Advertisement

Promoting Correctional Integrity

  • Andrew Goldsmith
  • Mark Halsey
  • Andrew Groves
Chapter
  • 347 Downloads
Part of the Crime Prevention and Security Management book series (CPSM)

Abstract

We began this book with an anecdote about COs, in particular how many, it was claimed, found their work not only challenging, but threatening, or even dangerous. Officers were commonly afraid to go to work, it was said. The ramifications of such a statement being true are profoundly disturbing. It has integrity-threatening implications as well as broader consequences for prisoner and officer conditions. Most importantly for present purposes, such a story underlines the inextricable links among correctional structures, cultures and environments, as well as matters such as integrity. In this book, we have deliberately resisted the temptation to call simply for better management, more training or more situational measures as ways of mitigating the incidence of or harms from correctional corruption. Although each of such measures has a place in any coordinated effort, each such measure must also reference the correctional environment—in particular, the ways in which policies, resources, political and public expectations define the terrain within which correctional institutions and their officers operate.

Keywords

Organisational Climate Organisational Justice Correctional Setting Correctional Institution Workplace Culture 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Anechiarico, F., & Jacobs, J. (1996). The pursuit of absolute integrity: How corruption control makes government ineffective. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  2. Bruursema, K., Kessler, S., & Spector, P. (2011). Bored employees misbehaving: The relationship between boredom and counterproductive work behaviour. Work & Stress: An International Journal of Work, Health and Organisations, 25(2), 93–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cerrato, S. (2014). Achieving reform in unstable correctional institutions: A theoretical perspective—revisited. Contemporary Justice Review, 17(2), 273–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Crewe, B. (2011b). Depth, weight, tightness: Revisiting the pains of imprisonment. Punishment & Society, 13(5), 509–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dryburgh, M. (2009). Personal and policy implications of whistle-blowing: The case of Corcoran state prison. Public Integrity, 11(2), 155–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Haas, N., Van Craen, M., Skogan, W., & Flietas, D. (2015). Explaining officer compliance: The importance of procedural justice and trust inside a police organization. Criminology & Criminal Justice, 1–22. [advanced online access].Google Scholar
  7. Heywood, P., & Rose, J. (2015). Curbing corruption or promoting integrity? Probing the hidden conceptual challenge. In P. Hardi, P. Heywood, & D. Torsello (Eds.), Debates of corruption and integrity. Palgrave Macmillan: Basingstoke.Google Scholar
  8. Liebling, A., & Arnold, H. (2012). Social relationships between prisoners in a maximum security prison: Violence, faith, and the declining nature of trust. Journal of Criminal Justice, 40(5), 413–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Mitchell, Z., Merrington, S., & Bell, P. (2014). A comparative analysis of the OECD anti-corruption models (Asia and Europe) and Australia’s existing anti-corruption platform. International Journal of Business and Commerce, 4(3), 1–23.Google Scholar
  10. Podmore, J. (2012). Out of sight, out of mind: Why Britain’s prisons are failing. London: Biteback Publishing.Google Scholar
  11. Punch, M. (2009). Police corruption: Deviance, accountability and reform in policing. Cullompton: Willan.Google Scholar
  12. Rorty, A. (1999). Integrity: Political, not psychological. In A. Montefiore, & D. Vines (Eds.), Integrity in the public and private domains. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  13. Rose, J., & Heywood, P. (2013). Political science approaches to integrity and corruption. Human Affairs, 23(2), 148–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Trammell, R. (2009). Values, rules and keeping the peace: How men describe order and the inmate code in California prisons. Deviant Behavior, 30(8), 746–771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Victorian Ombudsman (2012). The death of Mr Carl Williams at HM Barwon prison—Investigation into corrections Victoria. Melbourne: Victorian Ombudsman.Google Scholar
  16. Vinson, T. (1982). Wilful obstruction: The frustration of prison reform. North Ryde: Methuen.Google Scholar
  17. Webb, W. (2012). Ethical culture and the value-based approach to integrity management: A case study of the department of correctional services. Public Administration and Development, 32(1), 96–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Wolfe, S., Worth, M., Dreyfus, S., & Brown, A. J. (2014). Whistleblower protection laws in G20 countries: Priorities for action. Sydney: Transparency International Australia.Google Scholar
  19. Wortley, R. (2002). Situational prison control: Crime prevention in correctional institutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Andrew Goldsmith
    • 1
  • Mark Halsey
    • 1
  • Andrew Groves
    • 2
  1. 1.Flinders UniversityAdelaideAustralia
  2. 2.Deakin UniversityBurwoodAustralia

Personalised recommendations