Skip to main content

“I Love Red Hair. My Wife Has Strawberry”: Discursive Strategies and Social Identity in the Workplace

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Talking at Work

Part of the book series: Communicating in Professions and Organizations ((PSPOD))

Abstract

Coworkers are group members of the workplace community. They build their social identities through their verbal and nonverbal behaviors in everyday workplace practice. During small talk interactions, coworkers engage in specific discourses that serve to tell, and therefore, offer a self-definition of their behaviors within other groups, beyond the workplace. In other words, by telling their experiences as members of other groups, the speakers draw for the interlocutors the self-concept they want to (re)present within the workplace community. In order to convey this self-concept, speakers use determined, recursive linguistic patterns. In this chapter, two specific linguistic strategies are analyzed: my-relative strategy and I-feel-you strategy (Di Ferrante, Small talk at work: A corpus based discourse analysis of AAC and Non-AAC device users, 2013), which fulfill respectively the functions of validating statements—principle of authenticity—and displaying understanding—principle of sympathy. Using a discourse analysis approach within a social psychology framework, linguistic patterns are examined and shown to be exploited as tools used by speakers to build their social identities and affirm their positive image as members of the workplace community.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Beinstein, J. (1975). Small talk as social gesture. Journal of Communication, 25, 147–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bühler, K. (1934/1990). Theory of language: The representational function of language. (D. F. Goodwin, Trans.). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coupland, J. (Ed.). (2000). Small talk. London: Pearson Education Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coupland, J., & Ylänne-McEwen, V. (2000). Talk about the weather: Small talk, leisure talk and the travel industry. In J. Coupland (Ed.), Small talk (pp. 163–182). London: Pearson Education Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Ferrante, L. (2013). Small talk at work: A corpus based discourse analysis of AAC and Non-AAC device users. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation. Texas A&M University-Commerce. Commerce, Texas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. New York: Anchor Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, J. (2000a). Doing collegiality and keeping control at work: Small talk in government departments. In J. Coupland (Ed.), Small talk (pp. 32–61). London: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, J. (2000b). Talking English from 9 to 5: Challenges for ESL learners at work. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 10(1), 125–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, J. (2000c). Victoria University’s language in the workplace project: An overview. Language in the Workplace Occasional Papers, 1, 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, J. (2003). Small talk at work: Potential problems for workers with an intellectual disability. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 36(1), 65–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, J. (2005). When small talk is a big deal: Sociolinguistic challenges in the workplace. In M. H. Long (Ed.), Second language needs analysis (pp. 344–371). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, J., & Fillary, R. (2000). Handling small talk at work: Challenges for workers with intellectual disabilities. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 47(3), 273–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, J., & Marra, M. (2002). Humor as a discursive boundary marker in social interaction. In M. Duszak (Ed.), Us and others: Social identities across languages, discourses and cultures (pp. 377–400). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, J., & Marra, M. (2004). Relational practice in the workplace: Women’s talk or gendered discourse? Language in Society, 33, 377–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holmes, J., & Stubbe, M. (2003). Power and politeness in the workplace: A sociolinguistic analysis of talk at work. London: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koester, A. (2010). Workplace discourse. New York: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laver, J. (1975). Communicative function of phatic communion. In A. Kendon, R. M. Harris, & M. R. Key (Eds.), Organization of behavior in face-to-face interaction (pp. 215–238). New York: Mouton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinson, S. C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyons, J. (1977). Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R. K. (1968). Social theory and social structure. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mirivel, J. C., & Tracy, K. (2005). Pre-meeting talk: An organizationally crucial form of talk. Research on Language & Social Interaction, 38(1), 1–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mullany, L. (2006). Gender, politeness and institutional power roles: Humour as a tactic to gain compliance in workplace business meetings. Multilingua, 23, 13–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norrick, N., & Spitz, A. (2008). Humor as a resource for mitigating conflict in interaction. Journal of Pragmatics, 40, 1661–1686.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pickering, L., & Bruce, C. (2009). Augmentative and alternative communication users and non-AAC users workplace corpus (ANAWC) [collection of electronic texts]. Atlanta, Georgia: Georgia State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, K. P. (1988). Small talk: Analyzing phatic discourse. Marburg: Hitzeroth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stroebaek, P. S. (2013). Let’s have a cup of coffee! Coffee and coping communities at work. Symbolic Interaction, 36(4), 381–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stubbe, M. (1998, July). Researching language in the workplace: A participatory model. Proceedings of the Australian Linguistics Society Conference. Brisbane: University of Queensland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sumner, W. G. (1906). Folkways: A study of the sociological importance of usages, manners, customs, mores, and morals. New York: Mentor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel, H. (1974). Social identity and intergroup behavior. Social Science Information, 13(2), 65–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–47). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, J. C. (1982). Towards a cognitive redefinition of the social group. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Social identity and intergroup relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Dijk, T. A. (1998). Ideology: A multidisciplinary approach. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ventola, E. (1979/2006). The structure of casual conversation in English. Journal of Pragmatics 3, 267–298.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2016 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Di Ferrante, L. (2016). “I Love Red Hair. My Wife Has Strawberry”: Discursive Strategies and Social Identity in the Workplace. In: Pickering, L., Friginal, E., Staples, S. (eds) Talking at Work. Communicating in Professions and Organizations. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-49616-4_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-49616-4_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-137-49615-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-49616-4

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics