Skip to main content

Purgatory

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Handbook of the Afterlife

Part of the book series: Palgrave Frontiers in Philosophy of Religion ((PFPR))

Abstract

Purgatory raises many interesting metaphysical, moral, and doctrinal issues. It has historically been a major point of contention between Christian denominations. Purgatory is most identified with the teaching of the Roman Catholic Church and contemporary Catholic philosophers typically construe the ante-mortem person and the disembodied soul in the hylomorphic framework of Aquinas. We’ll very briefly explore the origins on the doctrine of Purgatory, its biblical sources, Protestant rejection, and some ecumenical reconciliation. Then we’ll focus on the moral and metaphysical puzzles that Purgatory creates. We’ll concentrate upon the philosophical divisions between survivalist and corruptionist accounts of Purgatory. Both camps assume a hylomorphic framework. The survivalists believe the deceased person can persist in Purgatory prior to the resurrection with the soul as his only part. The corruptionists believe it is not the deceased person but just his soul that resides in Purgatory. Corruptionists face certain moral obstacles if the entity purged won’t be the agent of the earlier misconduct. Both sides must confront major metaphysical hurdles explaining the relationship of the soul to the person given that the posthumous soul contributes to thought in a manner quite different than it did when embodied

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Jacques Le Goff (1981: 169) writes that the “Roman Catholic Church honed the doctrine of Purgatory” not just against the Protestants of the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries but also against the heretics of the twelfth and thirteenth centuries (168–176) and the Greeks of the thirteenth to fifteenth centuries (280–288).

  2. 2.

    Protestants don’t recognize the one book that explicitly supports prayer for the dead as part of the Old Testament.

  3. 3.

    Robert Bainton’s (1950: 58) memorable phrase.

  4. 4.

    Lewis defends Purgatory in his 1964 Letters to Malcolm: Choice on Prayer.

  5. 5.

    The satisfaction and sanctification models are informatively contrasted in Walls (2011: 59–91).

  6. 6.

    The corruptionist ranks include Anthony Kenny (1993: 138); Robert Pasnau (2002: 380–393); Brian Davies (1992: 215–220); Patrick Toner (2006: 121–38); Leo Edlers (1997: 274–84); Patrick Lee and Robert George (2008: 66–81).

  7. 7.

    The Catechism of the Catholic Church 1995. Part 1. Sec 1. Art. 12

  8. 8.

    Augustine, Gregory the Great, and Bonaventure claimed that the pains of Purgatory are worse than any person ever suffered in this life. Augustine. Comments on Psalm 37. Bonaventure. Ps. 3 poenit. n. 1. Gregory the Great. IV. dist. Xx. P. 1 a. q. ii

  9. 9.

    Oderberg (2012: 3, fn. 4) agrees.

  10. 10.

    Le Goff (1981: 55) considered Origen a father of Purgatory for he conceived of Hell as a place that one could leave after purification.

  11. 11.

    Parfit alleges that we would have the same concern for the two persons resulting from our cerebrum fissioning and each hemisphere being transplanted into a different body as we would have for the single being receiving our only extant cerebral hemisphere. But only in the latter scenario would we be identical to a post-transplant person.

  12. 12.

    See also Quaestiones de Anima (15c)

  13. 13.

    A plant cutting is another such example of substantial change. The branch of a plant is not a plant. But cut if off and place the cutting in soil and its matter may be reorganized, roots start to grow etc.

  14. 14.

    Survivalists include Eleonore Stump (2003: 51–54), David Oderberg (2008: 241–260), Jason Eberl (2009), Christopher Brown (2007), Mark Spencer (2014), Scott Rae and J.P. Moreland (2000: 201).

  15. 15.

    Even if semantic content is external, the person and the soul are related to the same environment.

  16. 16.

    The axiom that anything with a proper part has at least one other disjoint part. For doubts that the axiom is true or true of the meaning of parts and wholes, see Maureen Donnelly (2011) and Oderberg (2012)

  17. 17.

    Stump (2003: 50–58, 2006: 164) draws upon constitution, Baker (2000) in particular, to illustrate Aquinas’s notion of constitution without identity. Oderberg (2005: 97) explains the detached soul’s relation to the posthumous person with an “imperfect analogy” of becoming mutilated so that “I am constituted by a head as I was once constituted by a whole body”.

  18. 18.

    See the accounts of essence in Oderberg (2008) and Rae and Moreland (2000).

  19. 19.

    This tack is taken by Mark Spencer (2014). He writes of the person being analogously an animal.

References

  • Bainton, Robert (1950) Here I Stand: The Life of Martin Luther. Hendricks Publishers: Nashville, Tennessee.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, Lynne Rudder (2000) Persons and Bodies: A Constitution View. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, Christopher (2007) “Souls, Ships and Substances” American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly, 81, 655–88;

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, Brian (1992) The Thought of Thomas Aquinas, Oxford University Press: Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donnelly, Maureen (2011) “Using Mereological Principles to Support Metaphysics” Philosophical Quarterly, 61, 225–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eberl, Jason (2009) “Do Human Persons Persist Between Death and Resurrection,” Metaphysics and God: Essays in Honor of Eleonore Stump. Ed: Kevin Timpe. Routledge: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edlers, Leo (1997) The Philosophy of Nature of St. Thomas Aquinas. New York: E. J. Brill

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, Paul (2007) “Purgatory” The Oxford Handbook on Eschatology. Ed. Jerry Walls. Oxford University Press: Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haldane, John (2001) “The Examined Death and the Hope of the Future” American Catholic Philosophical Association Proceedings. 74: 245–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hershenov, David and Rose Koch-Hershenov (2006) “Personal Identity and Purgatory” Religious Studies, 42, 439–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kenny, Anthony (1993) Aquinas on Mind, Routledge: London, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Goff, Jacques (1981) Birth of Purgatory. University of Chicago Press: Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Patrick and Robert George (2008) Body-Self Dualism in Contemporary Ethics and Politics, Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oderberg, David (2008) Real Essentialism, Routledge: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oderberg, David (2012) “Survivalism, Corruptionism and Mereology” European Journal of Religion 4:4, 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oderberg, David. (2005) “Hylemorphic Dualism.” Social Philosophy and Policy, 22, 2, 70–99

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, Eric. (2011) “A Compound of Two Substances.” Soul, Body and Survival, Ed. Kevin Corcoran. Cornell University Press: Ithaca.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parfit, Derek (1984) Reasons and Persons. Oxford University Press: Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pasnau, Robert (2002) Thomas Aquinas on Human Nature, Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rae, Scott and J.P. Moreland (2000) Body and Soul. Intervarsity Press: Downers Grove, Illinois.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, Mark (2014) “Personhood of the Separated Soul,” Nova et Vetera, 12: 863–912

    Google Scholar 

  • Stump, Eleanore (2006). “Resurrection, Reassembly and Constitution.” Die menschliche Seele: Brauchen wir den Dualismus? Bruno Niederberger and Edmund Runggaldier (eds.). Ontos Verlag: Frankfurt, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stump, Eleonore (2003) Aquinas. Routledge: New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, Judith (1998) “The Statue and the Clay,” Nous, 32, 149–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toner, Patrick (2006) “Personhood and Death in St Thomas Aquinas,”. History of Philosophy Quarterly, 26: 2, 121–38;

    Google Scholar 

  • Toner, Patrick (2012a) “St. Thomas on Punishing Souls” International Journal of the Philosophy of Religion. 71, 2: 103–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toner, Patrick (2012b) “Saint Thomas Aquinas on the Problem of Too Many Thinkers.” Modern Schoolman, 3, 4: 209–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walls, Jerry (2011) Purgatory: The Logic of Total Transformation. Oxford University Press: Oxford.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Hershenov .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hershenov, D., Hershenov, R. (2017). Purgatory. In: Nagasawa, Y., Matheson, B. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of the Afterlife. Palgrave Frontiers in Philosophy of Religion. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-48609-7_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics