Skip to main content

Critical International Political Economy and Method

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Handbook of Critical International Political Economy

Part of the book series: Palgrave Handbooks in IPE ((PHIPE))

Abstract

The question of the adequate method is crucial not just for the field of critical international political economy (CIPE) but for scientific practice in general. There are however different ways to deal with methods. Concrete methods, such as the empirical investigation, the application of statistical analysis and so on, do not stand alone but should be systematically reflected and understood within a broader context of methodology. Methodology is more general than method and refers to the way methods are combined and applied, and therefore how scientific knowledge can be generated. In the philosophy of social science different perspectives on how to generate knowledge can be distinguished. This is simply because each philosophy of science has to start with assumptions about what the world consists of (ontology) and how humans can understand this reality (epistemology). Methodology in CIPE is rather different from “mainstream” approaches. This difference is rooted in the philosophy of science and is connected to a specific understanding of what scientific research is about, and what the purpose of critical social science should be.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    However, critical realism is a broad field and includes also non-dialectical strands which often deviate quite substantially from Marx’s critical historical materialist approach and which therefore are not considered in this chapter (cf. Patomäki 2002).

References

  • Arrighi, G. (1994). The long twentieth century: Money, power, and the origins of our times. London/New York: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, J., & Jäger, J. (2012). Integration in crisis: A regulationist perspective on the interaction of European varieties of capitalism. Competition & Change, 16(3), 169–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker, J., Jäger, J., & Weissenbacher, R. (2015). Uneven and dependent development in Europe: The crisis and its implications. In J. Jäger & E. Springler (Eds.), Asymmetric crisis in Europe and possible futures: Critical political economy and post-Keynesian perspectives. London: Routledge (forthcoming).

    Google Scholar 

  • Belfrage, C., & Worth, O. (2011). Critical international political economy: Renewing critique and ontologies. International Politics, 49(2), 131–135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, R. J. (1983). Beyond objectisim and relativism. Science, hermeneutics and praxis. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhaskar, R. (1975). A realist theory of science. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhaskar, R. (1998). Critical realism and dialectic. In M. S. Archer (Ed.), Critical realism. Essential readings (pp. 575–640). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bieler, A., & Morton, A. D. (2008). The deficits of discourse in IPE: Turning base metal into gold? International Studies Quarterly, 21(1), 103–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, A., Fleetwood, S., & Roberts, J. M. (Eds.). (2002). Critical realism and Marxism. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browning, G., & Kilmister, A. (2006). Critical and post-critical political economy. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bruff, I. (2011). The case for a foundational materialism: Going beyond historical materialist IPE in order to strengthen it. Journal of International Relations and Development, 14, 391–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruff, I., & Tepe, D. (2011). Forum: What is critical IPE? Journal of International Relations and Development, 14, 354–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruff, I., Ryner, M., & van Apeldoorn, B. (2010). The richness and diversity of critical IPE perspectives: Moving beyond the debate on the ‘British School’. In N. Philips & C. Weaver (Eds.), International political economy: Debating the past, present and future (pp. 215–222). Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckel, S., Georgi, F., Kannankulam, J., & Wissel, J. (2012). … wenn das Alte nicht stirbt und das Neue nicht zur Welt kommen kann. Kräfteverhältnisse in der Europäischen Krise. In Forschungsgruppe Staatsprojekt Europa (Ed.), Die EU in der Krise (pp. 12–49). Münster: Westfälisches Dampfboot.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cafruny, A. (2015). The European question and the rise of German power. In J. Jäger & E. Springler (Eds.), Asymmetric crisis in Europe and possible futures. Critical political economy and post-Keynesian perspectives. London: Routledge (forthcoming).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cafruny, A. W., & Ryner, J. M. (2007). Europa at bay. In the shadow of US hegemony. London: Lynne Rienner Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cardoso, F. H., & Faletto, E. (1979 [1971]). Dependency and development in Latin America. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clua-Losada, M., & Horn, L. (2015). Labour and the crisis in Europe. In J. Jäger & E. Springler (Eds.), Asymmetric crisis in Europe and possible futures: Critical political economy and post-Keynesian perspectives. London: Routledge (forthcoming).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cox, R. (1981). Social forces, states, and world orders. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 10(2), 126–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feyerabend, P. (2010 [1975]). Against method. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (1996). Justice, nature & the geography of difference. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jäger, J., & Springler, E. (Eds.). (2015). Asymmetric crisis in Europe and possible futures. Critical political economy and post-Keynesian perspectives. London: Routledge (forthcoming).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jessop, B. (2002). Capitalism, the regulation approach, and critical realism. In A. Brown, S. Fleetwood, & J. M. Roberts (Eds.), Critical realism and Marxism (pp. 88–115). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jessop, B. (2008). State power. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jessop, B. (2012, October). Left strategy in Transform! Magazine, pp. 9–17, available at http://www.transform-network.net/journal/issue-102012/news/detail/Journal/left-strategy.html. Accessed 18 Dec 2014.

  • Jessop, B., & Sum, N.-L. (2001). Pre-disciplinary and post-disciplinary perspectives in political economy. New Political Economy, 6(1), 89–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K. (1973 [1852]). The eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte. In Surveys from exile. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K. (2012 [1867]). Capital. A critique of political economy. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K., & Engels, F. (2011 [1845]). The German ideology. Eastford: Martino Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Overbeek, H. (2012). Transnational historical materialism: Theories of transnational class formation and world order. In R. Palan (Ed.), Global political economy: Contemporary theories. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patomäki, H. (2002). After international relations: Critical realism and the (re)construction of world politics. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, F. S., & Payaslian, S. (1999). International political economy. Conflict and cooperation in the global system. Boston: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petras, J., & Veltmeyer, H. (2013). Imperialism and capitalism in the twenty-first century. A system in crisis. Farnham: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, R. K. (2002). The logic of scientific discovery. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rauber, I., & Harnecker, M. (1996). Esquema para analizar una coyuntura In: Memoria oral y educcaion popular. Bogota: Cendal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, A. (2012). Financing social reproduction: The gendered relations of debt and mortgage finance in 21st century America. New Political Economy, 18, 21–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryner, M. (2012). Financial crisis, orthodoxy and heterodoxy in the production of knowledge about the EU. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 40(3), 642–668.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryner, M. (2015). Europe’s ordo-liberal iron cage: Critical political economy, the euro area crisis & its management. Journal of European Public Policy, 22(3), 275–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sayer, A. (1992). Method in social science. A realist approach (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sayer, A. (2005). The moral significance of class. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Screpanti, Ernesto/Zamagni, Stefano (2005): An Outline of the History of Economic Thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2 edition.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shields, S., Bruff, I., & Macartney, H. (Eds.). (2011). Critical international political economy (International political economy series). London: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Guardian. (2012). The Saturday interview: Stuart Hall. Saturday 11 February 2011, available at http://www.theguardian.com/theguardian/2012/feb/11/saturday-interview-stuart-hall. Accessed 18 Dec 2014.

  • Van Apeldoorn, B., Drahokoupil, J., & Horn, L. (Eds.). (2008). Contradictions and limits of neoliberal European governance: From Lisbon to Lisbon. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Pijl, K. (2007). Nomades, empires, states. Modes of foreign relations and political economy (Vol. 1). London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Pijl, K. (2009). A survey of global political economy 2.1. Economy Centre for Global Political, Sussex University. Available at http://www.sussex.ac.uk/ir/research/gpe/gpesurvey/. Accessed 18 Dec 2014.

  • Van Apeldoorn, Bastiaan (2013). The European capitalist class and the crisis of its hegemonic project. In: Leo Panitch/Greg Albo/Vivek Chibber (eds.): Registering Class. Socialist Register 2014. London: Merlin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallerstein, I. (2001). Unthinking social science (2nd ed.). Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, M. (2005). Foundations of international political economy. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waylen, G. (2006). You still don’t understand: Why troubled engagements continue between feminists and (critical) IPE. Review of International Studies, 32(1), 145–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wigger, A., & Horn, L. (2014). Uneven development and political resistance against EU austerity politics. In L. Pradella & T. Marois (Eds.), Polarizing development. Alternatives to neoliberalism and the crisis. London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Worth, O. (2011). Where did the critical go? Journal of International Relations and Development, 14, 358–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2016 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Jäger, J., Horn, L., Becker, J. (2016). Critical International Political Economy and Method. In: Cafruny, A., Talani, L., Pozo Martin, G. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Critical International Political Economy. Palgrave Handbooks in IPE. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-50018-2_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics