Abstract
In 2007 , after a series of reported intercultural crises in Québec, Canada, the provincial government appointed a commission. Its task was to research and recommend best practices for negotiating religious and cultural differences. The Commission’s focal point was a strategy often favoured by proponents of liberal democracy : public consultation, enacted in ‘live’, face-to-face dialogue. This chapter interprets public dialogue as liberal democratic performance, and assesses its relationship to the Commission’s outcomes. It argues that the Commission’s reception and its ultimate recommendation for ‘open secularism ’ reveal a tension between two repertoires: a repertoire of self-abstraction and a repertoire of embodied immediacy.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Anglophones Speak up at Bouchard-Taylor Commission. 2007. The West Island Chronicle Online. 5 Dec 2007. http://www.westislandchronicle.com/Cultural-activities/2007–12-05/article-635804/Anglophones-speak-up-at-BouchardTaylor-Commission/1.
Belkhodja, Chedly. 2008. The Discourse of New Individual Responsibility. In Immigration and Integration in Canada in the Twenty-first Century, ed. James Frideres, M.L. Burstein, and John Biles, 253–269. Kingston, ON: School of Policy Studies, Queen’s University.
Benhabib, Seyla. 1992. Models of Public Space: Hannah Arendt, the Liberal Tradition and Jurgen Habermas. Situating the Self: Gender, Community, and Postmodernism in Contemporary Ethics, 89–121. New York: Routledge.
Bouchard, Gérard, and Charles Taylor. 2008a. Building the Future: A Time for Reconciliation—Abridged Report. Québec City: Gouvernement Du Québec.
Bouchard, Gérard, and Charles Taylor. 2008b. Building the Future, a Time for Reconciliation: Full Report. Québec: Commission De Consultation Sur Les Pratiques D’accomodement Reliées Aux Différences Culturelles.
Butler, Judith. 2013. The Sensibility of Critique: Response to Asad and Mahmood. In Is Critique Secular? 95–130. New York: Fordham.
Chew, Dolores. 2009. Feminism and Multiculturalism in Quebec: An/Other Perspective. Canadian Woman Studies 27 (2–3).
Côté, Pauline. 2008. Québec and Reasonable Accommodation: Uses and Misuses of Public Consultation. In Religion and Diversity in Canada, ed. Lori G. Beaman and Peter Beyer, 41–66. Leiden: Brill.
Dorland, Michael, and Maurice René. Charland. 2002. Law, Rhetoric and Irony in the Formation of Canadian Civil Culture. Toronto: University of Toronto.
Fletcher, John. 2012. Performing Coexistence with Good Faith Tolerance. In Religion, Theatre, and Performance: Acts of Faith, ed. Lance Gharavi, 225–240. New York: Routledge.
Gagné, Pierre-Paul. 2007. Encore Les Accomodements. La Presse, 9 September 2007, A21.
Gastil, John. 2000. Is Face-to-Face Citizen Deliberation a Luxury or a Necessity? Political Communication 17 (4): 357–361.
Habermas, Jürgen. 1996. Deliberative Politics: A Procedural Concept of Democracy. Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy, 287–328. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
Held, David. 2000. Models of Democracy. Oxford: Polity.
Herrera, Charles, and Guy Lachapelle. 2010. Politicians, Public Opinion, and Reasonable Accommodation in Québec. Quebec Studies 49: 87–106.
Kant, Immanuel. 2014. Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Koussens, David. 2009. Neutrality of the State and Regulation of Religious Symbols in Schools in Quebec and France. Social Compass 56 (2): 202–213.
Leroux, Darryl. 2010. Québec Nationalism and the Production of Difference: The Bouchard-Taylor Commission, the Hérouxville Code of Conduct, and Québec’s Immigrant Integration Policy. Quebec Studies 49: 107–126.
Maclure, Jocelyn, and Charles Taylor. 2011. Liberal-Pluralist Secularism: The Case of Quebec. Secularism and Freedom of Conscience, 53–60. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Mahrouse, G. 2010. ‘Reasonable Accommodation’ in Quebec: The Limits of Participation and Dialogue. Race & Class 52 (1): 85–96.
Mahmoo, Saba. Religious Reason and Secular Affect: An Incommensurable Divide? In Is Critique Secular? 58–94. New York: Fordham.
Pellegrini, Ann. 2008. Feeling Secular. In Religion, Theatre, and Performance: Acts of Faith, ed. Lance Gharavi: 195–209. Oxon: Routledge.
Peters, John Durham. 1999. Dialogue and Dissemination. In Speaking Into the Air: A History of the Idea of Communication, 33–62. Chicaggo: University of Chicago.
Rawls, John. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Belknap of Harvard University Press.
Rawls, John. 2005. Political Liberalism: Expanded Edition. 1993. New York: Columbia University Press.
Schaefli, Laura M., and Anne M.C Godlewska. 2013. Ignorance and Historical Geographies of Aboriginal Exclusion: Evidence from the 2007 Bouchard-Taylor Commission on Reasonable Accommodation. The Canadian Geographer/ Le Géographe Canadien 58 (1): 110–122.
Schechner, Richard. 1985. Between Theater & Anthropology. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania.
Seidle, F. Leslie. 2009. Testing the Limits of Minority Accommodation in Quebec: The Bouchard-Taylor Commission. In The Ties That Bind: Accommodating Diversity in Canada and the European Union, ed. Fossum, Poirier, Magnette, 77–104. Brussels: Peter Lang.
Sharify-Funk, Meena. 2010. Muslims and the Politics of “Reasonable Accommodation”: Analyzing the Bouchard-Taylor Report and Its Impact on the Canadian Province of Québec. Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs 30 (4): 535–553.
Taylor, Diana. 1997. Disappearing Acts: Spectacles of Gender and Nationalism in Argentina’s “Dirty War”. Durham: Duke University Press.
Taylor, Diana. 2003. The Archive and the Repertoire: Performing Cultural Memory in the Americas. Durham: Duke University Press.
Taylor, Charles. 2007. A Secular Age. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Taylor, Charles. 2011. Why We Need a Radical Redefinition of Secularism. In The Power of Religion in the Public Sphere, ed. Eduardo Mendieta, and Jonathan VanAntwerpen, 34–59. New York: Columbia University Press.
Toscano, Alberto. 2010. Raving with Reason: Fanaticism and Enlightenment. Fanaticism: On the Uses of an Idea, 98–148. London: Verso.
Warner, Michael. 2002. Publics and Counterpublics. New York: Zone.
Welsh, Scott. 2002. Deliberative Democracy and the Rhetorical Production of Political Culture. Rhetoric & Public Affairs 5 (4): 679–707.
Young, Iris Marion. 2000. Inclusion and Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Zerilli, Linda G. 2012. Value Pluralism and the Problem of Judgment: Farewell to Public Reason. Political Theory 40 (6).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Cox, J. (2017). “Face-to-Face”: Open Secularism and the Politics of Display in Quebec’s Bouchard-Taylor Commission. In: Gluhovic, M., Menon, J. (eds) Performing the Secular. Contemporary Performance InterActions. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-49608-9_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-49608-9_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-49607-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-49608-9
eBook Packages: Literature, Cultural and Media StudiesLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)