Abstract
The question of the adequate method is crucial not just for the field of critical international political economy (CIPE) but for scientific practice in general. There are however different ways to deal with methods. Concrete methods, such as the empirical investigation, the application of statistical analysis and so on, do not stand alone but should be systematically reflected and understood within a broader context of methodology. Methodology is more general than method and refers to the way methods are combined and applied, and therefore how scientific knowledge can be generated. In the philosophy of social science different perspectives on how to generate knowledge can be distinguished. This is simply because each philosophy of science has to start with assumptions about what the world consists of (ontology) and how humans can understand this reality (epistemology). Methodology in CIPE is rather different from “mainstream” approaches. This difference is rooted in the philosophy of science and is connected to a specific understanding of what scientific research is about, and what the purpose of critical social science should be.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
However, critical realism is a broad field and includes also non-dialectical strands which often deviate quite substantially from Marx’s critical historical materialist approach and which therefore are not considered in this chapter (cf. Patomäki 2002).
References
Arrighi, G. (1994). The long twentieth century: Money, power, and the origins of our times. London/New York: Verso.
Becker, J., & Jäger, J. (2012). Integration in crisis: A regulationist perspective on the interaction of European varieties of capitalism. Competition & Change, 16(3), 169–187.
Becker, J., Jäger, J., & Weissenbacher, R. (2015). Uneven and dependent development in Europe: The crisis and its implications. In J. Jäger & E. Springler (Eds.), Asymmetric crisis in Europe and possible futures: Critical political economy and post-Keynesian perspectives. London: Routledge (forthcoming).
Belfrage, C., & Worth, O. (2011). Critical international political economy: Renewing critique and ontologies. International Politics, 49(2), 131–135.
Bernstein, R. J. (1983). Beyond objectisim and relativism. Science, hermeneutics and praxis. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Bhaskar, R. (1975). A realist theory of science. London: Verso.
Bhaskar, R. (1998). Critical realism and dialectic. In M. S. Archer (Ed.), Critical realism. Essential readings (pp. 575–640). London: Routledge.
Bieler, A., & Morton, A. D. (2008). The deficits of discourse in IPE: Turning base metal into gold? International Studies Quarterly, 21(1), 103–128.
Brown, A., Fleetwood, S., & Roberts, J. M. (Eds.). (2002). Critical realism and Marxism. London: Routledge.
Browning, G., & Kilmister, A. (2006). Critical and post-critical political economy. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
Bruff, I. (2011). The case for a foundational materialism: Going beyond historical materialist IPE in order to strengthen it. Journal of International Relations and Development, 14, 391–399.
Bruff, I., & Tepe, D. (2011). Forum: What is critical IPE? Journal of International Relations and Development, 14, 354–358.
Bruff, I., Ryner, M., & van Apeldoorn, B. (2010). The richness and diversity of critical IPE perspectives: Moving beyond the debate on the ‘British School’. In N. Philips & C. Weaver (Eds.), International political economy: Debating the past, present and future (pp. 215–222). Abingdon: Routledge.
Buckel, S., Georgi, F., Kannankulam, J., & Wissel, J. (2012). … wenn das Alte nicht stirbt und das Neue nicht zur Welt kommen kann. Kräfteverhältnisse in der Europäischen Krise. In Forschungsgruppe Staatsprojekt Europa (Ed.), Die EU in der Krise (pp. 12–49). Münster: Westfälisches Dampfboot.
Cafruny, A. (2015). The European question and the rise of German power. In J. Jäger & E. Springler (Eds.), Asymmetric crisis in Europe and possible futures. Critical political economy and post-Keynesian perspectives. London: Routledge (forthcoming).
Cafruny, A. W., & Ryner, J. M. (2007). Europa at bay. In the shadow of US hegemony. London: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
Cardoso, F. H., & Faletto, E. (1979 [1971]). Dependency and development in Latin America. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Clua-Losada, M., & Horn, L. (2015). Labour and the crisis in Europe. In J. Jäger & E. Springler (Eds.), Asymmetric crisis in Europe and possible futures: Critical political economy and post-Keynesian perspectives. London: Routledge (forthcoming).
Cox, R. (1981). Social forces, states, and world orders. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 10(2), 126–155.
Feyerabend, P. (2010 [1975]). Against method. London: Verso.
Harvey, D. (1996). Justice, nature & the geography of difference. Oxford: Blackwell.
Jäger, J., & Springler, E. (Eds.). (2015). Asymmetric crisis in Europe and possible futures. Critical political economy and post-Keynesian perspectives. London: Routledge (forthcoming).
Jessop, B. (2002). Capitalism, the regulation approach, and critical realism. In A. Brown, S. Fleetwood, & J. M. Roberts (Eds.), Critical realism and Marxism (pp. 88–115). London: Routledge.
Jessop, B. (2008). State power. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Jessop, B. (2012, October). Left strategy in Transform! Magazine, pp. 9–17, available at http://www.transform-network.net/journal/issue-102012/news/detail/Journal/left-strategy.html. Accessed 18 Dec 2014.
Jessop, B., & Sum, N.-L. (2001). Pre-disciplinary and post-disciplinary perspectives in political economy. New Political Economy, 6(1), 89–101.
Kuhn, T. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Marx, K. (1973 [1852]). The eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte. In Surveys from exile. London: Penguin.
Marx, K. (2012 [1867]). Capital. A critique of political economy. London: Penguin.
Marx, K., & Engels, F. (2011 [1845]). The German ideology. Eastford: Martino Publishing.
Overbeek, H. (2012). Transnational historical materialism: Theories of transnational class formation and world order. In R. Palan (Ed.), Global political economy: Contemporary theories. London: Routledge.
Patomäki, H. (2002). After international relations: Critical realism and the (re)construction of world politics. London: Routledge.
Pearson, F. S., & Payaslian, S. (1999). International political economy. Conflict and cooperation in the global system. Boston: McGraw-Hill.
Petras, J., & Veltmeyer, H. (2013). Imperialism and capitalism in the twenty-first century. A system in crisis. Farnham: Ashgate.
Popper, R. K. (2002). The logic of scientific discovery. London: Routledge.
Rauber, I., & Harnecker, M. (1996). Esquema para analizar una coyuntura In: Memoria oral y educcaion popular. Bogota: Cendal.
Roberts, A. (2012). Financing social reproduction: The gendered relations of debt and mortgage finance in 21st century America. New Political Economy, 18, 21–42.
Ryner, M. (2012). Financial crisis, orthodoxy and heterodoxy in the production of knowledge about the EU. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 40(3), 642–668.
Ryner, M. (2015). Europe’s ordo-liberal iron cage: Critical political economy, the euro area crisis & its management. Journal of European Public Policy, 22(3), 275–294.
Sayer, A. (1992). Method in social science. A realist approach (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.
Sayer, A. (2005). The moral significance of class. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Screpanti, Ernesto/Zamagni, Stefano (2005): An Outline of the History of Economic Thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2 edition.
Shields, S., Bruff, I., & Macartney, H. (Eds.). (2011). Critical international political economy (International political economy series). London: Palgrave.
The Guardian. (2012). The Saturday interview: Stuart Hall. Saturday 11 February 2011, available at http://www.theguardian.com/theguardian/2012/feb/11/saturday-interview-stuart-hall. Accessed 18 Dec 2014.
Van Apeldoorn, B., Drahokoupil, J., & Horn, L. (Eds.). (2008). Contradictions and limits of neoliberal European governance: From Lisbon to Lisbon. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Van der Pijl, K. (2007). Nomades, empires, states. Modes of foreign relations and political economy (Vol. 1). London: Pluto Press.
Van der Pijl, K. (2009). A survey of global political economy 2.1. Economy Centre for Global Political, Sussex University. Available at http://www.sussex.ac.uk/ir/research/gpe/gpesurvey/. Accessed 18 Dec 2014.
Van Apeldoorn, Bastiaan (2013). The European capitalist class and the crisis of its hegemonic project. In: Leo Panitch/Greg Albo/Vivek Chibber (eds.): Registering Class. Socialist Register 2014. London: Merlin Press.
Wallerstein, I. (2001). Unthinking social science (2nd ed.). Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Watson, M. (2005). Foundations of international political economy. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Waylen, G. (2006). You still don’t understand: Why troubled engagements continue between feminists and (critical) IPE. Review of International Studies, 32(1), 145–164.
Wigger, A., & Horn, L. (2014). Uneven development and political resistance against EU austerity politics. In L. Pradella & T. Marois (Eds.), Polarizing development. Alternatives to neoliberalism and the crisis. London: Pluto Press.
Worth, O. (2011). Where did the critical go? Journal of International Relations and Development, 14, 358–365.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2016 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Jäger, J., Horn, L., Becker, J. (2016). Critical International Political Economy and Method. In: Cafruny, A., Talani, L., Pozo Martin, G. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Critical International Political Economy. Palgrave Handbooks in IPE. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-50018-2_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-50018-2_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-50017-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-50018-2
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)