Abstract
Workplace interactions include varied and complex types of talk oriented toward not only the tasks workers are accomplishing but also toward relationship building among colleagues. This chapter will address the strategies used by assistive and augmentative communication (AAC) device users to interact with their coworkers. AAC users rely on spontaneous novel utterance generation (SNUG) in order to produce speech using their devices, as prestored text is difficult to program for workplace discourse. As a result, producing speech through typing or eye tracking takes a considerable amount of time and reduces their effectiveness in real-time communication. Using the AAC and Non-AAC Workplace Corpus (Pickering and Bruce, AAC and Non-AAC Workplace Corpus (ANAWC). [collection of electronic texts] 2009) and conversation analysis (CA) methodology, this chapter will discuss and illustrate an AAC user’s production of spelling as a strategy to communicate effectively. This strategy is used together with the coparticipants to negotiate meaning.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Atkinson, J., & Heritage, J. (1984). Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Blackorby, J., & Wagner, M. (1996). Longitudinal post-school outcomes of youth with disabilities: Findings from the National Longitudinal Transition Study. Exceptional Children, 62, 399–412.
Bloch, S. (2005). Co-constructing meaning in acquired speech disorders: Word and letter repetition in the construction of turns. In K. Richards & P. Seedhouse (Eds.), Applying conversation analysis (pp. 38–55). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Bloch, S. (2011). Anticipatory other-completion of augmentative and alternative communication talk: A conversation analysis study. Disability and Rehabilitation, 33, 261–269.
Bloch, S., & Wilkinson, R. (2004). The understandability of AAC: A conversation analysis study of acquired dysarthria. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 20, 272–282.
Bloch, S., & Wilkinson, R. (2011). Acquired dysarthria in conversation: Methods of resolving understandability problems. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 46, 310–523.
Bryen, D. N., Carey, A., & Potts, B. (2006). Technology and job-related social networks. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 22, 1–9.
Heritage, J., & Atkinson, J. (1984). Preference organisation. In J. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action: Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 53–56). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
McNaughton, D., & Bryen, D. N. (2002). Enhancing participation in employment through AAC technologies. Assistive Technology: The Official Journal of RESNA, 14(1), 58–70. doi:10.1080/10400435.2002.10132055.
McNaughton, D., & Bryen, D. N. (2007). AAC technologies to enhance participation and access to meaningful societal roles for adolescents and adults with developmental disabilities who require AAC. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 23, 217–229.
McNaughton, D., & Chapple, D. (2013). AAC and communication in the Workplace. Perspectives on AAC, 22(1), 30–36.
McNaughton, J., Light, J., & Groszyk, L. (2001). “Don’t give up”: Employment experiences of individuals with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis who use augmentative and alternative communication. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 17, 179–195.
McNaughton, D., Light, J., & Gulla, S. (2003). Opening up a ‘whole new world’: Employer and co-worker perspectives on working with individuals who use augmentative and alternative communications. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 19, 235–253.
Pickering, L., & Bruce, C. (2009). AAC and Non-AAC Workplace Corpus (ANAWC). [collection of electronic texts]. Atlanta, GA: GSU.
Rackensperger, T., McNaughton, D., Krezman, C., Williams, M., & D’Silva, K. (2005). When I first got it I wanted to throw it over a cliff: The challenges and benefits of learning technology as described by individuals who use AAC. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 21, 165–186.
Schegloff, E. A. (1979). The relevance of repair to syntax-for-conversation. Syntax and Semantics, 12, 261–286.
Schegloff, E. A. (2000). When ‘others’ initiate repair. Applied Linguistics, 21, 205–243.
Schegloff, E. A. (2007). Sequence organisation in interaction: A primer in conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schegloff, E. A., Jefferson, G., & Sacks, H. (1977). The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language, 53, 361–382.
Sidnell, J. (2010). Conversation analysis: An introduction. West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell.
ten Have, P. (2007). Doing conversation analysis. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Transcription Conventions
Transcription Conventions
[ ] = (0.5) (.) . , ? : ↑ word °word° •hhh hhh (( )) ( ) (word) {word} | overlapping talk the two lines connected by the equal signs are continuous talk silence timed in tenths of a second micro pause of less than 0.2 seconds falling intonation continuing intonation rising intonation lengthened sound marked rising shift of intonation emphasis quieter talk inbreath outbreath transcriber’s notes uninterpretable speech uncertainty about the words in parenthesis spelled letters talk produced using VOCA |
Copyright information
© 2016 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bouchard, J. (2016). Spelling as a Last Resort: The Use of Spelling in Workplace Interaction by Speakers with a Speech Impairment. In: Pickering, L., Friginal, E., Staples, S. (eds) Talking at Work. Communicating in Professions and Organizations. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-49616-4_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-49616-4_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-49615-7
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-49616-4
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)