Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Education, Democracy and Inequality pp 69–97Cite as

Palgrave Macmillan

Social Gaps in the Forms of Learning and Political Engagement: 11–16-Year-Olds in England

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

  • 593 Accesses

Part of the book series: Education, Economy and Society ((EDECSO))

Abstract

This chapter tests our theory of social reproduction of political engagement using the Citizenship Education Longitudinal Study (CELS) dataset. First, it tests if young people (11–16) from more disadvantaged backgrounds have less access to the learning for political engagement in the form of political activities at school and an open classroom climate. Then, second, it tests if young people from more disadvantaged backgrounds actually gain more from political learning experiences at school. These hypotheses are tested in this chapter in the context of lower secondary education in England. The findings show that it is access to political learning that is creating the highest barrier to disadvantaged youth political engagement and that access to citizenship education slightly reduces inequalities in political engagement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The effect of open climate on joining a political party in Round 3 is insignificant though. The effects of the learning sources do not change in models without the interaction terms. These models can be obtained from the authors upon request.

  2. 2.

    We only have measures for open classroom climate in Rounds 2 and 3, so from ages 13–14 to 15–16.

References

  • Alivernini, F., & Manganelli, S. (2011). Is there a relationship between openness in classroom discussion and students’ knowledge in civic and citizenship education? Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 3441–3445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, R., & Mycock, A. (2007). Citizenship education in the UK: Divergence within a multi-national state. Citizenship Teaching and Learning, 3(1), 73–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baird, K. (2012). Class in the classroom: The relationship between school resources and math performance among low socioeconomic status students in 19 rich countries. Education Economics, 20(5), 484–509.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Porath, S. (2013). Deferring virtue: The new management of students and the civic role of schools. School Field, 11(2), 111–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, B. (2003). Class, codes and control: Applied studies towards a sociology of language (Vol. 2). Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bischoff, K. (2016). The civic effects of schools: Theory and empirics. Theory and Research in Education, 14(1), 91–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boudon, R. (1974). Education, opportunity, and social inequality: Changing prospects in western society. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J. C. (1990). Reproduction in education, society and culture (Vol. 2). Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brady, H. E., Schlozman, K. L., & Verba, S. (2015). Political mobility and political reproduction from generation to generation. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 657(1), 149–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brookfield, S. (2012). Teaching for critical thinking: Tools and techniques to help students question their assumptions. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brookfield, S. D., & Preskill, S. (2012). Discussion as a way of teaching: Tools and techniques for democratic classrooms. John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, D. E. (2008). Voice in the classroom: How an open classroom climate fosters political engagement among adolescents. Political Behavior, 30(4), 437–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castillo, J. C., Miranda, D., Bonhomme, M., Cox, C., & Bascopé, M. (2015). Mitigating the political participation gap from the school: The roles of civic knowledge and classroom climate. Journal of Youth Studies, 18(1), 16–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duncan, G. J., & Raudenbusch, S. W. (1999). Assessing the effects of context in studies of child and youth development. Educational Psychologist, 34, 29–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eckstein, K., Noack, P., & Gniewosz, B. (2012). Attitudes toward political engagement and willingness to participate in politics: Trajectories throughout adolescence. Journal of Adolescence, 35, 485–495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finkel, S. E. (1995). Causal analysis with panel data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Flanagan, C. A., & Sherrod, L. R. (1998). Youth political development: An introduction. Journal of Social Issues, 54(3), 447–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gainous, J., & Martens, A. M. (2012). The effectiveness of civic education: Are good teachers actually good for students? American Politics Research, 40(2), 232–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hooghe, M., & Dassonneville, R. (2013). Voters and candidates of the future: The intention of electoral participation among adolescents in 22 European countries. Young, 21(1), 1–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hooghe, M., & Stolle, D. (2004). Good girls go to the polling booth, bad boys go everywhere: Gender differences in anticipated political participation among American fourteen-year-olds. Women & Politics, 26(34), 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooks, B. (1994). Teaching to transgress. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoskins, B., Janmaat, J. G., & Villalba, E. (2012). Learning citizenship through social participation outside and inside school: An international, multilevel study of young people’s learning of citizenship. British Educational Research Journal, 38(3), 419–446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ichilov, O. (2003). Education and democratic citizenship in a changing world. In D. O. Sears, L. Huddy, & J. Roberts (Eds.), Oxford handbook of political psychology (pp. 637–670). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ichilov, O. (2007). Civic knowledge of high school students in Israel: Personal and contextual determinants. Political Psychology, 28(4), 417–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahne, J., Crow, D., & Lee, N. J. (2013). Different pedagogy, different politics: High school learning opportunities and youth political engagement. Political Psychology, 34, 419–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahne, J., & Middaugh, E. (2008). Democracy for some: The civic opportunity gap in high school (Circle Working Paper 59). Center for Information and Research on Civic Learning and Engagement (CIRCLE).

    Google Scholar 

  • Keating, A., & Benton, T. (2013). Creating cohesive citizens in England? Exploring the role of diversity, deprivation and democratic climate at school. Education, Citizenship and Social Justice, 8(2), 165–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keating, A., & Janmaat, J. G. (2016). Education through citizenship at school: Do school activities have a lasting impact on youth political engagement? Parliamentary Affairs, 69(2), 409–429. https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsv017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keniston, K. (1968). Young radicals: Notes on committed youth. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, D., Lopes, J., Nelson, J., White, K., Cleaver, E., & Benton, T. (2007). Vision versus pragmatism: Citizenship in the secondary school curriculum in England (Fifth Annual Report). Slough: NFER.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langton, K. P., & Jennings, M. K. (1968). Political socialisation in the high school civic curriculum in the United States. American Political Science Review, 62, 852–867.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McFarland, D. A., & Starmanns, C. (2009). Inside student government: The variable quality of high school student councils. Teachers College Record, 111, 27–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neundorf, A., Niemi, R. G., & Smets, K. (2016). The compensation effect of civic education on political engagement: How civics classes make up for missing parental socialization. Political Behavior, 38(4), 921–949.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Persson, M. (2015). Classroom climate and political learning: Findings from a Swedish panel study and comparative Data. Political Psychology, 36(5), 587–601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quintelier, E., & Hooghe, M. (2012). Discussing politics at school. Does an open classroom climate contribute to the willingness to participate in political life? Unpublished paper, University of Leuven.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ratcliff, N. J., Jones, C. R., Costner, R. H., Savage-Davis, E., & Hunt, G. H. (2010). The elephant in the classroom: The impact of misbehavior on classroom climate. Education, 131(2), 306–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reay, D. (2006). The zombie stalking English schools: Social class and educational inequality. British Journal of Educational Studies, 54(3), 288–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlozman, K. L., & Brady, H. E. (2012). The unheavenly chorus: Unequal political voice and the broken promise of American democracy. Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuetz, G., Ursprung, H. W., & Woessmann, L. (2008). Education policy and equality of opportunity. Kyklos, 61(2), 279–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snijders, T., & Bosker, R. (1999). Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic and applied multilevel analysis. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solhaug, T. (2006). Knowledge and self-efficacy as predictors of political participation and civic attitudes: With relevance for educational practice. Policy Futures in Education, 4(3), 265–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torney-Purta, J. (2002). The school’s role in developing civic engagement: A study of adolescents in twenty-eight countries. Applied Developmental Science, 6(4), 203–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torney-Purta, J., Lehmann, R., Oswald, H., & Schulz, W. (2001). Citizenship and education in twenty-eight countries: Civic knowledge and engagement at age fourteen. Amsterdam: IEA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uslaner, C. J., Cain, B. E., & Roderick Kiewiet, D. (1989). Political participation of ethnic minorities in the 1980s. Political Behaviour, 11, 195–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verba, S., Burns, N., & Schlozman, K. L. (2003). Unequal at the starting line: Creating participatory inequalities across generations and among groups. The American Sociologist, 34(1–2), 45–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whiteley, P. (2012). Does citizenship education work? Evidence from a decade of citizenship education in secondary schools in England. Parliamentary Affairs, 67(3), 513–535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Social Science, University of Roehampton, London, UK

    Bryony Hoskins

  2. Institute of Education, University College London, London, UK

    Jan Germen Janmaat

Authors
  1. Bryony Hoskins
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jan Germen Janmaat
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bryony Hoskins .

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Hoskins, B., Janmaat, J.G. (2019). Social Gaps in the Forms of Learning and Political Engagement: 11–16-Year-Olds in England. In: Education, Democracy and Inequality. Education, Economy and Society. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-48976-0_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-48976-0_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-137-48975-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-48976-0

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation