Skip to main content

Works Councils as Crucial Social Institutions of Labor Regulation and Participation. Friedrich Fürstenberg’s Concept of Works Councils as ‘Boundary Spanning Institutions’

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Handbook of Workers’ Participation at Plant Level

Abstract

One of the most outstanding models of workers’ participation at plant level is the German system of co-determination or Mitbestimmung. Herein, Works Councils are elected every four years by all workers and employees of a single plant, independently of being unionized or not. From an international perspective, the system of Works Councils is difficult to understand and raises many questions. Trade unions often see Works Councils as a competition to the logic of trade unions. Management also is skeptical because of strong legal rights of Works Councils that could slow down management decisions, costs a lot of money, and needs to be fed continuously with information and favors. Workers and employees could suspect that Works Councils turn into bureaucratic ‘worker aristocracy’. This chapter explains the system of Works Councils embedding it in history and society and approaching it as a boundary spanning institution. First, it is a historical development since the beginning of the twentieth century and in the context of struggles of the working class after the First and the Second World War are presented. Second, the legal basis and the practical work of Works Councils as well as their spread and frequency in the German economy are offered. Then the analysis of Friedrich Fürstenberg ‘The Works Council – Structural Analysis of a Boundary Spanning Institution’ of 1958 is sketched out as one of the best scientific concepts to understand the social functions and mechanisms of Works Councils. Finally, some comments on the national and international reception of Fürstenberg’s broader work on Works Councils and the German regime of labor regulation and his role and impact in the international scientific community will be given.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The terms worker and employee are—if not specified in another way—used synonymously for reasons of wording variation.

  2. 2.

    We thank Tristan Bauer for his research assistance.

  3. 3.

    Neither the German Federation of Trade Unions (DGB) nor the Hans-Böckler-Foundation was able to give more specific data on the number of companies being ruled by the Law of Codetermination in the Coal and Mining Industries.

  4. 4.

    Russell Lansbury conducted a long interview with Friedrich Fürstenberg in 2014; all corresponding quotes are indicated as ‘interview Fürstenberg 2014’.

Bibliography

  • Behrens, M., & Dribbusch, H. (2014). Arbeitgebermaßnahmen gegen Betriebsräte: Angriffe auf die betriebliche Mitbestimmung. WSI-Mitteilungen, 2, 140–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blanpain, R. (1991). Fürstenberg Structure and Strategy, Bulletin of Comparative Labour Relation Series. Berlin/Heidelberg/New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brigl-Mathiaß, K. (1926). Das Betriebsräteproblem. Berlin/Leipzig: Walther de Gruyter & Co.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ellguth, P., & Kohaut, S. (2012). Tarifbindung und betriebliche Interessenvertretung: Aktuelle Ergebnisse aus dem IAB-Betriebspanel 2011. WSI-Mitteilungen, 65, 297–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fürstenberg, F. (1958). Der Betriebsrat: Strukturanalyse einer Grenzinstitution. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 10(3), 418–429.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fürstenberg, F. (1959). The Dynamics of Joint Consultation. The British Journal of Sociology, 10(3), 204–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fürstenberg, F. (1969a). Die Soziallage der Chemiearbeiter. Neuwied: Luchterhand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fürstenberg, F. (1969b). Workers’ Participation in Management in the Federal Republic of Germany. International Institute for Labour Studies Bulletin, 6, 94–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fürstenberg, F. (1971). Die Anwendung des Betriebsverfassungsgesetzes im Hause Siemens. München: Siemens AG.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fürstenberg, F. (1977). West German Experience of Industrial Democracy. The Annals, 431, 44–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greifenstein, R. (2011). Perspektiven der Unternehmensmitbestimmung in Deutschland. Ungerechtfertigter Stillstand auf der politischen Baustelle? Bonn: Friedrich-Ebert-Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greifenstein, R., Kißler, L., & Lange, H. (2014, September). Trendreport Betriebsrätewahlen – Zwischenbericht. Available from: http://www.boeckler.de/pdf/p_study_hbs_350.pdf. Accessed 21 Aug 2017.

  • Hauser-Ditz, A., Hertwig, M., & Pries, L. (Hrsg.) (2008). Betriebliche Interessenregulierung in Deutschland. Arbeitnehmervertretung zwischen demokratischer Teilhabe und ökonomischer Ezienz. Frankfurt/New York: Campus Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauser-Dietz, A., Hertwig, M., & Pries, L. (2010). Betriebliche Interessensregulierung in Deutschland. Frankfurt/New York: Campus Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidack, C. (1995). Arbeitsstrukturen im Umbruch. Festschrift für Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. Friedrich Fürstenberg. München/Mehring: Hampp Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karl, M. (1993). Fabrikinspektoren in Preußen. Das Personal der Gewerbeaufsicht 1854–1945: Professionalisierung, Bürokratisierung und Gruppenprofil. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ließmann, W. (1997). Historischer Bergbau im Harz. Ein Kurzführer. Berlin/Heidelberg/New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Monat, J., & Sarfati, H. (1986). Worker’s Participation: A Voice in Decisions, 1981–1985. Geneva: International Labour Organisation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Münk, D. (1995). Friedrich. Fürstenbergs Beiträge zur empirischen Erforschung der Arbeitsbeziehungen. Industrielle Beziehungen, 2(2), 211–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teuteberg, H.-J. (1961). Geschichte der betrieblichen Mitbestimmung in Deutschland. Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr (Paul Siebeck).

    Google Scholar 

  • Whyte, W. F. (1955). Money and Motivation: Analysis of Incentives in Industry. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ludger Pries .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Pries, L., Lansbury, R.D. (2019). Works Councils as Crucial Social Institutions of Labor Regulation and Participation. Friedrich Fürstenberg’s Concept of Works Councils as ‘Boundary Spanning Institutions’. In: Berger, S., Pries, L., Wannöffel, M. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Workers’ Participation at Plant Level. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-48192-4_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-48192-4_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-137-48191-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-48192-4

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics