Abstract
Over the last 30 years, important scholarship has been conducted around the role of content knowledge for teaching, pedagogical content knowledge, and the role of teacher preparation in helping novice teachers develop in these disciplinary realms (e.g., Shulman, Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4, 1986; Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–22, 1987; Ball, et al., Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389–407 2008; Grossman, The making of a teacher: Teacher knowledge and teacher education. New York, NY: Teachers College Press 1990; Holt-Reynolds, Good readers, good teachers? Subject matter expertise as a challenge in learning to teach. Harvard Educational Review, 69(1), 29, 1999). It is important to note, however, the historical context from which this focus on content knowledge in and for teaching came. As I discussed briefly in Chap. 2, the publication of two reports in 1986—Holmes Group of Education Deans report and the Carnegie Forum on Education and the Economy—served as a wake-up call to university teacher preparation and catalyzed wide-ranging reforms.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Applebee, A. (1996). Curriculum as conversation: Transforming traditions of teaching and learning. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Ball, D., Thames, M. H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389–407.
Ellis, V., Fox, C., & Street, B. (Eds.) (2007). Rethinking English in schools: Towards a new and constructive stage. New York, NY: Continuum.
Fraser, J. W. (2007). Preparing America’s teachers: A history. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Gatti, L. (2014a). Negotiating conflicting frames of experience: Learning to teach in an urban teacher residency. In V. Ellis & J. Orchard (Eds.), Learning teaching from experience: Multiple perspectives and international contexts (pp. 207–222). London: Bloomsbury.
Gatti, L. (2014b). Conversing with Longfellow: Democratizing the American literature curriculum. In C. Irmscher & R. Arbour (Eds.), Reconsidering Longfellow (pp. 177–192). Madison, MD: Fairleigh Dickinson Press.
Graff, G. (1992). Beyond the culture wars: How teaching the conflicts can revitalize American education. New York, NY: W. W. Norton and Company, Inc.
Grossman, P. (1990). The making of a teacher: Teacher knowledge and teacher education. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Holt-Reynolds, D. (1999). Good readers, good teachers? Subject matter expertise as a challenge in learning to teach. Harvard Educational Review, 69(1), 29.
Lowenstein, K. L. (2009). The work of multicultural teacher education: Reconceptualizing white teacher candidates as learners. Review of Educational Research, 79(1), 163. doi:10.3102/0034654308326161.
Luke, A. (2004). The trouble with English. Research in the Teaching of English, 39(1), 85.
Milner, H. R. (2012). But what is urban education? Urban Education, 47(3), 556–561.
Morrell, E. (2005). Critical English education. English Education, 37(4), 312.
Shulman, L. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4.
Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–22.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2016 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gatti, L. (2016). Disciplinary Resources and the Role of Aims: Teaching Our Subjects To What End?. In: Toward a Framework of Resources for Learning to Teach. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-50145-5_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-50145-5_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-50144-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-50145-5
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)