Abstract
This book draws its inspiration from the problematic raised by Deleuze and Guattari in their last book together, What is Philosophy?, which has been influential across many sectors of the academy due to the breadth of domains it addresses. Philosophy, science and art are each accounted for, and each discipline is attributed with its own distinct method, field of inquiry and orientation: succinctly put, philosophy is defined by its ability to create ‘pure concepts’; science, on the other hand, is charged to discover knowledge via functions and domains of reference, or regions as specific states of affairs; and lastly art creates new worlds of perception via blocs of affects and percepts.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Adkins, B. (2013). Rethinking philosophy and theology with Deleuze: A new cartography. London/New York: Bloomsbury.
Agamben, G. (1999). Absolute immanence. In G. Agambem (Ed.), Potentialities (pp. 220–242). Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Alcorn, M.,. R. (2013). Resistance to learning: Overcoming desire not to know in classroom teaching. New York/London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Andrejevic, M. (2013). Infoglut: How too much information is changing the way we thin and know. London/New York: Routledge.
Ansell-Pearson, K. (1997). Viroid: Perspectives on Nietzsche and the Transhuman condition. London/New York: Routledge.
Ansell-Pearson, K. (1999). Germinal life: The difference and repetition in Deleuze. London/New York: Routledge.
Apter, E. (2013). Planetary dysphoria. Third Text, 27(1), 131–140.
Chaosmologies: Quantum field theory, chaos and thought in Deleuze and Guattari’s What is Philosophy? Paragraph, 29(2), 40–56.
Ash, J. (2013). Rethinking affective atmospheres: Technology, perturbation and space times of the non-human. Geoforum, 49, 20–28.
Atzmon, L., & Boradkar, P. (2014). Introduction: A design encounter with thing theory. Design and Culture: The Journal of Design Studies Forum, 6(2), 141–152.
Bains, P. (2002). Subjectless subjectivities. In B. Massumi (Ed.), A shock to thought: Expression after Deleuze and Guattari (pp. 101–116). London/New York: Routledge.
Beighton, C. (2015). Deleuze and lifelong learning: Creativity, events, ethics. New York/London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Bell, J. A. (2016). Deleuze and Guattari’s what is philosophy?: A critical introduction and guide. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Benyus, J. (2002). Biomimicry: Innovation inspired by nature. New York: William Morrow.
Berry, D. M., Dartel, M. v., Dieter, M., Kasprzak, M. Muller, N., O’Reilly, R., Vicente, J. L. (2012). New aesthetic, new anxieties, Amsterdam: V2. Accessed 25 Mar 2015. http://www.v2.nl/publishing/new-aesthetic-new-anxieties
Bloom, I. (2007). On the style site: Art, society, and media culture. Berlin/New York: Sternberg Press.
Bogost, I. (2012). Alien phenomenology, or what it’s like to be a thing. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Bogue, R. (2004). Search, swim and see: Deleuze’s apprenticeship in signs and pedagogy of images. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 36(3), 327–342.
Bogue, R. (2006). Fabulation, narration, and the people to come. In C. V. Boundas (Ed.), Deleuze and philosophy (pp. 202–226). Edinburgh: Edinburg University Press.
Bogue, R. (2013). Master apprentice. In I. Semetsky & D. Masny (Eds.), Deleuze and education (pp. 21–36). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Bolt, B. (2004). Art beyond representation: The performative power of the image. London: I.B. Tauris & Co. Ltd.
Braidotti, R. (2013). The Posthuman. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Bryant, L. (2011). The democracy of objects. Ann Arbor: Open Humanities Press.
Bryant, L. (2014). Onto-Cartography: An ontology of machines and media. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Buchanan, I. (2000). Deleuzism: A metacommentary. London/Durham: Duke University Press.
Butler, R. (2016). Deleuze and Guattari’s what is philosophy? London/New Delhi/New York/Sydney: Bloomsbury Academic.
Carlin, M., & Wallin, J. (Eds.). (2014). Deleuze and Guattari, politics and education: For a people-yet-to-come. London/Oxford/New York/New Delhi/Syndney: Bloomsbury Publishing.
Carr, N. (2010). The shallows: What the Internet is doing to our brains. London/New York: W.W. Norton.
Cecchetto, D. (2011). Deconstructing affect: Posthumanism and Mark Hansen’s media theory. Theory Culture & Society, 28(5), 3–33.
Clough, P., & Halley, J. (Eds.). (2007). The affective reader: Theorizing the social. London/Durham: Duke University Press.
Colebrook, C. (2004). The sense of space: On the specificity of affect in Deleuze and Guattari. Postmodern Culture, 15(1). Available at http://pmc.iath.virginia.edu/text-only/issue.904/15.1colebrook.txt
Colebrook, C. (2010). Deleuze and the meaning of life. London: Continuum.
Coleman, R., & Ringrose, J. (Eds.). (2013). Deleuze and research methodologies. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Collins, L. (2010). Making restorative sense with Deleuzian morality, art brut and the schizophrenic. Deleuze Studies, 4(2), 234–255.
Como, V. (2013). The black singularity. Drain, 8(1). Available at: http://drainmag.com/the-black-singularity/
Culp, R. (2014). Dark Deleuze project abstract. Available at https://anarchistwithoutcontent.wordpress.com/2014/04/09/dark-deleuze-project-abstract/
Dakers, J. R. (2011a). Blurring the boundaries between human and world. In M. J. de Vries (Ed.), Positioning technology education in the curriculum (pp. 41–52). Rotterdam/Boston/Taipei: Sense Publishers.
Dakers, J. R. (2011b). Defining technological literacy by exploring the liminal space between technological disruptions. Vimeo (vimeo.com/49101331).
Dakers, J. R. (2014). Technological literacy as a creative process of becoming other. In J. R. Dakers (Ed.), New frontiers in technological literacy: Breaking with the past (pp. 9–27). New York/London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Damasio, A. (1995). Descartes’ error: Emotion, reason, and the human brain. New York: Harper Perennial.
Davis, H., & Turoin, E. (2015). Art in the anthopocene: Encounters amongst aesthetics, politics, environments and epistemologies. Ann Arbor: Open Humanities Press.
Deleuze, G. (1986). Cinema 1: The movement-image (H. Tomlinson & B. Habberjam, Trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press (C1).
Deleuze, G. (1989). Cinema 2: The time-image (H. Tomlinson & R. Galeta, Trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press (C2).
Deleuze, G. (1990). The logic of sense (M. Lester Trans. with C. Stivale, edited by C.V. Boudas). New York: Columbia University Press (LS).
Deleuze, G. (1992). The fold: Leibniz and the Baroque (T. Conley, Trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press (TF).
Deleuze, G. (1994). Difference and repetition (P. Patton, Trans.). New York: Columbia University Press (D).
Deleuze, G. (1997a). Essays critical and clinical (D. W. Smith & M. A. Greco, Trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press (CC).
Deleuze, G. (1997b). Negotiations 1972–1990. New York: Columbia University Press (N).
Deleuze, G. (1998). Having an idea in cinema (on the cinema of Straub-Huillet) (E. Kaufman, Trans.). In E. Kaufman & K. J. Heller (Eds.) Deleuze and Guattari: New mappings in politics, philosophy, and culture (pp. 14–19). London/Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Deleuze, G. (2000). Proust and signs: The complete text (R. Howard, Trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press (PS).
Deleuze, G. (2001). Pure immanence: Essays on a life (A. Boyman, Trans.). New York: Zone Books (PI).
Deleuze, G. (2003). Francis Bacon: The logic of sensation (Trans. and Introduced: D. W. Smith). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press (FB).
Deleuze, G. (2006). Foucault (S. Hand, Trans. and Ed.). London/New York: Continuum (F).
Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1983). Anti-Oedipus: Capitalism and schizophrenia (R. Hurley, M. Seem & H. R. Lane, Trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press (A-O).
Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). Thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia (B. Massumi, Trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, (TP).
Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1996). What is philosophy? New York: Columbia University Press (WP).
Dema, L. (2007). ‘Inorganic, Yet Alive’: How Deleuze and Guattari deal with the accusation of vitalism?. rhizomes 15 (Winter). Available at http://www.rhizomes.net/issue15/dema.html
Dirckinck-Holmfeld, K. (2015). Affect image, touch image. In D. Sharma & F. Tygstrup (Eds.), Structures of feeling: Affectivity and the study of culture (pp. 50–57). Berlin/Munich/Boston: Walter de Gruyter GmbH.
Drohan, C. M. (2009). Deleuze and the sign. New York: Atropos Press.
Drohan, C. M. (2013). Deleuze and the virtual classroom. In I. Semetsky & D. Masny (Eds.), Deleuze and education (pp. 112–133). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Elkins, J. (2001). Why art cannot be taught: A handbook for students. Urbana/Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
Flaxman, G. (2011). Gilles Deleuze and the fabulation of philosophy: Volume powers of the false. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Flaxman, G. (2012). Out of Field. Angelaki: Journal of the Theoretical Humanities, 17(4), 119–137.
Foster, H. (2009). Questionaire on ‘The Contemporary’. October, 130, 3–124.
Gallese, V. (2001). The ‘Shard Manifold’ hypothesis. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 8(5-7), 33–50.
Galloway, A. R. (2012). Laruelle and art. Continent, 2(4), 230–236.
Galloway, A. R. (2014). Laruelle: Against the digital. Minneapolis/London: University of Minnesota Press.
Galloway, A., Thacker, E., & Wark, M. K. (2014). Excommunication: Three inquires into media and mediation. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Gasché, R. (2014). Geophilosophy: On Gilles Deleuze and Félix Guattari’s what is philosophy? Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
Gopnik, A., Meltzoff, A., & Kuhl, P. (1999). The scientist in the crib: What early learning tells us about the mind. New York: HarperCollins Publishers.
Gregg, M., & Seigworth, G. J. (Eds.). (2010). The affective reader. London/Durham: Duke University Press.
Greenfield, S. (2008). The question for meaning in the 21st century. London: Sceptre.
Grosz, E. (2008). Chaos, territory, art: Deleuze and the framing of the Earth. New York: Columbia University Press.
Grusin, R. (2010). Remediation: Affect and mediality after 9/11. London/New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Guattari, F. (1995). Chaosmosis: An ethico-aesthetic paradigm (P. Bains & J. Pefanis, Trans.). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Hansen, M. (2000). Becoming as creative involution? Contextualizing Deleuze and Guattari’s biophilosophy. Postmodern Culture, 11(1). Available at: http://pmc.iath.virginia.edu/text-only/issue.900/11.1hansen.txt
Hansen, M. (2004a). New philosophy for new media. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Hansen, M. (2004b). Communication as interface or information exchange? A reply to Richard Rushton. Journal of Visual Culture, 3(3), 359–366.
Hansen, M. (2006). Bodies in code. New York/London: Routledge.
Hansen, M. (2011). From fixed to fluid: Material-mental images between neural synchronization and computational mediation. In J. Khalip & R. Mitchell (Eds.), Releasing the image: From literature to the new media (pp. 83–111). Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Hansen, M. (2015). Feed-forward: On the future of twenty-first century media. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Harris, P. A. (2005). To see with the mind and think through the eye, Deleuze Folding architecture and Simon Rodia’s Watts tower. In I. Buchanan & G. Lambert (Eds.), Deleuze and space (pp. 36–60). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Harris, P. A. (2009). Deleuze as Wunderkind: Spirit, wonder, and the empiricist conversion experiment. In H. Berressem & L. Haferkamp (Eds.), Deleuzian events: Writing|history (pp. 254–268). Berlin: Lit Verlag.
Haynes, P. (2014). Immanent transcendence: Reconfiguring materialism in continental philosophy. New York/London: Bloomsbury.
Hickey-Moody, A. (2013a). Youth, arts, education: Reassembling subjectivity through affect. London/New York: Routledge.
Hickey-Moody, A. (2013b). Affect as method: feelings, aesthetics and affective pedagogy. In R. Coleman & J. Ringrose (Eds.), Deleuze and research methodologies (pp. 79–95). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Hickey-Moody, A., & Page, T. (Eds.). (2016). Arts, pedagogy and cultural resistance: New materialisms. London/New York: Rowman & Littlefield International.
Holland, E. (2007). The neuroscience of metafilm. Projections, 1(1), 59–74.
Holt, M. (2015). Transformation of the aesthetic: Art as participatory design. Design and Culture: The Journal of the Design Studies Forum, 7(2), 143–165.
Hroch, P. (2015). Sustainable design activism: Affirmative politics and fruitful futures. In J. Brassett & B. Marenko (Eds.), Deleuze and design (pp. 219–245). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Hughes, J. (2008). Deleuze and the genesis of representation. London/New York: Continuum.
jagodzinski, j. (2007). Without Title: On the impossibility of art education: Art as becoming-posthuman (Gaitskell Address, Nov. 24, 2006). Canadian Journal of Education Through Art, 5(2), 6–15.
jagodzinski, j. (2010a). Visual art and education in an era of designer capitalism. London/New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
jagodzinski, j. (2010b). Between aisthetics and aesthetics: The challenges to aesthetic education in designer capitalism. In Tracie Constantino and Boyd White, Eds. Essays on aesthetic education for the twenty-first century (29-42). Rotterdam/Boston/Taipei: Sense Publishers.
jagodzinski, j. (2012). Immanent spirituality: Art|education in an era of digitalization. Visual Arts Forum: [Taiwan Journal], 7, 2–29.
jagodzinski, j. (2013). Commentary: Concerning the spiritual in arts and its education: Postmodern-romanticism and its discontents. Studies in Art Education: A Journal of Issues and Research, 54(3), 277–280.
jagodzinski, J. (2014a). Chapter 11, An avant-garde ‘without Authority’: Towards a future Oekoumene—If there is a future? In H. Felder, F. Vighi, & S. Žižek (Eds.), States of crisis and post-capitalist scenarios (pp. 219–239). Famham: Ashgate Press.
jagodzinski, j. (2014b). 1780 and 1985: An avant-garde without authority, addressing the anthropocene. In I. Buchanan & L. Collins (Eds.), Deleuze and schizoanalysis of visual art (pp. 149–171). London/New York/New Delhi/Sydney: Bloomsbury.
jagodzinski, j., & Wallin, J. (2013). Arts based research: A critique and proposal. Rotterdam/Boston/Taipei: Sense Publishers.
James, I. (2012). The new French philosophy. Cambridge, UK/Malden: Polity Press.
Jaynes, J. (1976). The origin of consciousness in the breakdown of the Bicaeral Mind. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Jeong, S.-H. (2013). Cinematic interfaces: Film theory after new media. New York/London: Routledge.
Justaert, K. (2012). Theology after Deleuze. New York: Continuum.
Kearnes, M. (2006). Chaos and control: Nanotechnology and the politics of emergence. Paragraph, 29(2), 57–80.
Kimbell, L. (2013). The object fights back: An interview with Graham Harman. Design and Culture: The Journal of Design Studies Forum, 5(1), 103–117.
Kimbell, L. (2011). Rethinking design thinking: Part 1. Design and Culture: The Journal of Design Studies Forum, 3(3), 285–306.
Kimbell, L. (2012). Rethinking design thinking: Part 2. Design and Culture: The Journal of Design Studies Forum, 4(2), 129–148.
Knott, S. (2013). Design in the age of presumption: The craft of design after the object. Design and Culture: The Journal of Design Studies Forum, 5(1), 45–67.
Lambert, G. (2005). What the Earth thinks. In I. Buchanan & G. Lambert (Eds.), Deleuze and space (pp. 220–239). Toronto/Buffalo: University of Toronto Press.
Lambert, G., & Flaxman G. (2000–2002). Five propositions on the brain. Artbrain.org: Journal of Neuro-Aesthetic Theory. Available at http://www.artbrain.org/five-propositions-on-the-brain/
Laruelle, F. (1989). Biographiie de l’oeil. La Décision Philosoque, 9, 93–104.
Laruelle, F. (1991). On the black universe in the human foundations of color (M. Abreu, Trans.). In Hyun soo choi: Seven large-scale paintings (pp. 2–4). New York: Thread Waxing Space.
LeDoux, J. (1996). The emotional brain: The mysterious underpinnings of emotional life. New York: Touchstone Books.
Leys, R. (2011). The turn to affect: A critique. Critical Inquiry, 37(3), 434–472.
Llinás, R. (2002). I of the vortex: From neurons to self. Cambridge, MA/London: MIT Press.
Malik, S. (2013). On the necessity of art’s exit form contemporary art, Lectures series, 1–4: Friday, May 3 – Friday, June 14, 2013. Available on YouTube, http://artistsspace.org/programs/on-the-necessity-of-arts-exit-from-contemporary-art
Malik, S., & Phillips, A. (2011). The wrong of contemporary art. In P. Bowman & R. Stamp (Eds.), Reading Rancière: Critical Dissensus (pp. 111–128). London/Oxford/New York/New Delhi/Syndney: Bloomsbury Publishing.
Mackay, R. (2012). A brief history of Geotrauma. In E. Keller et al. (Eds.), Leper creativity: Cyclonopedia symposium. Brooklyn: Punctum Books.
Malabou, C. (2008). What should we do with our brain? (S. Rand, Trans.). New York: Fordham University Press.
Marenko, B. (2014). Neo-animism and design: A new paradigm in object theory. Design and Culture: The Journal of Design Studies Forum, 6(2), 219–241.
Marenko, B., & Brassett, J. (2015). Deleuze and design. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Massumi, B. (1995). The autonomy of affect. Cultural Critique, 31, 83–109.
Massumi, B. (2002). Parables for the virtual: Movement, affect, sensation. Durham/London: Duke University Press.
Massumi, B. (2015). Politics of affect. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
Maturana, H., & Varela, F. (1980). Autopoesis and cognition: The realization of the living. Dordrecht/Holland/London/Boston: D. Reidel Publishing Company.
Mickey, S. (2015). Whole earth thinking and planetary coexistence: Ecological wisdom at the intersection of religion, ecology, and philosophy. London and New York: Routledge.
Negarestani, R. (2008). Cyclonopedia: Complicity with anonymous materials. Melbourne: re:press.
Neidich, W. (2003). Blow-up: Photography, cinema and the brain. New York: Distributed Art Publishers.
O’Neil, P., & Wilson, M. (Eds.). (2010). Curating and the educational turn. London: Open Editions.
O’Sullivan, S. (2006). Pragmatics for the production of subjectivity: Time for probe-heads. Journal for Cultural Research, 10(4), 309–322.
Pereira, P. C., & Harcha, J. Z. (2014). Revolutions of resolution: About the fluxes of poor images in visual capitalism. tripeC, 12(1), 315–327.
Petrina, S. (2014). Postliterate machineries. In J. R. Dakers (Ed.), New frontiers in technological literacy: breaking with the past (pp. 29–43). New York/London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Pfaller, R. (2003). Illusionen der Anderen. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
Pisters, P. (2012). The neuro-image: A Deleuzian film-philosophy of digital screen culture. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Pisters, P. (2016). Neurothriller. Aeon. Available at: https://aeon.co/essays/horror-films-are-far-scarier-than-in-the-past-here-s-how
Plotnitsky, A. (2006). Chaosmologies: Quantum field theory, Chaos and thought in Deleuze and Guattari’s what is philosophy? Paragraph, 29(2), 40–56.
Ramey, J. (2012). The hermetic Deleuze: Philosophy and the spiritual ordeal. Durham/London: Duke University Press.
Rancière, J. (2004). Is there a Deleuzian aesthetics? Qui Parle, 14(2), 1–14.
Reinertsen, A. B. (Ed.). (2016). Becoming Earth: A post human turn in educational discourse collapsing nature/culture divide. Rotterdam/Boston/Taipei: Sense Publishers.
Reynolds, J. (2007). Wounds and scars: Deleuze on the time and ethics of the event. Deleuze Studies, 1(2), 144–164.
Roden, D. (2014). Posthuman life: Philosophy at the edge of the human. London/New York: Routledge.
Roy, K. (2003). Teachers in nomadic spaces: Deleuze and curriculum. New York: Peter Lang.
Roy, Olivier (2014). Holy ignorance: When religion and culture part ways (R. Schwartz, Trans.). Oxford University Press.
Rushton, R. (2004). Response to Mark B.N. Hansen’s ‘Affect as Medium’, or the ‘Digital-Facial-Image’. Journal of Visual Culture, 3(3), 353–357.
Rushton, R. (2008). Passions and actions: Deleuze’s cinematographic Cogito. Deleuze Studies, 2(2), 121–139.
Sauvagnargues, A. (2013). Deleuze and art (S. Bankston, Trans.). London/Oxford/New York/New Delhi/Syndney: Bloomsbury Publishing.
Schönher, M. (2013). The creation of the concept through the interaction of philosophy and science and art. Deleuze Studies, 7(1), 26–52.
Screel, L. (2014). The work of art as monument: Deleuze and the (after-) life of art. Footprint: Asignifying semiotics: Or, How to Paint Pink on Pink (Spring): 97–108.
Sholtz, J. (2015). The invention of a people: Heidegger and Deleuze and the political. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Shults, F. L. R. (2014). Iconoclastic theology: Gilles Deleuze and the secretion of atheism. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Shults, F. L. R., & Powell-Jones, L. (2016). Deleuze and the Schizoanalysis of religion. London: Bloomington Academic.
Sparrow, T. (2013). Levinas unhinged. New York: Zero Books.
Steyerl, H. (2009). In defence of the poor image. e-flux, 10. Available at http://www.e-flux.com/journal/in-defense-of-the-poor-image/
Thacker, E. (2010a). In the dust of this planet, Horror of philosophy (Vol. 1). Alresford: Zero Books.
Thacker, E. (2010b). After life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Virno, P. (2008). Mirror neurons, linguistic egation, reciprocal recognition. In Multitude: Between innovation and negation (pp. 175–190) (I. Bertoletti, J. Cascaito & A. Cassson, Trans.). Los Angeles: Semiotex(e).
Voss, D. (2013). Conditions of thought: Deleuze and transcendental ideas. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Williams, J. (2013). Time and education in the philosophy of Gilles Deleuze. In I. Semetsky & D. Masny (Eds.), Deleuze and education (pp. 235–251). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Wolf, M. (2007). Proust and the squid. New York/London/Toronto/Sydney/New Delhi/Auckland: Harper Perennial.
Woodward, B. (2013). On an ungrounded Earth: Towards a new geophilosophy. New York: Punctum Books.
Zepke, S., & O’Sullivan, S. (Eds.). (2010). Deleuze and contemporary art. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Ziarek, K. Z. (2004). Force of art. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Žižek, S. (2004). Organs without bodies: On Deleuze and consequences. New York/London: Routledge.
Zourabichvili, F. (1996). Six notes on the percept (On the relation between the critical and the clinical). In P. Patton (Ed.), Deleuze: A critical reader (pp. 188–216). Oxford/Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
List of Abbreviations
List of Abbreviations
Works by Gilles Deleuze
- C1:
-
Cinema 1: The Movement-Image
- C2:
-
Cinema 2: The Time-Image
- CC:
-
Essays Critical and Clinical
- DR:
-
Difference and Repetition
- F:
-
Foucault
- FB:
-
Francis Bacon
- PI:
-
Pure Immanence
- LS:
-
Logic of Sense
- N:
-
Negotiations
- PS:
-
Proust and Signs
- TF:
-
The Fold
Works by Gilles Deleuze and Fèlix Guattari
- A-O:
-
Anti-Oedipus
- TP:
-
Thousand Plateaus
- WP:
-
What is Philosophy?
Copyright information
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
jagodzinski, j. (2017). A Critical Introduction to What Is Art Education?. In: jagodzinski, j. (eds) What Is Art Education?. Education, Psychoanalysis, and Social Transformation. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-48127-6_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-48127-6_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-48126-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-48127-6
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)