Abstract
How natural is economic nature and how provocative is it to claim that this nature is a provoke done? The purpose of this contribution is to expose the problem of the naturalness of economic things. Naturalism in modern economic reason is examined through a series of ‘breaching thought experiments’: intellectual setups in which economics, economic critique and the critique of economics are confronted to annoying situations or uncomfortable paradoxes. The very idea of the performativity of economics and the critical reactions it prompts are analysed in these terms: that is, as an anthropological test on the quandaries of economic naturalism.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The reflection that follows was initially elaborated as a contribution to the Colloque de Cerisy on ‘The Historical Anthropology of Scientific Reason’ organized by Philippe Descola and Bruno Latour (12–19 July 2006). It was also presented at the ‘Markets, Economics, Culture and Performativity’ Conference at Goldsmiths organized by Will Davies and José Ossandón (6 March 2007) and then transformed into a contribution to ‘Performativities: Contexts, Domains, Perspectives’, a publication project (sadly suspended) prepared by Silvia Posocco and Sadie Wearing. After sleeping for a few years, it gained the opportunity to reach the published side of the world as a contribution to this collection of essays prepared by Ivan Boldyrev and Ekaterina Svetlova. Acknowledgements are also due to funding provided by the European Research Council (grant no. 263529). I thank Daniel Beunza, Ivan Boldyrev, Michel Callon, Will Davies, Philippe Descola, Keith Hart, Petter Holm, Bruno Latour, Scott Lash, Javier Lezaun, Emilio Luque, Donald MacKenzie, José Ossandón, Paolo Quattrone, Ekaterina Svetlova, Silvia Posocco, Yamina Tadjeddine, David Teira, Manuel Torres and Sadie Wearing for their remarks on this unusual essay or for the conversations that contributed to the reflection.
- 2.
Actor–network theory—a scholarly viewpoint of which Michel Callon is an active proponent—originated as both a materialist approach to the study of science and technology and a pragmatist critique of regular sociological explanatory categories (see Muniesa 2015).
- 3.
Francesco Guala’s phrasing conveys this idea remarkably well: ‘Economic rationality is not like Newton’s laws, which are supposed to be at work everywhere in the universe. It is a fragile property that must be carefully preserved by creating a hospitable environment’ (Guala 2007, 147).
- 4.
But see also the clarification provided by Marshall Sahlins (2008).
- 5.
- 6.
The structural classification proposed by Descola adds to naturalism and animism, two other forms of intellection, which are totemism and analogism. In naturalism, the universality of physicality is linked to the contingency of interiorities. In animism, the generalization of interiority is a counterpoint to the differentiation of physicalities. Totemism is characterized by a moral and material continuity of physicality and interiority. Analogism is the realm of multiple differences at both levels, and of multiple networks of correspondence that make the world readable as an ongoing chain of relations.
- 7.
This instance of a ‘breaching thought experiment’ is based on a real conversation with a British academic on how to translate slightly ambiguous expressions like ‘économie des conventions’ or ‘économie alternative’, for which both ‘economics’ and ‘economy’ may make sense (but mean entirely different things).
- 8.
- 9.
This second instance of a ‘breaching thought experiment’ is based on one actual discussion at the seminar of an interdisciplinary academic society which includes economists, sociologists, anthropologists and political scientists as members and which hosts a monthly research seminar in Paris on the ‘social studies of finance’. A clarification was needed to convince one economist (who actually made a point of speaking ‘as an economist’) that ‘sciences sociales’ was short for ‘sciences économiques et sociales’, not a nasty way to exclude economics. The name of the ESRC (the British Economic and Social Research Council) can also serve as a blatant demonstration.
- 10.
This instance of a ‘breaching thought experiment’ is inspired by observations at one panel discussion at the annual meeting of the Society for Social Studies of Science held in Paris in 2004.
- 11.
A particularly helpful introduction to the analysis of the role of metrology in the construction of universality is O’Connell (1993).
- 12.
- 13.
This fourth ‘breaching thought experiment’ is based on memories from the first year of the undergraduate programme in economics at the Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (I then had to redirect preferences to sociology).
- 14.
I owe to Petter Holm a particularly brilliant interpretation of neoliberal economics in the light of Right Said Fred’s debut song ‘I’m too sexy’: the music stops abruptly after we hear ‘I’m too sexy for this song’.
- 15.
This last instance of a ‘breaching thought experiment’ is inspired by the discussions that took place during a workshop on ‘The Performativities of Economics’ held in Paris in August 2004. A number of papers presented at the workshop evolved into contributions to MacKenzie et al. (2007), others were part of Callon et al. (2007).
- 16.
- 17.
An almost identical version of the argument is published as Mirowski and Nik-Khah (2008).
- 18.
The empirical parts of the critique by Mirowski and Nik-Khah focus on an article by Francesco Guala on the role played by economics (game theory and experimental economics) in the construction of spectrum auctions (Guala 2001). A further exchange is available in Edward Nik-Khah (2006) and Guala (2006). See also Callon (2007a), Nik-Khah (2008) and Muniesa and Callon (2009).
- 19.
I put here the topic of shared academic socialization and scholarly habits aside.
- 20.
If we play with Descola’s structural categories, we could think of the role of Callon in this ‘breaching thought experiment’ as impersonating the menace of analogism over naturalism, that is, the menace of a style of intellection that would be attentive to varied correspondences between economists and economies, both imitating each other, engendering each other.
- 21.
In a critical review of MacKenzie et al. (2007) published in the Journal of Economic Literature, David Colander (a reputable economist) says among other things that he does not understand the notion of performativity very well, that he dislikes it and finds it irritating, that proponents in that field think this topic is new but in reality it is not, that the point is about signalling a contradiction in economics but that there is no such contradiction, that most economists are indifferent to science studies and would not care about this discussion, and, finally, that economics should perform more and better (Colander 2008).
- 22.
References
Ariztía, Tomás (ed.). 2012. Produciendo lo social: Usos de las Ciencias Sociales en el Chile Reciente. Santiago de Chile: Ediciones UDP.
Barry, Andrew, and Don Slater (eds.). 2005. The Technological Economy. London: Routledge.
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1997. Le Champ Économique. Actes de la Recherche en Sciences Sociales 119(1): 48–66.
Bourdieu, Pierre. 2005. The Social Structures of the Economy. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Breslau, Daniel. 2003. Economics Invents the Economy: Mathematics, Statistics, and Models in the Work of Irving Fisher and Wesley Mitchell. Theory and Society 32(3): 379–411.
Callon, Michel. 1998. The Embeddedness of Economic Markets in Economics. In The Laws of the Markets, edited by Michel Callon, 1–58. Oxford: Blackwell.
Callon, Michel. 1999. Whose Imposture? Physicists at War with the Third Person. Social Studies of Science 29(2): 261–286.
Callon, Michel. 2005. Why Virtualism Paves the Way to Political Impotence: A Reply to Daniel Miller’s Critique of The Laws of the Markets. Economic Sociology European Electronic Newsletter 6(2): 3–20.
Callon, Michel. 2007a. An Essay on the Growing Contribution of Economic Markets to the Proliferation of the Social. Theory, Culture & Society 24(7–8): 139–163.
Callon, Michel. 2007b. What Does It Mean to Say that Economics is Performative? In Do Economists Make Markets? On the Performativity of Economics, edited by Donald MacKenzie, Fabian Muniesa, and Lucia Siu, 311–357. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Callon, Michel, Yuval Millo, and Fabian Muniesa (eds.). 2007. Market Devices. Oxford: Blackwell.
Carrier, James G., and Daniel Miller (eds.). 1998. Virtualism: A New Political Economy. Oxford: Berg.
Cartwright, Nancy. 1999. The Dappled World: A Study of the Boundaries of Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Colander, David. 2008. Review of ‘Do Economists Make Markets?’ Journal of Economic Literature 46(3): 720–724.
Daston, Lorraine, and Peter Galison. 2007. Objectivity. New York: Zone Books.
Demeulenaere, Pierre. 1996. Homo Oeconomicus: Enquête sur la Constitution d’un Paradigme. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Descola, Philippe. 2013. Beyond Nature and Culture. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Dodd, Nigel. 1994. The Sociology of Money: Economics, Reason and Contemporary Society. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Dumont, Louis. 1992. Essays on Individualism: Modern Ideology in Anthropological Perspective. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Dupuy, Jean-Pierre. 1992. Le Sacrifice et l’ Envie: Le Libéralisme aux Prises avec la Justice Sociale. Paris: Grasset.
Fine, Ben. 2003. Callonistics: A Disentanglement. Economy and Society 32(3): 478–484.
Foucault, Michel. 2008. The Birth of Biopolitics: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1978–1979. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Fourcade, Marion. 2007. Theories of Markets and Theories of Society. American Behavioral Scientist 50(8): 1015–1034.
Galison, Peter. 1997. Image and Logic: A Material Culture of Microphysics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Garfinkel, Harold. 1967. Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Goswami, Manu. 2004. Producing India: From Colonial Economy to National Space. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Guala, Francesco. 2001. Building Economic Machines: The FCC Auctions. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, Part A 32(3): 453–477.
Guala, Francesco. 2005. The Methodology of Experimental Economics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Guala, Francesco. 2006. Getting the FCC Auctions Straight: A Reply to Nik-Khah. Economic Sociology European Electronic Newsletter 7(3): 23–28.
Guala, Francesco. 2007. How to Do Things with Experimental Economics. In Do Economists Make Markets? On the Performativity of Economics, edited by Donald MacKenzie, Fabian Muniesa, and Lucia Siu, 128–162. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Hacking, Ian. 1983. Representing and Intervening: Introductory Topics in the Philosophy of Natural Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Holm, Petter. 2007. Which Way is Up on Callon? In Do Economists Make Markets? On the Performativity of Economics, edited by Donald MacKenzie, Fabian Muniesa, and Lucia Siu, 225–243. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Hopwood, Anthony G., and Peter Miller (eds.). 1994. Accounting as Social and Institutional Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ingrao, Bruna, and Giorgio Israel. 1990. The Invisible Hand: Economic Equilibrium in the History of Science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Izquierdo Antonio, Javier. 2010. Marcianos, Melanesios, Millonarios, Mochileros y Murcianos: De la Perdición Económica o el Turista Espacial. San Fernando de Henares: Fiesta.
Jensen, Casper Bruun. 2004. A Nonhumanist Disposition: On Performativity, Practical Ontology, and Intervention. Configurations 1(2): 229–261.
Jones, Geoff, Christine McLean, and Paolo Quattrone. 2004. Spacing and Timing. Organization 11(6): 723–741.
Latour, Bruno. 1987. Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Latour, Bruno. 1993. We Have Never Been Modern. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Latour, Bruno. 2004. Politics of Nature: How to Bring the Sciences into Democracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Latour, Bruno. 2013. An Inquiry into Modes of Existence. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Lezaun, Javier, Fabian Muniesa, and Signe Vikkelsø. 2013. Provocative Containment and the Drift of Social-Scientific Realism. Journal of Cultural Economy 6(3): 278–293.
MacKenzie, Donald. 2006. An Engine, Not a Camera: How Financial Models Shape Markets. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
MacKenzie, Donald. 2007. Is Economics Performative? Option Theory and the Construction of Derivatives Markets. In Do Economists Make Markets? On the Performativity of Economics, edited by Donald MacKenzie, Fabian Muniesa, and Lucia Siu, 54–86. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
MacKenzie, Donald, Fabian Muniesa, and Lucia Siu (eds.). 2007. Do Economists Make Markets? On the Performativity of Economics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Miller, Daniel. 2002. Turning Callon the Right Way Up. Economy and Society 31(2): 218–233.
Miller, Daniel. 2005. Reply to Michel Callon. Economic Sociology European Electronic Newsletter 6(3): 3–13.
Mirowski, Philip. 1989. More Heat than Light: Economics as Social Physics, Physics as Nature’s Economics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Mirowski, Philip. 2002. Machine Dreams: Economics Becomes a Cyborg Science. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Mirowski, Philip. 2004. The Effortless Economy of Science? Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Mirowski, Philip, and Edward Nik-Khah. 2007. Markets Made Flesh: Performativity, and a Problem in Science Studies, Augmented with Consideration of the FCC Auctions. In Do Economists Make Markets? On the Performativity of Economics, edited by Donald MacKenzie, Fabian Muniesa, and Lucia Siu, 190–224. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Mirowski, Philip, and Edward Nik-Khah. 2008. Command Performance: Exploring What STS Thinks It Takes to Build a Market. In Living in a Material World: Economic Sociology Meets Science and Technology Studies, edited by Trevor Pinch and Richard Swedberg, 89–128. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Mitchell, Timothy. 1998. Fixing the Economy. Cultural Studies 12(1): 82–101.
Mitchell, Timothy. 2002. Rule of Experts: Egypt, Techno-Politics, Modernity. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Mitchell, Timothy. 2008. Rethinking Economy. Geoforum 39(3): 1116–1121.
Montecinos, Verónica, and John Markoff (eds.). 2009. Economists in the Americas. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
Muniesa, Fabian. 2014. The Provoked Economy: Economic Reality and the Performative Turn. Abingdon: Routledge.
Muniesa, Fabian. 2015. Actor-Network Theory. In The International Encyclopedia of Social and Behavioral Sciences, edited by James D. Wright, Vol. 1, 2nd ed., 80–84. Amsterdam etc: Elsevier.
Muniesa, Fabian, and Michel Callon. 2009. La Performativité des Sciences Économiques. In Traité de Sociologie Économique, edited by Philippe Steiner and François Vatin, 289–324. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Nik-Khah, Edward. 2006. What the FCC Auctions Can Tell Us About the Performativity Thesis. Economic Sociology European Electronic Newsletter 7(2): 15–21.
Nik-Khah, Edward. 2008. A Tale of Two Auctions. Journal of Institutional Economics 4(1): 73–97.
O’Connell, Joseph. 1993. Metrology: The Creation of Universality by the Circulation of Particulars. Social Studies of Science 23(1): 129–173.
Pickering, Andrew. 1995. The Mangle of Practice: Time, Agency and Science. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Power, Michael (ed.). 1996. Accounting and Science: Natural Inquiry and Commercial Reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sahlins, Marshall. 2008. The Western Illusion of Human Nature: With Reflections on the Long History of Hierarchy, Equality and the Sublimation of Anarchy in the West, and Comparative Notes on Other Conceptions of the Human Condition. Chicago, IL: Prickly Paradigm Press.
Valdés, Juan Gabriel. 1995. Pinochet’s Economists: The Chicago School in Chile. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Viveiros de Castro, Eduardo. 1998. Cosmological Deixis and Amerindian Perspectivism. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 4(3): 469–488.
Viveiros de Castro, Eduardo. 2004. Exchanging Perspectives: The Transformation of Objects into Subjects in Amerindian Ontologies. Common Knowledge 10(3): 463–484.
Zelizer, Viviana A. 1997. The Social Meaning of Money: Pin Money, Paychecks, Poor Relief, and Other Currencies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2016 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Muniesa, F. (2016). The Problem with Economics: Naturalism, Critique and Performativity. In: Boldyrev, I., Svetlova, E. (eds) Enacting Dismal Science. Perspectives from Social Economics. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-48876-3_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-48876-3_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-49210-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-48876-3
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)