Abstract
More than a decade ago, the European Union (EU) embarked on the most ambitious enlargement in its history. Since 2004, it has admitted 13 new EU member states, 11 of them from East Central Europe. EU accession held the promise of prosperity and democracy for a region which, located on Europe’s periphery, has historically been plagued by poor living standards, political instability and different brands of authoritarian regimes. And indeed, while the road to the EU’s eastern enlargement was anything but smooth, the benefits of membership have initially lived up to expectations. EU accession triggered a major inflow of foreign direct investment (FDI) and public funds, and after a decade of recession and crisis, growth took off in the region. While there were some worries about democratic “backsliding” in the immediate aftermath of accession, overall there was a sense that the East Central European countries had managed the “double transition” (Offe 1991) to capitalism and democracy quite well, not least due to the EU’s accession conditionality and membership.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Neo-Gramscian IPE, similar to regulation theory, is not a coherent theoretical approach, but combines different strands of thoughts. As these approaches are treated elsewhere in the volume in depth (Chap. 9 by van Apeldoorn), I will only briefly introduce the major concepts on which I draw for my empirical analysis.
- 2.
For the concept of variegated capitalism, see e.g. Jessop 2014.
- 3.
In the following I will only concentrate on two major accumulation regimes that have emerged in the East. Space prevents me from discussing the third—less dependent—Slovene model, as well as those of the late comers Bulgaria and Romania. For a more complete overview see Becker and Jäger 2012, Bohle and Greskovits 2012, and Myant and Drahokoupil 2011.
- 4.
It is telling that Valdis Dombrovskis, Latvia’s Prime Minister from 2009 to 2014, who inflicted one of the harshest austerity programs in the EU on the population of the tiny Baltic state became EU commissioner and vice-president responsible for “Euro and Social Dialogue” (sic!) in the 2014–2019 Juncker Commission.
- 5.
An excellent example of the ideology of austerity nationalism is Aslund and Dombrovskis 2011.
References
Aglietta, M. (2000). A theory of capitalist regulation: The US experience. London: Verso.
Aslund, A. (2010). The last shall be the first: The East European financial crisis (1st edn). Washington, DC: Peterson Institute.
Aslund, A., & Dombrovskis, V. (2011). How Latvia came through the financial crisis (Vol. 17). Washington, DC: Peterson Institute.
Bandelj, N. (2008). From communists to foreign capitalists: The social foundations of foreign direct investment in postsocialist Europe. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Becker, J., & Jäger, J. (2012). Integration in crisis: A regulationist perspective on the interaction of European varieties of capitalism. Competition & Change, 16(3), 169–187.
Bieler, A. (2002). Globalisation and enlargement of the European Union: Austrian and Swedish social forces in the struggle over membership. London/New York Routledge
Bieling, H.-J. (2003). Social forces in the making of the new European economy: The case of financial market integration. New Political Economy, 8(2), 203–224.
Bieling, H.-J. (2013). European financial capitalism and the politics of (de-) financialization. Competition & Change, 17(3), 283–298.
Bieling, H.-J. (2014). Comparative analysis of capitalism from a regulationist perspective extended by neo-Gramscian IPE. Capital & Class, 38(1), 31–43.
Bohle, D. (2006). Neoliberal hegemony, transnational capital and the terms of the EU’s eastward expansion. Capital & Class, 30(1), 57–86.
Bohle, D. (2008). Race to the bottom? Transnational companies and reinforced competition in the enlarged European Union. In B. Van Apeldoorn, L. Horn, & J. Drahokoupil (Eds.), Contradictions and limits of neoliberal governance: From Lisbon to Lisbon.
Bohle, D. (2014). Post-socialist housing meets transnational finance: Foreign banks, mortgage lending, and the privatization of welfare in Hungary and Estonia. Review of International Political Economy, 21(4), 913–948.
Bohle, D., & Greskovits, B. (2012). Capitalist diversity on Europe’s periphery. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Boyer, R. (2000). Is a finance-led growth regime a viable alternative to Fordism? A preliminary analysis. Economy and Society, 29(1), 111–145.
Bruszt, L., & Vukov, V. (2014). European integration and the evolution of state capacities in the southern and eastern peripheries of Europe. Manuscript.
Cafruny, A. W., & Ryner, M. (2007). Europe at bay: In the shadow of US hegemony. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.
Cafruny, A. W., & Schwartz, H. M. (Eds.). (2013). Exploring the global financial crisis. Boulder/London: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
Cafruny, A. W., & Talani, L. S. (2013). The crisis of the eurozone. In A. W. Cafruny & H. M. Schwartz (Eds.), Exploring the global financial crisis. Boulder/London: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
Dellepiane, S., Hardiman, N., & Las Heras, J. (2013). Building on easy money: The political economy of housing bubbles in Ireland and Spain. http://irserver.ucd.ie/handle/10197/4929
Drahokoupil, J. (2008). Globalisation and the state in Central and Eastern Europe: The politics of foreign direct investment. London\New York. Routledge.
EBRD. (2013). Transition report 2013: Stuck in transition? London: European Bank of Reconstruction and Development.
Égert, B., & Mihaljek, D. (2007). Determinants of house prices in Central and Eastern Europe. Comparative Economic Studies, 49(3), 367–388.
Epstein, R. A. (2014). Overcoming ‘economic backwardness’ in the European Union. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 52(1), 17–34.
European Commission. (1999). Implementing the framework for financial markets: Action plan, COM/99/0232 final, quoted after: http://europa.eu/legislation_summaries/internal_market/single_market_services/financial_services_general_framework/l24210_en.htm. Accessed 1 Apr 2015.
European Council. (2000, March). Lisbon European Council presidency conclusions, available at http://www.europarl.europa.eu/summits/lis1_en.htm. Accessed 11 Apr 2015.
Eyal, G., Townsley, E., & Szelenyi, E. (1998). Making capitalism without capitalists: The new ruling elites in Eastern Europe. London: Verso.
Gill, S. (1998). European governance and new constitutionalism: Economic and Monetary Union and alternatives to disciplinary neoliberalism in Europe. New Political Economy, 3(1), 5–26.
Grabbe, H. (2006). The EU’s transformative power: Europeanization through conditionality in Central and Eastern Europe. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Gramsci, A. (1971). Selections from the prison notebooks (Ed. and trans: Hoare, Q. & Smith, G. N. In Q. Hoare & G. N. Smith (Eds.). New York: International, 62.
Greskovits, B. (2014). Legacies of industrialization and paths of transnational integration after socialism. In M. Beissinger & S. Kotkin (Eds.), Historical legacies of communism in Russia and Eastern Europe (pp. 68–89). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Hancké, B., & Rhodes, M. (2005). EMU and labor market institutions in Europe. The rise and fall of national social pacts. Work and Occupations, 32(2), 196–228.
Harvey, D. (2001). Globalisation and the spatial fix. Geographische Revue, 2(3), 23–31.
Hay, C., Riiheläinen, J. M., Smith, N. J., & Watson, M. (2008). Ireland: The outlier inside. In K. Dyson (Ed.), The euro at ten: Europeanization, power, and convergence (pp. 182–203). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Holman, O., & Van der Pijl, K. (2003). Structure and process in transnational European business. In A. W. Cafruny & M. Ryner (Eds.), A ruined fortress?: Neoliberal hegemony and transformation in Europe (pp. 71–94). Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Höpner, M. (2007). Corporate governance reform and the German party paradox. Comparative Politics, 39(4), 401–420.
Hudson, M. (2014). Stockholm syndrome in the Baltics: Latvia’s neoliberal war against labor and industry. In J. Sommers & C. Woolfson (Eds.), The contradictions of austerity: The socio-economic costs of the neoliberal Baltic model (pp. 17–43). London: Routledge.
Jacoby, W. (2006). The enlargement of the European Union and NATO: Ordering from the menu in Central Europe. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Jacoby, W. (2014). The EU factor in fat times and in lean: Did the EU amplify the boom and soften the bust? JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 52(1), 52–70.
Jessop, B. (2002). Globalisation and the national state. In S. Aaronowitz and P. Bratsis, eds Paradigm lost: State theory reconsidered (pp. 185–220). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Jessop, B. (2014). Capitalist diversity and variety: Variegation, the world market, compossibility and ecological dominance. Capital & Class, 38(1), 45–58.
Jessop, B., & Sum, N.-L. (2006). Beyond the regulation approach: Putting capitalist economies in their place. Cheltenham/Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Johnson, J., & Barnes, A. (2015). Financial nationalism and its international enablers: The Hungarian experience. Review of International Political Economy, 22(3), 535–69
Kemeny, J. (2005). ‘The really big trade-off’ between home ownership and welfare: Castles’ evaluation of the 1980 thesis, and a reformulation 25 years on. Housing, Theory and Society, 22(2), 59–75.
Langley, P. (2009). The everyday life of global finance: Saving and borrowing in Anglo-America. Oxford: Oxford university Press
Lipietz, A. (1992). Towards a new economic order: Postfordism, ecology and democracy. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press Cambridge.
Lütz, S., & Kranke, M. (2014). The European rescue of the Washington consensus? EU and IMF lending to Central and Eastern European countries. Review of International Political Economy, 21(2), 310–338.
Majone, G. (1997). From the positive to the regulatory state: Causes and consequences of changes in the mode of governance. Journal of Public Policy, 17(02), 139–167.
Meardi, G. (2013). Social failures of EU enlargement: A case of workers voting with their feet. London/New York Routledge.
Medve-Bálint, G. (2014). The role of the EU in shaping FDI flows to East Central Europe. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 52(1), 35–51.
Myant, M., & Drahokoupil, J. (2011). Transition economies: Political economy in Russia, Eastern Europe, and Central Asia. Hoboken: John Wiley and Sons.
Offe, C. (1991). Capitalism by democratic design? Democratic theory facing the triple transition in East Central Europe. Social Research, 58(2), 865–892.
Ost, D. (2006). The defeat of solidarity: Anger and politics in postcommunist Europe. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Palier, B., & Thelen, K. (2010). Institutionalizing dualism: Complementarities and change in France and Germany. Politics & Society, 38(1), 119–148.
Raviv, O. (2008). Chasing the dragon east: Exploring the frontiers of Western European finance. Contemporary Politics, 14(3), 297–314.
Ryner, M. (2012). Financial crisis, orthodoxy and heterodoxy in the production of knowledge about the EU. Millennium-Journal of International Studies, 40(3), 647–673.
Ryner, M. (2015). Europe’s ordoliberal iron cage: Critical political economy, the euro area crisis and its management. Journal of European Public Policy, 22 (2), 275–294.
Scepanovic, V. (2013). FDI as a solution to the challenges of late development: Catch-up without convergence? Budapest: Central European University.
Scharpf, F. W. (1999). Governing in Europe: Effective and democratic? Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Schimmelfennig, F., & Sedelmeier, U. (2004). Governance by conditionality: EU rule transfer to the candidate countries of Central and Eastern Europe. Journal of European Public Policy, 11(4), 661–679.
Schwartz, H. (2009). Subprime nation: American power, global capital, and the housing bubble. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Schwartz, H. M., & Seabrooke, L. (2009). Varieties of residential capitalism in the international political economy: Old welfare states and the new politics of housing. In H. M. Schwartz & L. Seabrooke (Eds.), The politics of housing booms and busts (pp. 1–27). Basingstoke/New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Sedelmeier, U. (2014). Anchoring democracy from above? The European Union and democratic backsliding in Hungary and Romania after accession. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 52(1), 105–121.
Soederberg, S. (2014). Debtfare states and the poverty industry: Money, discipline and the surplus population. London: Routledge.
Sommers, J. (2014). Austerity, internal devaluation, and social (in)security in Latvia. In J. Sommers & C. Woolfson (Eds.), The contradictions of austerity: The socio-economic costs of the neoliberal Baltic model (pp. 17–43). London: Routledge.
Sommers, J., & Woolfson, C. (2014). The contradictions of austerity: The socio-economic costs of the neoliberal Baltic model. New York: Routledge.
Stockhammer, E. (2008). Some stylized facts on the finance-dominated accumulation regime. Competition & Change, 12(2), 184–202.
Stockhammer, E., Durand, C., & List, L. (2015). European growth models and working class restructuring before the crisis. Post-Keynesian Economic Study Group, Working Paper 1508. www.postkeynesian.net.
Streeck, W. (2015). The rise of the European consolidation state. MPIfG discussion paper 15/1. http://www.econstor.eu/handle/10419/107091
Szacki, J. (1995). Liberalism after communism. Budapest: Central European University Press.
Vachudova, M. A. (2005). Europe undivided: Democracy, leverage, and integration after communism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Van Apeldoorn, B. (2000). Transnational class agency and European governance: The case of the European round table of industrialists. New Political Economy, 5(2), 157–181.
Van der Pijl, K., Holman, O., & Raviv, O. (2011). The resurgence of German capital in Europe: EU integration and the restructuring of Atlantic networks of interlocking directorates after 1991. Review of International Political Economy, 18(3), 384–408.
Van Treeck, T. (2009). The political economy debate on ‘financialization’–A macroeconomic perspective. Review of International Political Economy, 16(5), 907–944.
Ziltener, P. (2000). Die Veränderung von Staatlichkeit in Europa: Regulations-Und Staatstheoretische Überlegungen. In Die Konfiguration Europas (pp. 73–101). Münster: Westfälisches Dampfboot.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2016 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bohle, D. (2016). East Central Europe in the European Union. In: Cafruny, A., Talani, L., Pozo Martin, G. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Critical International Political Economy. Palgrave Handbooks in IPE. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-50018-2_19
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-50018-2_19
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-50017-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-50018-2
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)