Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Critical Studies of the Asia-Pacific ((CSAP))

  • 194 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter reviews government policies with regard to industrialisation, regional development, employment and minimum wages. While the focus is on the post-Soeharto period, it also briefly reviews the policy framework of the Soeharto regime. Given the systemic change that occurred following the fall of Soeharto, the policy approach has changed from a highly centralised to a radically decentralised decision-making process. The decentralised decision-making is also extended to industrial relations, especially with regard to minimum wages. This has essentially created an element of labour market flexibility in terms of regional variations. Thus, labour-intensive activities can potentially relocate to regions with lower minimum wages while industrially advanced regions with higher minimum wages can specialise in high value-added activities. The chapter argues that the ultimate aim should be to strengthen backward and forward linkages within the industrial sector and among regions, and thereby create internal dynamics within Indonesia’s development path.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The Preamble was also influenced by several philosophical thoughts; one of them came from the Utilitarianism thought “The great happiness for the greatest number” of Jeremy Bentham inspired the founding fathers to formulate landmark and energising starting points in meaningful paragraphs of the Preamble. Inspired by the Soviet socialist revolution, like most independence leaders who fought against the colonial powers, the founding fathers of Indonesia were also deeply committed to social justice and equity.

  2. 2.

    The concept of budget deficit as a difference between domestic revenues and domestic expenditures is more useful in analysing the impact of the budget on the domestic economy.

  3. 3.

    See Booth (2016).

  4. 4.

    An Indonesian economist summed up the reasons that the Japanese often are disliked here. Asked whether they are guilty of all they have been charged with, he said: “Of intent, no. Of being oblivious, insensitive, unthinking, short-sighted, excessively competitive, yes. They do not look at whose garden they are trampling on.” “Tanaka’s Explosive Trip” by Richard Halloranjan, The New York Times, 21 January 1974.

  5. 5.

    Ibid.

  6. 6.

    This involved deleting the product from the list of components that can be imported once domestic suppliers were identified.

  7. 7.

    The share would be even greater if the oil sector was taken into account (Lewis 1994).

  8. 8.

    The equalisation component of the trilogy was specified in the “eight paths of equalisation”. They are equalisations of (1) basic needs, (2) access to educations, (3) income distribution especially through labour-intensive economic activities, (4) employment opportunities though regional development, (5) entrepreneurship opportunities through credit access to economically disadvantage groups, (6) participation especially for youths and women, (7) population distribution through government-sponsored transmigration and (8) access to justice.

  9. 9.

    https://en.tempo.co/read/news/2014/10/29/056617961/Bappenas-to-Serve-as-Jokowis-Think-Tank

  10. 10.

    The 14 new industrial estates are (1) Bintuni, West Papua; (2) Buli, Halmahera Timur, North Maluku; (3) Bitung, North Sulawesi; (4) Palu, Central Sulawesi; (5) Morowali, Central Sulawesi; (6) Konawe, Southeast Sulawesi; (7) Bantaeng, South Sulawesi; (8) Batulicin, South Kalimantan; (9) Jorong, South Kalimantan; (10) Ketapang, West Kalimantan; (11) Landak, West Kalimantan, (12) Kuala Tanjung, North Sumatra, (13) Sei Mangee, North Sumatra; and (14) Tanggamus, Lampung.

  11. 11.

    However, the 4.5 per cent average annual GDP growth during the period was lower than both high-performing Asian economies such as China, India and Vietnam and the pre-crisis years.

  12. 12.

    See http://ekbis.sindonews.com/read/1083502/34/diguncang-phk-pemerintah-didesak-revisi-uu-ketenagakerjaan-1454845310, accessed on 29 February 2016.

  13. 13.

    Dhanani et al. (2009) also make a similar point based on their analysis of labour market outcomes during 2000–2007.

  14. 14.

    World Economic Forum, The Global Competitiveness Report 2009–2010.

  15. 15.

    The 2013 Manpower Law is the main legal basis for the Wage Council. However, its origin can be traced back to the establishments of Dewan Penelitian Pengupahan Nasional (DPPN or National Wage Research Council) in 1969, followed by Dewan Penelitian Pengupahan Daerah (DPPD or Regional Wage Research Council).

  16. 16.

    Government Regulation (Peraturan Pemerintah or PP) no. 78/2015.

  17. 17.

    The Jakarta Post, 21 November 2012, http://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2012/11/21/jokowi-sets-jakarta-s-2013-minimum-wage-rp-22m.html, accessed on 19 March 2016.

References

  • Adhiati, M.A.S. and A. Bobsien. 2001. “Indonesia’s transmigration programme – An update.” A Report Prepared for Down to Earth. London: International Campaign for Ecological Justice in Indonesia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aswicahyono, H., H. Hill and D. Narjoko. 2013. “Industrialization: Patterns, issues, and constraints.” In H. Hill, M.E. Khan and J. Zhuang (eds.). Diagnosing the Indonesian economy: Toward inclusive and green growth. Manila: Asian Development Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Azis, Iwan Jaya. 1990. “Inpres’ role in the reduction of interregional disparity.” Asian Economic Journal 4 (2):1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Booth, Anne 2005. “The evolving role of the central government in economic planning and policy making in Indonesia.” Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies 41(2): 197–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Booth, Anne. 2016. Economic change in modern Indonesia: Colonial and post-colonial comparisons. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chowdhury, A. 2008. “Labour market policies as instruments of industry policy: What can Europe learn from Southeast Asia?” American Journal of Economics and Sociology 67(4): 661–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dhanani, S., I. Islam and A. Chowdhury. 2009. The Indonesia labour market: Challenge and changes. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duflo, Esther 2001. “Schooling and labor market consequences of school construction in Indonesia: Evidence from an unusual policy experiment.” American Economic Review 91(4): 795–813.

    Google Scholar 

  • GOI. 2011. Master plan for acceleration and expansion of Indonesia economic development. Jakarta: Government of Indonesia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, B. 1968. Economic development principles, problems, and policies. London: Constable.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, H. 2000. The Indonesian economy, 2nd edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ILO. 2010. Accelerating a job-rich recovery in G20 countries: Building on experience. Geneva: International Labour Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, J.D. 1994. “Indonesia’s industrial and trade policy during and after the oil boom.” Development Discussion Papers No. 491. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Institute for International Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • LPEM-FEUI. 2007. Investment climate monitoring. Round IV. Jakarta: Institute for Economic and Social Research, University of Indonesia.

    Google Scholar 

  • LPEM-FEUI. 2011. Final report: Survey of the impact of the global economic crisis in Indonesia’s investment climate. Jakarta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maftuchan A. and V. Fanggidae. 2015. “Social security for all workers.” The Jakarta Post, July 7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manning, C. and K. Roesad. 2007. “The manpower law of 2003 and its implementing regulations: Genesis, key articles and potential impact.” Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies 43(1): 59–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCawley, Peter. 2013. “The Indonesian economy during the Soeharto era: A review.” Masyarakat Indonesia 39(2): 269–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myrdal, G. 1968. Asian drama – An inquiry into the poverty of nations. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strategic Asia. 2012. “Implementing Indonesia’s Economic Master Plan (MP3EI): Challenges, limitations and corridor specific differences.” Report for the UK Foreign and Commonwealth Office in Jakarta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suryahadi, A, V. Febriany and A. Yumna. 2014. “Expanding social security in Indonesia: The processes and challenges.” UNRISD Working Paper 2014–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tadjoeddin, M.Z., W. Suharyo and S. Mishra. 2001. “Regional disparity and vertical conflicts in Indonesia.” Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy 6(3): 283–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tijaja, J. and M. Faisal. 2014. “Industrial policy in Indonesia: A global value chain perspective.” Asian Development Bank Economics Working Paper Series No. 411.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tjandra, S. 2015. Labour law and development in Indonesia. PhD Thesis at University of Leiden.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNDP. 2001. Indonesia National Human Development Report (NHDR): Towards a new consensus, democracy and human development in Indonesia. Jakarta: UNDP.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. 2010. Indonesia jobs report: Towards better jobs and security for all. Jakarta: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Tadjoeddin, M.Z., Chowdhury, A. (2019). Policy Perspectives. In: Employment and Re-Industrialisation in Post Soeharto Indonesia. Critical Studies of the Asia-Pacific. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-50566-8_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics