Advertisement

‘Dogging Men’: Car Parks, Masculinity and Anonymous Sex

  • Chris Haywood
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter provides an insight into the sexual world of ‘dogging’; that of anonymous sex between men, men and women usually carried out in car parks. Drawing upon interviews with 12 men who engage in dogging practices, this chapter provides insights into the micro-negotiations of the dogging encounter and men’s masculine subjectivities. The chapter begins by exploring the reasons for dogging and then details how dogging takes place. By understanding the sexual etiquette of dogging, we are able to capture the different kinds of masculinities that may be involved in negotiating the sex. However, as men in dogging encounters reject both gender and sexual identity categories, the chapter explores the notion of de-subjectification. Furthermore, with men explaining their sexual experiences through bodies and pleasure, the chapter ends by examining how men position women as being in control of the sexual encounter.

Bibliography

  1. Ashford, C. (2012). Heterosexuality, Public Places and Policing. In P. Johnson & D. Dalton (Eds.), Policing Sex (pp. 41–54). Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Bell, D. (2006). Bodies, Technologies, Spaces: On ‘Dogging’. Sexualities, 9, 387–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bertone, C., & Ferrero Camoletto, R. (2009). Beyond the Sex Machine? Sexual Practices and Masculinity in Adult Men’s Heterosexual Accounts. Journal of Gender Studies, 18(4), 369–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Butler, J. (1999). Revisiting Bodies and Pleasures. Theory, Culture & Society, 16(2), 11–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Byrne, R. (2003). Setting the Boundaries—Tackling Public Sex Environments in Country Parks. Proceedings of the Royal Town Planning Institute Planning Research Conference. Oxford: University of Oxford.Google Scholar
  6. Byrne, R. (2006). Beyond Lovers’ Lane: The Rise of Illicit Sexual Leisure in Countryside Recreational Space. Leisure/Loisir, 30(1), 73–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Church, J., Green, J., Vearnals, S., & Keogh, P. (1993). Investigation of Motivational and Behavioural Factors Influencing Men Who Have Sex with Other Men in Public Toilets (Cottaging). Aids Care, 5(3), 337–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Couture, J. (2008). Peek: Inside the Private World of Public Sex. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Dutsch, D. (2014). Kynogamia and Cynic Sexual Ethics. In M. Masterson, N. S. Rabinowitz, & J. Robson (Eds.), Sex in Antiquity: Exploring Gender and Sexuality in the Ancient World (pp. 245–259). Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Elliott, J. H. (1991). Household and Meals vs. Temple Purity Replication Patterns in Luke-Acts. Biblical Theology Bulletin, 21(3), 102–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Everett, B. G. (2013). Sexual Orientation Disparities in Sexually Transmitted Infections: Examining the Intersection Between Sexual Identity and Sexual Behavior. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 42(2), 225–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Farvid, P., & Braun, V. (2006). ‘Most of Us Guys Are Raring to Go Anytime, Anyplace, Anywhere’: Male and Female Sexuality in Cleo and Cosmo. Sex Roles, 55(5–6), 295–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Flowers, P., Marriott, C., & Ha, G. (2000). ‘The Bars, the Bogs, and the Bushes’: The Impact of Locale on Sexual Cultures. Culture, Health & Sexuality, 2(1), 69–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Foucault, M. (1990). The History of Sexuality, Volume 1: An Introduction. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  15. Foucault, M. (2011). The Gay Science. Critical Inquiry, 37(3), 385–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Frank, K. (2003). “Just Trying to Relax”: Masculinity, Masculinizing Practices, and Strip Club Regulars. Journal of Sex Research, 40(1), 61–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Frankis, J., & Flowers, P. (2005). Men Who Have Sex with Men (MSM) in Public Sex Environments (PSEs): A Systematic Review of Quantitative Literature. AIDs Care, 17(3), 273–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Halperin, D. M. (1997). Saint Foucault: Towards a Gay Hagiography. Oxford Paperbacks.Google Scholar
  19. Haywood, C., & Mac an Ghaill, M. (2012). ‘What’s Next for Masculinity?’ Reflexive Directions for Theory and Research on Masculinity and Education. Gender and Education, 24(6), 577–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Heckert, J. (2010). Love Without Borders? Intimacy, Identity and the State of Compulsory Monogamy. In M. Barker & D. Langdridge (Eds.), Understanding Non-monogamies (pp. 255–266). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  21. Hennelly, S. (2010). Public Space, Public Morality: The Media Construction of Sex in Public Places. Liverpool Law Review, 31, 69–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Holmes, D., O’Byrne, P., & Murray, S. J. (2010). Faceless Sex: Glory Holes and Sexual Assemblages. Nursing Philosophy, 11, 250–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Humphreys, L. (1975). Tearoom Trade, Enlarged Edition: Impersonal Sex in Public Places. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
  24. Keogh, P., & Holland, P. (1999). Observing the Rules: An Ethnographic Study of London’s Cottages and Cruising Areas. In P. Aggleton (Ed.), Families and Communities Responding to AIDS (pp. 121–132). London: UCL Press.Google Scholar
  25. Klesse, C. (2014). Polyamory: Intimate Practice, Identity or Sexual Orientation? Sexualities, 17(1–2), 81–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lacquer, T. (1990). Making Sex: Body and Gender from the Greeks to Freud. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Limmer, M. (2014). The Pressure to Perform: Understanding the Impact of Masculinities and Social Exclusion on Young Men’s Sexual Risk Taking. International Journal of Men’s Health, 13(3), 184.Google Scholar
  28. Mills, S. (2011). Communities of Practice and Politeness. In B. Davies, M. Haugh, & A. J. Merrison (Eds.), Situated Politeness (pp. 73–87). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  29. Mooney-Somers, J. (2005). Heterosexual Male Sexuality: Representations and Sexual Subjectivity. Unpublished PhD. Sydney: University of Western Sydney.Google Scholar
  30. Murphy, P. F. (2001). Studs, Tools, and the Family Jewels: Metaphors Men Live by. Wisconsin: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
  31. Race, K. (2015). ‘Party and Play’: Online Hook-Up Devices and the Emergence of PNP Practices Among Gay Men. Sexualities, 18(3), 253–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Reback, C. J., & Larkins, S. (2010). Maintaining a Heterosexual Identity: Sexual Meanings Among a Sample of Heterosexually Identified Men Who Have Sex with Men. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39(3), 766–773.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Reid, R. C., Bramen, J. E., Anderson, A., & Cohen, M. S. (2014). Mindfulness, Emotional Dysregulation, Impulsivity, and Stress Proneness Among Hypersexual Patients. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 70(4), 313–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Tiefer, L. (1995). Sex Is Not a Natural Act and Other Essays. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
  35. Visser, R., & McDonald, D. (2007). Swings and Roundabouts: Management of Jealousy in Heterosexual ‘Swinging’ Couples. British Journal of Social Psychology, 46(2), 459–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Warner, M. (1999). The Trouble with Normal: Sex, Politics, and the Ethics of Queer Life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Weeks, J. (1989). Sexuality and Its Discontents: Meanings, Myths and Modern Sexualities. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  38. Williams, S. L. (2002). Trying on Gender, Gender Regimes, and the Process of Becoming Women. Gender & Society, 19(1), 29–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chris Haywood
    • 1
  1. 1.Media, Culture and HeritageNewcastle UniversityNewcastle-upon-TyneUK

Personalised recommendations