Abstract
The chapter explores the issues of rape in India from the broader perspective of feminism(s) and gender justice. The question central to this study is: are adequate to provide gender justice or the modernization of the legal system is merely a part of the neoliberal social order of contemporary India? The chapter has examined the nature of law and/or it’s functioning along with critical assessment of the legal provisions and recent Criminal Law (Amendment) Act of 2013 in relation to rape in India. The chapter analyses how historically there is always a clear distinction between law–as-legislation and the law-in-practice. For example, how in every rape trial, a woman goes through a verbal rape in the name of judicial verification, and the judicial discourse objectifies and sexualizes the body by humiliating the victim in a packed courtroom. The chapter thus attempts to evaluate the feminists’ claim that legal reforms and criminal justice, in the main disfavour women’s interests and viewpoints conceptually, procedurally and substantively. This is in spite of the fact that some laws actually promote formal equality while, at the same time, failing by and large to deliver substantial equality and how gender justice remains a pipedream in spite of the fact that the incidence of rape is alarmingly growing and the rape conviction has remained shamelessly low in India. The chapter advocates that promises and premises for delivering gender justice should be Feminist Lawmaking rather than Modernization in Legal Reform for contemporary India.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Agnes, F. (1998). Violence Against Women: Review of Recent Enactments. Retrieved from http://www.womenstudies.in/elib/crime_ag_women/ca_violence_against.pdf.
Allen, H. (1987). Justice Unbalanced. New York, NY: McGraw Hill and Open University Press.
Baxi, P. (2013). Sleazy Court Dramas Keep Rape Victims on Tenterhooks. The Interview gave to T. Bhasin (9th February 2013). Retrieved from http://www.sunday-guardian.com.
Das, V. (1996). Sexual Violence, Discursive Formations and the State. Economic and Political Weekly, Special Number, September, 2411–2433.
Dawson, T. B. (Ed.). (1993). Existence: Legal Personhood. In Women, Law and Social Change (2nd ed.). North York, Ontario: Captus Press.
DeCrow, K. (1975). Sexual Justice. New York, NY: Vintage Press. English Language Edition.
Finlay, L. (1989). Breaking Women’s Silence in Law: The Dilemma of the Gendered Nature of Legal Reasoning. Notre Dame Law Review, 64, 886–910.
Fox-Genovese, E. (1991). Feminism without Illusions: A Critique of Individualism. Durham: University of North Carolina Press.
Ganguly, G. (2007). Indian Feminisms: Law, Patriarchies, and Violence in India. Burlington: Aldershot.
Henry, S., & Milovanovic, D. (1994). The Constitution of Constitutive Criminology. In D. Nelken (Ed.), The Futures of Criminology (pp. 110–133). London: Sage Publications.
Kapur, R., & Cossman, B. (1996). Subversive Sites: Feminist Engagements with Law in India. New Delhi: Sage Publications.
Kapur, R., & Cossman, B. (1999). On women, Equality and the Constitution: Through the Looking Glass of Feminism. In N. Menon (Ed.), Gender and Politics in India (pp. 197–261). New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
Kiss, E. (1997). Alchemy or Fool’s Gold? Assessing Feminist Doubts about Rights. In S. M. Lyndon & U. Narayan (Eds.), Reconstructing Political Theory: Feminist Perspective. London: Polity Press.
Lacey, N. (1995). Feminist Legal Theory beyond Neutrality. Current Legal Problems, 48(2), 1–38.
Lahey, K. A. (2002). Celebration and Struggle: Feminism and Law. In A. Miles & G. Finn (Eds.), Feminism: From Pressure to Politics (pp. 99–102). Jaipur, India: Rawat Publications.
Larcombe, W. (2011). Falling Rape Conviction Rates: (Some) Feminist Aim and Measures for Rape Law. Feminist Legal Studies, 19, 27–45.
Machado, H. (2008). Biologising Paternity, Moralising Maternity: The Construction of Parenthood in the Determination of Paternity through Courts in Portugal. Feminist Legal Studies, 6(2), 215–236.
MacKinnon, C. (1983). Feminism, Marxism, Method and the State: Toward Feminist Jurisprudence. Signs, 8(2), 653–658.
McKinnon, C. (1987). Feminism Unmodified. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Mennon, N. (1999). Rights, Bodies, and the Law: Rethinking Feminist Politics of Justice. In N. Menon (Ed.), Gender and Politics in India. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
Naqvi, F. (2013, March 7). For the Women of India, Parliament Must Speak. The Hindu. Retrieved from http://www.thehindu.com. Accessed on 16 September 2015.
National Crime Records Bureau. (2015). Crime in India 2014. New Delhi, India: Ministry of Home Affairs.
Polan, D. (1982). Towards a Theory of Law and Patriarchy. In D. Kairys (Ed.), The Politics of Law (pp. 294–303). New York: Pantheon Books Press.
Rifkin, J. (1993). Toward a Theory of Law and Patriarchy. In D. K. Weisberg (Ed.), Feminist Legal Theory: Foundations. Philadelphia, USA: Temple University Press.
Rothenberg, L. (1999). Rethinking Privacy: Peeping Toms, Video Voyeurs, and the Failure of the Criminal Law to Recognize a Reasonable Expectation of Privacy in the Public Space. American University Law Review, 49(5), 1127–1165.
Rukmini, S. (2014). As Funds Dry Up, Fast-track Courts Close Down. The Hindu. Retrieved from http://www.thehindu.com/news. Accessed on 14 December 2015.
Shakil, A. (2013). Protests, the Justice Verma Committee and the Government Ordinance. Economic & Political Weekly, 48(6). Retrieved from http://www.epw.in/node/127492/pdf.
Sheldon, S. (2005). Reproductive Technologies and the Legal Determination of Fatherhood. Feminist Legal Studies, 13(3), 349–362.
Smart, C. (1987). There is, of Course, the Distinction Dictated by Nature: Law and the Problem of Paternity. In M. Stanworth (Ed.), Reproductive Technologies: Gender, Motherhood and Medicine. London: Polity Press.
Smart, C. (1995). Law, Crime and Sexuality: Essays in Feminism. London: Sage Publications.
Stamatopoulou, E. (1995). Women’s Rights and the United Nations. In J. A. Peters & A. Wolper (Eds.), Women’s Rights, Human Rights: International Feminist Perspectives (pp. 36–48). London: Routledge.
Stewart, A. (2001). Judicial Attitudes to Gender Justice in India: The Contribution of Judicial Training. Law, Social Justice and Global Development. Retrieved from http://elj.warwick.ac.uk.
Talwar, R. (2013). Courting Injustice: The Nirbhaya Case and its Aftermath. New Delhi, India: Hay House Publishers.
The Hindu. (2013, February 3). Ordinance Bypasses all Vital Recommendations of Verma Panel (Staff Reporter). Retrieved from PETITIONER: TUKA RAM AND ANR. Vs. RESPONDENT: STATE OF MAHARASHTRA DATE OF JUDGMENT15/09/1978 BENCH: KOSHAL, A.D. BENCH: KOSHAL, A.D. SINGH, JASWANT KAILASAM, P.S. CITATION: 1979 AIR 185 1979 SCR (1) 810 1979 SCC (2) 143. http://www.thehindu.com.
Tukaram and Anr v. State of Maharashtra Date of Judgment15/09/1978 Bench: Koshal, A.D. Singh, Jaswant Kailasam, P.S., 1979 AIR 185 1979 SCR (1) 810 1979 SCC (2) 143.
Uberoi, P. (Ed.). (1996). Social Reform, Sexuality and the State. New Delhi, India: Sage Publications.
Verma, J. S., Seth, L., & Subramanium, G. (2013). Part 1: Report of the Committee on Amendments to Criminal Law. New Delhi, India.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bhadra, B. (2017). Rape Law Reforms in India: Catalyst to Gender Justice or Modernization in Legal Reforms?. In: Shahidullah, S.M. (eds) Crime, Criminal Justice, and the Evolving Science of Criminology in South Asia. Palgrave Advances in Criminology and Criminal Justice in Asia. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-50750-1_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-50750-1_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-50749-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-50750-1
eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)