Skip to main content

A Critical Introduction to What Is Art Education?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Education, Psychoanalysis, and Social Transformation ((PEST))

Abstract

This book draws its inspiration from the problematic raised by Deleuze and Guattari in their last book together, What is Philosophy?, which has been influential across many sectors of the academy due to the breadth of domains it addresses. Philosophy, science and art are each accounted for, and each discipline is attributed with its own distinct method, field of inquiry and orientation: succinctly put, philosophy is defined by its ability to create ‘pure concepts’; science, on the other hand, is charged to discover knowledge via functions and domains of reference, or regions as specific states of affairs; and lastly art creates new worlds of perception via blocs of affects and percepts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adkins, B. (2013). Rethinking philosophy and theology with Deleuze: A new cartography. London/New York: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agamben, G. (1999). Absolute immanence. In G. Agambem (Ed.), Potentialities (pp. 220–242). Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alcorn, M.,. R. (2013). Resistance to learning: Overcoming desire not to know in classroom teaching. New York/London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Andrejevic, M. (2013). Infoglut: How too much information is changing the way we thin and know. London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ansell-Pearson, K. (1997). Viroid: Perspectives on Nietzsche and the Transhuman condition. London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ansell-Pearson, K. (1999). Germinal life: The difference and repetition in Deleuze. London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Apter, E. (2013). Planetary dysphoria. Third Text, 27(1), 131–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaosmologies: Quantum field theory, chaos and thought in Deleuze and Guattari’s What is Philosophy? Paragraph, 29(2), 40–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ash, J. (2013). Rethinking affective atmospheres: Technology, perturbation and space times of the non-human. Geoforum, 49, 20–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atzmon, L., & Boradkar, P. (2014). Introduction: A design encounter with thing theory. Design and Culture: The Journal of Design Studies Forum, 6(2), 141–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bains, P. (2002). Subjectless subjectivities. In B. Massumi (Ed.), A shock to thought: Expression after Deleuze and Guattari (pp. 101–116). London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beighton, C. (2015). Deleuze and lifelong learning: Creativity, events, ethics. New York/London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, J. A. (2016). Deleuze and Guattari’s what is philosophy?: A critical introduction and guide. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benyus, J. (2002). Biomimicry: Innovation inspired by nature. New York: William Morrow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, D. M., Dartel, M. v., Dieter, M., Kasprzak, M. Muller, N., O’Reilly, R., Vicente, J. L. (2012). New aesthetic, new anxieties, Amsterdam: V2. Accessed 25 Mar 2015. http://www.v2.nl/publishing/new-aesthetic-new-anxieties

  • Bloom, I. (2007). On the style site: Art, society, and media culture. Berlin/New York: Sternberg Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bogost, I. (2012). Alien phenomenology, or what it’s like to be a thing. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bogue, R. (2004). Search, swim and see: Deleuze’s apprenticeship in signs and pedagogy of images. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 36(3), 327–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bogue, R. (2006). Fabulation, narration, and the people to come. In C. V. Boundas (Ed.), Deleuze and philosophy (pp. 202–226). Edinburgh: Edinburg University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bogue, R. (2013). Master apprentice. In I. Semetsky & D. Masny (Eds.), Deleuze and education (pp. 21–36). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolt, B. (2004). Art beyond representation: The performative power of the image. London: I.B. Tauris & Co. Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braidotti, R. (2013). The Posthuman. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryant, L. (2011). The democracy of objects. Ann Arbor: Open Humanities Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bryant, L. (2014). Onto-Cartography: An ontology of machines and media. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, I. (2000). Deleuzism: A metacommentary. London/Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, R. (2016). Deleuze and Guattari’s what is philosophy? London/New Delhi/New York/Sydney: Bloomsbury Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlin, M., & Wallin, J. (Eds.). (2014). Deleuze and Guattari, politics and education: For a people-yet-to-come. London/Oxford/New York/New Delhi/Syndney: Bloomsbury Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, N. (2010). The shallows: What the Internet is doing to our brains. London/New York: W.W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cecchetto, D. (2011). Deconstructing affect: Posthumanism and Mark Hansen’s media theory. Theory Culture & Society, 28(5), 3–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clough, P., & Halley, J. (Eds.). (2007). The affective reader: Theorizing the social. London/Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colebrook, C. (2004). The sense of space: On the specificity of affect in Deleuze and Guattari. Postmodern Culture, 15(1). Available at http://pmc.iath.virginia.edu/text-only/issue.904/15.1colebrook.txt

  • Colebrook, C. (2010). Deleuze and the meaning of life. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, R., & Ringrose, J. (Eds.). (2013). Deleuze and research methodologies. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, L. (2010). Making restorative sense with Deleuzian morality, art brut and the schizophrenic. Deleuze Studies, 4(2), 234–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Como, V. (2013). The black singularity. Drain, 8(1). Available at: http://drainmag.com/the-black-singularity/

  • Culp, R. (2014). Dark Deleuze project abstract. Available at https://anarchistwithoutcontent.wordpress.com/2014/04/09/dark-deleuze-project-abstract/

  • Dakers, J. R. (2011a). Blurring the boundaries between human and world. In M. J. de Vries (Ed.), Positioning technology education in the curriculum (pp. 41–52). Rotterdam/Boston/Taipei: Sense Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dakers, J. R. (2011b). Defining technological literacy by exploring the liminal space between technological disruptions. Vimeo (vimeo.com/49101331).

  • Dakers, J. R. (2014). Technological literacy as a creative process of becoming other. In J. R. Dakers (Ed.), New frontiers in technological literacy: Breaking with the past (pp. 9–27). New York/London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Damasio, A. (1995). Descartes’ error: Emotion, reason, and the human brain. New York: Harper Perennial.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, H., & Turoin, E. (2015). Art in the anthopocene: Encounters amongst aesthetics, politics, environments and epistemologies. Ann Arbor: Open Humanities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G. (1986). Cinema 1: The movement-image (H. Tomlinson & B. Habberjam, Trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press (C1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G. (1989). Cinema 2: The time-image (H. Tomlinson & R. Galeta, Trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press (C2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G. (1990). The logic of sense (M. Lester Trans. with C. Stivale, edited by C.V. Boudas). New York: Columbia University Press (LS).

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G. (1992). The fold: Leibniz and the Baroque (T. Conley, Trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press (TF).

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G. (1994). Difference and repetition (P. Patton, Trans.). New York: Columbia University Press (D).

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G. (1997a). Essays critical and clinical (D. W. Smith & M. A. Greco, Trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press (CC).

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G. (1997b). Negotiations 1972–1990. New York: Columbia University Press (N).

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G. (1998). Having an idea in cinema (on the cinema of Straub-Huillet) (E. Kaufman, Trans.). In E. Kaufman & K. J. Heller (Eds.) Deleuze and Guattari: New mappings in politics, philosophy, and culture (pp. 14–19). London/Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G. (2000). Proust and signs: The complete text (R. Howard, Trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press (PS).

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G. (2001). Pure immanence: Essays on a life (A. Boyman, Trans.). New York: Zone Books (PI).

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G. (2003). Francis Bacon: The logic of sensation (Trans. and Introduced: D. W. Smith). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press (FB).

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G. (2006). Foucault (S. Hand, Trans. and Ed.). London/New York: Continuum (F).

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1983). Anti-Oedipus: Capitalism and schizophrenia (R. Hurley, M. Seem & H. R. Lane, Trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press (A-O).

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). Thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia (B. Massumi, Trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, (TP).

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1996). What is philosophy? New York: Columbia University Press (WP).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dema, L. (2007). ‘Inorganic, Yet Alive’: How Deleuze and Guattari deal with the accusation of vitalism?. rhizomes 15 (Winter). Available at http://www.rhizomes.net/issue15/dema.html

  • Dirckinck-Holmfeld, K. (2015). Affect image, touch image. In D. Sharma & F. Tygstrup (Eds.), Structures of feeling: Affectivity and the study of culture (pp. 50–57). Berlin/Munich/Boston: Walter de Gruyter GmbH.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drohan, C. M. (2009). Deleuze and the sign. New York: Atropos Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drohan, C. M. (2013). Deleuze and the virtual classroom. In I. Semetsky & D. Masny (Eds.), Deleuze and education (pp. 112–133). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elkins, J. (2001). Why art cannot be taught: A handbook for students. Urbana/Chicago: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flaxman, G. (2011). Gilles Deleuze and the fabulation of philosophy: Volume powers of the false. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flaxman, G. (2012). Out of Field. Angelaki: Journal of the Theoretical Humanities, 17(4), 119–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, H. (2009). Questionaire on ‘The Contemporary’. October, 130, 3–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallese, V. (2001). The ‘Shard Manifold’ hypothesis. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 8(5-7), 33–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galloway, A. R. (2012). Laruelle and art. Continent, 2(4), 230–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galloway, A. R. (2014). Laruelle: Against the digital. Minneapolis/London: University of Minnesota Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Galloway, A., Thacker, E., & Wark, M. K. (2014). Excommunication: Three inquires into media and mediation. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gasché, R. (2014). Geophilosophy: On Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari’s what is philosophy? Evanston: Northwestern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gopnik, A., Meltzoff, A., & Kuhl, P. (1999). The scientist in the crib: What early learning tells us about the mind. New York: HarperCollins Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregg, M., & Seigworth, G. J. (Eds.). (2010). The affective reader. London/Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenfield, S. (2008). The question for meaning in the 21st century. London: Sceptre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grosz, E. (2008). Chaos, territory, art: Deleuze and the framing of the Earth. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grusin, R. (2010). Remediation: Affect and mediality after 9/11. London/New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Guattari, F. (1995). Chaosmosis: An ethico-aesthetic paradigm (P. Bains & J. Pefanis, Trans.). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, M. (2000). Becoming as creative involution? Contextualizing Deleuze and Guattari’s biophilosophy. Postmodern Culture, 11(1). Available at: http://pmc.iath.virginia.edu/text-only/issue.900/11.1hansen.txt

  • Hansen, M. (2004a). New philosophy for new media. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, M. (2004b). Communication as interface or information exchange? A reply to Richard Rushton. Journal of Visual Culture, 3(3), 359–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, M. (2006). Bodies in code. New York/London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, M. (2011). From fixed to fluid: Material-mental images between neural synchronization and computational mediation. In J. Khalip & R. Mitchell (Eds.), Releasing the image: From literature to the new media (pp. 83–111). Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, M. (2015). Feed-forward: On the future of twenty-first century media. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, P. A. (2005). To see with the mind and think through the eye, Deleuze Folding architecture and Simon Rodia’s Watts tower. In I. Buchanan & G. Lambert (Eds.), Deleuze and space (pp. 36–60). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, P. A. (2009). Deleuze as Wunderkind: Spirit, wonder, and the empiricist conversion experiment. In H. Berressem & L. Haferkamp (Eds.), Deleuzian events: Writing|history (pp. 254–268). Berlin: Lit Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haynes, P. (2014). Immanent transcendence: Reconfiguring materialism in continental philosophy. New York/London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hickey-Moody, A. (2013a). Youth, arts, education: Reassembling subjectivity through affect. London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hickey-Moody, A. (2013b). Affect as method: feelings, aesthetics and affective pedagogy. In R. Coleman & J. Ringrose (Eds.), Deleuze and research methodologies (pp. 79–95). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hickey-Moody, A., & Page, T. (Eds.). (2016). Arts, pedagogy and cultural resistance: New materialisms. London/New York: Rowman & Littlefield International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland, E. (2007). The neuroscience of metafilm. Projections, 1(1), 59–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holt, M. (2015). Transformation of the aesthetic: Art as participatory design. Design and Culture: The Journal of the Design Studies Forum, 7(2), 143–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hroch, P. (2015). Sustainable design activism: Affirmative politics and fruitful futures. In J. Brassett & B. Marenko (Eds.), Deleuze and design (pp. 219–245). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, J. (2008). Deleuze and the genesis of representation. London/New York: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • jagodzinski, j. (2007). Without Title: On the impossibility of art education: Art as becoming-posthuman (Gaitskell Address, Nov. 24, 2006). Canadian Journal of Education Through Art, 5(2), 6–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • jagodzinski, j. (2010a). Visual art and education in an era of designer capitalism. London/New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • jagodzinski, j. (2010b). Between aisthetics and aesthetics: The challenges to aesthetic education in designer capitalism. In Tracie Constantino and Boyd White, Eds. Essays on aesthetic education for the twenty-first century (29-42). Rotterdam/Boston/Taipei: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • jagodzinski, j. (2012). Immanent spirituality: Art|education in an era of digitalization. Visual Arts Forum: [Taiwan Journal], 7, 2–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • jagodzinski, j. (2013). Commentary: Concerning the spiritual in arts and its education: Postmodern-romanticism and its discontents. Studies in Art Education: A Journal of Issues and Research, 54(3), 277–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • jagodzinski, J. (2014a). Chapter 11, An avant-garde ‘without Authority’: Towards a future Oekoumene—If there is a future? In H. Felder, F. Vighi, & S. Žižek (Eds.), States of crisis and post-capitalist scenarios (pp. 219–239). Famham: Ashgate Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • jagodzinski, j. (2014b). 1780 and 1985: An avant-garde without authority, addressing the anthropocene. In I. Buchanan & L. Collins (Eds.), Deleuze and schizoanalysis of visual art (pp. 149–171). London/New York/New Delhi/Sydney: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • jagodzinski, j., & Wallin, J. (2013). Arts based research: A critique and proposal. Rotterdam/Boston/Taipei: Sense Publishers.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • James, I. (2012). The new French philosophy. Cambridge, UK/Malden: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaynes, J. (1976). The origin of consciousness in the breakdown of the Bicaeral Mind. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeong, S.-H. (2013). Cinematic interfaces: Film theory after new media. New York/London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Justaert, K. (2012). Theology after Deleuze. New York: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kearnes, M. (2006). Chaos and control: Nanotechnology and the politics of emergence. Paragraph, 29(2), 57–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kimbell, L. (2013). The object fights back: An interview with Graham Harman. Design and Culture: The Journal of Design Studies Forum, 5(1), 103–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kimbell, L. (2011). Rethinking design thinking: Part 1. Design and Culture: The Journal of Design Studies Forum, 3(3), 285–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kimbell, L. (2012). Rethinking design thinking: Part 2. Design and Culture: The Journal of Design Studies Forum, 4(2), 129–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knott, S. (2013). Design in the age of presumption: The craft of design after the object. Design and Culture: The Journal of Design Studies Forum, 5(1), 45–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, G. (2005). What the Earth thinks. In I. Buchanan & G. Lambert (Eds.), Deleuze and space (pp. 220–239). Toronto/Buffalo: University of Toronto Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, G., & Flaxman G. (2000–2002). Five propositions on the brain. Artbrain.org: Journal of Neuro-Aesthetic Theory. Available at http://www.artbrain.org/five-propositions-on-the-brain/

  • Laruelle, F. (1989). Biographiie de l’oeil. La Décision Philosoque, 9, 93–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laruelle, F. (1991). On the black universe in the human foundations of color (M. Abreu, Trans.). In Hyun soo choi: Seven large-scale paintings (pp. 2–4). New York: Thread Waxing Space.

    Google Scholar 

  • LeDoux, J. (1996). The emotional brain: The mysterious underpinnings of emotional life. New York: Touchstone Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leys, R. (2011). The turn to affect: A critique. Critical Inquiry, 37(3), 434–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Llinás, R. (2002). I of the vortex: From neurons to self. Cambridge, MA/London: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malik, S. (2013). On the necessity of art’s exit form contemporary art, Lectures series, 1–4: Friday, May 3 – Friday, June 14, 2013. Available on YouTube, http://artistsspace.org/programs/on-the-necessity-of-arts-exit-from-contemporary-art

  • Malik, S., & Phillips, A. (2011). The wrong of contemporary art. In P. Bowman & R. Stamp (Eds.), Reading Rancière: Critical Dissensus (pp. 111–128). London/Oxford/New York/New Delhi/Syndney: Bloomsbury Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackay, R. (2012). A brief history of Geotrauma. In E. Keller et al. (Eds.), Leper creativity: Cyclonopedia symposium. Brooklyn: Punctum Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malabou, C. (2008). What should we do with our brain? (S. Rand, Trans.). New York: Fordham University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marenko, B. (2014). Neo-animism and design: A new paradigm in object theory. Design and Culture: The Journal of Design Studies Forum, 6(2), 219–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marenko, B., & Brassett, J. (2015). Deleuze and design. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massumi, B. (1995). The autonomy of affect. Cultural Critique, 31, 83–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massumi, B. (2002). Parables for the virtual: Movement, affect, sensation. Durham/London: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Massumi, B. (2015). Politics of affect. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maturana, H., & Varela, F. (1980). Autopoesis and cognition: The realization of the living. Dordrecht/Holland/London/Boston: D. Reidel Publishing Company.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mickey, S. (2015). Whole earth thinking and planetary coexistence: Ecological wisdom at the intersection of religion, ecology, and philosophy. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Negarestani, R. (2008). Cyclonopedia: Complicity with anonymous materials. Melbourne: re:press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neidich, W. (2003). Blow-up: Photography, cinema and the brain. New York: Distributed Art Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Neil, P., & Wilson, M. (Eds.). (2010). Curating and the educational turn. London: Open Editions.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Sullivan, S. (2006). Pragmatics for the production of subjectivity: Time for probe-heads. Journal for Cultural Research, 10(4), 309–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pereira, P. C., & Harcha, J. Z. (2014). Revolutions of resolution: About the fluxes of poor images in visual capitalism. tripeC, 12(1), 315–327.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petrina, S. (2014). Postliterate machineries. In J. R. Dakers (Ed.), New frontiers in technological literacy: breaking with the past (pp. 29–43). New York/London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pfaller, R. (2003). Illusionen der Anderen. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pisters, P. (2012). The neuro-image: A Deleuzian film-philosophy of digital screen culture. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pisters, P. (2016). Neurothriller. Aeon. Available at: https://aeon.co/essays/horror-films-are-far-scarier-than-in-the-past-here-s-how

  • Plotnitsky, A. (2006). Chaosmologies: Quantum field theory, Chaos and thought in Deleuze and Guattari’s what is philosophy? Paragraph, 29(2), 40–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramey, J. (2012). The hermetic Deleuze: Philosophy and the spiritual ordeal. Durham/London: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rancière, J. (2004). Is there a Deleuzian aesthetics? Qui Parle, 14(2), 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinertsen, A. B. (Ed.). (2016). Becoming Earth: A post human turn in educational discourse collapsing nature/culture divide. Rotterdam/Boston/Taipei: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds, J. (2007). Wounds and scars: Deleuze on the time and ethics of the event. Deleuze Studies, 1(2), 144–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roden, D. (2014). Posthuman life: Philosophy at the edge of the human. London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy, K. (2003). Teachers in nomadic spaces: Deleuze and curriculum. New York: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy, Olivier (2014). Holy ignorance: When religion and culture part ways (R. Schwartz, Trans.). Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rushton, R. (2004). Response to Mark B.N. Hansen’s ‘Affect as Medium’, or the ‘Digital-Facial-Image’. Journal of Visual Culture, 3(3), 353–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rushton, R. (2008). Passions and actions: Deleuze’s cinematographic Cogito. Deleuze Studies, 2(2), 121–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sauvagnargues, A. (2013). Deleuze and art (S. Bankston, Trans.). London/Oxford/New York/New Delhi/Syndney: Bloomsbury Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schönher, M. (2013). The creation of the concept through the interaction of philosophy and science and art. Deleuze Studies, 7(1), 26–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Screel, L. (2014). The work of art as monument: Deleuze and the (after-) life of art. Footprint: Asignifying semiotics: Or, How to Paint Pink on Pink (Spring): 97–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sholtz, J. (2015). The invention of a people: Heidegger and Deleuze and the political. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Shults, F. L. R. (2014). Iconoclastic theology: Gilles Deleuze and the secretion of atheism. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Shults, F. L. R., & Powell-Jones, L. (2016). Deleuze and the Schizoanalysis of religion. London: Bloomington Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sparrow, T. (2013). Levinas unhinged. New York: Zero Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steyerl, H. (2009). In defence of the poor image. e-flux, 10. Available at http://www.e-flux.com/journal/in-defense-of-the-poor-image/

  • Thacker, E. (2010a). In the dust of this planet, Horror of philosophy (Vol. 1). Alresford: Zero Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thacker, E. (2010b). After life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Virno, P. (2008). Mirror neurons, linguistic egation, reciprocal recognition. In Multitude: Between innovation and negation (pp. 175–190) (I. Bertoletti, J. Cascaito & A. Cassson, Trans.). Los Angeles: Semiotex(e).

    Google Scholar 

  • Voss, D. (2013). Conditions of thought: Deleuze and transcendental ideas. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, J. (2013). Time and education in the philosophy of Gilles Deleuze. In I. Semetsky & D. Masny (Eds.), Deleuze and education (pp. 235–251). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, M. (2007). Proust and the squid. New York/London/Toronto/Sydney/New Delhi/Auckland: Harper Perennial.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodward, B. (2013). On an ungrounded Earth: Towards a new geophilosophy. New York: Punctum Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zepke, S., & O’Sullivan, S. (Eds.). (2010). Deleuze and contemporary art. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziarek, K. Z. (2004). Force of art. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Žižek, S. (2004). Organs without bodies: On Deleuze and consequences. New York/London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zourabichvili, F. (1996). Six notes on the percept (On the relation between the critical and the clinical). In P. Patton (Ed.), Deleuze: A critical reader (pp. 188–216). Oxford/Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

List of Abbreviations

List of Abbreviations

Works by Gilles Deleuze

C1:

Cinema 1: The Movement-Image

C2:

Cinema 2: The Time-Image

CC:

Essays Critical and Clinical

DR:

Difference and Repetition

F:

Foucault

FB:

Francis Bacon

PI:

Pure Immanence

LS:

Logic of Sense

N:

Negotiations

PS:

Proust and Signs

TF:

The Fold

Works by Gilles Deleuze and Fèlix Guattari

A-O:

Anti-Oedipus

TP:

Thousand Plateaus

WP:

What is Philosophy?

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

jagodzinski, j. (2017). A Critical Introduction to What Is Art Education?. In: jagodzinski, j. (eds) What Is Art Education?. Education, Psychoanalysis, and Social Transformation. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-48127-6_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-48127-6_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-137-48126-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-48127-6

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics