Advertisement

Same-Sex Partnership Debate in Slovenia: Between Declarative Support and Lack of Political Will

  • Roman Kuhar
  • Metka Mencin Čeplak
Chapter
  • 446 Downloads
Part of the Gender and Politics book series (GAP)

Abstract

‘Nothing much’, replied one Slovenian gay activist when asked by a Western journalist what had changed for the LGBT community in Slovenia after 1989. The fall of the Berlin wall and the political changes in the European socialist countries at that time may have been a crucial turning point for some of the Eastern European LGBT communities, and the first opportunity for the LGBT movement that would eventually emerge in some of the post-socialist states, but that was not the case in Slovenia. ‘Nothing much’ referred to the fact that, in 1991, when Slovenia gained its independence, the gay movement had been already active for seven years, and the most important political demands for equality had already been voiced and acted upon. The change in the political system did not alter the essence of these demands, but it did create a new, post-socialist context, and for a moment, raised high hopes that demands for equality would soon be met. Why this did not happen is the focus of this chapter, which provides an overview of the trajectory of the Slovenian gay and lesbian movement. It focuses on the three decades of struggles aimed at deconstructing the heteronormative foundations of partnership and family legislation in Slovenia, and shows that while Europeanization and international norms might have been important factors in these debates, the delays in and resistance to the adoption of marriage equality legislation are best explained by the internal relations between and within the parties that have made up the ruling coalitions in Slovenia over the past 20 years. Furthermore, the role of the conservative movements and political parties—often in close relationship with the Roman Catholic Church—cannot be ignored.

Keywords

Heterosexual Couple Sexual Prejudice Marriage Equality Legal Recognition Family Code 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Ayoub, P. M. (2014). With arms wide shut: Threat perception, norm perception, and mobilized resistance to LGBT rights. Journal of Human Rights, 13(3), 337–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Foucault, M. (1978). History of sexuality, Vol. I: The will to knowledge. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
  3. Foucault, M. (1994). The order of things: An archeology of the human sciences. New York: Random House, Inc..Google Scholar
  4. Hodžič, A., & Bijelić, N. (2014). Neo-conservative threats to sexual and reproductive health & rights in the European Union. Zagreb, Croatia: CESI.Google Scholar
  5. Howell, K. E. (2004). Developing conceptualizations of Europeanization: Synthesizing methodological approaches. Queens Papers on Europeanization, 3/2004.Google Scholar
  6. Kerševan, M. (1996). Cerkev v postsocializmu. Družboslovne razprave, 12(21), 43–56.Google Scholar
  7. Kirn, G., 2013. Social uprising in Slovenia against neoliberal austerity measures. Global Research, [Online] February 25. Retrieved July 10, 2015, from http://www.globalresearch.ca/social-uprising-in-slovenia-against-neoliberal-austerity-measures/5324218.
  8. Kollman, K. (2009). European institutions, transnational networks and national same-sex unions policy: When soft law hits harder. Contemporary Politics, 15(1), 37–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kuhar, R. (2015). Playing with science: Sexual citizenship and the Roman Catholic Church counter-narratives in Slovenia and Croatia. Women’s Studies International Forum, 49(1), 84–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Luthar, O., Grdina, I., Šašel Kos, M., Svoljšak, P., Kos, P., Štih, D., et al. (Eds.) (2013). The land between: A history of Slovenia. Frankurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  11. Mastnak, T. (1992). Vzhodno od raja. Ljubljana, Slovenia: Državna založba Slovenije.Google Scholar
  12. Mencin Čeplak, M. (2013a). Heteronormativity: School, ideology, and politics. Pedagogický časopis, 4(2), 162–187.Google Scholar
  13. Mencin Čeplak, M. (2013b). Heteronormativnost in regulacije rodnosti. Annales Series historia et sociologia, 23(2), 403–414.Google Scholar
  14. Mosse, G. L. (1985). Nationalism and sexuality: Respectability and abnormal sexuality in modern Europe. New York: H. Fertig.Google Scholar
  15. O’Dwyer, C. (2012). Does the EU help or hinder gay-rights movements in postcommunist Europe? The case of Poland. East European Politics, 28(4), 332–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. O’Dwyer, C., & Vermeersch, P. (2016). From pride to politics: Niche-party politics and LGBT rights in Poland. In K. Slootmaeckers, H. Touquet, & P. Vermeersch (Eds.), The EU enlargement and gay politics. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  17. Olsen, J. P. (2002). The Many Faces of Europeanization. Journal of Common Market Studies, 40(5), 921–952.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Paternotte, D. (2014). Christian trouble: The Catholic Church and the subversion of gender. CritCom, [Online] 8 May. Retrieved January 3, 2015, from http://councilforeuropeanstudies.org/critcom/christian-trouble-the-catholic-church-and-the-subversion-of-gender/.
  19. Paternotte, D., & Kollman, K. (2013). Regulating intimate relationships in the European polity: Same-sex unions and policy convergence. Social politics, 20(4), 510–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Pavlovič, V. (2006). Društevni pokreti i promene. Beograd, Serbia: Službeni glasnik.Google Scholar
  21. Radaelli, C. (2000). Whiter Europeanization? Concept stretching and substantive change. European Integration Online Papers, 4(8), 1–12.Google Scholar
  22. Repe, B. (2000). Slovenci v osemdesetih letih (drugi del). Zgodovinski časopis, 54(2), 233–262.Google Scholar
  23. Yuval-Davis, N. (1997). Gender & nation. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  24. Žnidaršič Skubic, V. (2006). Pravna narava zakonske zveze. In Z. Kobe & I. Pribac (Eds.), Prava poroka? Dvanajst razmišljanj o zakonski zvezi (pp. 211–236). Ljubljana, Slovenia: Krtina.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Roman Kuhar
    • 1
  • Metka Mencin Čeplak
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Arts, Department of SociologyUniversity of LjubljanaLjubljanaSlovenia

Personalised recommendations