Skip to main content

Collaborative Scriptwriting: Social and Psychological Factors

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Creative Process

Abstract

Because script writing is fundamentally a collaborative act, the first part of this chapter considers the social interactions before and through the writing process. The second part describes the psychological factors associated with different stages of the creative process as experienced by professional screenwriters. The last part focuses on the role of experience and education in the development of functional and collaborative skills. In exploring the underlying mechanisms that promote the emergence, the selection and implementation of creative ideas during script writing, our discussion is based on central ideas from a number of psychological, socio-cultural and neuropsychological theories.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Andreasen, N. C. (2011). A journey into chaos: Creativity and the unconscious. Mens Sana Monographs, 9(1), 42–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andreasen, N. C., O’Leary, D. S., Cizadlo, T., Arndt, S., & Rezai, K. (1995). Remembering the past: Two facets of episodic memory explored with positron emission tomography. American Journal of Psychiatry, 152, 1576–1585.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Binder, J. R., Frost, J. A., Hammeke, T. A., Bellgowan, P. S. F., Rao, S. M., & Cox, R. W. (1999). Conceptual processing during the conscious resting state: A functional MRI study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 11, 80–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourgeois-Bougrine, S., Glăveanu, V. P., Botella, M., Guillou, K., De Biasi, P. M., & Lubart, T. (2014). The creativity maze: Exploring creativity in screenplay writing. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8(4), 384–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brangier, E., & Bornet, C. (2010). Persona: A method to produce representations focused on consumers’ needs. In W. Karwowski & M. Soares (Eds.), Human factors and ergonomics in consumer product design. Boca Raton: Taylor and Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, T. (2008). Design thinking. Harvard Business Review (June), 84–92. https://hbr.org/2008/06/design-thinking.

  • Buckner, R. L., Andrews-Hanna, J. R., & Schacter, D. L. (2008). The brain’s default network: Anatomy, function, and relevance to disease. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1124, 1–38. https://doi.org/10.1196/annals.1440.011.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Buckner, R. L. (2012). The serendipitous discovery of the brain’s default network. NeuroImage, 62(2012), 1137–1145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole, M. (1996). Cultural psychology: A once and future discipline. Cambridge: Belknap Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Condor, B. (2010). ‘Everybody’s a writer’: Theorizing screenwriting as creative labour. Journal of Screenwriting, 1(1), 27–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. New York: HarperCollins.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeVaan, M., Vedres, B., & Stark, D. (2014). Game changer: The topology of creativity. American Journal of Sociology, 120, 1144–1194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dijksterhuis, A., Bos, M. W., Nordgren, L. F., & Van Baaren, R. B. (2006). On making the right choice: The deliberation-with-out-attention effect. Science, 311(5763), 1005–1007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, B. (2004). Art, commerce, and values: The relationship between creativity and integrity in the feature film development process (Order No. 1425324, Pepperdine University). ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, 169p. http://search.proquest.com/docview/305034398?accountid=25340. (305034398).

  • Ferguson, B. (2014). Professional creators unveiled: Screenwriters’ experiences collaborating in motion picture development teams (Order No. 3616054, Fielding Graduate University). ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, 235p. http://search.proquest.com/docview/1526012807.

  • Förster, J., & Dannenberg, L. (2010). GLOMO sys: A systems account of global versus local processing. Psychological Inquiry: An International Journal for the Advancement of Psychological Theory, 21(3), 175–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glăveanu, V. P. (2012). Habitual creativity: Revisiting habit, reconceptualizing creativity. Review of General Psychology, 16(1), 78–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glăveanu, V. P. (2015). Creativity as a sociocultural act. Journal of Creative Behavior, Early View, 49, 165–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldman, W. (1996). Adventures in the screen trade: A personal view of Hollywood and screenwriting. London: Abacus.

    Google Scholar 

  • Labro, A. A., & Patrick, V. M. (2009). Psychological distancing: Why happiness helps you see the big picture. Journal of Consumer Research, 35, 800–809.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liberman, N., Trope, Y., McCrea, S. M., & Sherman, S. J. (2007). The effect of level of construal on the temporal distance of activity enactment. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 143–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lubart, T. (1994). Creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Thinking and problem solving (pp. 289–332). New York, NY: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lubart, T. I. (2009). In search of the writer’s creative process. In S. B. Kaufman & J. C. Kaufman (Eds.), The psychology of creative writing (pp. 149–165). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markman, K. D., & Dyczewski, E. A. (2010). Think and act global and local: A portrait of the individual as a flexible information-processor. Psychological Inquiry, 21, 239–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marková, I. (2003). Dialogicality and social representations: The dynamics of mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCrea, S. M., Liberman, N., Trope, Y., & Sherman, S. J. (2008). Construal level and procrastination. Psychological Science, 19(12), 1308–1314.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMahon, K., Sparrow, B., Chatman, L., & Riddle, T. (2011). Driven to distraction: The impact of distracter type on unconscious decision making. Social Cognition, 29(6), 683–698.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mehta, R., Zhu, R. J., Cheema, A. (2012). Is noise always bad? Exploring the effects of ambient noise on creative cognition. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(4), 784–799.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelmes, J. (2007). Some thoughts on analysing the screenplay, the process of screenplay writing and the balance between craft and creativity. Journal of Media Practice, 8(2), 107–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norman, D. A., & Draper, S. W. (1986). User centered system design: New perspectives on human-computer interaction. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Paton, E. (2012). ‘When the book takes over’: Creativity, the writing process and flow in Australian fiction writing. The International Journal of Creativity & Problem Solving, 22(1). Special issue: Applied creativity and problem-solving in Australia, 61–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pritzer, S. R., & McGarva, D. J. (2009). Characteristics of eminent screenwriters: Who are those guys? In S. B. Kaufman & J. C. Kaufman (Eds.), The psychology of creative writing (pp. 57–79). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Redvall, E. N. (2009). Scriptwriting as a creative, collaborative learning process of problem finding and problem solving. MedieKultur, 25(46), 34–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sawyer, R. K. (2009). Writing as a collaborative act. In S. B. Kaufman & J. C. Kaufman (Eds.), The psychology of creative writing (pp. 166–179). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Stark, D. (2009). The sense of dissonance: Accounts of worth in economic life. New York, NY and Oxford, UK: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Steidle, A., & Werth, L. (2013). Freedom from constraints: Darkness and dim illumination promote creativity. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 35, 67–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uzzi, B., & Spiro, J. (2005). Collaboration and creativity: The small world problem. American Journal of Sociology, 111(2), 447–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Samira Bourgeois-Bougrine .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Bourgeois-Bougrine, S., Glăveanu, V.P. (2018). Collaborative Scriptwriting: Social and Psychological Factors. In: Lubart, T. (eds) The Creative Process. Palgrave Studies in Creativity and Culture. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-50563-7_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics