Skip to main content

The Measurement of Bank Efficiency and Bank Risk in China

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 513 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter will mainly deal with the measurements of bank efficiency and bank risk in China. With regard to the estimation of bank efficiency, the technical, pure technical and scale efficiencies of Chinese commercial banks will be evaluated using the non-parametric Data Envelopment Analysis, while the stochastic frontier approach will be used to estimate the cost, revenue and profit efficiencies of Chinese commercial banks. The measurement of different types of risk by the Chinese commercial banks will also be explained in this chapter, and finally, the chapter will discuss the modelling framework in order to investigate the relationship between risk and efficiency in the Chinese banking industry.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Technical efficiency is estimated using four outputs (total loans, securities, total deposits and non-interest income) and three inputs (total cost which includes interest expenses and non-interest expenses, price of funds and price of capital).

  2. 2.

    The non-interest expenses include the price of labour.

  3. 3.

    The Z-score reflects the extent to which banks have the ability to absorb the losses. Thus, higher value of Z-score indicates lower risk and greater stability. The Z-score has been widely used to measure the stability of financial institutions by the empirical studies (see Hesse and Cihak, 2007; Iannotta et al. 2007; Beck et al. 2009; Liu and Wilson 2013, Liu et al., 2013). The calculation of Z-score can be expressed as follows:

    \( Z=\frac{ROA+E}{\sigma (ROA)} \)

    where ROA is banks’ Return on Assets, E/A is the ratio of equity over total assets, σ(ROA) is the standard deviation of Return on Assets.

References

  • Abedifar, P., Molyneux, P., & Tarazi, A. (2013). Risk in Islamic banking. Review of Finance, 17, 2035–2096.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aigner, D. J., Lovell, C. A. K., & Schmeidt, P. (1977). Formulation and estimation of stochastic frontier production function models. Journal of Econometrics, 6, 21–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ajibefun, I. A. (2008). An evaluation of parametric and non-parametric methods of technical efficiency measurement: Application to small scale crop production in Nigeria. Journal of Agriculture and Social Sciences, 4, 95–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altunbas, Y., Liu, M., Molyneux, P., & Seth, R. (2000). Efficiency and risk in Japanese banking. Journal of Banking and Finance, 24, 1605–1628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Altunbas, Y., Carbo, S., Gardener, E. P. M., & Molyneux, P. (2007). Examining the relationships between capital, risk and efficiency in European banking. European Financial Management, 13, 49–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ariff, M., & Can, L. (2008). Cost and profit efficiency of Chinese banks: A non- parametric analysis. China Economic Review, 19, 260–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Athanasoglou, P. P., Brissmis, S. N., & Delis, M. D. (2008). Bank-specific, industry-specific and macroeconomic determinants of bank profitability. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 18, 121–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banker, R. D., Charnes, A., & Cooper, W. W. (1984). Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management Science, 30, 1078–1092.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, T., Hesse, H., Kick, T., and Von Westernhagen, N. (2009). Bank ownership and stability: Evidence from Germany. Working paper, Bundesbank.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, T., Demirguc-Kunt, A., & Merrouche, O. (2013). Islamic vs. conventional banking: Business model, efficiency and stability. Journal of Banking and Finance, 37, 433–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, A. N. (1993). Distribution-free estimates of efficiency in the U.S banking industry and tests of the standard distributional assumptions. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 4, 261–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, A. N., & DeYoung, R. (1997). Problem loans and cost efficiency in commercial banks. Journal of Banking and Finance, 21, 849–870.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, A. N., & Humphrey, D. B. (1997). Efficiency of financial institutions: International survey and directions for future research. European Journal of Operational Research, 98, 175–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, A. N., Hasan, I., & Zhou, M. (2009). Bank ownership and efficiency in China: What will happen in the world’s largest nation? Journal of Banking and Finance, 33, 113–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brissimis, S. N., Delis, M. D., & Papanikolaou, N. I. (2008). Exploring the nexus between banking sector reform and performance: Evidence from newly acceded EU countries. Journal of Banking and Finance, 32, 2674–2683.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casu, B., & Molyneux, P. (2003). A comparative study of efficiency in European banking. Applied Economics, 35, 1865–1876.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2, 429–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., Lewin, A. Y., & Seiford, L. M. (1995). Data envelopment analysis: Theory, methodology and applications. Boston: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, X., Skully, M., & Brown, K. (2005). Bank efficiency in China: Application of DEA to pre- and post- deregulation eras: 1993–2000. China Economic Review, 16, 229–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Craig, B. R., & Dinger, V. (2013). Deposit market competition, wholesale finding and bank risk. Journal of Banking and Finance, 37, 3605–3622.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demirguc-Kunt, A., & Huizinga, H. (2004). Market discipline and deposit insurance. Journal of Monetary Economics, 51, 375–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dietrich, A., & Wanzenried, G. (2011). Determinants of bank profitability before and during the crisis: Evidence from Switzerland. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 21, 307–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Distinguin, I., Roulet, C., & Tarazi, A. (2013). Bank regulatory capital and liquidity: Evidence from US and European publicly traded banks. Journal of Banking and Finance, 37, 3295–3317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Estelle, S. M., Johnson, A. C., & Ruggiero, J. (2010). Three-stage DEA models for incorporating exogenous inputs. Computers and Operations Research, 37, 1087–1090.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fang, Y., Hasan, I., Marton, K. (2011). Market reforms, legal changes and bank risk-taking: Evidence from transition economies. Discussion paper, Bank of Finland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farruggio, C., & Uhde, A. (2015). Determinants of loan securitization in European banking. Journal of Banking and Finance, 56, 12–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiordelisi, F., Marques-Ibanez, D., & Molyneux, P. (2011). Efficiency and risk in European banking. Journal of Banking and Finance, 35, 1315–1326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Francis, W. B., & Osborne, M. (2012). Capital requirements and bank behaviour in the UK: Are there lessons for international capital standards. Journal of Banking and Finance, 36, 803–816.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fu, X., & Heffernan, S. (2007). Cost X-efficiency in China’s banking sector. China Economic Review, 18, 35–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fukuyama, H., & Matousek, R. (2011). Efficiency of Turkish banking: Two-stage network system. Variable returns to scale model. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 21, 75–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia-Herrero, A., Gavila, S., & Santabarbara, D. (2009). What explains the low profitability of Chinese banks? Journal of Banking and Finance, 33, 2080–2092.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garza-Garcia, J. G. (2012). Determinants of bank efficiency in Mexico: A two-stage analysis. Applied Economics Letters, 19, 1679–1682.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Girardone, C., Molyneux, P., & Gardener, E. (2004). Analysing the determinants of bank efficiency: The case of Italian banks. Applied Economics, 36, 215–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goddard, J., Molyneux, P., & Wilson, J. O. S. (2009). The financial crisis in Europe: Evolution, policy responses and lessons for the future. Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance, 17, 362–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goddard, J., Molyneux, P., & Wilson, J. O. S. (2004). Dynamic of growth and profitability in banking. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 36, 1069–1090.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Golin, J. (2001). The bank credit analysis handbook: A guide for analyst, bankers and investors. Singapore: John Wiley and Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagendorff, J., & Nieto, M. J. (2015). The safety and soundness effects of bank M&A in the EU: Does prudential regulation have any impact. European Financial Management, 21, 462–490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hesse, H., and Cihak, M. (2007). Competitive banks and financial stability. Working paper, International Monetary Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoff, A. (2007). Second stage DEA: Comparison of approaches for modelling the DEA score. European Journal of Operational Research, 18, 425–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iannotta, G., Nocera, G., & Sironi, A. (2007). Ownership structure, risk and performance in the European banking industry. Journal of Banking and Finance, 31, 2127–2149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, P. M., and Fethi, M. D. (2000). Evaluating the technical efficiency of Turkish commercial banks: An application of DEA and Tobit Analysis. Paper presented at the International DEA symposium, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia, 2–4 July.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liang, Q., Xu, P., & Jiraporn, P. (2013). Board characteristics and Chinese bank performance. Journal of Banking and Finance, 37, 2953–2968.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, H., & Wilson, J. O. S. (2013). Competition and risk in Japanese banking. European Journal of Finance, 19, 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, H., Molyneux, P., & Wilson, J. (2013). Competition and stability in European banking: A regional analysis. The Manchester School, 81, 176–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lovell, C. A. K., Wallers, L. C., & Wood, L. L. (1995). Stratified models of education production using modified DEA and regression analysis. In A. Charnes, W. W. Cooper, A. Y. Lewin, & L. M. Seiford (Eds.), Data envelopment analysis: Theory, methodology and application (pp. 329–352). Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers (6th).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lozano-Vivas, A., & Pasiouras, F. (2010). The impact of non-traditional activities on the estimation of bank efficiency: International evidence. Journal of Banking and Finance, 34, 1436–1449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mcdonald, J. (2009). Using least square and Tobit in second stage DEA efficiency analyses. European Journal of Operational Research, 197, 792–798.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meeusen, W., & van den Broeck, J. (1977). Technical efficiency and dimension of the firm: Some results on the use of frontier production functions. Empirical Economics, 2, 109–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molyneux, P., Liu, H., and Jiang, C. (2014). Bank capital, adjustment and ownership: Evidence from China. Discussion paper, Bank of Finland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murillo-Zamorano, L. R., and Vega-Cervera, J. (2000). The use of parametric and non-parametric frontier methods to measure the productive efficiency in the industrial sector: A comparative study. Discussion papers in economics, The University of York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Onali, E. (2014). Moral hazard, dividends, and risk in banks. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 41, 128–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pan, H., & Wang, C. (2013). House prices, bank instability and economic growth: Evidence from threshold model. Journal of Banking and Finance, 37, 1720–1732.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radic, N., Fiordelisi, F., & Girardone, C. (2012). Efficiency and risk-taking in pre-crisis investment banks. Journal of Financial Services Research, 41, 81–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sealey, C. E., & Lindley, J. T. (1977). Inputs, outputs and a theory of production and cost at depository financial institutions. Journal of Finance, 32, 1251–1266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seiford, L. M., & Thrall, R. M. (1990). Recent development in DEA: The mathematical programming approach to frontier analysis. Journal of Econometrics, 46, 7–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simar, L., & Wilson, P. W. (2007). Estimation and inference in two-stage, semi-parametric models of production processes. Journal of Econometrics, 136, 31–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sufian, F., & Habibullah, M. S. (2010). Bank specific, industry-specific and macroeconomic determinants of bank efficiency: Empirical evidence from the Thai banking sector. Journal of Applied Economic Research, 4, 427–461.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun, L., & Chang, T. (2011). A comprehensive analysis of the effects of risk measures on bank efficiency: Evidence from emerging Asian countries. Journal of Banking and Finance, 35, 1727–1735.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tabak, B. M., Fazio, D. M., & Cajueiro, D. O. (2012). The relationship between banking market competition and risk-taking: Do size and capitalization matter? Journal of Banking and Finance, 36, 3366–3381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan, Y., & Floros, C. (2012a). Bank profitability and inflation: The case of China. Journal of Economic Studies, 39, 675–696.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan, Y., & Floros, C. (2012b). Bank profitability and GDP growth in China: A note. Journal of Chinese Economics and Business Studies, 10, 267–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan, Y., & Floros, C. (2012c). Stock market volatility and bank performance in China. Studies in Economics and Finance, 29, 221–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan, Y., & Floros, C. (2013). Risk, capital and efficiency in Chinese banking. Journal of International Financial Market, Institutions and Money, 26, 378–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weill, L. (2003). Banking efficiency in transition economies: The role of foreign ownership. Economics of Transition, 11, 569–592.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2016 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Tan, Y. (2016). The Measurement of Bank Efficiency and Bank Risk in China. In: Investigating the Performance of Chinese Banks: Efficiency and Risk Features. Palgrave Macmillan Studies in Banking and Financial Institutions. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-49376-7_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-49376-7_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-137-49375-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-49376-7

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics