Skip to main content

Is This the End of Environmentalism, as We Know It?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 218 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter explores the theoretical critiques that environmental politics attracted since the 1990s onward. Among them, building upon political ecology critique, post-environmentalist theory gained a prominent role and claimed that green diplomacy, business, and large NGOs determined a de-politicization of environmental issues in the pursuit of establishing a widespread consensus on the mainstream strategies for global environmental governance. The origins and development of post-environmentalism are described in the chapter, with particular attention devoted to the differences between the realist perspective of US scholars (most notably Michel Shellenberger and Ted Nordhaus, authors of the pamphlet “The Death of Environmentalism”) and the European scholars, advancing a constructivist interpretation of the end of environmentalism under the name of post-ecologism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See for instance the Inshore Fisheries Aggregating Devices, WWF Australia project in the Solomon Islands (WWF 1995). This process is called essentialisation.

  2. 2.

    However, different from political ecology scholars, Schellenberger and Nordhaus’ analysis is deeply connected to the US social and political context. Their aim is to revitalize progressive and liberal political forces by including environmentalism amongst them (while liberalism in other countries, especially across Europe, is at best understood as social democratic force rather than progressive). There is in fact a certain convergence among political scientists on the idea that environmentalism cannot be anything other than liberal (Arial Maldonado 2012).

  3. 3.

    Following other Critical Thinkers, Blühdorn uses the world “ecologism.” Despite the fact that he does not devote particular attention to the difference between ecologism and environmentalism, the difference is actually defined in other relevant literature (Castells 1998; Hayward 2003). Political philosopher Andrew Dobson states that environmentalism proposes “a managerial approach to environmental problems, [and affirms] that they can be solved without fundamental changes in present values or patterns of production and consumption [while ecologism holds that] a sustainable and fulfilling existence presupposes radical changes in our relationship with the non-human natural world, and in our mode of social and political life” (Dobson 2003a, 365). For the purposes of this book, such differences are not very relevant, and the definition of environmental thinking is adopted to include the variegated world of those concerned with environmental issues.

  4. 4.

    As already mentioned, the terms ecologists and ecologism, rather than environmentalists and environmentalism (as preferred in this book), are adopted here to reference Blühdorn. The differences, however, are not relevant in this context, and the terms can be used synonymously.

  5. 5.

    Blühdorn’s indistinct use of the word ecology, instead of environment, leads to the paradoxical affirmation that post-ecologism was an ecology without identity. Post-ecologism (or post-environmentalism) is clearly not an ecology because ecology is a natural science with its own status, heuristic processes, paradigms, and objects of research.

  6. 6.

    For Ecuador, this was comparable to 19 years of carbon emissions and the production of 107.00 barrels of oil per day for at least 13 years of full exploitation (Government of Ecuador 2011).

  7. 7.

    CGYs are also sold to private investors that develop projects in line with the Clean Development Mechanism guidelines, as established by the Kyoto Protocol under conditions not to exceed the total quota of annual emission permits. However, because market-based revenues from the sale of certificates of avoided emissions are not currently recognized in the carbon market, a dedicated agreement is required.

  8. 8.

    The post-Kyoto regime derives from the recognition of the marginal results actually achieved in the implementation of Kyoto protocol, and the considerable criticism that followed. This new regime proposes stricter measures, particularly the UN Reducing Emission from Deforestation and Degradation (UN-REDD) Programme. Nevertheless, it too has been severely criticized, especially by indigenous groups for not clearly taking into account human resources and social issues (Larrea and Warnas 2009).

References

  • Adorno, Theodor W. 1973. Negative Dialectics. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agyeman, J. 2005. Sustainable Communities and the Challenge of Environmental Justice. New York: New York University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Arias Maldonado, M. 2012. Real Green: Sustainability After the End of Nature. Farnham: Ashgate Publishing

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, I., 1991. “Radical Conservatism,” Future, March: 204–206

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbier, E. 2010. A Global Green New Deal. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, U. 1995. Ecological Politics in an Age of Risk. Cambridge: Polity press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berg, P. 2001. “The Post-Environmentalist Directions of Bioregionalism.” Lecture by Peter Berg. Missoula: University of Montana. Accessed April 10, 2001. http://www.planetdrum.org/Post-Enviro.htm.

  • Blühdorn, I., and Welsh, I. 2008. The Politics of Unsustainability, Eco-Politics in the Post-Environmental Era. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blühdorn, I. 2000a. Post-Ecologist Politics. Social Theory and the Abdication of the Ecologist Paradigm. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Blühdorn 2000. “Social Theory and the Abdication of the Ecologist Paradigm.”Post-Ecologist Politics. London/New York: Routledge

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Blühdorn 2006. “Self-Experience in the Theme Park of Radical Action? Social Movements and Political Articulation in the Late-modern Condition.” European Journal of Social Theory 9: 23–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blühdorn, I. 2007b. “The Politics of Unsustainability: Eco-Politics in the Post-Environmental Era.” In Environmental Politics (Special Issue) Vol. 16: 185 edited by I. Blühdorn and L. Wels. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blühdorn, I. 2011. “The Politics of Unsustainability: COP15, Post-ecologism, and the Ecological Paradox.” Organization and Environment 24: 34–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blühdorn, I., and Welsh, I. 2007. “Eco-politics Beyond the Paradigm of Sustainability: A Conceptual Framework and Research Agenda.” Environmental Politics 16: 185–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blühdorn and Welsh, I. 2008. The Politics of Unsustainability: Eco-Politics in the Post-Ecologist Era. London/New York: Routledge

    Google Scholar 

  • Broder, J. 2011. “An Energy Plan Derailed by Events Is Being Retooled,” The New York Times, March 30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bromberg, A., Morrow, G.D., and Pfeiffer, D. 2007. Critical Planning. Summer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryant, R.L., and Baile, S. 1997. Third World Political Ecology. London: Routledge

    Google Scholar 

  • Buck, C. 2012.“Post-environmentalism: An Internal Critique.” Environmental Politics 22/6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buell, F. 2003. From Apocalypse to Way of Life: Environmental Crisis in the American Century. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M. 1997. The Power of Identity, The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture. Cambridge (MA), Oxford (UK): Blackwell

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M. 1998. The Power of Identity: The Information Age–Economy, Society and Culture. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing

    Google Scholar 

  • Centro di Documentazione sui Conflitti Ambientali (CDCA). 2011. “Estrazioni petrolifere nel parco nazionale dello Yasuni.” Accessed July 11, 2011. http://www.cdca.it/spip.php?article606.

  • Certomà C., and Greyl, L. 2012. “Non-Extractive Policies as a Main Road to Environmental Justice? The Case of the Yasunì Park in Ecuador.” In New Political Spaces in Latin American Natural Resource Governance edited by H. Haarstad. New York (NY): Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christoff, P. 1996. “Ecological Modernisation, Ecological Modernities.” Environmental Politics 5/3: 209–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collina, T., and Poff, E. 2009. “The Green New Deal: Energizing the U.S.” Economy Fokus America 4. http://library.fes.de/pdf-files/bueros/usa/06873.pdf.

  • Dobson, A. 2003a. “Ecologism and Environmentalism.” In Contemporary Political Thought: A Reader and Guide Contemporary Political Thought: A Reader and Guide edited by A. Finlayson. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobson, A. 2003. Citizenship and the Environment. New York: Oxford University Press

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dobson, A. 1998. Justice and the Environment: Conceptions of Environmental Sustainability and Theories of Distributive Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Donoso, A. 2009. “Game DEUDA ECOLÓGICA Impactos de la deuda externa en las comunidades y la naturaleza” Accion Ecologica Quito – Ecuador, September. http://www.accionecologica.org/deuda-ecologica/documentos/1177-nueva-publicacion-qdeuda-ecologica-impactos-de-la-deuda-externa-en-las-comunidades-y-la-naturalezaq.

  • Dryzek, J. 1987. Rational Ecology: Environment and Political Economy. New York: Basil Blackwell

    Google Scholar 

  • Eder, K. 1996a. “The Institutionalisation of Environmentalist.” In Risk, Environment and Modernity edited by S. Lash, B. Szerszynsky and B. Wynne. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eder, K. 1996b. The Social Construction of Nature. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eder, K. 1996. The Social Construction of Nature. Nottingham on Trent: Sage Publications. Originally published in Die Vergesellshaftung der Natur: Studien zur sozialen Evolution der praktishen Vernunft. 1988

    Google Scholar 

  • EJOLT. 2015. “Environmental Justice Organisation, Liability and trade.” EU FP/7, http://www.ejolt.org/.

  • Faburel, G. 2010. “The Environment as a Factor of Spatial Injustice: A New Challenge for the Sustainable Development of European Regions?.” In Sustainable Development–Policy and Urban Development edited by C. Ghenai. InTech. Accessed January 3, 2013. http://www.intechopen.com/books/.

  • Featherstone, D. 2002. Spatiality, Political Identity and the Environmentalism of the Poor. Unpublished PhD thesis. The Open University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forsyth, T. 2008. “Political Ecology and the Epistemology of Social Justice.” Geoforum 39: 756–764

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, N. 1997. Justice Interruptus: Critical Reflections on the “Postsocialist” Condition. New York: Routledge

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. 1990. The Consequences of Modernity. Stanford: Stanford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Government of Ecuador. 2010. “Ecuador Yasuni ITT Trust Fund: Terms of Reference.” Accessed March 1, 2012. http://mdtf.undp.org/document/download/4492.

  • Green New Deal. 2014. “What Is the Green New Deal?.” http://greennewdeal.eu/what-is-the-green-new-deal.html.

  • Habermas, J. 1984. “Reason and the Rationalization of Society.” Volume 1 of The Theory of Communicative Action. English translation by Thomas McCarthy. Boston: Beacon Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Haq, G., and Alistair, P. 2011. Environmentalism Since 1945. London: Routledge

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. 1973. Social Justice and the City. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. 1996. Justice, Nature and the Geography of Difference. Oxford: Basil Blackwell

    Google Scholar 

  • Haughton, G. 1999. “Environmental Justice and the Sustainable City.” Journal of Planning Education and Research 18: 233–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayward, T. 1994. Ecological Thought: An Introduction. Cambridge: Polity press

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayward, T. 2003. “Ecologism and Environmentalism.” In Contemporary Political Thought: A Reader and Guide Contemporary Political Thought: A Reader and Guide edited by A. Finlayson. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Huggan, G., and Tiffin, H. 2010. Postcolonial Ecocriticism. Literature, Animals, Environment. New York: Routledge

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, C. 1998. “Whose Nature, Whose Culture? Private Productions of Space and the ‘Preservation’ of Nature’.” In Remaking Reality: Nature at the Millennium edited by B. Brawn and N. Castree. London: Routledge

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. 1993. We Have Never Been Modern. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefebvre, H. 1991. The Production of Space. Oxford: Basil Blackwell. Originally published in 1974

    Google Scholar 

  • Leonard L., and Kedzior, S. 2014. Occupy the Earth: Global Environmental Movements Emerald Group. Bingley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyotard, J.-F. 1984. The Postmodern Condition. Manchester: Manchester University Press (or. ed. La Condition postmoderne: rapport sur le savoir, 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinez Alier, J. 2003. The Environmentalism of the Poor: A Study of Ecological Conflicts and Valuation. Cheltenham (UK), Northampton (MA): Edward Elgar Publishing

    Google Scholar 

  • Mary Louise Pratt. 1992. Imperial Eyes: Travel Writing and Transculturation. London: Routledge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Melvin, J. 2009. “Obama’s Green Energy Plans Build Hopes, Scepticism.” Reuters, January 9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mennis, J. 2002. “Using Geographic Information Systems to Create and Analyse Statistical Surfaces of Population and Risk for Environmental Justice Analysis.” Social Science Quarterly 83: 281–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neri, V. 2004. “FAI modelli organizzativi e dialettica istituzionale di un’associazione postambientalista.” Equilibri. Il Mulino.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niklas. 1995. Social Systems. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. Adorno, Theodor W. 1973. Negative Dialectics. London: Routledge

    Google Scholar 

  • Plumwood, V. 2002. Environmental Culture the Ecological Crisis of Reason. London: Routledge

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbins, P. 2004. Political Ecology. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodrigues, G., and Rabben, L. 2007. Walking the Forest with Chico Mendes. Austin: University of Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roos, B., and Hunt, A. 2010. Postcolonial Green: Environmental Politics and World Narratives. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Sachs, W. 1993. “Global Ecology and the Shadow of ‘Development’.” In Global Ecology: A New Arena of Political Conflict edited by W. Sachs. Halifax (Nova Scotia): Fernwood Books

    Google Scholar 

  • Sachs, W. 1997. “Sustainable Development.” In The International Handbook of Environmental Sociology edited by M. Redclift, 71–82. Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Said, Edward. 1977. Orientalism. London: Penguin

    Google Scholar 

  • Sassen, S. 1998. Globalization and Its Discontents. Essays on the New Mobility of People and Money. New York: New Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiller, F. 2005. “Environmental Symbolism and the Discourse on Sustainability.” Paper presented at conference of Munich Institution for Social Research on Sustainability, Munich, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumacher, E.F. 1973. Small is Beautiful: A Study of Economics as if People Mattered. London: Blond&Briggs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shellenberger, M., and T. Nordhaus. 2004. The Death of Environmentalism. Global Warming Politics in a Post-Environmental World. The Breacktrought institute. http://thebreakthrough.org/archive/the_death_of_environmentalism.

  • Shellenberger, M., and Nordhaus, T. 2010. “Cap and Charade: The Green Jobs Myth.” The New Republic, October 28. http://www.tnr.com/print/article/politics/78209/clean-energy-jobs-obama.

  • Shiva, V. 1993. Monocultures of the Mind. Perspectives on Biodiversity and Biotechnology. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soja, E. 1989. Postmodern Geographies: The Reassertion of Space in Critical Social Theory. London (NY): Verso

    Google Scholar 

  • Soja, E. 2010. Seeking Spatial Justice. Minneapolis (MN): University of Minnesota Press

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C. 1992. The Ethic of Authenticity. Harvard: Harvard University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, F, and Homer-Dixon. 1999. Environment, Scarcity, and Violence. Princeton (NJ): Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wackernagel, M., and Rees, W. 1998. Our Ecological Footprint: Reducing Human Impact on the Earth. Gabriola Island (BC, Canada): New Society Publishers

    Google Scholar 

  • WWF. 1995. “Solomon Islands project.” http://www.wwfpacific.org/about/solomon_islands_/.

  • Young, I.M. 1990. Justice and the Politics of Difference. Princeton: Princeton University Press

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2016 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Certomà, C. (2016). Is This the End of Environmentalism, as We Know It?. In: Postenvironmentalism. Palgrave Pivot, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-50790-7_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics