Skip to main content

Refugees’ Encampment in Italy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Rethinking International Protection

Part of the book series: Migration, Diasporas and Citizenship ((MDC))

Abstract

In Italy, refugees tend to be ‘protected’ in the sense that the principle of non-refoulement is generally respected and access to the asylum procedure guaranteed. But we can hardly refer to protection in terms of emancipation. The biggest problem is not necessarily access to the asylum procedure but the following stage. Refugees are left unassisted in the sense that there is a general lack of opportunities for receiving socio-economic support and/or housing facilities even under conditions of homelessness and destitution. In full respect of the 1951 Refugee Convention, Italy accords to refugees the very same socio-economic rights guaranteed to its nationals. The problem is not simply which rights are guaranteed but how these rights are translated into practice. Many are those who find themselves under conditions of destitution, mostly because of the lack of answers, solutions or alternatives from public institutions, which tend to shift protection to private charity organizations. This situation has resulted in the emergence of a myriad of conditions of forced encampment, in the sense that a great number of refugees have resorted to their own survival strategies, including finding a place of shelter or making one by themselves.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The 1951 Refugee Convention was ratified on 24 July 1954 (law no. 722), while the 1967 Protocol on 14 February 1970 (law no. 95).

  2. 2.

    Article 1(3) does not contain the wording ‘refugees under mandate’, but simply ‘foreigners’, despite the special protection received from the UNHCR.

  3. 3.

    Social Adviser at CIR, Centro Servizi, conversation held in Badolato Superiore, Catanzaro, 22 May 2001.

  4. 4.

    Italian Official at the Ministry of the Interior and member of the Central Commission, interview held in Rome, 22 June 2001.

  5. 5.

    Social adviser at the Special Immigration Office, interview held in Rome, 19 June 2001.

  6. 6.

    Its implementation was regulated only following the D.P.R. 303/2004. Up to April 2005, the previous law was applied 40/1998.

  7. 7.

    From 20 August 2014, the number of the territorial commissions have been doubled (Law Decree no. 119/2014).

  8. 8.

    Interview with a protection officer at SPRAR, Rome, 10/12/2012. In March 2012, some 4634 were in their waiting list.

  9. 9.

    Formal and informal conversations were held in Rome between mid-December 2012 and beginning of February 2013.

  10. 10.

    Conversation with a member of Cittadini del Mondo, Rome, January 2013.

  11. 11.

    Dublin II Regulation applied up to end of 2013.

  12. 12.

    The application was originally lodged by 11 Somalis and 13 Eritreans who claimed that their forced transfer to Libya by the Italian authorities violated article 3 of the Convention and article 4 of the Protocol no. 4. The case goes back to May 2009, when Italian policy of interception at sea and push-back started to be more aggressive, following the agreement of 29 December with Libya, into force since 4 February 2009. On 6 May, three vessels, with some 200 people on board, were intercepted by three ships from the Italian Revenue Police (Guardia di finanza) and the Coastguard. Although the location of the interception was the Maltese Search and Rescue Region of responsibility, all the people were rescued and transferred to the Italian military ships and returned to Tripoli. No identification was carried out, and no information on protection was given. Once in Tripoli, all of them were handed over to the local authorities, and forced to disembark against their will. Fourteen of them were later granted the refugee status by the UNHCR office in Tripoli. Twenty-four were later contacted by the Italian Refugee Council, which played a key role in submitting their application to the ECHR. Two aspects are especially important to recall here from the ECHR’s sentence, enunciated in paragraphs 129 and 131. In the first one, ‘The Court observes that Italy cannot evade its own responsibility by relying on its obligations arising out of bilateral agreements with Libya’. As well documented in the Report of the Council of Europe’s Committee for the Prevention of Torture, Libya could not be considered as a safe country in terms of human rights and refugee law. And because unsafe, Italy had to take its international obligation seriously and could not shift its responsibility against countries whose human rights records are extremely poor. The consideration that Italy should have known the Libyan (violent) methods has been reaffirmed in paragraph 131, which states: ‘It therefore considers that when the applicants were removed, the Italian authorities knew or should have known that, as irregular migrants, they would be exposed in Libya to treatment in breach of the Convention and that they would not be given any kind of protection in that country’.

  13. 13.

    Doctor Donatella D’Angelo, member of the NGO, Cittadini del Mondo, conversation held at Salaam Palace, Rome, January 2013.

  14. 14.

    Termini is the main train station in Rome.

  15. 15.

    Foggia is the location of a CARA, that is, reception centre for asylum-seekers.

References

  • Amnesty International. (2014). Lives adrift. Refugees and migrants in peril in the central Mediterranean. http://www.amnesty.eu/content/assets/Reports/4380_SOS_Europe_SAR_complete_lowres.pdf. Accessed 13 Oct 2014.

  • ASGI (2011). Il diritto alla protezione. La protezione internazionale in Italia. Quale futuro? Alessandria: Impressioni Grafiche ONLUS Acqui Terme.

    Google Scholar 

  • Auge, M. (1995). Non-places (John Howe, Trans.). London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloch, A., Galvin, T., & Schuster, L. (2000). Editorial introduction. Journal of Refugee Studies, 13(1), 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CARITAS DI ROMA. (1997). Immigrazione: dossier statistico. Roma: Anterem.

    Google Scholar 

  • CARITAS DI ROMA. (1998). Immigrazione: dossier statistico. Roma: Anterem.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlini, V. (2010). Accoglienza e integrazione: la protezione sociale di richiedenti asilo e Rifugiati. In C. Hein (Ed.), Rifugiati: Vent’anni di storia del diritto d’asilo in Italia. Rome: Donzelli Editore.

    Google Scholar 

  • CeSPI (2000). Migrazioni e politiche locali: l’esperienza Italiana nel quadro Europeo. In D. di Ricerca (Ed.), Migrazioni. Scenari per il XXI Secolo. Rome: Agenzia Romana per la Preparazione del Giubileo.

    Google Scholar 

  • CIR. (1998a). Missione Cir in Puglia dal 2–6 Gennaio. Rome, unpublished report.

    Google Scholar 

  • CIR. (1998b). Nota Informativa sui Richiedenti Asilo Alloggiati nella Provincia di Catanzaro. Rome, unpublished report.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cittadini del Mondo. (2014, June). Palazzo Selam: The invisible city. Hensa deqi hedertena. http://www.associazionecittadinidelmondo.it/files/09510354_Selam%20report%20en.pdf. Accessed 10 May 2016.

  • Commissione de Mistura. (2007). Rapporto de Mistura. Il rapporto della Commissione per le verifiche e le strategie dei centri di accoglienza e permanenza temporanea. Ministero degli interni. http://www.interno.it/mininterno/export/sites/default/it/sezioni/sala_stampa/documenti/immigrazione/Rapporto_De_Mistura.html_1603681444.html. Accessed 10 Oct 2015.

  • Commissioni Riunite I-III. (1998). Audizione del Ministro degli Affari Esteri, Lamberto Dini, e del Ministro dell’Interno, Giorgio Napolitano, sulle Relazioni tra l’Italia e la Turchia e sulla Questione dei Profughi Curdi, 08/01/1998. In Camera dei Deputati, ‘Documentazione sul Caso Ocalan’, No. 117. Rome: Camera dei Deputati. Servizio Studi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corriere Romano. (2011, March 8). La mappa delle occupazioni a Roma. http://www.corriereromano.it/roma-notizie/10072/la-mappa-delle-occupazioni-a-roma.html. Accessed 30 May 2016.

  • COSA. (2015, August 6). Incontro a Selam Palace tra migranti, istituzioni e associazioni per il problema delle residenze. https://codadirittoasilo.wordpress.com/2015/08/07/incontro-a-selam-palace-tra-migranti-istituzioni-e-associazioni-per-il-problema-delle-residenze/. Accessed 22 May 2016.

  • CRI. (2014). La Croce Rossa al Salaam Palace di Roma: “Intervento indispensabile”. https://www.cri.it/flex/cm/pages/ServeBLOB.php/L/IT/IDPagina/22220. Accessed 19 May 2016.

  • Crisp, J. (2013). In search of solutions: Refugees are doing it for themselves, keynote speech presented at RSC 2014 Conference, Refugee Voices, Oxford. http://www.rsc.ox.ac.uk/news/in-search-of-solutions-refugees-are-doing-it-for-themselves-refugee-voices-opening-plenary-jeff-crisp

  • Cutts, M. (1998). Politics and humanitarianism. Refugee Survey Quarterly, 17(1), 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Damiani, M. (1999). La Questione Kurda. InServizio Sociale Internazionale, Albania, Kosovo e Popolo Kurdo Tre Tematiche che Interessano L’Italia. Roma: AWR.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Bernart, M. (1991–1992). Rifugiati e richiedenti asilo in Europa: nuove sfide, vecchi timori. Sociologia Urbana e Rurale, 13(36–37), 75–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • delle Donne, M. (1995). La Strada dell’Oblio. Richiedenti Asilo e Rifugiati in Italia. Roma: Sensibili alle Foglie.

    Google Scholar 

  • Der Spiegel. (2014, September 29). “Aren’t we human beings?”: One year after the lampedusa refugee tragedy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillon, M. (1999). The scandal of the refugee: Some reflections on the “inter” of international relations and continental thought. In D. Campbell & M. J. Shapiro (Eds.), Moral spaces. Rethinking ethics and world politics. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • di Pascale, A. (2010). Migration control at sea: The Italian case. In B. Ryan & V. Mitsilegas (Eds.), Extraterritorial immigration control: Legal challenges. Leiden: Martin Nijhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • Engbersen, G. (1999). Sans-papiers. Les Stratégies de Séjour des Immigrés Clandestins. Actes (M. Aujollet, Trans.), 129, 26–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2016, March 19). EU-Turkey agreement: Questions and answers. Brussels. http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_MEMO-16-963_en.htm. Accessed 28 May 2016.

  • Finotelli, C., & Sciortino, G. (2009). The importance of being southern: The making of policies of immigration control in Italy. European Journal of Migration and Law, 11(2), 119–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fondazione IntegrA/Azione. (2012, May) I rifugiati invisibili. L’accoglienza informale nella capitale. http://www.meltingpot.org/IMG/pdf/I_rifugiati_invisibili.pdf. Accessed 30 May 2016.

  • Galieni, S., & Patete, A. (2002). Frontiera Italia. Troina: Città Aperta Edizioni.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gazzetta del Sud. (1997, December 28). Il dramma dei kurdi si abbatte sulla Calabria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hailbronner, K., & Thiery, C. (1997). Schengen II and Dublin: Responsibility for asylum applications in Europe. Common Market Law Review, 34(4), 957–989.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamood, S. (2008). EU–Libya cooperation on migration: A raw deal for refugees and migrants? Journal of Refugee Studies, 21(1), 19–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrell-Bond, B. (1999). The experience of refugees as recipients of aid. In A. Ager (Ed.), Refugees. Perspectives on the experiences of forced migration. New York: Pinter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hein, C. (Ed.) (2010). Rifugiati: vent’anni di storia del diritto d’asilo in Italia. Rome: Donzelli Editore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hein, C., & Pittau, F. (1991). Aspetti giuridici relativi alla tutela dei rifugiati in Italia. Affari Sociali Internazionali, 29(2), 167–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heller, C., Pezzani, L., & Situ Studio. (2012). Forensic oceanography. Report on the ‘left-to-die boat’. http://www.forensic-architecture.org. Accessed 6 Oct 2014.

  • Human Rights Watch. (2015c, December). Europe’s refugee crisis. An agenda for action. https://www.hrw.org/report/2015/11/16/europes-refugee-crisis/agenda-action. Accessed 20 May 2016.

  • Hyndman, J. (2000). Managing displacement refugees and the politics of humanitarianism. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ICS. (2000). Dossier Nausicaa. Primo quadro sulla tutela del diritto d’asilo in Italia, unpublished report.

    Google Scholar 

  • Il Corriere della Calabria. (2015, March 16). Conclusa la protesta degli immigrati al Sant’Anna.

    Google Scholar 

  • Il Corriere della Sera. (1997c, November 6). L’emergenza dei curdi: resteranno in Italia solo i profughi politici.

    Google Scholar 

  • Il Corriere della Sera. (1997d, November 7). Fassino: i curdi non chiedono asilo. Saranno espulsi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Il Corriere della Sera. (1997f, November 20). Emergenza: sbarcano altri 400 curdi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Il Crotonese. (2015, March 16). Protesta migranti: bloccata la 106, chiuso l’aeroporto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Il Giornale. (1997, December 28). Kurdi, Sbarco dei Mille in Calabria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Il Giornale. (1998, January 2). Il sindaco di Badolato: darò Casa a chi Resta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Il Giornale di Calabria. (1997, December 28). Calabria, ‘Terra Promessa’ per i Kurdi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Il Manifesto. (1997, November 5). Accoglienza italiana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Il Quotidiano. (1998a, January 7). Un rifugio nel paese ‘in vendita’.

    Google Scholar 

  • Il Quotidiano. (1998b, January 9). A Badolato, progetto ‘multietnico’ elaborato dal comune.

    Google Scholar 

  • Il Tempo. (1997, December 28). Kurdi, lo sbarco dei disperati.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Herald Tribune. (2012, December 28). Asylum, then neglect in Italy, 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kibreab, G. (1999). Revisiting the debate on people, place, identity and displacement. Journal of Refugee Studies, 12(4), 384–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klepp, S. (2010). A contested asylum system: The European Union between refugee protection and border control in the Mediterranean sea. European Journal of Migration and Law, 12(1), 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korać, M. (2003). The lack of integration policy and the experiences of settlement: A case study of refugees in Rome. Journal of Refugee Studies, 16(4), 398–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • La Repubblica. (1997a, November 13). Per i profughi curdi Bonn sgrida l’Italia.

    Google Scholar 

  • La Repubblica. (2011, December 30). Immigrati, il 2011 anno record di arrivi. Aumentano le richieste d’asilo, più 102%.

    Google Scholar 

  • La Stampa. (2015, August 24). Protesta dei migranti: traffico in tilt verso Milano.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malkki, L. H. (1996). Speechless emissaries: Refugees, humanitarianism, and dehistoricization. Cultural Anthropology, 11(3), 377–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manconi, L., & Anastasia, S. (2012, June). Lampedusa non è un’isola. Profughi e migranti alle porte dell’Italia. http://www.protezionecivile.gov.it/resources/cms/documents/Lampedusa_non_e_isola.pdf. Accessed 30 May 2016.

  • MEDU. (2011). Città senza dimora. Indagine sulle strade dell’esclusione. http://www.mediciperidirittiumani.org/pdf/CITTA_SENZA_DIMORA_ROMA.pdf. Accessed 30 May 2016.

  • MEDU. (2016, April). Precarious asylum. The centres of special reception for asylum seekers and the experience in ragusa (Sicily). http://www.mediciperidirittiumani.org/pdf/Precarious_Asylum_summary.pdf. Accessed 5 May 2016.

  • Migration News Sheet. (1998a, January). Influxes of Kurdish asylum seekers, No. 178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Migration News Sheet. (1998b, February). Schengen partners express irritation at Rome’s decision to allow kurds apply for asylum, No. 179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monzini, P. (2007). Sea-border crossings: The organization of irregular migration to Italy. Mediterranean Politics, 12(2), 163–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, L. (2002). Managing migration. Civic stratification and migrants’ rights. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • MSF. (2016a, April 12). Fuori Campo. Richiedenti Asilo e Rifugiati in Italia: Insediamenti Informali e Marginalità Sociale. http://fuoricampo.medicisenzafrontiere.it/Fuoricampo.pdf. Accessed 19 May 2016.

  • MSF. (2016b, April 12). Fuori campo. Mappa dell’accoglienza che esclude. http://www.medicisenzafrontiere.it/notizie/news/fuori-campo-mappa-dell%E2%80%99accoglienza-che-esclude. Accessed 15 May 2016.

  • New York Times. (2012, December 28). In Italy, shantytowns of refugees reflect paradox on asylum, 12.

    Google Scholar 

  • New York Times. (2014, June 15). Palace of squatters is a symbol of refugee crisis, 6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrone, L. (1999). Diari dai Centri di Prima Accoglienza. Critica Marxista, 1–2, 38–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Presidenza del Consiglio dei Ministri. (2011, April 12). Piano per l’accoglienza dei migranti. http://www.protezionecivile.gov.it/resources/cms/documents/Piano_migranti.pdf. Accessed 30 May 2016.

  • Progetto MeltingPot. (2015, October 8). La crisi dell’asilo in Europa—Parte I. La ricollocazione dei richiedenti asilo fra gli Stati europei. Cos’è, come funziona? Analisi delle Decisioni 1523 e 1601 del 2015. http://www.meltingpot.org/stampa19757.html. Accessed 10 Jan 2016.

  • Progetto MeltingPot. (2016a). Hotspot, ovvero come cancellare il diritto d’asilo. Intervista a Paola Ottaviano, avvocato dell’associazione Borderline Sicilia. www.meltingpot.org/stampa20024.html. Accessed 4 Apr 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Progetto MeltingPot. (2016b, January 19). Le porte girevoli della Fortezza Europa. www.meltingpot.org/stamapa20045.html. Accessed 5 Apr 2016.

  • Puggioni, R. (2005). Refugees, self-help strategies, and institutional invisibility: Evaluating Kurdish experience in Rome. Journal of Refugee Studies, 18(3), 319–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Puggioni, R. (2006a). Resisting sovereign power: Camps in-between exception and dissent. In J. Huysmans, A. Dobson, & R. Prokhovnik (Eds.), The politics of protection. Sites of insecurity and political agency. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Puggioni, R. (2006b). Refugees reception and the construction of identities: Encountering Kurdish refugees in Italy. Borderlands E-Journal, 5(1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Puggioni, R. (2015). Border politics, right to life and acts of dissensus: Voices from lampedusa-borderland. Third World Quarterly, 36(6), 1145–1159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quassoli, F. (1999). Migrants in the Italian underground economy. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 23(2), 212–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reyneri, E. (1998). The role of the underground economy in irregular migration to Italy: Cause or effect? Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 24(2), 313–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rovelli, M. (2006). Lager italiani. Milan: BUR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sciortino, G. (1999). Planning in the dark. The evolution of Italian immigration control. In G. Brochmann & T. Hammar (Eds.), Mechanisms of immigration control. Oxford: Berg.

    Google Scholar 

  • SPRAR. (2016). Description of SPRAR. http://www.sprar.it/images/Inglese/SPRAR_Description_-_Italy.pdf. Accessed 20 May 2016.

  • The Independent. (2015, December 18). Refugees protest plans to allow Italy to forcibly fingerprint asylum seekers entering the country.

    Google Scholar 

  • The New York Times. (2012, December 28). In Italy, shantytowns of refugees reflect paradox on asylum, 12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tosi, A. (1995). Italy 1994 report. Brussels: Feantsa.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNHCR. (2016b). Refugees/migrants emergency response—Mediterranean, Italy. http://data.unhcr.org/mediterranean/country.php?id=105. Accessed 30 May 2016.

  • UNHCR. (2016c). Refugees/migrants emergency response—Mediterranean, Greece. http://data.unhcr.org/mediterranean/country.php?id=83. Accessed 30 May 2016.

  • Warner, D. (1999). The politics of the political/humanitarian divide. International Review of the Red Cross, 833, 109–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolff, S. (2008). Border management in the Mediterranean: Internal, external and ethical challenges. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 21(2), 253–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zincone, G. (Ed.) (2006). Familismo legale. Come (non) diventare italiani. Bari: Laterza.

    Google Scholar 

Legal Documents

  • Act no. 39, 28/02/1990. Norme urgenti in materia di asilo politico, di ingresso e soggiorno dei cittadini extracomunitari ed apolidi già presenti nel territorio dello Stato. Gazzetta Ufficiale, No. 49, 28 February 1990, which converted the decree-Law (decreto-legge) no. 416, 30 December 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council Decision 2015/1523/EC of 14 September 2015 establishing provisional measures in the area of international protection for the benefit of Italy and of Greece.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council Decision 2015/1601/EC of 22 September 2015 establishing provisional measures in the area of international protection for the benefit of Italy and Greece.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council Directive 2004/83/EC of 29 April 2004. Minimum Standards for the Qualification and Status of Third Country Nationals or Stateless Persons as Refugees or as Persons Who Otherwise Need International Protection and the Content of the Protection Granted.

    Google Scholar 

  • Council Directive 55/2001/EU of 20 July 2001. Minimum Standards for Giving Temporary Protection in the Event of a Mass Influx of Displaced Persons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Law Decree, no. 47, 28/03/2014, converted into Act no. 80, 23/05/2014. Misure urgenti per l’emergenza abitativa, per il mercato delle costruzioni e per Expo 2015. Gazzetta Ufficiale, No. 121, 27/05/2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Legislative Decree, no. 25, 28/01/2008. Attuazione della direttiva 2005/85/CE recante norme minime per le procedure applicate negli Stati membri ai fini del riconoscimento e della revoca dello status di rifugiato. Gazzetta Ufficiale, No. 40, 28/02/2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Legislative Decree, no. 140, 30/05/2005. Attuazione della direttiva 2003/9/CE, che stabilisce norme minime relative all'accoglienza dei richiedenti asilo negli Stati membri. Gazzetta Ufficiale, No.168, 21/07/2005.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2016 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Puggioni, R. (2016). Refugees’ Encampment in Italy. In: Rethinking International Protection. Migration, Diasporas and Citizenship. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-48310-2_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-48310-2_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-137-48309-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-48310-2

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics