Abstract
A full-page color newspaper and billboard advertisement for the regional hospital during the course of the research study read:What is the relevance of this ad to a study on doula care in childbirth? Is it important to understand why a particular part of a hospital markets to patients and what that marketing is trying to portray? The answer is yes because this ad portrays two important elements about birth in the USA: First, women are viewed as the consumers of childbirth as opposed to the producers. Second, that the medical model, and technology specifically, imposes an authority over the domain of childbirth, limiting women’s own autonomy to control their own production. This chapter expands on these two arguments and explains how women have become alienated from the birthing process and their bodies devalued as an authority.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Blanton, W. B. (1972). Medicine in Virginia in the seventeenth century. New York: Arno Press. reprint.
Bogdan, J. (1978). Care or cure? Childbirth practices in nineteenth century America. Feminist Studies, 4(2), 92–99.
Bourgeault, I. L., & Fynes, M. (1997). Integrating lay and nurse-midwifery into the U.S. and Canadian healthcare systems. Social Science and Medicine, 44(7), 1051–1063.
Briggs, L. (2000). The race of hysteria: Overcivilization and the savage woman in late nineteenth-century obstetrics and gynecology. American Quarterly, 52(2), 246–273.
Bulletin of the lying-in hospital of the city of New York (1913) Volumes 8–9. New York (N.Y.) Lying-in Hospital.
Caton, D. (1999). What a blessing she had chloroform: The medical and social response to the pain of childbirth from 1800 to the present. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Center for Disease Control. (2013). Re: Births – method of delivery. Retrieved from http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/delivery.htm
Code, L. (1991). What can she know? Feminist theory and the construction of knowledge. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Craven, C. (2005). Claiming respectable American motherhood: Homebirth mothers, medical officials, and the state. Medical Anthropology Quarterly, 19(2), 194–215.
Cutter, I. S., & Viets, H. R. (1964). A short history of midwifery. Philadelphia: Saunders.
Davis-Floyd, R. E. (1992). Birth as an American right of passage. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Dekker, R. (2013). National birth center study II. American Association of Birth Centers. Retrieved from http://www.birthcenters.org/?page=NBCSII
Dick-Read, G. (1933). Natural childbirth. London: Heinemann.
Dick-Read, G. (1960). Childbirth without fear. London: Heinemann.
Goer, H., & Romano, A. M. (2012). Optimal care in childbirth: The case for a physiologic approach. Seattle: Classic Day Publishing. Retrieved from http://www.optimalcareinchildbirth.com/
Hikel, K. (2009). Autism, ADHD, and medicated births. Medscape multispecialty. 28 May 2009 Retrieved from http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/703211_2
Howell-White, S. (1999). Choosing a birth attendant: The influences of a women’s childbirth definition. Social Science and Medicine, 45, 925–936.
Jordan, B. (1997). Authoritative knowledge and its construction. In R. E. Davis-Floyd & C. F. Sargent (Eds.), Childbirth and authoritative knowledge. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Ketler, S. (2000). Preparing for motherhood: Authoritative knowledge and the undercurrents of shared experience in two childbirth education courses in Cagliari, Italy. Medical Anthropology Quarterly, 14(2), 138–158.
Kitzinger, S. (1997). Authoritative touch in childbirth. In R. E. Davis-Floyd & C. F. Sargent (Eds.), Childbirth and authoritative knowledge. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Lamaze, F. (1956). Painless childbirth: The lamaze method (trans: Celestin, L. R.). Chicago: Contemporary Books.
Leavitt, J. W. (1980). Birthing and Anesthesia: The debate over twilight sleep. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 6(1).
Loudon, I. (1992). Death in childbirth: An international study of maternal care and maternal mortality 1800–1950. Oxford: Clarendon.
Mander, R. (2001). Supportive care and midwifery. Oxford: Blackwell Science Ltd.
Marx, K. (1983). The portable Karl Marx. New York: Penguin Press.
Morton, C. H. (2002). Doula care: The (Re)emergence of woman supported childbirth in the United States. Los Angeles: University of California.
Nelson, M. (1982). The effect of childbirth preparation on women of different social classes. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 23, 339–352.
O’Brian, M. (1995). Reproducing Marxist man. In N. Tuana & R. Tong (Eds.), Feminism and philosophy: Essential readings in theory, reinterpretation, and application. Boulder: Westview Press.
Simkin, P. (2005). Why keep on keeping on? Journal of Perinatal Education, 14(2), 5–7.
Tong, R. (1989). Feminist thought: A comprehensive introduction. Boulder: Westview Press.
Walling, A. D. (2002, November 15). Epidural analgesia prolongs the active phase of labor. American Family Physician. Available at: http://www.aafp.org/afp/20021115/tips/18.html. Accessed 12 Mar 2009.
Wertz, D. C. (1996). What birth has done for doctors. In P. K. Wilson (Ed.), Childbirth: Changing ideas and practices in Britain and America 1600 to the present (Vol. 2, pp. 3–20). New York: Garland Publishing.
World Health Organization. (1996). Care in normal birth: A practical guide. Geneva: Department of reproductive health and research. World Health Organization.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2016 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hunter, C.A., Hurst, A. (2016). Alienation and a Challenge to Authority in Childbirth. In: Understanding Doulas and Childbirth. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-48536-6_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-48536-6_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-48535-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-48536-6
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)