Advertisement

Nationalism and Homophobia in Central and Eastern Europe

  • Richard C. M. Mole
Chapter
Part of the Gender and Politics book series (GAP)

Abstract

In terms of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) rights, few organizations have done as much to promote the legal equality of sexual minorities as the European Union (EU). Especially since the inclusion of sexual orientation in the equalities agenda through Article 19 of Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU; formerly Article 13 TEC), there has been increased pressure at the European level for existing members and accession states to promote the equal rights of their LGBT citizens (Slootmaeckers and Touquet 2016). Despite similar top-down pressure, however, the degree of legal equality for LGBT individuals—not to mention social attitudes towards homosexuality—differs markedly across the region, with the situation particularly difficult in the states of the EU’s Eastern Partnership. The aim of this chapter is to suggest that the failure of Europeanization—understood here as the adoption of EU laws and values—to liberalize attitudes towards sexual minorities in Central and Eastern Europe can be explained in large part with reference to the nation. In line with the conclusions of Freyburg and Richter (2010) and Schimmelfennig and Sedelmeier (2005) on the need to move beyond rationalist arguments and incorporate ideational factors to explain the relative success or failure of Europeanization, I argue that in many Central and East European member states and accession countries, homosexuality clashes with discourses of national identity, which have greater resonance among the population. This chapter will also demonstrate that EU support for LGBT equality can also have a negative impact on attitudes towards non-heteronormative individuals in states that are neither EU member states nor candidate countries, in that nationalist politicians use the EU’s more liberal position towards LGBT rights to draw a boundary between the ‘decadent West’ and ‘traditional East’ for their own social and political purposes. The analysis will focus in particular on the case studies of Latvia, Serbia and Russia to show that in each case, the marginalization of LGBT individuals is legitimized with calls to ‘the defence of the nation’.

Keywords

European Union Sexual Minority Internal Homogeneity Patriarchal Family Ethnic Nation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Aljazeera. (2014). Putin: Russia must ‘cleanse’ itself of gays, but they shouldn’t fear Sochi. Aljazeera America, [Online] 19 January. Retrieved April 21, 2015, from http://america.aljazeera.com/articles/2014/1/19/putin-russia-mustcleanseitselfofgays.html.
  2. Ayoub, P. M. (2014). With arms wide shut: Threat perception, norm reception, and mobilized resistance to LGBT rights. Journal of Human Rights, 13(3), 337–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. BBC. (2005). Latvia gay pride given go-ahead. BBC News, [Online] 22 July. Retrieved June 23, 2008, from http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/4708617.stm.
  4. Brenman, M. & Byrne, C. (2007). Fury at Polish president gay threat warning. Irish Independent, [Online] 21 February. Retrieved June 25, 2008, from http://www.independent.ie/national-news/fury-at-polish-president-gay-threat-warning-56059.html.
  5. Breuilly, J. (1993). Nationalism and the state. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Brubaker, R. (1999). Nationalism reframed: Nationhood and the national question in the new Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Bracewell, W. (1996). Women, motherhood and contemporary Serbian nationalism. Women’s Studies International Forum 19, 25–33.Google Scholar
  8. Charles, N., & Hintjens, H. (1998). Gender, ethnicity and political ideologies. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Connor, W. (1992). The nation and its myth. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, 33, 48–57Google Scholar
  10. Doty, R.L. (1996). Immigration and national identity: Constructing the nation. Review of International Studies, 22, 235–255.Google Scholar
  11. Duncan, P. J. S. (2000). Russian messianism: Third Rome, revolution, communism and after. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Foucault, M. (1978). The history of sexuality (vol. 1, ). New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
  13. Freyburg, T., & Richter, S. (2010). National identity matters: The limited impact of EU political conditionality in the Western Balkans. Journal of European Public Policy, 17(2), 263–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gal, S. (1994). Gender in the post-socialist transition: The abortion debate in Hungary. East European Politics and Societies, 8(2), 256–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gellner, E. (1996). Nations and nationalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Gil-White, F. J. (2001). Are ethnic groups biological “species” to the human brain? Essentialism in our cognition of some social categories. Current Anthropology, 42(4), 515–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Greenberg, J. (2006). Nationalism, masculinity and multicultural citizenship in Serbia. Nationalities Papers, 34(3), 321–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Greenwood, P. A. (2007). Crucible of hate. The Guardian, [Online] 1 June. Retrieved March 3, 2010, from http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2007/jun/01/gayrights.poland.
  19. Hall, D. (2015). Antagonism in the making: Religion and homosexuality in post-communists Poland. In S. Sremac & R. R. Ganzevoort (Eds.), Religious and sexual nationalisms in Central and Eastern Europe. Gods, gays and governments (pp. 74–92). Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Healey, D. (2001). Homosexual desire in revolutionary Russia: The regulation of sexual and gender dissent. London: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hilpern, K. (2009). Flying the flag: Why pride is still relevant. The Independent, [Online] 18 June. Retrieved June 20, 2009, from http://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/love-sex/flyingthe-flag-why-pride-is-still-relevant-1707556.html.
  22. Hobsbawm, E. J. (1995). Nations and nationalism since 1780. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Inglehart, R., & Baker, W. E. (2000). Modernization, cultural change, and the persistence of traditional values. American Sociological Review, 65, 19–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kahlina, K. (2013). Contested terrain of sexual citizenship: EU accession and the changing position of sexual minorities in the post-Yugoslav context. The Europeanisation of Citizenship in the Successor States of the Former Yugoslavia Working Paper Series. Edinburgh: School of Law, University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar
  25. Kohn, H. (1967). The idea of nationalism: A study of its origins and backgrounds. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  26. Linz, J. J., & Stepan, A. (1996). Problems of democratic transition and consolidation: Southern Europe, South America, and post-communist Europe. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation. (2013). Report on the human rights situation in the European Union. [Online] Retrieved July 14, 2015, from http://archive.mid.ru//BDOMP/Brp_4.nsf/arh/AE1F6F483631588444257C60004A6491?OpenDocument.
  28. Mole, R. C. M. (2011). Nationality and sexuality: Homophobic discourse and the ‘national threat’ in contemporary Latvia. Nations and Nationalism, 17(3), 540–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mole, R. C. M. (2013). The baltic States from the Soviet Union to the European Union. Identity, discourse and power in the post-communist transition of Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania. Abingdon, England: Routledge.Google Scholar
  30. Mosse, G. L. (1985). Nationalism and sexuality: Respectability and abnormal sexuality in modern Europe. New York: Howard Fertig.Google Scholar
  31. Mosse, G. L. (1996). The image of man: The creation of modern masculinity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  32. Mouffe, C. (2005). On the political. Abingdon, England: Routledge.Google Scholar
  33. Mozaīka. (2007). Annex 1, database of quotes. In: Mozaīka. Homophobic speech in Latvia: Monitoring the politicians. [Online] Retrieved October 1, 2009, from www.ilga-europe.org/home/what_we_do/ilga_europe_as_a_funder/completed_projects/homophobic_hate_speech_in_latvia_monitoring_the_decision_makers.
  34. Nagel, J. (1998). Masculinity and nationalism: Gender and sexuality in the making of nations. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 21(2), 242–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Nagel, J. (2000). Ethnicity and sexuality. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 107–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Nagel, J. (2003). Race, ethnicity and sexuality. Intimate intersections, forbidden frontiers. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Novikova, I. (2002). Gender, ethnicity and identity politics in Latvia. In R. Ivekovic & J. Mostov (Eds.), From gender to nation (pp. 171–187). Ravenna, Italy: Longo Editore.Google Scholar
  38. Parker, A., Russo, M., Sommer, D., & Yaeger, P. (Eds.) (1992). Nationalisms and sexualities. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  39. Pateman, C. (1988). The sexual contract. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  40. Pavasović Trošt, T., & Slootmaeckers, K. (2015). Religion, homosexuality and nationalism in the Western Balkans: The role of religious institutions in defining the nation. In S. Sremac & R. R. Ganzevoort (Eds.), Religious and sexual nationalisms in Central and Eastern Europe. Gods, gays and governments (pp. 154–180). Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Pechersaya, N. V. (2013). Perspektivy rossiiskoi semejnoi politiki: prinuzhdenie k traditsii [Prospects for Russian family policy: The drive towards tradition]. Zhurnal Sotsiologii i Sotsialnoi Antropologii, 69(4), 94–105.Google Scholar
  42. Peterson, V. S. (1999). Political identities/nationalism as heterosexism. International Feminist Journal of Politics., 1(1), 34–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Plugge-Foust, C., & Strickland, G. (2000). Homophobia, irrationality, and Christian ideology: Does a relationship exist? Journal of Sex Education and Therapy, 25, 240–244.Google Scholar
  44. Prendergast, F. (2000). Dead man used to attack Yugoslav gays. Daily Xtra, [Online] 26 January. Retrieved August 27, 2015, from http://www.dailyextra.com/toronto/dead-man-used-attack-yugoslav-gays-56882.
  45. President of Russia. (2013). Poslanie Prezidenta Federal’nomy Sobraniyu. [Presidential Address to the Federal Assembly.] Website of the President of Russia. [Online] Retrieved July 7, 2015, from http://kremlin.ru/events/president/news/19825.
  46. President of Russia. (2014). Interv’yu rossiyskim i inostranym SMI. [Interview with Russian and Foreign Media.] Website of the President of Russia. [Online] Retrieved July 7, 2015, from http://kremlin.ru/events/president/news/20080.
  47. Pryke, S. (1998). Nationalism and sexuality, what are the issues? Nations and Nationalism, 4(4), 529–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Rivkin-Fish, M. (2006). From “demographic crisis” to “dying nation”—The politics of language and reproduction in Russia. In H. Goscilo & A. Lanoux (Eds.), Gender and national identity in twentieth-century Russian culture (pp. 151–173). DeKalb: Northern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
  49. Rohrschneider, R., & Whitefield, S. (2012). The strain of representation. How parties represent diverse voters in Western and Eastern Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Rowatt, W.C., LaBouff, J., Johnson, M., Froese, P., & Tsang, J-A. (2009). Associations among religiousness, social attitudes, and prejudice in a national random sample of American adults. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 1, 14-24.Google Scholar
  51. Schimmelfennig, F., & Sedelmeier, U. (2005). The Europeanization of Central and Eastern Europe. Cornell: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  52. Schluter, D. P. (2002). Gay life in the former USSR: Fraternity without community. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  53. Schöpflin, G. (1993). Politics in Eastern Europe. Oxford, England: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  54. Schöpflin, G. (2000). Nations, identity, power. London: Hurst.Google Scholar
  55. Slootmaeckers, K., & Touquet, H. (2016). The Co-evolution of EU’s Eastern enlargement and LGBT politics: An ever gayer union? In K. Slootmaeckers, H. Touquet, & P. Vermeersch (Eds.), The EU enlargement and gay politics. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  56. Smith, A. D. (1996). The ethnic origin of nations. Oxford, England: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  57. Spencer, P., & Wollman, H. (2002). Nationalism. A critical introduction. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  58. Stakić, I. (2011). Homophobia and hate speech in Serbian public discourse: How national myths and stereotypes influence prejudices against the LGBT minority. MA thesis. University of Gothenburg.Google Scholar
  59. Stukuls, D. (1999). Body of the nation: Mothering, prostitution and women’s place in post-communist Latvia. Slavic Review, 58, 537–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Štulhofer, A., & Sandfort, T. (Eds.) (2005). Sexuality and gender in post-communist Eastern Europe and Russia. New York: Haworth Press.Google Scholar
  61. Suny, R. (1993). The revenge of the past: Nationalism, revolution and the collapse of the Soviet Union. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  62. Suny, R. (2001). Constructing primordialism: Old histories for new nations. Journal of Modern History, 73, 862–896.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behaviour. In S. Worchel & W. G. Austin (Eds.), Psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7–24). Chicago, IL: Nelson Hall.Google Scholar
  64. Turner, J. C. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorisation theory. Oxford, England: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  65. Veličković, V. (2012). Homofobni nacionalizam i kriza maskulinosti u Srbiji. Sarajevske Sveske, pp. 39–40.Google Scholar
  66. Weeks, J. (1992). Foreword. In A. Schmitt & J. Sofer (Eds.), Sexuality and eroticism among males in moslem societies (pp. ix–xii). New York: Haworth Press.Google Scholar
  67. Wilkinson, C. (2014). Putting “traditional values” into practice: The rise and contestation of anti-homopropaganda laws in Russia. Journal of Human Rights, 13(3), 363–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Whitley, B. (2009). Religiosity and attitudes towards lesbians and gay men: a meta-analysis. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 19, 21–38.Google Scholar
  69. Yuval-Davis, N. (1997). Gender and nation. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  70. Yuval-Davis, N., & Anthias, F. (1989). Woman-nation-state. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Richard C. M. Mole
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Slavonic and East European, StudiesUniversity College LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations