Abstract
This book suggests how we might approach the explanation of the central pattern of behavior in affluent, marketing-oriented societies. The task is well worth the effort since it is a central component of both social scientific endeavor and the need to comprehend ourselves in the twenty-first century. While our parents and grandparents were primarily producers, we are more likely to define ourselves as consumers. Parts of our very identities are bound up with something as superficially trivial as our shopping behavior. There is, of course, much more than this to consumer choice: so much so that seriously seeking to understand ourselves as consumers ought surely to assume a dominant position in our epistemological landscape.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Academic marketing is not a discipline in its own right, but an application area that relies on the perspectives, theories, methodologies, and techniques provided by disciplines such as economics and psychology. At a theoretical level, therefore, it generally incorporates rather than creates. As a result, it frequently makes philosophical and methodological assumptions that stem directly from the deliberations of other scientists pursuing other ends. Whatever discipline forms the predominant underlying intellectual basis of marketing science at the moment—it was once economics, has been and continues to be economic psychology, but sociology and anthropology have had their days too—tends to provide a philosophical and theoretical foundation of a sort, somewhat ad hoc, and necessarily temporary. There may not be an easy alternative to this, given the nature of marketing inquiry, but it raises certain difficulties of explanation. For the methodological imperatives imported into marketing are, inevitably, not constructs that are in some way absolutely characteristic of the discipline involved but only those that are currently acceptable to the exponents of that discipline or a subdisciplinary section of it.
- 2.
By operancy I mean the processes described by operant behaviorology or operant psychology in terms of the linkages between behavior and its contingent environmental consequences. See the discussion of radical behaviorism in Chapter 2.
Bibliography
Ainslie, G. (1992). Picoeconomics: The strategic interaction of successive motivational states within the person. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dennett, D. C. (1987). The intentional stance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Searle, J. R. (1995). The construction of social reality. New York: Free Press.
Searle, J. R. (2010a). Making the social world: The structure of human civilization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Searle, J. R. (2010b). Consciousness and the problem of free will. In R. F. Baumeister, A. R. Mele, & K. D. Vohs (Eds.), Free will and consciousness: How might they work? (pp. 121–134). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Stanovich, K. E. (2009a). Distinguishing the reflective, algorithmic, and autonomous minds: Is it time for a tri-process theory? In J. S. B. T. Evans & K. Frankish (Eds.), In two minds: Dual processes and beyond (pp. 55–88). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2016 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Foxall, G.R. (2016). Introduction. In: Perspectives on Consumer Choice. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-50121-9_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-50121-9_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-50119-6
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-50121-9
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)