Abstract
While the focus of this study to this point has been the development of the Education with Community Participation (EDUCO) program during 1988–1995, it is important to emphasize that mechanisms of transnational influence continued to operate in the post-1995 period. Emphasizing the post-1995 period is essential because we can gain additional insights into mechanisms of transnational influence, the way that education policies go global, and the significance of EDUCO from a long-term perspective (i.e., in the post-WWII context). In order to set the stage for these additional insights, I begin the present chapter by detailing the global promotion of EDUCO. The following section then delves into the ways that EDUCO has been featured in literature with a global reach.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Alec Gershberg served as a senior education economist for the World Bank during the late 1990s.
- 2.
The same Minister of Education would later also contribute a chapter on EDUCO in a book published by a Salvadoran think tank (Jacir de Lovo 2003).
- 3.
- 4.
For more on IDB and its involvement in Central America since 1990, see Large (2005).
- 5.
As discussed in Chap. 2, there are more than eight studies of EDUCO produced in all. Here, I refer exclusively to those produced by the World Bank. This is because the present discussion is focused on mechanisms of transnational influence in relation to the program’s ascendance. The non-World Bank studies were not favorable to the program and, as such, would not function as a mechanism of transnational influence which served to promote the program.
- 6.
Until recently (2010), the United States held a sufficient number of votes in the World Bank to veto any policy change with which it did not agree. For this reason, the United States has unilaterally appointed each of the Bank’s presidents. Furthermore, it should be noted that, effectively, the United States continues to possess a sufficient number of shares to control World Bank policy, in that it has 15.85 percent of the 16 percent of votes required to veto policy changes.
References
Barrera-Osorio, F., Fasih, T., Patrinos, H., & Santibánez, L. (2009). Decentralized decision-making in schools: The theory and evidence on school-based management. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
Beleli, O., Chang, V., Fegelson, M., Kopel-Bailey, J., Maak, S., Mnookin, J., Nguyen, T., Salazar, M., Sinderbrand, J., & Tafoya, S. (2007). Education in emergencies and early reconstruction: UNICEF interventions in Colombia, Liberia, and Southern Sudan. Princeton: Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs.
Berends, M., Springer, M., Ballou, D., & Wallberg, H. (Eds.). (2009). Handbook of research on school choice. New York: Routledge.
Birdsall, N., Levine, R., & Ibrahim, A. (2005). Toward universal primary education: Investments, incentives, and institutions. UN Millennium Project, task force on Education and Gender Equality. London: Earthscan.
Bonal, X., Tarabini, A., & Rambla, X. (2012). Conditional cash transfers in education for development: Emergence, policy dilemmas and diversity of impacts. In A. Verger, M. Novelli, & H. Kosar-Altinyelken (Eds.), Global education policy and international development: New agendas, issues and programmes (pp. 147–166). New York: Continuum.
Broad, R. (2006). Research, knowledge, and the art of “paradigm maintenance”: The World Bank’s development economics Vice-Presidency (DEC). Review of International Political Economy, 13, 387–419.
Bruns, B., Filmer, D., & Patrinos, H. A. (2011). Making schools work: New evidence on accountability Reforms. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
Compton, M., & Weinar, L. (2008). The global assault on teaching, teachers, and their unions. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Cuéllar-Marchelli, H. (2003a). Decentralization and privatization of education in El Salvador: Assessing the experience. International Journal of Educational Development, 23(2), 45–166.
Cuéllar-Marchelli, H. (2003b). The cost-effectiveness of EDUCO and traditional public school in rural El Salvador (Unpublished dissertation). Teachers College, Columbia University, New York.
Desmond, C. (2009). EDUCO schools in El Salvador: A democratic tree in a globalized forest? International Education, 38(2), 7–28.
Di Gropello, E. (2005). Análisis comparativo de la gestión centrada en la escuela en América Central. En Breve, 72(junio), 1–4.
Di Gropello, E. (2006). A Comparative analysis of school-based management in Central America (World Bank working paper 72). Washington, DC: World Bank.
Di Gropello, E. (2007). Education decentralisation and accountability relationships in Latin American and the Caribbean region. In T. Townsend (Ed.), International handbook of school effectiveness and improvement (pp. 503–522). Dordrecht: Springer.
Di Gropello, E., & Marshall, J. (2011). Decentralization and educational performance: Evidence from the PROHECO community school program in rural Honduras. Education Economics, 19(2), 161–180.
Edge, K. (2000). Decentralization and school-based management resource kit – Case studies: El Salvador: EDUCO (Educación con participación de la comunidad). Prepared for the Education Reform & Management Thematic Group, HDNED, World Bank.
Edwards, D. B., Jr. (2012). The approach of the World Bank to participation in development and education governance: Trajectories, frameworks, results. In C. Collins & A. Wiseman (Eds.), Education strategy in the developing world: Revising the World Bank’s education policy (pp. 249–273). Bingley: Emerald.
Edwards Jr., D. B., & Loucel, C. (2016). The EDUCO Program, impact evaluations, and the political economy of global education reform. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 24(49), 1–50. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.14507/epaa.24.2019
Edwards, D. B., Jr., Victoria, J., & Martin, P. (2015). The geometry of policy implementation Lessons from the political economy of three education reforms in El Salvador during 1990–2005. International Journal of Educational Development, 44, 28–41.
Edwards Jr., D. B., Okitsu, T., da Costa, R., & Kitamura, Y. (forthcoming). Organizational legitimacy in the global education policy field: Learning from UNESCO and the global monitoring report. Comparative Education Review.
Eriksson, J., Kreimer, A., & Arnold, M. (2000). El Salvador: Post-conflict reconstruction: Country case evaluation. Washington, DC: World Bank.
Fiszbein, A. (Ed.). (2005). Citizens, politicians, and providers: The Latin American experience with service delivery reform. Washington, DC: World Bank.
Gauri, V. (1998). School choice in Chile: Two decades of educational reform. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Gershberg, A. I., Meade, B., & Andersson, S. (2009). Providing better education services to the poor: Accountability and context in the case of Guatemalan decentralization. International Journal of Educational Development, 29, 187–200.
Gillies, J. (Ed.). (2010). Education system reform and aid effectiveness: The power of persistence. Washington, DC: USAID/Equip 2. Available at: http://www.equip123.net/docs/E2-Power_of_Persistence.pdf
Ginsburg, M. (Ed.). (1991). Understanding educational reform in global context: Economy, ideology, and the state. London: Routledge.
Global Partnership for Education. (2009). Six steps for abolishing primary school fees: Operational guide. Washington, DC: World Bank.
Hartmann, A., & Linn, J. (2008). Scaling up: A framework and lessons for development effectiveness from literature and practice (Brookings global economy and development working paper series). Available at: http://www.brookings.edu/research/papers/2008/10/scaling-up-aid-linn
IDB. (1998, March 12–13). Seminar: Social programs, poverty, and citizen participation. Cartagena.
IDB. (2000). Reforming primary and secondary education in Latin America and the Caribbean: An IDB strategy. Washington, DC: IDB.
Jacir de Lovo, A. (2000). Participación comunitaria en proyectos sociales. el caso de EDUCO en El Salvador. In E. Jarquín & A. Pietri (Eds.), Programas sociales, pobreza y participación ciudadana (pp. 3–33). Washington, DC: IDB.
Jacir de Lovo, A. (2003). Participación comunitaria en proyectos sociales. El caso de EDUCO en El Salvador. In R. Córdova Macias (Ed.), Participación ciudadania y desarrollo local en Centro America (pp. 399–448). San Salvador: FUNDAUNGO.
Jakobi, A. P. (2009). Global education policy in the making: International organisations and lifelong learning. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 7(4), 473–487.
Jimenez, E., & Sawada, Y. (1999). Do community-managed schools work? An evaluation of El Salvador’s EDUCO program. The World Bank Economic Review, 13(3), 415–441.
Jimenez, E., & Sawada, Y. (2003). Does community management help keep kids in schools? Evidence using panel data from El Salvador’s EDUCO program (Discussion Paper, Center for International Research on the Japanese Economy). University of Tokyo, Tokyo.
Large, W. (Ed.). (2005). An enduring partnership for development: Central America and the IDB since 1990. Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank.
Lindo Fuentes, H. (1998). Comunidad, participación y escuelas: EDUCO en El Salvador. Washington, DC: World Bank.
McEwan, P. J., & Benveniste, L. (2001). The politics of rural school reform: Escuela Nueva in Colombia. Journal of Education Policy, 16(6), 547–559.
Merino, C., Ycardo, A., & Jacir de Lovo, A. (1999). Participación comunitaria en proyectos sociales: Caso EDUCO. Revista Latinoamericana de Innovaciones Educativas, 11(31), 93–148.
Meza, D. (1997). Descentralización educativa, organización y manejo de las escuelas a nivel local – el caso de El Salvador: EDUCO. Grupo de Desarrollo Humano, America Latina y la Region del Caribe. Informe No. 9. World Bank.
Meza, D. (2001, July 9–11). El Salvador: El caso de EDUCO. Presentado al Taller Internacional Sobre Participación y Empoderamiento para un Desarrollo Inclusivo, Lima, Perú, Available at: http://www.bancomundial.org/foros/meza.htm
Meza, D., Guzmán, J., & de Varela, L. (2004a, May 25–27). EDUCO: A community-managed education program in rural areas of El Salvador. Ensayo presentado en la Scaling Up Poverty Reduction: A Global Learning Process and Conference, Shanghai.
Meza, D., Guzmán, J., & De Varela, L. (2004b). EDUCO: Un programa de educación administrado por la comunidad en las zonas rurales de El Salvador (1991–2003). En Breve, 51, 1–4.
Moreno-Dodson, B. (2005). Reducing poverty on a global scale: Learning and innovating for development. Findings from the Shanghai global learning initiative. Washington, DC: World Bank.
Mundy, K., & Verger, A. (2015). The World Bank and the global governance of education in a changing world order. International Journal of Educational Development, 40, 9–18.
Najarro, A. (2003, July 14–18). EDUCO, El Salvador. Presentación al Workshop for the Caribbean Educational Sector on the OAS Horizontal Cooperation Program, INEAM.
Parandekar, S. (2002). Democratic decentralization and people’s participation: An examination of the EDUCO programme in El Salvador. In L. Haagh & C. Helgo (Eds.), Social policy reform and market governance in Latin America (pp. 165–179). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Patrinos, H., Barrera-Osorio, F., & Guáqueta, J. (2009). The role and impact of public-private partnerships in education. Washington, DC: World Bank.
PREAL (Partnership for Education Revitalization in the Americas). (2001). Tomorrow is too late. Task Force on Education Reform in Central America. Washington, DC: Inter-American Dialogue Center.
Ramírez, C. (2006, febrero 24). Banco Mundial pide a China que importe Educo. La Prensa Gráfica, p. 28.
Reimers, F. (1997). The role of the community in expanding educational opportunities: The EDUCO schools in El Salvador. In J. Lynch, C. Modgil, & S. Modgil (Eds.), Education and development: Tradition and innovation. Equity and excellence in education for development (Vol. 2, pp. 146–162). London: Cassell.
Research Gate. (2017). The World Bank economic review. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/journal/1564-698X_The_World_Bank_Economic_Review
Rivero, J. (1999). Education and poverty: Policies, strategies and challenges. In Bulletin 48, The major project of education in Latin America and the Caribbean (pp. 5–32). Santiago: UNESCO.
Robinson, W. (1996). Promoting polyarchy: Globalization, US intervention, and hegemony. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Save the Children. (2013). The right to learn: Community participation improving learning. Westport: Save the Children.
Sawada, Y. (2000). Community participation, teacher effort, and educational outcome: The case of El Salvador’s EDUCO program. Michigan: The William Davidson Institute, University of Michigan Business School.
Sawada, Y., & Ragatz, A. (2005). Decentralization of education, teacher behavior, and outcomes: The case of El Salvador’s EDUCO program. In Incentive to improve teaching: Lessons from Latin America (pp. 255–306). Washington, DC: The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank.
Schiefelbein, E., & Schiefelbein, P. (2000). Three decentralization strategies in two decades: Chile 1981–2000. Journal of Educational Administration, 38(5), 412–425.
Squire, L. (2000). Why the World Bank should be involved in development research. In C. Gilbert & D. Vines (Eds.), The World Bank: Structures and policies (pp. 109–131). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Steiner-Khamsi, G. (2006). The economics of policy borrowing and lending: A study of late adopters. Oxford Review of Education, 32(5), 665–678.
Steiner-Khamsi, G., & Stople, I. (2006). Educational import: Local encounters with global forces in Mongolia. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Steiner-Khamsi, G., Silova, I., & Johnson, E. (2006). Neo-liberalism liberally applied: Educational policy borrowing in Central Asia. In J. Ozga, T. Popkewitz, & T. Seddon (Eds.), Education research and policy: Steering the knowledge-based economy (pp. 217–245). New York: Routledge.
Tarabini, A. (2008). Eduación, pobreza y desarrollo: Agendas globales, políticas nacionales, realidades locales (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona.
Umansky, I., & Vegas, E. (2007). Inside decentralization: How three Central American school-based management reforms affect student learning through teacher incentives. The World Bank Research Observer, 22(2), 197–215.
Umanzor, S., Soriano, I., Vega, M., Jimenez, E., Rawlings, L., & Steele, D. (1997). El Salvador’s EDUCO program: A first report on parents’ participation in school-based management (Working Paper Series on Impact Evaluation of Education Reforms, No. 4). World Bank.
UNESCO. (1996). The major project of education in Latin America and the Caribbean, Bulletin 40. Santiago: UNESCO.
UNESCO. (2001). Situación educativa de América Latina y del Caribe, 1980–2000. Santiago: UNESCO.
UNESCO. (2007). Educational governance at the local level. Paris: UNESCO.
UNESCO. (2008). EFA global monitoring report 2009: Overcoming inequality: Why governance matters. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
UNESCO. (2011). EFA global monitoring report 2011: The hidden crisis: Armed conflict and education. Paris: UNESCO.
UNESCO. (n.d.). EDUCO: Educación con participación de la comunidad. Innovemos: Education Innovations Network for Latin America and the Caribbean. Available at: http://www.redinnovemos.org/content/view/189/92/lang,en/
Verger, A. (2012). Framing and selling global education policy: The promotion of PPPs in education in low-income countries. Journal of Education Policy, 27(1), 109–130.
Verger, A., Edwards, D. B., Jr., & Kosar-Altinyelken, H. (2014). Learning from all? The World Bank, aid agencies and the construction of hegemony in education for development. Comparative Education, 50(4), 1–19.
Winkler, D. (1989). Decentralization in education: An economic perspective. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
Woessman, L. (2011). Merit-pay international. Education Next (Spring), 73–77. Retrieved from: http://educationnext.org/files/ednext_20112_Woessmann.pdf
World Bank. (1999). A symposium on education reforms. The World Bank Economic Review, 13(3), 409–508.
World Bank. (2003). World development report 2004: Making services work for poor people. Washington, DC: World Bank.
World Bank. (2006). El Salvador: Rural schools triple enrollment and deliver higher quality, results in action. En Breve, Issue 1. Washington, DC: World Bank.
World Bank. (2011). Synopsis of WDRs (1995–2005). Available at: http://web.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/EXTDEC/EXTRESEARCH/EXTWDRS/0,contentMDK:20313941~isCURL:Y~pagePK:478093~piPK:477627~theSitePK:477624,00.html. Accessed 24 Nov 2012.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Edwards, D.B. (2018). EDUCO’s Post-1995 Trajectory and Implications for Global Education Policy. In: The Trajectory of Global Education Policy. International and Development Education. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-50875-1_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-50875-1_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-50874-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-50875-1
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)