Skip to main content

Materializing Postenvironmentalism in Living Spaces

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Postenvironmentalism
  • 206 Accesses

Abstract

How does a material-semiotic postenvironmentalism actually take form in the world? This chapter presents some examples (including the Transition Network movement, the U’wa’s and the Brazilian seringueros’ struggle…) of current environmentalist practices that while confirming environmentalism is not dead at all, nonetheless show it is transforming by including nonhuman and more-than-human networks in the realm of social actors and by listening unheard voices through devices, techniques, and procedures that allow their expression in the public space. Their space of interaction is a “living space”, which is the locus for environmental issues to be pragmatically debated in forms of life. The three-step process of assembling, mobilizing, and impacting, which characterizes environmental actor networks’ agency, is finally considered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This includes, for instance, worldwide fixers of the iFixit community fixing the world “one device at a time” (information available at https://www.ifixit.com/); the Permaculture Network of desert greeners (information available at http://permacultureglobal.org/); or the resilient community planners (information available at http://thrivingresilience.org/trcc-overview/).

  2. 2.

    Information available at http://www.spontaneousinterventions.org/ and http://www.impossibleliving.com/

  3. 3.

    Information available at http://www.everyaware.eu/; http://mappingforchange.org.uk/; http://citizencyberlab.eu/; https://openideo.com; https://www.ucl.ac.uk/excites

  4. 4.

    A repository of European initiatives has been provided by the research network on “Urban Allotment Gardens in European Cities – Future, Challenges and Lessons Learned” founded under the COST framework (http://www.urbanallotments.eu/case-studies.html); a further source of information about worldwide initiatives is the Guerrilla Gardening website, which reports actions nearly every continent (http://www.guerrillagardening.org/).

References

  • Barry, A. 2001. Political Machines. Governing a Technological Society. London: The Athlone Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckie, M., and Bogdan, E. 2010. “Planting Roots: Urban Agriculture for Senior Immigrants.” Journal of Agriculture. Food Systems and Community Development. 1/2: 77–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Been, V., and Voicu I. 2006. “The Effect of Community Gardens on Neighboring Property Values.” New York University Law and Economics Working Papers, 46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennet, J. 2010. Vibrant Matter. The Political Ecology of Things. Durham and London: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brabham, D.C. 2009. “Crowdsourcing the Public Participation Process for Planning Projects.” Planning Theory 8: 242–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brabham, D.C. 2012. “Motivations for Participation in a Crowdsourcing Application to Improve Public Engagement.” Transit. Planning. 40: 307–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Certomà, C. 2009. “Environmental Politics and Place Authenticity Protection.” Environmental Values 18: 313–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Certomà, C. 2011. “Critical Urban Gardening as a Post-Environmentalist Practice.” Local Environment 16(10): 977–987.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Certomà, C., Corsini, F. and Rizzi, F. 2015. “Crowdsourcing Urban Sustainability. Data, People and Technologies in Participatory Governance.” Futures (forth. 2015).

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, D., and Chadwick, M. 2011. The Rough Guide to Community Energy. London: Rough Guides.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cultural survival. 2015. “The Thinking People: The U’wa Battle Oxy.” http://www.culturalsurvival.org/publications/cultural-survival-quarterly/colombia/thinking-people-uwa-battle-oxy.

  • Emmett, R. 2011. “Community Gardens, Ghetto Pastoral, and Environmental Justice.” Interdisciplinary Studies in Literature and Environment 18/1: 67–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferris J, Norman, C., and Sempik, J. 2001. “People, Land and Sustainability: Community Gardens and the Social Dimension of Sustainable Development.” Social Policy Administration 35/5: 559–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Escobar, A. 1999. “Gender, Place and Networks. A Political Ecology of Cyberculture.” In Women@Internet. Creating New Cultures in Cyberspace edited by W. Harcourt. London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flachs A. 2010. “Food For Thought: The Social Impact of Community Gardens in the Greater Cleveland Area.” Electronic Green Journal 1/30: 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, D. 1992. “The Promises of Monsters: A Regenerative Politics for Inappropriate/d Others.” In Cultural Studies edited by L. Grossberg, C. Nelson and P. A. Treichler. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinchliffe, S. 2007. Geography of Nature: Societies, Environments, Ecologies. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinchliffe, S, and Whatmore, S. 2006. “Living Cities: Toward a Politics of Conviviality.” Science as Culture 15: 123–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins, R. 2013. The Power of Just Doing Stuff: How Local Action Can Change the World. Cambridge: Green Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hou J., Johnson, J., and Lawson, L. 2009. “Greening Cities Growing Communities: Learning from Seattle’s.” Urban Community Gardens. Washington & London: University of Washington Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC. 2007. “Summary for Policymakers.” A report of Working Group I of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.

    Google Scholar 

  • Istanbul Declaration and The Habitat Agenda. 1996. “Istanbul Declaration on Human Settlements.”

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurtz, H. 2001. “Differentiating Multiple Meanings of Garden and Community.” Urban Geography 22: 656–670.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. 2004. Politics of Nature: How to Bring the Sciences into Democracy. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • March, H., and Ribera, R. 2014. “Smart Contradictions: The Politics of Making Barcelona a Self-Sufficient City.” European Urban and Regional Studies 1–15. ISSN.0969–7764.

    Google Scholar 

  • McClintock, N. 2008. “From Industrial Garden to Food Desert: Unearthing the Root Structure of Urban Agriculture in Oakland, California.” Institute for Study of Societal Issues Working Papers. http://escholarship.org/uc/item/1wh3v1sj.

  • Milbourne, P. 2012. “Everyday (in)justices and Ordinary Environmentalisms: Community Gardening in Disadvantaged Urban Neighbourhoods.” Local Environment 17(9): 943–957.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J. 2005. “Biodiversity Conservation and the Extinction of Experience.” Trends in Ecology & Evolution 20(8): 430–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pagano, M.A., and Bowman, A. 2000. “Vacant Land in Cities: An Urban Resource.” The Brookings Institution Survey Series, 8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinkerton, T., and Hopkins, R. 2009. Local Food. How to Make It Happen in Your Community. Devon: Green Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ribera, R., Santangelo, M., and Vanolo, A. 2015. “Technology and the Cities of Tomorrow: Exploring the Smart City Imagery (and Beyond).” AAG Chicago conference programme http://www.aag.org/.

  • Schmelzkopf, K. 1995. “Urban Community Gardens as Contested Space.” Geographical Review 85: 364–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sennett, Richard. 2012. “No One Likes a City That’s Too Smart.” The Guardian, December 4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shelton, T., Zook, M., and Wiig, A. 2015. “The ‘actually existing smart city’.” Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society (forth. 2015).

    Google Scholar 

  • Söderström, O., Paasche, T., and Klauser, F. 2014. “Smart Cities as Corporate Storytelling.” City 18(3): 307–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C. 1991. The Malaise of Modernity. Concord (ON): Anansi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tracey, D. 2007. Guerrilla Gardening: A Manualfesto. Gabriola Island (BC): New Society Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • UN-HABITAT. 2010.“Cities for All: Bridging the Urban Divide.” State of the World’s Cities. 2010/2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Haren, Lena. 2015. “Environmental Justice Case Study: The U’wa Struggle Against Occidental Petroleum.” http://umich.edu/~snre492/Jones/uwa.htm.

  • Vanolo, A. 2014. “Smartmentality: The Smart City as Disciplinary Strategy.” Urban Studies 51(5): 883–898.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wakefield, S., Yeudall, F., Taron, C., Reynolds, J., and Skinner, A. 2007. “Growing Urban Health: Community Gardening in South-east Toronto.” Health Promotion International 22(2): 92–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wekerle, G.R., Sandberg, L.A., and Gilbert, L. 2009. “Taking a Stand in Exurbia: Environmental Movements to Preserve Nature and Resist Sprawl.” In Environmental Conflicts and Democracy in Canada edited by L. Adkin, 279–297. Vancouver: UBC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, D., and Wilbert, C. 2006. “Introduction: Technonatural Time–Spaces.” Science as Culture 15: 95–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2016 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Certomà, C. (2016). Materializing Postenvironmentalism in Living Spaces. In: Postenvironmentalism. Palgrave Pivot, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-50790-7_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics