Skip to main content

Inequality and Poverty in the Neoliberal Era

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Palgrave Handbooks in IPE ((PHIPE))

Abstract

It is undoubted that inequality has come back with a bang in the wake of the global crises of the past decade. This is true with respect to advanced capitalist countries and to developing and underdeveloped countries alike. In the former, this renewed attention is perhaps best highlighted by Thomas Piketty’s Capital in the Twenty-First Century (2014) becoming a widely read and discussed bestseller. In the latter, the role of real and perceived inequalities is best exemplified by the calls for social justice at the heart of the revolutionary and protest movements in various corners of the Global South, from Egypt to Brazil to Turkey (Mason 2012). Indeed, those very international economic organizations (IEOs) that had been relentlessly promoting liberalizing policies have come to appreciate the potentially damaging effects of high levels of inequality (Ostry et al. 2014; Dabla-Norris et al. 2015).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This contribution speaks of global crises in the plural as in my view it is possible to distinguish between: (i) a global food crisis, with particularly severe repercussions for developing and underdeveloped countries (McMichael 2009); (ii) a North Atlantic financial crisis (Jessop 2015), sending ripples throughout the globe but with varying intensity and pace in different regions; (iii) a Great Recession, which was short-lived globally but appears to have mired Europe and arguably North America in stagnation (Teulings and Baldwin 2014).

  2. 2.

    Please refer to the constantly updated “The World Top Incomes Database”: http://goo.gl/EZj7RM

  3. 3.

    For a discussion of the pros and cons of measuring GDP per capita at PPP or at market exchange rates, see Wade (2014: 317–8).

  4. 4.

    This is perhaps best embodied in the Bank’s motto: “our dream is a world free of poverty”, which has been sarcastically turned by Liam Clegg into “our dream is a world full of poverty indicators” (2010).

  5. 5.

    The main outlier is Sweden, which incidentally is also the traditionally social democratic country that has gone further towards neoliberalising its own economy through its own version of the Third Way (Ryner 2002).

  6. 6.

    One should also note that this fall in within-country inequality happened in a region traditionally characterised by extremely high levels of inequality.

  7. 7.

    “Goal 1: Eradicate extreme poverty and hunger”, available online at: http://www.un.org/millenniumgoals/poverty.shtml

  8. 8.

    For an excellent summary of such discussion, see Wade (2014: 328–32).

  9. 9.

    In a slightly different but not unrelated direction, Hopkin and Blyth (2012) argued for the possibility of a “trade-in”, and thus a mutually reinforcing relationship, between equity and efficiency.

  10. 10.

    Milanovic (2011: 160–3) calls these ethical reasons, but he then goes on to make the very same points and discusses the very same theories of social justice.

  11. 11.

    According to a Pew Research Center report (2014), 47% of UK and 46% of US citizens consider the gap between rich and poor to be a “very big problem”, against a 56% median for advanced economies and much higher rates for countries like Italy (73%), Spain (74%) and Greece (85%).

  12. 12.

    Even though it should be pointed out that one of the key texts in the literature (Baran 1957) was written in the USA and predates the “non-communist manifesto” at the heart of modernisation theory (Rostow 1960).

  13. 13.

    Whether the relation between capitalist and the state system is a necessary or a contingent one has been subject to much discussion. See for instance Callinicos (2007), Pozo-Martin (2007), and Teschke and Lacher (2007).

  14. 14.

    For notable exceptions, see Callinicos (2009: 199–205) and Kiely (2007).

  15. 15.

    On both “critical economics” and mercato determinato, see Krätke (2011).

  16. 16.

    The classical texts on these have been Blyth’s constructivist account (2003) and Harvey’s historical materialist approach (2005). For an excellent text on the ideological and institutional resilience of neoliberalism, see Cahill (2014).

  17. 17.

    Katie Morley, “How ‘middle class’ inflation is threatening your standard of living”, The Telegraph, 23 May 2015, available online at: http://goo.gl/9wj0F0

  18. 18.

    Zoe Williams, “The middle-class malaise that dare not speak its name”, The Guardian, 24 May 2015, available online at: http://goo.gl/KVvdRV.

  19. 19.

    Ibid.

References

  • Allianz. (2014). Allianz global wealth report. Munich: Allianz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amin, S. (1990). Maldevelopment: Anatomy of a global failure. London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, A. (2015). Inequality: What can be done? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, D. (1985). Economic statecraft. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baran, P. (1957). The political economy of growth. New York: Monthly Review Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, U. (2010). Re-mapping social inequalities in an age of climate change: For a cosmopolitan renewal of sociology. Global Networks, 10(2), 165–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blanden, J., Gregg, P., & Machin, S. (2005). Intergenerational mobility in Europe and North America. London: Centre for Economic Performance.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blyth, M. (2003). Great transformations: Economic ideas and institutional change in the twentieth century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruff, I. (2014). The rise of authoritarian neoliberalism. Rethinking Marxism, 26(1), 113–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cahill, D. (2014), The End of Laissez-Faire? On the Durability of Embedded Neoliberalism, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callinicos, A. (2007). Does capitalism need the state system? Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 20(4), 533–549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Callinicos, A. (2009). Imperialism and global political economy. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cammack, P. (2011). Knowledge versus power in the field of IPE. In S. Shields, I. Bruff, & H. Macartney (Eds.), Critical international political economy: Dialogue, debate and dissensus (pp. 149–168). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cardoso, F. H. (1973). Associated-dependent development: Theoretical and practical implications. In A. Stepan (Ed.), Authoritarian Brazil: Origins, policies, future (pp. 142–176). New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, H.-J. (2003). Kicking away the ladder: Development strategy in historical perspective. London: Anthem Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, S., & Ravallion, M. (2004). How have the world’s poorest fared since the early 1980s? (World Bank policy research working paper, no. 3341). Washington, DC: The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, S., & Ravallion, M. (2008). The developing world is poorer than we thought, but no less successful in the fight against poverty (World Bank policy research working paper, no. 4703). Washington, DC: The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clegg, L. (2010). Our dream is a world full of poverty indicators: The US, the World Bank, and the power of numbers. New Political Economy, 15(4), 473–492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, B. (2008). International political economy: An intellectual history. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornia, G. A. (2004). Inequality, growth and poverty: An overview of the changes over the last two decades. In G. A. Cornia (Ed.), Inequality, poverty and growth in an era of liberalization and globalisation (pp. 3–25). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cornia, G. A. (2015). Income inequality in Latin America: Recent decline and prospects for its further reduction (WIDER working paper series, WP 2015/20). Helsinki: United Nations University World Institute for Development Economics Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crouch, C. (2011). The strange non-death of neoliberalism. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dabla-Norris, E., Kochhar, K., Suphaphiphat, N., Ricka, F., & Tsounta, E. (2015). Causes and consequences of income inequality: A global perspective (IMF staff discussion notes, SDN/15/13). Washington, DC: The International Monetary Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, M. (2006). Planet of slums. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dos Santos, T. (1970). The structure of dependence. American Economic Review, 60(2), 231–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, A. G. (1966). The development of underdevelopment. New York: Monthly Review Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, A. G. (1969). Latin America: Underdevelopment or revolution. New York: Monthly Review Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gramsci, A. (1966). La questione meridionale. Rome: Editori Riuniti.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gramsci, A. (1971). Selection from the prison notebooks (Ed. and trans. Hoare, Q. & Smith, G. N.). London: Lawrence & Wishart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gramsci, A. (1995), Further Selections from the Prison Notebooks, ed. and transl. D. Boothman, London: Lawrence & Wishart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, S. (1996). The problem of ideology: Marxism without guarantees. In D. Morley & K.-H. Chen (Eds.), Stuart Hall: Critical dialogues in cultural studies (pp. 24–45). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (1982). The limits to capital. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (2005). A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (2003), The New Imperialism, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holton, R. (2014). Global inequalities. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopkin, J., & Blyth, M. (2012). What can Okun teach Polanyi? Efficiency, regulation and equality in the OECD. Review of International Political Economy, 19(1), 1–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IMF. (2014). Global financial stability report, October 2014: Risk taking, liquidity, and shadow banking: Curbing excess while promoting growth. Washington, DC: The International Monetary Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jessop, B. (2015). Crisis construal in the North Atlantic financial crisis and the Eurozone crisis. Competition & Change, 19(2), 95–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kharas, H. (2010). The emerging middle class in developing countries (OECD development centre working papers, WP 285, DEV/DOC(2010)2). Paris: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiely, R. (2007). Poverty reduction through liberalisation? Neoliberalism and the myth of global convergence. Review of International Studies, 33(3), 415–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krätke, M. (2011). Antonio Gramsci’s contribution to a critical economics. Historical Materialism, 19(3), 63–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laclau, E. (1978). Politics and ideology in Marxist theory: Capitalism, fascism, populism. London: New Left Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lapavitsas, C. (2009). Financialised capitalism: Crisis and financial expropriation. Historical Materialism, 17(2), 114–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, J. Y. (2012). New structural economics: A framework for rethinking development and policy. Washington, DC: The World Bank.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lucas, R. (1990). Why doesn’t capital flow from rich to poor countries? American Economic Review: Papers and Proceedings, 80(2), 92–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKenzie, D., Muniesa, F., & Siu, L. (Eds.). (2007). Do economists make markets? On the performativity of economics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, P. (2012). Why it’s kicking off everywhere: The new global revolutions. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazzucato, M. (2013). The entrepreneurial state: Debunking public vs private sector myths. London: Anthem.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMichael, P. (2009). The world food crisis in historical perspective. Monthly Review, 61(3), 32–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milanovic, B. (2003). The two faces of globalisation: Against globalisation as we know it. World Development, 31(4), 667–683.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milanovic, B. (2005). Worlds apart: Measuring international and global inequality. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milanovic, B. (2011). The haves and the have-nots: A brief and idiosyncratic history of global inequality. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montgomerie, J. (2009). The pursuit of (past) happiness? Middle-class indebtedness and American financialisation. New Political Economy, 14(1), 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morton, A. D. (2007). Waiting for Gramsci: State formation, passive revolution and the international. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 35(3), 597–621.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morton, A. D. (2010). The continuum of passive revolution. Capital & Class, 34(3), 315–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor, J. (2010). Marxism and the three movements of neoliberalism. Critical Sociology, 36(5), 691–715.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2011). Divided we stand: Why inequality keeps rising. Paris: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Okun, A. (1975). Equity and efficiency: The big trade-off. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osborne, P., & Segal, L. (1997). Culture and power: Interview with Stuart Hall. Radical Philosophy, 86, 24–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostry, J., Berg, A., & Tsangarides, C. (2014). Redistribution, inequality and growth (IMF staff discussion note, SDN/14/02). Washington, DC: The International Monetary Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oxfam. (2015). Wealth: Having it all and wanting more. Oxford: Oxfam International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pew Research Center. (2014). Emerging and developing economies much more optimistic than rich countries about the future. Available online at: http://www.pewglobal.org/files/2014/10/Pew-Research-Center-Inequality-Report-FINAL-October-17-2014.pdf

  • Piketty, T. (2014). Capital in the twenty-first century. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pomeranz, K. (2000). The great divergence: China, Europe, and the making of the modern world economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pozo-Martin, G. (2007). Autonomous or materialist geopolitics? Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 20(4), 551–563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pradella, L. (2015). The working poor in Western Europe: Labour, poverty and global capitalism. Comparative European Politics, advance online publication, doi:10.1057/cep.2015.17

    Google Scholar 

  • Prasad, E., Rajan, R., & Subramanian, A. (2007). The paradox of capital. Finance & Development, 44(1), 10–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roccu, R. (2013). The political economy of the Egyptian revolution: Mubarak, economic reforms and failed hegemony. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rodrik, D. (2006). Goodbye Washington consensus, hello Washington confusion? A review of the World Bank’s economic growth in the 1990s: Learning from a decade of reform. Journal of Economic Literature, 44(4), 973–987.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rostow, W. (1960). The stages of economic growth: A non-communist manifesto. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryner, M. (2002). Capitalist restructuring, globalisation and the third way: Lessons from the Swedish model. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, T. (1979). The underdevelopment of the development literature: The case of dependency theory. World Politics, 31(2), 247–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, N. (2008). Uneven development: Nature, capital, and the production of space (3rd ed.). Athens: University of Georgia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teschke, B., & Lacher, H. (2007). The changing “logics” of capitalist competition. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 20(4), 565–580.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teulings, C., & Baldwin, R. (2014). Secular stagnation: Facts, causes and cures. London: CEPR Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Therborn, G. (2006). Meaning, mechanisms, patterns and sources: An introduction. In G. Therborn (Ed.), Inequalities of the world: New theoretical frameworks, multiple empirical approaches (pp. 1–58). London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wade, R. (2004). On the causes of increasing poverty and inequality, or why the Matthew effect prevails. New Political Economy, 9(2), 163–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wade, R. (2010). Is the globalisation consensus dead? Antipode, 41(S1), 142–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wade, R. (2014). Growth, inequality, and poverty: Evidence, arguments, and economists. In J. Ravenhill (Ed.), Global political economy (pp. 305–343). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallerstein, I. (1974). The modern world system: Capitalist agriculture and the origins of the European world economy in the sixteenth century. New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallerstein, I. (2004). World-systems analysis: An introduction. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallerstein, I. (1976), ‘Semi-Peripheral Countries and the Contemporary World Crisis’, Theory & Society, 3(4): 461-483.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wei, Y. H. D., & Ye, X. Y. (2009). Beyond convergence: Space, scale, and regional inequality in China. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 100(1), 59–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, R., & Pickett, K. (2009). The spirit level: Why equality is better for everyone. London: Allen Lane.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, M. (2004). Why globalisation works. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (2002). Global economic prospects and developing countries: Making trade work for the poor. Washington, DC: The World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Economic Forum. (2014). Global risks 2014: Ninth edition. Geneva: World Economic Forum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xue, J., Luo, C., & Li, S. (2014). Globalisation, liberalization and income inequality: The case of China. Singapore Economic Review, 59(1). doi:10.1142/S0217590814500027.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2016 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Roccu, R. (2016). Inequality and Poverty in the Neoliberal Era. In: Cafruny, A., Talani, L., Pozo Martin, G. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Critical International Political Economy. Palgrave Handbooks in IPE. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-50018-2_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics