Skip to main content

Abstract

This short introductory chapter explains the rationale of the book and sets the scene by identifying key gaps in existing research both on the Energiewende in Germany and in wider debates on energy transitions worldwide. The case is made that the current energy transition in Germany, though widely discussed in the social sciences, has not as yet received the theoretically informed analysis it deserves. Referring to global debates on energy transitions and ways of conceptualizing them, we set out the principal lines of research and justify the book’s focus on issues of institutional change, materiality, power and space (IMPS). The chapter then elaborates on the purpose and objectives of the book and presents the book’s structure, methodological background and line of argument.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Allen, J. 2003. Lost Geographies of Power. Malden: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aradau, C. 2010. “Security that Matters: Critical Infrastructure and Objects of Protection.” Security Dialogue 41 (5): 491–514.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, J. 2005. “The Agency of Assemblages and the North American Blackout.” Public Culture 17 (3): 445–466.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beveridge, R., and K. Kern. 2013. “The Energiewende in Germany: Background, Developments and Future Challenges.” Renewable Energy Law and Policy Review 1: 3–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, R. R., M. A. Farrelly, and D. A. Loorbach. 2013. “Actors Working the Institutions in Sustainability Transitions: The Case of Melbourne’s Stormwater Management.” Global Environmental Change 23 (4): 701–718.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bulkeley, H., V. Castán Broto, M. Hodson, and S. Marvin, eds. 2011. Cities and Low Carbon Transitions. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burger, C., and J. Weinmann. 2012. The Decentralized Energy Revolution. Business Strategies for a New Paradigm. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coenen, L., P. Benneworth, and B. Truffer. 2012. “Toward a Spatial Perspective on Sustainability Transitions.” Research Policy 41 (6): 968–979.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeLanda, M. 2006. A New Philosophy of Society. Assemblage Theory and Social Complexity. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elzen, B., F. W. Geels, C. Leeuwis, and B. van Mierlo. 2011. “Normative Contestation in Transitions “in the Making”: Animal Welfare Concerns and System Innovation in Pig Husbandry.” Research Policy 40 (2): 263–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farías, I., and T. Bender, eds. 2010. Urban Assemblages. How Actor-network Theory Changes Urban Studies. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gawel, E., P. Lehmann, K. Korte, S. Strunz, J. Bovet, W. Köck, P. Massier, A. Löschel, D. Schober, D. Ohlhorst, K. Tews, M. Schreurs, M. Reeg, and S. Wassermann. 2014. “The Future of the Energy Transition in Germany.” Energy, Sustainability and Society 4 (15): 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gawel, E., S. Strunz, and P. Lehmann. 2013. “Germany’s Energy Transition Under Attack: Is There an Inscrutable German Sonderweg?” Nature and Culture 8 (2): 121–133.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geels, F. W. 2002. “Technological Transitions as Evolutionary Reconfiguration Processes: A Multi-level Perspective and a Case-study.” Research Policy 31 (8–9): 1257–1274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geels, F. W. 2004. “From Sectoral Systems of Innovation to Socio-technical Systems. Insights about Dynamics and Change from Sociology and Institutional Theory.” Research Policy 33 (6–7): 897–920.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geels, F. W., and J. Schot. 2007. “Typology of Sociotechnical Transition Pathways.” Research Policy 36 (3): 399–417.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grin, J. 2011. “Understanding Transitions from a Governance Perspective.” In Transitions to Sustainable Development. New Directions in the Study of Long Term Transformative Change, edited by J. Grin, J. Rotmans, and J. Schot. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hess, D. J. 2014. “Sustainability Transitions: A Political Coalition Perspective.” Research Policy 43 (2): 278–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heynen, N. 2013. “Urban Political Ecology I: The Urban Century.” Progress in Human Geography 38 (4): 598–604.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heynen, N., M. Kaika, and E. Swyngedouw, eds. 2006a. In the Nature of Cities. Urban Political Ecology and the Politics of Urban Metabolism. London, New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodson, M., and S. Marvin. 2010. “Can Cities Shape Socio-technical Transitions and How Would We Know if They Were?” Research Policy 39 (4): 477–485.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jankowska, K. 2014. “The German Policy Support Mechanism for Photovoltaics: The Road to Grid Parity.” In The Political Economy of Renewable Energy and Energy Security. Common Challenges and National Responses in Japan, China and Northern Europe, edited by E. Moe, and P. Midford. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenssen, T., A. König, and L. Eltrop. 2014. “Bioenergy Villages in Germany: Bringing a Low Carbon Energy Supply for Rural Areas into Practice.” Renewable Energy 61: 74–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laes, E., L. Gorissen, and F. Nevens. 2014. “A Comparison of Energy Transition Governance in Germany, The Netherlands and the United Kingdom.” Sustainability 6 (3): 1129–1152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawhon, M., and J. Murphy. 2012. “Socio-technical Regimes and Sustainability Transitions: Insights from Political Ecology.” Progress in Human Geography 36 (3): 354–378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lieberherr, E., and B. Truffer. 2014. “The Impact of Privatization on Sustainability Transitions: A Comparative Analysis of Dynamic Capabilities in Three Water Utilities.” Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions (February 2014). doi:10.1016/j.eist.2013.12.002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markard, J., R. Raven, and B. Truffer. 2012. “Sustainability Transitions: An Emerging Field of Research and Its Prospects. Special Section on Sustainability Transitions.” Research Policy 41 (6): 955–967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meadowcroft, J. 2009. “What About the Politics? Sustainable Development, Transition Management, and Long Term Energy Transitions.” Policy Sciences 42 (4): 323–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moss, T., S. Becker, and M. Naumann. 2014. “Whose Energy Transition is It, Anyway? Organisation and Ownership of the Energiewende in Villages, Cities and Regions.” Local Environment (May 2014). doi: 10.1080/13549839.2014.915799.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R. R., and S. G. Winter. 1982. An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Cambridge: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rip, A., and R. Kemp. 1998. “Technological Change.” In Human Choice and Climate Change. Vol. 2: Resources and Technology, edited by S. Rayner, Columbus: Battelle Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rohracher, H. 2007. “Die Wechselwirkung technischen und institutionellen Wandels in der Transformation von Energiesystemen.” In Gesellschaft und die Macht der Technik. Sozioökonomischer und institutioneller Wandel durch Technisierung, edited by U. Dolata, and R. Werle. Frankfurt am Main, New York: Campus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rotmans, J., and R. Kemp. 2008. “Detour Ahead: A Response to Shove and Walker about the Perilous Road of Transition Management.” Environment and Planning A 40 (4): 1006–1011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rotmans, J., R. Kemp, and M. van Asselt. 2001. “More Evolution than Revolution: Transition Management in Public Policy.” Foresight 3 (1): 15–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutherford, J., and O. Coutard. 2014. “Urban Energy Transitions: Places, Processes and Politics of Socio-technical Change.” Urban Studies 51 (7): 1353–1377.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shove, E., and G. Walker. 2007. “CAUTION! Transitions Ahead: Politics, Practice, and Sustainable Transition Management. Commentary.” Environment and Planning A 39 (4): 763–770.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A., and A. Stirling. 2008. Social-ecological Resilience and Socio-technical Transitions: Critical Issues for Sustainability Governance. Brighton: STEPS Centre

