Skip to main content

Criminology and Crimes of the State

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 753 Accesses

Part of the book series: Critical Criminological Perspectives ((CCRP))

Abstract

Back in the late 1980s the sociologist Zygmunt Bauman took his fellow sociologists to task for their failure to pay attention to the attempt by the Nazi state to murder Europe’s Jews after 1939:Having documented the paucity of attempts to engage with the Holocaust on the part of sociologists, Bauman then posed a provocative question. That question, he said, was not ‘what we sociologists can say about the Holocaust’ so much as ‘what does the Holocaust … [say] about us the sociologists and our practice?’ Bauman insists thatAs I will demonstrate shortly, Bauman’s criticism of his fellow sociologists applies also to criminologists whose avoidance of the Holocaust has been exceeded only by the capacity of so many to avoid engaging with almost every other kind of crime of the state. It seems fitting therefore to revise Bauman and ask ‘what do crimes of the state say about criminology and the practices of criminologists?’ This is the task I undertake here. It is one in several steps and over several chapters.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Crimes of the state are no less striking an absence in sociology. Apart from the way the way mainstream sociology has ignored the case of the Nazi’s Final Solution, many other examples of state crime have likewise been forgotten by sociologists. In what was designed as an exhaustive and authoritative UNESCO survey of twentieth-century sociology, Smelser and Badie (1994) made no reference to the Holocaust, or to any other forms of state crime like the Soviet Terror or any of the post-1945 genocides. Smelser’s silence on this matter holds true for sociology in general. All the major figures from Parsons and Merton, through C. Wright Mills, to Foucault, Giddens, Beck and Bourdieu have steadfastly ignored the problem, a silence echoed in any number of standard sociological textbooks. As Keane (2004: 9–14) and Kalyvas (2006: 19–22) point out, cognate disciplines like political science have had some equivalent difficulties both thinking about and researching state-sponsored violence. That said a small number of distinguished sociologists and social theorists like Collins (1974), Elias (1982), Bauman (1989), Chalk and Jonassohn (1990), Mann (2005), Agamben (1997; 2005), Keane (1996, 2004) and Sofsky (1997, 2003) have made important contributions to this field of studies. Mann’s work in particular offers an important sociological contribution to making sense of murderous ethnic cleansing ‘as a central problem of our civilization, our modernity and our attempts to introduce democracy’ (2004: ix).

  2. 2.

    Cohen (2000: 280–7) clearly acknowledges what he calls ‘intellectual denial’ but unaccountably chooses to ignore the central evasion by his fellow criminologists. Instead, he picks a soft target, the ‘anti-realist, morally nihilist’ deconstruction theorists and post-modernists. Given the explicit empiricism of most ‘conventional’ criminologists, conservatives and progressives alike, Cohen has a sizeable job in front of him to explain how come his past and present peers could not see what was in front of them. We might add that the famed value-neutrality of the social science research tradition leaves them as culpable as those post-modernists who refuse to take ethical issues seriously.

  3. 3.

    Among important monographs, see Grabosky (1989), Barak (1990, 1991), Friedrichs (1996), Miller (1992), Tunnell (1993), Kauzlarich and Kramer (1995), Ross (1995, 2000, 2002, 2012), Simon (1996, 1999), Jamieson (1998), Cohen (2000), Green and Ward (2004), Kofele-Kale (2006), Rothe and Ross (2008), Rothe (2009), Hagan (2010), Savelsberg (2010), Laslett (2011) and Nivette (2014). There have also been important edited books, such as Barak (1991), Friedrichs (1998), Kramer and Michalowski (2005), Smeulers and Haveman (2008), Chambliss et al. (2010) Rothe and Mullins (2011), Stanley and McCulloch (2012), South et al. (2013), Chambliss et al. (2013) and Rothe and Kauzlarich (2014).

  4. 4.

    In selecting Cohen, Green and Ward I do not assume that their work would either be endorsed by other criminologists of state crime, or that their work is in any sense necessarily exemplary of contemporary criminology. Their work simply offers good, convenient and recent examples of the way certain frames centring on the idea of ‘deviance’ have been put to use in trying to make sense of state crime. Clearly, one obstacle to generalizing about criminology is suggested when Garland highlights the radical eclecticism of the problems and the styles of research now found in criminology. As he notes, criminology investigates a very large array of problems and does so using a range of research methods and data sets of every description, and draws on a wide spectrum of theoretical perspectives as well as disciplines like sociology, psychology, law, history, anthropology, public health, biology, economics, and political science. That eclecticism parallels ‘competing visions of what criminology ought to be—criminology as experimental science; criminology as social science; criminology as policy prescription; criminology as security management; criminology as criminal justice training; criminology as public discourse’ (Garland 2009: 117).

  5. 5.

    Though it is a major point to be developed later, this definition seems to beg so many questions when applied to state crime as to not warrant too much scrutiny: for one thing a good deal of state crime is carried out in secret so that it lacks an audience willing and able to declare it ‘deviant’ or it is carried out in the full light of day initially to general acclaim and only later comes to be seen for what it is: in either case there is a lag effect which vitiates the very point of this definition.

References

  • Agamben, G. (1997). The camp as the nomos of the modern. In H. de Vries & S. Weber (Eds.), Violence, identity and self determination (pp. 106–118). Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agamben, G. (2005). State of exception (K. Attell, Trans.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, J. (1982). Theoretical Logic in Sociology Volume I: Positivism, presuppositions, and current controversies. Berkeley: University of California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barak, G. (1990). Crime, criminology and human rights: Towards an understanding of state criminality. Journal of Human Justice, 2(1), 11–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barak, G. (Ed.). (1991). Crimes by the capitalist state: An introduction to state criminality. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauman, Z. (1989). Modernity and the Holocaust. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellah, R. (Ed.). (1973). Emile Durkheim on morality and society: Selected writings. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berne, P., & Messerschmidt, J. (1995). Criminology. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (2014). On the state; Lectures at the College de France 1989–1992 (P. Champagne, R. Lenoir, F. Poupeau & M. Riviere, Ed., D. Fernbach, Trans.). Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bromwich, D. (2014). Moral imagination: Essays. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Carrabine, E., Iganski, P., Lee, M., Plummer, K., & South, N. (2004). Criminology: A sociological introduction. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chalk, G., & Jonassohn, S. (1990). History and Sociology of Genocide: Analyses and Case Studies. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambliss, W. (1989). ‘State-organised crime’, The American Society of Criminology, 1988 Presidential Address. Criminology, 27(2), 183–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chambliss, W. J., Michalowski, R., & Kramer, R. (Eds.). (2010). State crime in the global age. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambliss, W., Michalowski, R., & Kramer, R. (Eds.). (2013). State Crime in the Global Age. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, S. (1993). Human rights and crimes of the state: The culture of denial. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 26(2), 97–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, S. (2000). States of denial: Knowing about atrocities and suffering. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, R. (1974). The faces of cruelty: Towards a comparative sociology of violence. Theory and Society, 1(4), 415–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coser, L. (1970). Masters of sociological thought. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danner, M. (2004). Torture and truth: America, Abu Ghraib, and the war on terror. New York: New York Review of Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danziger, K. (1990). Constructing the subject: Historical origins of psychological research. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Day, L., & Vandiver, M. (2000). Criminology and genocide studies: Notes on what might have been and what still could be. Crime, Law and Social Change, 34(1), 43–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, E. ([1925] 1961). Moral education: A study in the theory and application of the sociology of education (E. K. Wilson & H. Schnurer, Trans.). New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elias, N. (1982). The civilizing process: Sociogenetic and psychogenetic investigations: Vol. 1. The history of manners (E. Jephcott, Trans.). New York: Pantheon; Vol. 2: State formation and civilization (E. Jephcott, Trans.). Oxford: Blackwell [revised editions 1994].

    Google Scholar 

  • Fattah, A. (1997). Criminology: Past, present and future. London: Palgrave MacMillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Finney, H., & Lesieur, H. (1982). A contingency theory of organizational crime. Research in Sociology of Organizations, 1, 255–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flyvbjerg, B. (2013). How planners deal with uncomfortable knowledge: The dubious ethics of the American planning association. Cities, 32, 157–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedrichs, D. (1996). Trusted criminals: White-collar crime in contemporary society. Belmont: ITP/Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedrichs, D. (Ed.). (1998). State crime (2 Vols.). Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedrichs, D. (2010). Trusted Criminals: White Collar crime in Contemporary Society. Belmont: Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garland, D. (2009). Disciplinando a Criminologia [Disciplining Criminology]. Sistema Penal & Violência, 1(1), 114–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gledhill, C. (2013). Queering State crime theory: The state, civil society and marginalization. Critical Criminology, 22(1), 127–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gottfredson, M., & Hirschi, T. (1990). A general theory of crime. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grabosky, P. (1984). Wayward Governance. Canberra: Criminology Research Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grabosky, P. N. (1989). Wayward governance: Illegality and its control in the public sector. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, P., & Ward, R. (2004). State crime: Governments, violence and corruption. London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, K., & Dratel, J. (Eds.). (2005). The torture papers: The road to Abu Ghraib. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagan, J. (2010). Who are the criminals? The politics of crime policy from the age of Roosevelt to the age of Reagan. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagan, J., & Greer, S. (2002). Making war criminal. Criminology, 40(2), 231–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart, H. L. A. (1958). Positivism and the separation of law and morals. Harvard Law Review, 71(4), 593–629.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heffernan, M. (2011). Willful blindness. London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hochschild, A. (1999). King Leopold’s ghost: A story of greed, terror and heroism in Colonial Africa. New York: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jamieson, R. (1998). Towards a criminology of war in Europe. In V. Ruggiero, N. South, & I. Taylor (Eds.), The new European criminology: Crime and social order in Europe (pp. 480–506). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jamieson, R., & McEvoy, K. (2005). State crime by proxy and juridical othering. British Journal of Criminology, 45(4), 504–527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalyvas, S. (2006). The logic of violence in civil war. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kauzlarich, D., & Kramer, R. (1995). The nuclear terrorist state. Peace Review: A Journal of Social Justice, 7(3–4), 333–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kauzlarich, D., & Kramer, R. (1998). Crimes of the American nuclear state: At home and abroad. Boston: Northeastern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keane, J. (1996). Reflections on violence. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keane, J. (2004). Violence and democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kofele-Kale, N. (2006). The international law of responsibility for economic crimes: Holding state officials individually liable for acts of fraudulent enrichment. Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kramer, R. (2010). From Guernica to Hiroshima to Baghdad: The normalization of the terror bombing of civilian populations. In W. Chambliss, R. Michalowski, & R. Kramer (Eds.), State crime in the global age (pp. 118–133). Uffculme, Devon: Willan Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kramer, R., & Michalowski, R. (2005). War, aggression and state crime: A criminological analysis of the invasion and occupation of Iraq. British Journal of Criminology, 45(4), 446–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kramer, R., Michalowski, R., & Rothe, D. (2005). The supreme international crime: How the U.S. war in Iraq threatens the rule of law. Social Justice, 32(2), 52–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacey, N. (2001). In search of the responsible subject: History, philosophy and social sciences in criminal law theory. Modern Law Review, 64(3), 350–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lacey, N. (2007). Legal constructions of crime. In M. Maguire, R. Morgan, & R. Reiner (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of criminology (pp. 179–200). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laslett, K. (2011). State crime on the margin of empire. London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lifton, R. J. (1986). The Nazi doctors: A study of the psychology of evil. London: MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maguire, M., Morgan, R., & Reiner, R. (Eds.). (1994). The Oxford handbook of criminology (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maguire, M., Morgan, R., & Reiner, R. (Eds.). (1997). The Oxford handbook of criminology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maguire, M., Morgan, R., & Reiner, R. (Eds.). (2002). The Oxford handbook of criminology (3rd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maguire, M., Morgan, R., & Reiner, R. (Eds.). (2012). The Oxford handbook of criminology (5th ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maier-Katkin, D., Mears, D., & Bernard, T. (2009). Towards a criminology of crimes against humanity. Theoretical Criminology, 13(2), 227–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mann, J. (2004). Rise of the Vulcans: The history of Bush’s war cabinet. New York: Viking.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mann, M. (2005). The dark side of democracy: Explaining ethnic cleansing. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matza, D. (1969). Becoming deviant. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R. K. (1957). Social Structure and Anomie. Glencoe: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R. K. (1968). Social structure and anomie. In R. K. Merton (Ed.), Social theory and social structure (pp. 185–214). New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michalowski, R. (2010). In search of “state” and “crime” in state crime studies. In W. Chambliss, R. Michalowski, & R. Kramer (Eds.), State crime in the global age (pp. 13–30). Uffculme, Devon: Willan Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mill, J. S. ([1859] 1982). In G. Himmelfarb (Ed.), On liberty. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, N. (1992). Stealing from America: A history of corruption from Jamestown to Reagan. New York: Paragon House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, W. (2004). Criminology, genocide and modernity: Remarks on the companion that criminology ignored. In C. Sumner (Ed.), The Blackwell companion to criminology (pp. 68–88). Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newburn, T. (2007). Criminology. Uffculme, Devon: Willan Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nivette, A. (2014). Legitimacy and crime: Theorizing the role of the state in cross-national criminological theory. Theoretical Criminology, 18(1), 93–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Passas, N. (1990). Anomie and corporate deviance. Contemporary Crises, 14(2), 157–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrow, C. (1984). Normal accidents: Living with high-risk technologies. London: HarperCollins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Power, S. (2002). ‘A problem from hell’: America and the age of genocide. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pruitt, W. (2014). How criminology can engage in the theorizing on genocide? International Journal of Criminal Justice Sciences, 9(1), 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pusey, M. (1991). Economic rationalism in Canberra: A nation-building state changes its mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, J. (Ed.). (1995). Controlling state crime: An introduction. New York: Garland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, J. (2000). Varieties of state crime and its control. Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, J. (2002). The dynamics of political crime. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, J. (2012). An introduction to political crime. Bristol: Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothe, D. (2009). State criminality: The crime of all crimes. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothe, D., & Kauzlarich, D. (Eds.). (2014). Towards a victimology of state crime. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothe, D., & Mullins, C. (Eds.). (2011). State crime: Current perspectives. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothe, D., & Ross, J. (2008). The marginalization of state crime in introductory textbooks on criminology. Critical Sociology, 34(5), 741–752.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Savelsberg, J. (2010). Crime and human rights: Criminology of genocide and atrocities. Los Angeles: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwendinger, H., & Schwendinger, J. (1970). Defenders of order or guardians of human rights? Issues in Criminology, 5(2), 123–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, D. (1996). Elite deviance (5th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, D. (1999). Elite deviance (6th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smelser, N., & Badie, B. (1994). Sociology. Cambridge, MA: UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smeulers, A., & Haveman, R. (Eds.). (2008). Supranational criminology: Towards a criminology of international crimes. Antwerp: Intersentia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sofsky, W. (1997). The order of terror: The concentration camp (W. Templer, Trans.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sofsky, W. (2003). Violence: Terrorism, genocide, war. London: Granta Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • South, N., Brisman, A., & Beirne, P. (2013). A guide to a green criminology. In N. South & A. Brisman (Eds.), Routledge international handbook of green criminology (pp. 27–42). Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanley, E., & McCulloch, J. (Eds.). (2012). State crime and resistance. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sumner, C. (1994). The sociology of deviance: An obituary. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland, E. H. (1940). The White-collar criminal. American Sociological Review 5: 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland, E. (1949). White Collar Crime. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tappan, P. (2001). Who is the criminal? In S. Henry & M. Lanier (Eds.), What is crime? Controversies over the nature of crime and what to do about it (pp. 27–36). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tunnell, K. (1993). Political crime in contemporary America: A critical approach. New York: Garland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaughan, D. (1983). Controlling unlawful organizational behavior: Social structure and corporate misconduct. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, T. (2005). State crime in the heart of darkness. British Journal of Criminology, 45(4), 434–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watts, R., Bessant, J., & Hill, R. (2008). International criminology: A critical introduction. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (1949). The meaning of “ethical neutrality” in sociology and economics. In E. A. Shils & H. A. Finch (Eds. & Trans.), The methodology of the social sciences (pp. 1–47). New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (1978). In G. Roth & C. Wittich (Eds.), Economy and society: An outline of interpretive sociology (Vol. 1–2). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisbord, R. G. (2003). The King, the Cardinal and the Pope: Leopold II’s genocide in the Congo and the Vatican. Journal of Genocide Research, 5(1), 35–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woolford, A. (2006). Making genocide unthinkable: Three guidelines for a critical criminology of genocide. Critical Criminology, 14(1), 87–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yacoubian, S. (2000). The (in)significance of genocidal behavior to the discipline of criminology. Crime, Law and Social Change, 34(1), 7–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Žižek, S. (2011). Living in the End Times, London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2016 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Watts, R. (2016). Criminology and Crimes of the State. In: States of Violence and the Civilising Process. Critical Criminological Perspectives. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-49941-7_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-49941-7_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-137-49940-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-49941-7

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics