The Twenty-First-Century History Play

  • Paola Botham


In the context of a re-engagement with history after postmodernism, this chapter offers an exploration of the history play in twenty-first century Britain. The main argument concerns the endurance of historical drama as a political genre, following the paradigm of the modern history play and, in particular, that of the ‘radical’ blueprint identified in post-1968 British theatre. Three recent history plays are analysed in terms of continuities and discontinuities with this tradition: Howard Brenton’s Anne Boleyn (2010), David Greig’s Dunsinane (2010) and James Graham’s This House (2012). The discussion includes aspects of contemporary historiography and a reconsideration of nostalgia as (arguably) a progressive exercise. The chapter also reflects on the continued relevance of historicization in the Brechtian sense of linking past and present.


History play Political theatre Historiography Post-postmodernism Nostalgia Howard Brenton David Greig James Graham 


  1. Adiseshiah, S. (2009) Churchill’s Socialism: Political Resistance in the Plays of Caryl Churchill (Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars).Google Scholar
  2. Barker, H. (1993) Arguments for a Theatre (Manchester: Manchester University Press).Google Scholar
  3. Beckett, A. (2009) When the Lights Went Out: What Really Happened to Britain in the Seventies (London: Faber and Faber).Google Scholar
  4. Berninger, M. (2002) ‘Variations of a Genre: The British History Play in the Nineties’, Anglistik & Englischunterricht 64: 37–64.Google Scholar
  5. Berns, U. (2015) ‘Introduction: Theatre and History – Cultural Transformations’, JCDE: Journal of Contemporary Drama in English 3(1): 1–11.Google Scholar
  6. Billington, M. (2010) Rev. of Anne Boleyn, by Howard Brenton, Guardian, 30 July, rpt in Theatre Record, 16–29 July, 841.Google Scholar
  7. Bonnett, A. (2010) Left in the Past: Radicalism and the Politics of Nostalgia (New York and London: Continuum).Google Scholar
  8. Botham, P. (2014) ‘Howard Brenton and the Improbable Revival of the Brechtian History Play’, JCDE: Journal of Contemporary Drama in English 2(1): 170–84.Google Scholar
  9. Botham, P. (2016) ‘“Look at the Ground and Imagine its Past”: David Greig’s History Plays’, Contemporary Theatre Review 26(1): 49–59.Google Scholar
  10. Bowie-Sell, D. (2015) ‘James Graham: The Writer Putting the Sexy Back into Political Theatre’, Time Out, 10 May,
  11. Boym, S. (2001) The Future of Nostalgia (New York: Basic Books).Google Scholar
  12. Brenton, H. (2007) ‘Playing to the Crowd’, Guardian, 12 May, p. 14.Google Scholar
  13. Brenton, H. (2011) ‘Anne Boleyn and the Theatre of Reformation’, Guardian, 8 July,
  14. Brenton, H. (2012a) Anne Boleyn (London: Nick Hern).Google Scholar
  15. Brenton, H. (2012b) ‘Preface’, in Anne Boleyn (London: Nick Hern), pp. 5–8.Google Scholar
  16. Bull, J. (2013) ‘“History Repeating Itself?”: Text and Image, Theatre and Performance: Howard Brenton and David Edgar’s Appropriation of the Historical Drama’, Studies in Theatre and Performance 33(2): 169–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cavendish, D. (2010) Rev. of Anne Boleyn, by Howard Brenton, Daily Telegraph, 30 July, rpt in Theatre Record, 16–29 July, 841.Google Scholar
  18. Chakelian, A. (2013) ‘Ayes to the Playwright: James Graham Interview’, Total Politics, 28 January,
  19. Childs, P. (2012) ‘History and Heritage: The English Novel’s Persistent Historiographical Turn’, in R. L. Caserio and C. Hawes (eds) The Cambridge History of the English Novel (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), pp. 840–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fleming, M. (1997) Emancipation and Illusion: Rationality and Gender in Habermas’s Theory of Modernity (University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press).Google Scholar
  21. Fukuyama, F. (1989) ‘The End of History?’, The National Interest 16: 3–18.Google Scholar
  22. Fulbrook, M. (2002) Historical Theory (Abingdon and New York: Routledge).Google Scholar
  23. Graham, J. (2013a) This House (London: Bloomsbury Methuen).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Graham, J. (2013b) ‘Acknowledgments’ and ‘Introduction’, in This House (London: Bloomsbury Methuen), pp. v–x.Google Scholar
  25. Greig, D. (2008) ‘Rough Theatre’, in R. D’Monté and G. Saunders (eds) Cool Britannia? British Political Drama in the 1990s (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan), pp. 208–21.Google Scholar
  26. Greig, D. (2010) Dunsinane (London: Faber and Faber).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Greig, D. and L. Cunillé (1999) The Speculator and The Meeting (London: Methuen).Google Scholar
  28. Guldi, J. and D. Armitage (2014a) ‘Why The History “Manifesto”?’,
  29. Guldi, J. and D. Armitage (2014b) The History Manifesto (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hammond, B. S. (2007) ‘“Is Everything History?”: Churchill, Barker, and the Modern History Play’, Comparative Drama 41(1): 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Harben, N. (1988) Twentieth-Century English History Plays: From Shaw to Bond (Basingstoke: Macmillan).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Heinz, S. (2014) Report on the 23rd CDE Annual Conference, Hamburg Blankenese (University of Hamburg), 19–22 June,
  33. Itzin, C. (1980) Stages in the Revolution: Political Theatre in Britain since 1968 (London: Methuen).Google Scholar
  34. Itzin, C. and S. Trussler (1975) ‘Petrol Bombs through the Proscenium Arch. Interview with Howard Brenton’, Theatre Quarterly 5(17): 4–20.Google Scholar
  35. Jameson, F. (1991) Postmodernism, or, the Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism (Durham, NC: Duke University Press).Google Scholar
  36. Jameson, F. (2003) ‘The End of Temporality’, Critical Inquiry 29(4): 695–718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kellner, D. (1989) Critical Theory, Marxism and Modernity (Cambridge: Polity).Google Scholar
  38. Kershaw, B. and G. Ley (2008) ‘Editorial’, special issue: ‘Beyond Postmodernism’, Contemporary Theatre Review 18(3): 289–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Mair, P. (2013) Ruling the Void: The Hollowing of Western Democracy (London and New York: Verso).Google Scholar
  40. Mantel, H. (2014) ‘Notes on Characters’, in H. Mantel and M. Poulton, Wolf Hall and Bring Up the Bodies (London: Nick Hern and Fourth Estate), pp. 8–53.Google Scholar
  41. Natali, M. P. (2004) ‘History and the Politics of Nostalgia’, Iowa Journal of Cultural Studies 5: 10–25.Google Scholar
  42. Palmer, R. H. (1998) The Contemporary British History Play (Westport, CT: Greenwood).Google Scholar
  43. Peacock, D. K. (1991) Radical Stages: Alternative History in Modern British Drama (New York and London: Greenwood).Google Scholar
  44. Rawnsley, A. (2015) ‘Writer James Graham Talks to Andrew Rawnsley about His TV Drama Coalition: “I Love Humanising Politics”’, Observer, 22 March,
  45. Richard III Society (2015) The Richard III Society,
  46. Samuel, R. (1994) Theatres of Memory, vol. 1: Past and Present in Contemporary Culture (London: Verso).Google Scholar
  47. Sierz, A. (2012) Rev. of This House, by James Graham, Tribune, 16 November, rpt in Theatre Record, 14–17 November, 1240.Google Scholar
  48. Taylor, A. (2013) The Daily Politics, BBC 2, 5 March.Google Scholar
  49. Wallace, C. (2011) ‘Unfinished Business – Allegories of Otherness in Dunsinane’, in A. Müller and C. Wallace (eds) Cosmotopia: Transnational Identities in David Greig’s Theatre (Prague: Litteraria Pragensia), pp. 196–213.Google Scholar
  50. Wallace, C. (2013) The Theatre of David Greig (London and New York: Bloomsbury).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. White, H. (1973) Metahistory: The Historical Imagination in Nineteenth-Century Europe (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press).Google Scholar
  52. Whitney, H. (2010) ‘The Arts Desk Q & A: Playwright David Greig’, The Arts Desk, 6 February,

Copyright information

© The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paola Botham
    • 1
  1. 1.School of EnglishBirmingham City UniversityBirminghamUK

Personalised recommendations