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A., and A. Stirling. 2010. “The Politics of Social-ecological Resilience and Sustainable Socio-technical Transitions.” Ecology and Society 15 (1): 11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A., J.-P. Voß, and J. Grin. 2010. “Innovation Studies and Sustainability Transitions. The Allure of the Multi-level Perspective and Its Challenges.” Research Policy 39 (4): 435–448.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solorio, I., E. Öller, and H. Jörgens. 2014. “The German Energy Transition in the Context of the EU Renewable Energy Policy. A Reality Check!” In Im Hürdenlauf zur Energiewende. Von Transformationen, Reformen und Innovationen, edited by A. Brunnengräber, and M. R. Di Nucci. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sovacool, B. K. 2014. “What are We Doing Here? Analyzing Fifteen Years of Energy Scholarship and Proposing a Social Science Research Agenda.” Energy Research & Social Science 1: 1–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strunz, S. 2014. “The German Energy Transition as a Regime Shift.” Ecological Economics 100: 150–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swyngedouw, E. 2006. “Metabolic Urbanization. The Making of Cyborg Cities.” In In the Nature of Cities. Urban Political Ecology and the Politics of Urban Metabolism, edited by N. Heynen, M. Kaika, and E. Swyngedouw. London, New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Timmermans, J., S. van der Heiden, and M. P. Born. 2014. “Policy Entrepreneurs in Sustainability Transitions. Their Personality and Leadership Profiles Assessed.” Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 13: 96–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toke, D., and V. Lauber. 2007. “Anglo-Saxon and German Approaches to Neoliberalism and Environmental Policy: The Case of Financing Renewable Energy.” Geoforum 38 (4): 677–687.

    Google Scholar 

  • Truffer, B., and L. Coenen. 2012. “Environmental Innovation and Sustainability Transitions in Regional Studies.” Regional Studies 46 (1): 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • van den Bosch, S. J. M., J. C. Brezet, and P. Vergragt. 2005. “How to Kick Off System Innovation: A Rotterdam Case Study of the Transition to a Fuel Cell Transport System.” Journal of Cleaner Production 13 (10–11): 1027–1035.

    Google Scholar 

  • WBGU (Wissenschaftlicher Beirat der Bundesregierung Globale Umweltveränderungen). 2011. Ein Gesellschaftsvertrag für die Transformation. Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2016 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Moss, T., Gailing, L. (2016). Introduction. In: Gailing, L., Moss, T. (eds) Conceptualizing Germany’s Energy Transition. Palgrave Pivot, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-50593-4_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics