Abstract
Popular songs have arguably a huge impact on society. It is therefore legitimate to investigate the nature of the creative act underlying popular song composition. Ethnographic experiments in song composition are difficult to conduct. This chapter describes an experiment addressing the role of feedback in the lead sheet composition process. To what extent can peer feedback affect the quality of a music composition? How does musical experience influence the quality of feedback during the song composition process? Participants compose short songs using an online lead sheet editor, and are given the possibility to provide feedback on other participants’ songs. Feedback can either be accepted or rejected in a later step. Quantitative data were collected from this experiment that can be used to estimate the relation between the intrinsic quality of songs (estimated by peer evaluation) and the nature of feedback. Results show that peer feedback can indeed improve both the quality of a song composition and the composer’s satisfaction about it. Also, composers tend to prefer compositions from other musicians with similar musical experience levels.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Although it is difficult to draw a line between experimental and popular music , we refer here to popular songs, i.e., songs that are composed with the aim of being performed publicly, distributed, sold, and more generally aiming at pleasing a specific audience .
- 2.
Lead sheets , for instance, are the primary assets of music publishing companies, which is a tangible sign that they somehow represent the essence of a song, regardless of its possible interpretations.
References
Ahren, T. (2015, 10). Versions, variants, and the performatives of the score: Traces of performances in the texts of Anton Webern’s music. Retrieved from http://medias.ircam.fr/xc1449e.
Barbot, B., & Lubart, T. (2012). Creative thinking in music: Its nature and assessment through musical exploratory behaviors. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 6(3), 231.
Bigand, E., & Poulin-Charronnat, B. (2006). Are we “experienced listeners”? A review of the musical capacities that do not depend on formal musical training. Cognition, 100(1), 100–130.
Bonnardel, N., & Marmèche, E. (2005). Towards supporting evocation processes in creative design: A cognitive approach. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 63(4), 422–435.
Collins, D. (2012). The act of musical composition: Studies in the creative process. Farnham: Ashgate.
Dominic, M., & Francis, S. (2013). An assessment of popular e-learning systems via Felder-Silverman model and a comprehensive-learning system using the tools on web 2.0. International Journal of Modern Education and Computer Science, 5(11), 1.
Donin, N. (2016). Domesticating gesture: The collaborative creative process of Florence Baschet’s StreicherKreis for ‘augmented’ string quartet (2006–2008). In E. Clarke & M. Doffman (Eds.), Creativity, improvisation and collaboration: Perspectives on the performance of contemporary music. New York: Oxford University Press.
Frese, M., Teng, E., & Wijnen, C. J. (1999). Helping to improve suggestion systems: Predictors of making suggestions in companies. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20(7), 1139–1155.
Hickey, M. (2001). An application of Amabile’s consensual assessment technique for rating the creativity of children’s musical compositions. Journal of Research in Music Education, 49(3), 234–244.
Lam, R. (2010). A peer review training workshop: Coaching students to give and evaluate peer feedback. TESL Canada Journal, 27(2), 114.
Martín, D., Neullas, T., & Pachet, F. (2015). Leadsheetjs: A javascript library for online lead sheet editing. In First International Conference on Technologies for Music Notation and Representation (Tenor). Paris, France.
Miell, D., & MacDonald, R. (2000). Children’s creative collaborations: The importance of friendship when working together on a musical composition. Social Development, 9(3), 348–369.
Müllensiefen, D., Gingras, B., Musil, J., & Stewart, L. (2014). The musicality of non-musicians: An index for assessing musical sophistication in the general population. PLoS One, 9(2), e89642.
Pachet, F. (2011). Hit song science. In Tao, Tzanetakis, & Ogihara (Eds.), Music data mining (pp. 305–326). Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC Press.
Pachet, F., & Diran, C. (2014). Marie-claire. http://www.cdbaby.com/AlbumDetails.aspx?AlbumID=marieclaire.
Pachet, F., & d’Inverno, M. (2014). Count on it. http://www.cdbaby.com/cd/markdinvernoquintet?SourceCode=widgetbaby.
Pachet, F., Suzda, J., & Martín, D. (2013, November). A comprehensive online database of machine-readable lead sheets for jazz standards. In ISMIR (pp. 275–280). Curitiba (Brazil).
Peretz, I., Gaudreau, D., & Bonnel, A.-M. (1998). Exposure effects on music preference and recognition. Memory & Cognition, 26(5), 884–902.
Rentfrow, P. J. (2012). The role of music in everyday life: Current directions in the social psychology of music. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 6(5), 402–416.
Rollinson, P. (2005). Using peer feedback in the ESL writing class. ELT Journal, 59(1), 23–30.
Sadler, P. M., & Good, E. (2006). The impact of self-and peer-grading on student learning. Educational Assessment, 11(1), 1–31.
Salavuo, M. (2006, 11). Open and informal online communities as forums of collaborative musical activities and learning. British Journal of Music Education, 23, 253–271. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0265051706007042.
Salganik, M. J., Dodds, P. S., & Watts, D. J. (2006). Experimental study of inequality and unpredictability in an artificial cultural market. Science, 311(5762), 854–856.
September, O. (2013). Behind the scenes with MOOCs: Berklee college of music’s experience developing, running, and evaluating. Continuing Higher Education Review, 77, 137.
Settles, B., & Dow, S. (2013). Let’s get together: The formation and success of online creative collaborations. In Proceedings of the Sigchi Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 2009–2018).
Smith, S. M., Ward, T. B., & Schumacher, J. S. (1993). Constraining effects of examples in a creative generation task. Memory & Cognition, 21(6), 837–845.
Urbano, J., Lloréns, J., Morato, J., & Sánchez-Cuadrado, S. (2011). Melodic similarity through shape similarity. In Exploring music contents (pp. 338–355). Berlin: Springer.
Acknowledgements
This research was conducted within the Flow -Machines project funded by the ERC under the European Union’s 7th Framework Programme (FP/2007–2013)/ERC Grant Agreement n. 291156, and by the Praise project (EU FP7 number 388770), a collaborative project funded by the European Commission under program FP7-ICT-2011-8.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Martín, D., Pachet, F., Frantz, B. (2018). The Creative Process in Lead Sheet Composition. In: Lubart, T. (eds) The Creative Process. Palgrave Studies in Creativity and Culture. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-50563-7_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-50563-7_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-50562-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-50563-7
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)