Advertisement

‘Clouds’ in the Desert? Central and Eastern Europe and Ukraine in the New Division of Labour for Business Services and Software Development

Chapter
Part of the Dynamics of Virtual Work book series (DVW)

Abstract

In the post-communist countries of Central and Eastern Europe (CEE) after 1990, foreign direct investment (FDI) was viewed as a key driver of the transition to a market-based economy and integration with the global and European economies. However, an extensive literature has critically addressed the assumption that foreign firms would bring much needed capital and have the propensity to transfer advanced technology and management techniques (Hardy 1998, 2006; Pavlinek and Smith 1998; Drahokoupil 2008; Fifekova, 2008a). Attention has now shifted to the increasing importance of offshoring in the service sector as a key driver of the globalisation process. Much has been written on the implications of relocating business services from the sender country perspective, in particular, focusing on job loss, welfare implications and efficiency gains. However, with the exception of India and Ireland, little consideration has been given to offshore destinations and even less to the impacts of this emerging trend in foreign investment in the new receiver countries of CEE from 2000 onwards.

Keywords

Foreign Direct Investment Software Development Tacit Knowledge Foreign Firm Business Service 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The research came from a project ‘Foreign Direct Investment in Central and Eastern Europe: What Kind of Competitiveness for the Visegrad Four?’ funded by the Visegrad Fund and the University of Hertfordshire. Additional company interviews were conducted with the financial support from OTKA (68435). We would like to acknowledge colleagues Dr Martina Fifekova, Dr Magdolna Sass and Mr Michal Trnik.

References

  1. Amin, A., & Thrift, N. (1995). Institutional issues from the European regions: From markets and plans to socioeconomics and powers of association. Economy and Society, 24(1), 41–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aggarwal, A., Berry, O., Kenney, M., Lenway, S. A., & Taylor, V. (2008). Corporate strategies for software globalisation. In L. Labrianidis (Ed.), The moving frontier: The changing geography of production in labour-intensive industries (pp. 255–280). Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  3. Aspray, W., Mayadas, F., & Vardi, Y. M. (2006). Globalization and offshoring of software: A report of the ACM job migration task force. Association for Computing Machinery: New York.Google Scholar
  4. Bain, P., & Taylor, P. (2005). India calling to far away towns. Work, Employment and Society, 19(36), 123–145.Google Scholar
  5. Bathelt, A., Malmberg, A., & Maskell, P. (2004). Clusters and knowledge; Local buzz, global pipelines, and the process of knowledge creation. Progress in Human Geography, 28(1), 31–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Christopherson, S., & Clark, J. (2007). Power in firm networks: What it means for regional innovation systems. Regional Studies, 41(9), 1223–1236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Coe, N., Dicken, P., & Hess, M. (2008). Global production networks—Debates and challenges. Journal of Economic Geography, 8(3), 267–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Coe, N., Hess, M., Yeung, W.-C., Dicken, P., & Henderson, J. (2004). Globalizing regional development: A global production networks perspective. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 29(4), 468–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dossani, R., & Kenney, M. (2007). The next wave of globalization: Relocating service provision to India. World Development, 35(5), 772–791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Drahokoupil, J. (2008). Globalization and the state in Central and Eastern Europe: The politics of foreign investment. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. Feuerstein, P. (2013). Patterns of work reorganization in the course of the IT industry’s internationalization. Competition and Change, 17(1), 24–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fifekova, M. (2008a). The case of Slovakia. Presentation at the project meeting “Foreign Direct Investment in Central and Eastern Europe: What Kind of Competitiveness for the Visegrad Four?” Hatfield, February 8–10.Google Scholar
  13. Fifekova, M. (2008b) Foreign investment and spillover effects. http://alternative.sk/uploads/tx_clanok/Fifekova_RP.pdf
  14. Gereffi, G. (1996). ‘Global commodity chains: New forms of coordination and control among nations and firms in international industries'. Competition and Change, 1(4), 427–439.Google Scholar
  15. Gereffi, G., Humphrey, J., & Sturgeon, T. (2005). The governance of global value chains. Review of International Political Economy, 12(1), 78–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Grabher, G. (1992). Eastern conquista. In H. Ernste & V. Meier (Eds.), Regional development and the contemporary industrial restructuring. London: Belhaven Press.Google Scholar
  17. Grabher, G. (Ed.) (1993). The embedded firm: On the socioeconomics of industrial networks. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structures: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 481–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Guzik, R., & Micek, G. (2008). The impact of delocalisation on the European software industry. In L. Labrianidis (Ed.), The moving frontier: The changing geography of production in labour-intensive industries (pp. 229–254). Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  20. Hardy, J., Fifekova, M., & Sass, M. (2011). Impacts of horizontal and vertical foreign investment in business services: The experience of Hungary, Slovakia and the Czech Republic. European Urban and Regional Studies, 18(4), 427–443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hardy, J., & Hollinshead, G. (2011). The embeddedness of software development in the Ukraine: An offshoring country perspective. European Planning Studies, 19(9), 1633–1650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hardy, J. (2006). Bending workplace institutions in transforming economies: Foreign investment in Poland. Review of International Political Economy, 13(1), 129–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hardy, J. (1998). Cathedrals in the desert: Transnationals, corporate strategy and locality in Wroclaw. Regional Studies, 32(7), 639–652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hess, M. (2004). Spatial’ relationships? Towards a reconceptualization of embeddedness. Progress in Human Geography, 28(2), 165–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Humphrey, J., & Schmitz, H. (2002). How does the insertion in global value chain affect upgrading in industrial clusters. Regional Studies, 36(9), 1017–1027.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hutton, W. (2004, December 19) Don’t weep for our lost factories. The Observer. Google Scholar
  27. Kaminski, B., & Smarzynska, B. (2001). Integration into global production and distribution networks through FDI: The case of Poland. Post-Communist Economies, 13(3), 265–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Malmberg, A., & Maskell, P. (2006). Local learning revisited. Growth and Change, 37(1), 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Martin, R. (1998). Central and Eastern Europe and the international economy: The limits of globalisation. Europe-Asia Studies, 50(1), 7–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Martin, R. (1999). The new economic geography of money. In R. Martin (Ed.), Money and the space economy. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  31. Pavlinek, P., & Smith, A. (1998). Internalization and embeddedness in east-central Europe transition: The contrasting geographies of inward investment in the Czech and Slovak Republics. Regional Studies, 32(7), 619–638.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Phelps, N. (2000). The locally embedded multinational and institutional capture. Area, 32(2), 169–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Richardson, R., & Gillespie, A. (2003). The call of the wild: Call centres of economic development in rural areas. Growth and Change, 34(1), 87–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Robert-Nicoud, F. (2008). Offshoring of routine tasks and (de) industrialisation: Threat or opportunity—And for whom? Journal of Urban Economics, 63, 517–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sass M. (2008) Case studies—Hungary. Presentation at the project meeting ‘Foreign Direct Investment in Central and Eastern Europe: What Kind of Competitiveness for the Visegrad Four?’ Hatfield, February 8-10.Google Scholar
  36. Smith, A., Rainnie, A., Dunford, M., Hardy, J., Hudson, R., & Sadler, D. (2002). Networks of value, commodities and regions: Reworking divisions of labour in macro regional economies. Progress in Human Geography, 26(1), 41–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Trnik, M. (2008) Attracting service sector FDI: The case of the Czech Republic. http://www.thinktank.cz/fdi/files/papers/Trnik-february-2008.pdf
  38. Zukin, S., & DiMaggio, P. (Eds.) (1990). Structures of capital: The social organization of the economy. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of HertfordshireHatfieldUK

Personalised recommendations