Skip to main content

Towards a New Anthropogony? Tron Revisited

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Psychoanalysis, Philosophy and Myth in Contemporary Culture

Part of the book series: Studies in the Psychosocial ((STIP))

  • 686 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter discusses the transformation of aporia into (tragic) indifference. In the fast-moving world of the virtual game, one does not have time to think, only to act fast and survive. Aporia as a way of speaking and knowing one’s truth and desire is undercut by fast movement and the inability or reluctance to think. If the ancient hero’s misfortune was an oblique affirmation of the existence of God or the father who guarantees Law and order, the new hero seduces the Father-God and eventually leads him to death, in line with Baudrillard’s argument that the rules of the game have replaced the Law. In reality, Law (Lacan) and game (Baudrillard) play with one another.

For if the divine mission of all things is to find their meaning, they also seek, by virtue of a diabolical nostalgia, to lose themselves in appearances, in the seduction of their image.

(Baudrillard 1990: 67)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Baudrillard has been critiqued for absence of praxis, looking at society as a system of exchange only, inflicting a reductionist game of signification, employing a concept of signification which has not been developed enough (see Poster 1979; Kellner 1989), accepting the code and the omnipotence of the semiotic system too easily (see Poster 1981: 475), and providing an inadequate and loose concept of symbolic exchange posited as romanticised ‘loss’ and ‘rhetorical necessity’ (Hefner 1977: 112). For a more recent ‘reinstitution’ of Baudrillard in his rightful place in the critique of culture, see The International Journal of Baudrillard Studies; Clarke et al. (2009); Bishop (2009).

  2. 2.

    Baudrillard ’s On Nihilism in Simulation and Simulacra (2006) is a mini manifesto on why he simultaneously is and is not a nihilist, ‘because it would be beautiful to be a nihilist, if there were still a radicality, as it would be nice to be a terrorist if death , including that of the terrorist, still had meaning’ (2006: 164). See Bogard for Baudrillard’s reading of the Nietzschean amor fati (1990: 5). Bishop and Phillips consider Baudrillard as an anti-rationalist, not a nihilist (2007: 141); Gane (2000: 120) sees Baudrillard as a Stoic. See Woodward (2009) for a comprehensive account of Baudrillard’s nihilism in the postmodern context.

  3. 3.

    For Baudrillard ’s style, which is often intentionally elliptical, aphoristic, and hyperbolic, see Laügt (2012). Baudrillard has a tendency to proclaim his insights caring little for contradictions (Poster cited in Bogard 1990: 3) and often embodies the disorder he critiques and writes about (Butler 1999: 101).

  4. 4.

    As opposed to a Theogony (Hesiod), the body of myths which describe the genesis—the advent of the gods.

  5. 5.

    For a biographical note and information relevant to Baudrillard ’s work, see Gane (2000) and Baudrillard’s short autobiographical own account in The Ecstasy of Communication (1988).

  6. 6.

    Among Baudrillard ’s examples at that time were the Twin Towers in New York (2004: 70).

  7. 7.

    For Baudrillard ’s relation to Marx, Adorno, Weber, Habermas, Foucault and Man, and Durkheim, see Bogard (1990); to Mauss and Bataille, see Boldt-Irons (2001); to McLuhan, see Genosko (1999); to Lyotard and Vattimo see Ashley (1990); Felski (1996); Woodward (2009); to Marxism, see Poster (1979 and 1981); Hefner (1977); to Barthes and Lefebvre see Butler (1999); to Hegel, Simondon and Serres, see Levin (1996); to Merlau-Ponty, Wittgenstein and Bakhtin, see Grace (2004); to Debord, see Huyssen (1989).

  8. 8.

    For a succinct discussion of the object in French thought, see Levin (1996: 65–80).

  9. 9.

    In the Order of Things (2006), Foucault discusses Velázquez’s painting as an example of pure representation, supported by the partial elision of the eye-painter-spectator. Baudrillard ’s emphasis is on the seduction of the gaze, not on the subject of the gaze.

  10. 10.

    For Baudrillard the figure of the hostage is fascinating. The hostage posits the problem of non-exchange. The latter is only conceivable in the framework of the law . Torn from the circuit of exchange, the hostage becomes a pure object , ‘exchangeable against anything at all.’ (2008b: 71) and therefore perfectly meaningless or non-exchangeable.

  11. 11.

    Baudrillard further comments: ‘Death does not allow itself to be caught in the mirror of psychoanalysis’ (2004: 154). When Lacan considers death as a Real (experience), he seems to echo this assessment.

  12. 12.

    For a feminist discussion of Baudrillard ’s work, rebuttal of the critique of sexism, and possible uses of Baudrillard in feminist theory, see Grace (2000).

  13. 13.

    The phrase ‘end of line’ is an old programming software command. It is also the film chapter title in the  Tron Legacy DVD release and move 12 in the film’s musical score by Daft Punk.

Bibliography

  • Ashley, D. (1990). Marx and the Excess of the Signifier: Domination as Production and as Simulation. Sociological Perspectives, 33(1), 129–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baudrillard, J. (1988). The Ecstasy of Communication (B. Schutze & C. Schutze, Trans.). New York: Semiotext(e).

    Google Scholar 

  • Baudrillard, J. (1990). Seduction (B. Singer, Trans.). New York: St Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baudrillard, J. (2000). The Vital Illusion (J. Witwer, Trans.). New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baudrillard, J. ([1999] 2001). The Impossible Exchange (C. Turner, Trans.). London: Verso Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baudrillard, J. ([1976] 2004). Symbolic Exchange and Death (I. Hamilton Grant, Trans.). London: Sage Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baudrillard, J. ([1981] 2006). Simulation and Simulacra (S. Faria Glaser, Trans.). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baudrillard, J. ([1996] 2008a). The Perfect Crime (C. Turner, Trans.). London: Verso Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baudrillard, J. ([1990] 2008b). Fatal Strategies (P. Beitchman & W. G. J. Niesluchowksi, Trans.). Los Angeles: Semiotext(e).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, R. (Ed.). (2009). Baudrillard Now: Cultural Perspectives in Baudrillard Studies. London: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, R., & Phillips, J. (2007). Baudrillard and the Evil Genius. Theory, Culture and Society, 24(5), 135–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bogard, W. (1990). Closing Down the Social: Baudrillard’s Challenge to Contemporary Sociology. Sociological Theory, 8(1), 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boldt-Irons, L. A. (2001). Batallie and Baudrillard: From a General Economy to the Transparency of Evil. Angelaki, 6(2), 79–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butler, R. (1999). Jean Baudrillard, The Defence of the Real. London: Sage Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassirer, E. ([1955] 2009). The Philosophy of Symbolic Forms: Volume 2: Mythical Thoughts (J. M. Krois, Trans.). New Haven/London: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, D. B., Doel, M. A., Merrin, W., & Smith, R. G. (Eds.). (2009). Baudrillard, Jean: Fatal Theories. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowden, K. (1992). The Uses of Greek Mythology. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, D. (1996). An Introductory Dictionary of Lacanian Psychoanalysis. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felski, R. (1996). Fin de siècle, fin de sexe: Transsexuality, Postmodernism and the Death of History. New Literary History, 27(2), 337–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (2006). The Order of Things, The Archaeology of Human Sciences. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. (1917). Mourning and Melancholia. In J. S. Strachey (Ed. & Trans.), On Metapsychology: The Theory of Psychoanalysis (The Penguin Freud Library 11). Reprinted in 1991, London: Penguin Books, pp. 245–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gane, M. (2000). Modern European Thinkers: Jean Baudrillard: In Radical Uncertainty. London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Genosko, G. (1994). Baudrillard and Signs: Signification Ablaze. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gensosko, G. (1999). McLuhan and Baudrillard, Masters of Implosion. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grace, V. (2000). Baudrillard’s Challenge: A Feminist Reading. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grace, V. (2004). Baudrillard and the Meaning of Meaning. International Journal of Baudrillard Studies, 1(1). http://www2.ubishops.ca/baudrillardstudies/vol1_1/grace.htm. Accessed 25 Nov 2016.

  • Hefner, R. (1977). Baudrillard’s Noble Anthropology: The Image of Symbolic Exchange in Political Economy. Sub-Stance, 6(17), 105–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huyssen, A. (1989). In the Shadow of McLuhan: Jean Baudrillard’s Theory of Simulation. Assemblage, 10, 6–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kellner, D. (1989). Jean Baudrillard: From Marxism to Postmodernism and Beyond. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacan, J. (1989). The Signification of the Phallus. In J. Lacan, Écrits: A Selection (A. Sheridan, Trans., pp. 281–291). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacan, J. (2007). The Other Side of Psychoanalysis. The Seminar of Jacques Lacan, Book XVII (R. Grigg, Trans.). New York: Norton and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laügt, É. (2012). America in Time: Aphoristic Writing in Jean Baudrillard’s “America”. Paragraph, 35(3), 338–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin, C. (1996). Jean Baudrillard: A Study in Cultural Metaphysics. London: Prentice Hall/Harvester Wheatsheaf Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poster, M. (1979). Semiology and Critical Theory: From Marx to Baudrillard. Boundary 2, 8(1), 275–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poster, M. (1981). Technology and Culture in Habermas and Baudrillard. Contemporary Literature, 22(4), 456–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schroeder, R. (2004). Playspace Invaders: Huizinga, Baudrillard and Video Game Violence. The Journal of Popular Culture, 30(3), 143–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tron Legacy. (2010). J. Kosninski, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verheaghe, P. (2006). Enjoyment and Impossibility: Lacan’s Revision of the Oedipus Complex. In J. Clemens & R. Grigg (Eds.), Jacques Lacan and the Other Side of Psychoanalysis, Reflections on Seminar XVII (pp. 29–49). Durham: Duke University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Woodward, A. (2009). Nihilism in Postmodernity. Aurora: The Davies Group Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Žižek, S. (1994). Enjoy Your Symptom, Jacques Lacan in Hollywood and Out. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Žižek, S. (1999). The Ticklish Subject: The Absent Centre of Political Ontology. London: Verso Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zupančič, A. (2000). Ethics of the Real. London: Verso Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Angie Voela .

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Voela, A. (2017). Towards a New Anthropogony? Tron Revisited. In: Psychoanalysis, Philosophy and Myth in Contemporary Culture. Studies in the Psychosocial. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-48347-8_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics