as others see us? Incorporating the constraining role of socio-cultural practices in the theorisation of micropolitical resistance. Gender, Work and Organization, 22(1), 16–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edley, N. (2006). Never the twain shall meet: A critical appraisal of the combination of discourse and psychoanalytic theory in studies of men and masculinity. Sex Roles, 55(9–10), 601–608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, D. (1997). Discourse and cognition. London: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Farr, R. M. (1996). The roots of modern social psychology, 1872–1954. Malden: Blackwell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish. London: Allen Lane.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1979). The history of sexuality, Vol. 1: An introduction. London: Allen Lane.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, D. J., & Meyer, J. W. (2002). The profusion of individual roles and identities in the postwar period. Sociological Theory, 20(1), 86–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frosh, S. (2003). Psychosocial studies and psychology: Is a critical approach emerging? Human Relations, 56(12), 1545–1567.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guthe, Carl E., & Mead, M. (1943, October). The problem of changing food habits (Bulletin of the National Research Council, No. 108). Washington, DC: National Research Council and National Academy of Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haynes, K. (2012). Body beautiful? Gender, identity and the body in professional services firms. Gender, Work & Organization, 19(5), 489–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hovland, C. I., Lumsdane, A. A., & Sheffield, F. D. (1949). Experiments on mass communication. Studies in social psychology in World War II. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klonoff, E. A., & Landrine, E. H. (1995). The schedule of sexist events: A measure of lifetime and recent sexist discrimination in women’s lives. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 19(4), 439–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knights, D., & Morgan, G. (1991). Corporate strategy, organizations and subjectivity: A critique. Organization Studies, 12(2), 251–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maccoby, E., & Jacklin, C. N. (1974). The psychology of sex differences. London: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mama, A. (1995). Beyond the masks: Gender, race and subjectivity. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98(2), 224–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mills, A. J. (1992). Organisation, gender and culture. In A. J. Mills & P. Tancred (Eds.), Gendering organisational analysis. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrin, S., & Spencer, C. (1981). Independence or conformity in the Asch experiment as a reflection of cultural and situational factors. British Journal of Social Psychology, 20, 205–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollner, M. (1987). Mundane reason: Reality in everyday and sociological discourse. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Potter, J., & Wetherell, M. (1987). Discourse and social psychology: Beyond attitudes and behaviour. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiner, R. (2007). Political economy, crime, and criminal justice. In M. Maguire, R. Morgan, & R. Reiner (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of criminology (pp. 341–380). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, N. (1990). Governing the soul: The shaping of the private self. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, N. (1996). Inventing ourselves: Psychology, power and personhood. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Scarduzio, J. A., & Geist-Martin, P. (2008). Making sense of fractured identities: Male professors’ narratives of sexual harassment. Communication Monographs, 75(4), 369–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Somvadee, C., & Morash, M. (2008). Dynamics of sexual harassment for policewomen working alongside men. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 31(3), 485–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Speer, S. (2005). Gender talk: Feminism, discourse and conversation analysis. Sussex: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stallybrass, P., & White, A. (1986). The politics and poetics of transgression. New York: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wetherell, M. (2012). Affect and emotion: A new social science understanding. London: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wooffitt, R. (1992). Telling tales of the unexpected: The organization of factual accounts. Hemel Hempstead, UK: Harvester Wheatsheaf.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Burr, V., Dick, P. (2017). Social Constructionism. In: Gough, B. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Critical Social Psychology. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-51018-1_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics