Skip to main content

Majority Society and Women’s Capacity of Action

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Muslim Women and Power

Part of the book series: Gender and Politics ((GAP))

  • 515 Accesses

Abstract

Although their immediate socialisation takes place within the family and the ethnic group, Muslim women form an integral part of the majority society in which they live and most consider themselves as such. However, their relationship with majority society reveals a kaleidoscope of features, both positive and negative and in accordance with French or British specificities, which affect their action. The first section of this chapter examines obstacles and facilitating factors present in majority society and how they advance or detract from Muslim women’s autonomisation and capacity of action. The second part is dedicated to their parameters of action and the various strategies adopted by Muslim women to build autonomy for themselves and pursue their respective projects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 19.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 29.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Archer, M. (2007). Making our way through the world. Cambridge: CUP. Archer, M. (1995). Realist social theory: The morphogenetic approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Barbara, A (1992). Représentation de la femme musulmane par les non musulmans. Migrations Sociétés, 4(19), 11--22.Bertossi, C. (2016). La citoyenneté à la française. Valeurs et réalités. Paris: Editions CNRS. Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of Practice. Cambridge. CUP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chowdhury, N., & Nelson, B. (Eds.). (1994). Women and politics worldwide. New Haven/London: Yale University Press.Delphy, C. (2008). Classer, dominer. Qui sont les 'autres'?. Paris: La Fabrique.Githens, M., Lovenduski, J. & Norris, P. (Eds.). (1994). Different roles, different voices. New York: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guénif-Souilamas, N. (2000). Des ‘beurettes’ aux descendants d’immigrants nord-africains. Paris: Grasset.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joly, D. (2001). Blacks and britannity. Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joly, D. (2012). Race, ethnicity and religion: Emerging policies in Britain. Patterns of Prejudice, 46(5), 467–485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kapoor, N. (2013). The advancement of racial neoliberalism in Britain. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 36(6), 1028–1046.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patel, P. (1997). Third wave feminism and black women’s activism. In H. S. Mirza (Ed.), Black British feminism (pp. 255–268). London: Routledge.Simmel, G. (1964). The Sociology of Georg Simmel. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sudbury, J. (1998). Other kinds of dreams. London: Routledge.Weber, M. (1978). Economy and society. Vol. 1. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Joly, D., Wadia, K. (2017). Majority Society and Women’s Capacity of Action. In: Muslim Women and Power. Gender and Politics. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-48062-0_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics