Advertisement

The Struggle for Visibility and Equality: Bosnian LGBT Rights

  • Safia Swimelar
Chapter
Part of the Gender and Politics book series (GAP)

Abstract

In 1995, the Dayton Peace Accords (DPA) brought an end to the entrenched three-year war in Bosnia-Herzegovina (hereafter ‘Bosnia’ or ‘BiH’) and set the stage for the construction of a new state that was to be based on the rule of law, democracy, and human rights. As the narrative is now familiar, while the DPA supported and created relative peace and better human rights protections, it has not been able to create a civic identity, a well-functioning state or democracy, or the strong implementation of human rights. The Dayton constitution has (along with informal state and societal practices) institutionalized ethno-national identities and representation in a way that is keenly felt today in almost all areas of Bosnian political life (Mujkić 2008). During the late 1990s and early 2000s, Bosnian political elites and the international community were focused not on minority rights, but instead on immediate security concerns, rebuilding the economy and country, creating a functioning state, and capturing and prosecuting war criminals. Especially since 2006, elites have been unable and/or unwilling to compromise and reform the political and electoral system in line with European Union (EU) expectations and requirements. However, the recent coming into force of the Stabilization and Association Agreement (SAA) with the EU may signal a change.

Keywords

European Union Sexual Minority Hate Crime Hate Speech Civil Society Actor 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. AKI. (2008). Bosnia: Gay festival closes after clashes with hardline Muslims. Adnkronos International [Online], 26 September. Retrieved January 18, 2015, from http://www1.adnkronos.com/AKI/English/CultureAndMedia/?id=1.0.2515181716.
  2. Ayoub, P. M. (2014). With arms wide shut: Threat perception, norm reception, and mobilized resistance to LGBT rights. Journal of Human Rights, 13(3), 337–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ayoub, P. M. (2015). Contested norms in new-adopter states: International determinants of LGBT rights legislation. European Journal of International Relations, 21(2), 293–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ayoub, P. M., & Paternotte, D. (Eds.) (2014). LGBT activism and the making of Europe: A rainbow Europe? Basingstoke, England: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  5. Barreiro, M., & Vasić, V. (2013). Monitoring the implementation of the Council of Europe Committee of Ministers recommendation on combating sexual orientation or gender identity discrimination. Sarajevo: Sarajevo Open Center.Google Scholar
  6. Berger, N. (2004). Tensions in the struggle for sexual minority rights in Europe. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Bieber, F. (2004). Institutionalizing ethnicity in the Western Balkans managing change in deeply divided societies. ECMI Working Paper #19 [Online]. Retrieved June 30, 2015, from http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/UNTC/UNPAN015487.pdf.
  8. Bieber, F. (2006). Post-war Bosnia: Ethnicity, inequality, and public sector governance. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bieber, F. (2010). Constitutional reform in Bosnia and Herzegovina: Preparing for EU accession. European Policy Centre Policy Brief [Online]. Retrieved June 5, 2015, from http://www.epc.eu/documents/uploads/1087_constitutional_reform_in_bosnia_and_herzegovina.pdf.
  10. Börzel, T. A., & Risse, T. (2003). Conceptualizing the domestic impact of Europe. In K. Featherstone & C. M. Radaelli (Eds.), The politics of Europeanization (pp. 57–80). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bosnia and Herzegovina 2008 Progress Report, SEC(2008) 2693, final.Google Scholar
  12. Butterfield, N. (2013). Sexual rights as a tool for mapping Europe: Discourses of human rights and European identity in activists' struggles in Croatia. In N. Fejes & A. P. Balogh (Eds.), Queer visibility in post-socialist cultures (pp. 11–34). Bristol, England: Intellect Ltd.Google Scholar
  13. Causević, A. (2010). Making it queer in post-socialist BiH. Master’s thesis, Central European University, Budapest.Google Scholar
  14. Checkel, J. (1999). Norms, institutions, and national identity in contemporary Europe. International Studies Quarterly, 43(1), 83–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Checkel, J. (2001). Why comply? Social learning and European identity. International Organization, 55(3), 553–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cortell, A., & Davis, J. (1996). How do international institutions matter? The domestic impact of international rules and norms. International Studies Quarterly, 40(4), 451–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cortell, A., & Davis, J. (2000). Understanding the domestic impact of international norms: A research agenda. International Studies Review, 2, 65–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ćuzulan, J. (2015). IDAHOT 2015: Pregled dešavanju u BiH. LGBT.ba [Online], 22 May. Retrieved June 15, 2015, from http://lgbt.ba/idahot-2015-pregled-desavanja-u-bih/.
  19. Đurković, S. (2008). The invisible Q? Human rights issues and concerns of LGBTQ persons in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Sarajevo: Organization Q.Google Scholar
  20. Enlargement strategy and main challenges 2013–2014, COM (2013) 700, final.Google Scholar
  21. E-Novine. (2015). Poboljšati položaj LGBT osoba u BiH. E-Novine, [Online] 21 May. Retrieved June 13, 2015, from http://www.e-novine.com/region/region-bosna/120748-Poboljati-poloaj-LGBT-osoba-BiH.html.
  22. Fagan, A. (2008). Global–local linkage in the Western Balkans: The politics of environmental capacity building in Bosnia-Herzegovina. Political Studies, 56(3), 629–652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Featherstone, K., & Radaelli, C. (Eds.) (2003). The politics of Europeanization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Fejes, N., & Balogh, A. (Eds.) (2014). Queer visibility in post-socialist cultures. Bristol, CT: Intellect.Google Scholar
  25. Freedom House. (2014). Bosnia and Herzegovina overview. Freedom House [Online]. Retrieved June 5, 2015, from https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-world/2014/bosnia-and-herzegovina#.VXHd5WTBzGc.
  26. Fischer, M (Ed.). (2007). Ten Years after Dayton: Peacebuilding and Civil Society in Bosnia Herzegovina. Berlin: Lit Verlag.Google Scholar
  27. Greenberg, J. (2006). Nationalism, masculinity and multicultural citizenship in Serbia. Nationalities Papers, 34(3), 321–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Grabbe, H. (2006). The EU Transformative Power: Europeanization through Conditionality in Central and Eastern Europe. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  29. Helsinki Committee for Human Rights in Bosnia and Herzegovina. (2008) Report on the status of human rights in Bosnia and Herzegovina: Analysis for the period January 2008–December 2008.Google Scholar
  30. Human Rights Watch. (2014). Bosnia and Herzegovina: Attack on LGBT Activists. 4 February. Retrieved June 5, 2015, from https://www.hrw.org/news/2014/02/04/bosnia-and-herzegovina-attack-lgbt-activists.
  31. ILGA-Europe (2013). Annual review of the human rights situation of lesbian, gay, bisexual, trans and intersex people in Europe 2013. Brussels, Belgium: ILGA-Europe. Retrieved June 10, 2015, from http://www.ilga-europe.org/resources/rainbow-europe/2015.
  32. ILGA-Europe. (2015). ILGA-Europe rainbow map May 2015, Brussels, Belgium: ILGA-Europe. Retrieved June 25, 2015, from http://rainbow-europe.org.
  33. Jukić, E. (2014). Sarajevo Queer Fest Violence Condemned, Balkan Insight, [Online] 3 February. Retrieved January 27, 2015, from http://www.balkaninsight.com/en/article/sarajevo-violence-over-queer-fest-condemned.
  34. Kajinic, S. (2008). ‘Battle for Sarajevo’ as ‘Metropolis’: Closure of the first queer Sarajevo festival according to liberal press. Anthropology of East Europe Review, 28(1), 62–82.Google Scholar
  35. Katzenstein, P. (Ed.) (1996). The culture of national security: Norms and identity in world politics. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Kelley, J. (2006). Ethnic politics in Europe: The power of norms and incentives. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Keck, M., & Sikkink K. (1998). Activists Beyond Borders. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Kulpa, R., & Mizielińska, J. (Eds.) (2011). De-centring western sexualities: Central and Eastern European perspectives. Surrey, England: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  39. Mikuš, M. (2011). “State Pride”: Politics of LGBT rights and democratisation in “European Serbia”. East European Politics & Societies, 25(4), 834–851.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Muja, A. (Ed.) (2013). The EU visa liberalisation process in Western Balkans: A comparative assessment. Pristina: Kosovar Center for Security Studies. Retrieved August 6, 2015, from http://www.qkss.org/repository/docs/The_EU_Visa_Liberalization_Process_in_the_Western_Balkans_Countries-A_Comparative_Assessment_363096.pdf.
  41. Mujkić, A. (2008). We, the citizens of ethnopolis. Sarajevo: Center for Human Rights.Google Scholar
  42. Nagel, J. (1998). Masculinity and nationalism: gender and sexuality in the making of nations. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 21(2), 242–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. O’Dwyer, C. (2010). From conditionality to persuasion? Europeanization and the rights of sexual minorities in post-accession Poland. Journal of European Integration, 32(3), 229–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. O’Dwyer, C. (2013). Gay rights and political homophobia in post-communist Europe: Is there an “EU effect”? In M. L. Weiss & M. J. Bosia (Eds.), Global homophobia: States, movements, and the politics of oppression (pp. 103–126). Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  45. O’Dwyer, C., & Schwartz, K. Z. S. (2010). Minority rights after EU enlargement: A comparison of antigay politics in Poland and Latvia. Comparative European Politics, 8(2), 220–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Pandurević, D., Bošnjak, E., & Kučukalić, N. (2015). Political parties and the human rights of LGBT people: Monitoring of the general election 2014. Sarajevo: Sarajevo Open Center.Google Scholar
  47. Pickering, P. (2007). Peacebuilding in the Balkans: The view from the ground floor. Cornell: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Popov-Momčinović, Z. (2013). Ko smo mi da sudimo drugima. Sarajevo: Heinrich Boll, Foundation CURE, Sarajevo Open Center. Retrieved August 4, 2015, from http://soc.ba/site/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/ko_smo_mi_2013_10_25web1.pdf.
  49. Risse, T., Ropp, S., & Sikkink, K. (1999). The power of human rights. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Risse, T., Ropp, S., & Sikkink, K. (2013). The persistent power of human rights. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Risse-Kappen, T (Ed.). (1995). Bringing Transnational Relations Back In: Non-State Actors, Domestic Structures and International Institutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  52. Schäuble, M. (2009). Contested masculinities: Discourses on the role of Croatian combatants during the “Homeland War” (1991–1995). In C. Eifler & R. Seifert (Eds.), Gender dynamics and post-conflict reconstruction (pp. 169–198). Frankfurt am Main, Germany: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  53. Schimmelfennig, F., & Sedelmeier, U. (Eds.) (2005). The Europeanization of Central and Eastern Europe. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  54. Slootmaeckers, K., & Touquet, H. (2016). The Co-evolution of EU’s Eastern enlargement and LGBT politics: An ever gayer union? In K. Slootmaeckers, H. Touquet, & P. Vermeersch (Eds.), The EU enlargement and gay politics. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  55. SOC (Sarajevo Open Center). (2015). Written submission by Sarajevo Open Centre on the state of human rights of LGBT people in Bosnia and Herzegovina tot the 2015 progress report. Sarajevo: Sarajevo Open Center. Retrieved September 28, 2015, from http://soc.ba/site/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/Written-submission_2015-Progress-Report_LGBT-rights_Sarajevo-Open-Centre.pdf.
  56. Subotić, J. (2011). Europe is a state of mind: Identity and Europeanization in the Balkans. International Studies Quarterly, 55(2), 309–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Swimelar, S. (2008). The making of minority rights norms in the context of EU enlargement: The Czech Republic and the Roma. The International Journal of Human Rights, 12(4), 505–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Tinjak, A. (2015). Intervju: Vesna Švancer: Svako je Osjetljiv kada njegovo pravo povrijeđeno. LGBT.ba, [Online] 28 May. Retrieved February 12, 2015, from http://lgbt.ba/intervju-vesna-svancer-svako-je-osjetljiv-kada-je-njegovo-pravo-povrijedjeno/.
  59. Vasić, V., Gavrić, S., & Bošnjak, E. (2014). Pink report: Annual report on the state of human rights of LGBT persons in Bosnia Herzegovina in 2014. Sarajevo: Sarajevo Open Center.Google Scholar
  60. Weiss, M. L., & Bosia, M. J. (Eds.) (2013). Global homophobia: States, movements, and the politics of oppression. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
  61. Wilkinson, C. (2014). LGBT activism in Kyrgyzstan: What role for Europe? In P. M. Ayoub & D. Paternotte (Eds.), LGBT activism and the making of Europe: A rainbow Europe? (pp. 50–72). Palgrave Macmillan: Basingstoke, England.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Yuval-Davis, N. (1997). Gender and nation. London: Sage.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Safia Swimelar
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Political Science and Policy StudiesElon UniversityUSA

Personalised recommendations