Paralympic Philosophy and Ethics

  • Mike J. McNamee
  • Richard J. Parnell
Chapter

Abstract

In this chapter, we consider certain aspects of the philosophy of the Paralympic Movement by examining the four stated values of the International Paralympic Committee, namely, courage, determination, equality and inspiration. We then challenge these core values by reference to a number of prominent ethical issues in Paralympic sport. These issues include doping; autonomic dysreflexia (or “boosting”); botox injections; prosthetic technology; eligibility and classification; access to, and distribution of, resources; and elective amputation. Finally, we endeavour to offer a tentative definition of “Paralympism” based on the discussion and interrelation between ethics and Paralympic values.

References

  1. Beckman, E.M., M. Connick, M. McNamee, R. Parnell, and S. Tweedy. 2016. Should Markus Rehm be Permitted to Compete in the Long Jump at the Olympic Games? British Journal of Sports Medicine 51 (14): 1048–1049.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Boorse, Christopher. 1977. Health as a Theoretical Concept. Philosophy of Science 44: 542–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bridy, Annemarie. 2004. Confounding Extremities: Surgery at the Medico-Ethical Limits of Self Modification. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 32 (1): 148–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brittain, Ian. 2010. The Paralympic Games Explained. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Bruggemann G.P., A. Arampatzis, and F. Emrich. 2007. Biomechanical and Metabolic Analysis of Long Sprint Running of the Double Transtibial Amputee Athlete O. Pistorius Using Cheetah Sprint Prostheses – Comparison with Able-Bodied Athletes at the Same Level of 400m Sprint Performance – A Study Performed on the Request of the IAAF, Final Report, December.Google Scholar
  6. Burkett, B., M. McNamee, and W. Potthast. 2011. Shifting Boundaries in Sports Technology and Disability: Equal Rights or Unfair Advantage in the Case of Oscar Pistorius? Disability and Society 26 (5): 643–654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dyer, C. 2000. Surgeon Amputated Healthy Legs. British Medical Journal 320 (7231): 332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Edwards, S., and M. McNamee. 2015. Disability and Paralympic Sport. In Routledge Handbook of the Philosophy of Sport, ed. M. McNamee and W. Morgan. Abington: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Fraleigh, W.P. 1984. Right Actions in Sport: Ethics for Contestants. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.Google Scholar
  10. Howe, P.D. 2008. The Cultural Politics of the Paralympic Movement: Through an Anthropological Lens. Abington: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. Howe, P.D., and C. Jones. 2006. Classification of Disabled Athletes: (Dis)Empowering the Paralympic Practice Community. Sociology of Sport Journal 23: 29–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. IOC. 2013. Olympism and the Olympic Movement. Lausanne: IOC Olympic Museum.Google Scholar
  13. Jones, C., and David Howe. 2005. The Conceptual Boundaries of Sport for the Disabled: Classification and Athletic Performance. Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 32 (2): 133–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jones, Carwyn, and Cassie Wilson. 2009. Defining Advantage and Athletic Performance: The Case of Oscar Pistorius. European Journal of Sport Science 9 (2): 125–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Loland, Sigmund, and Hans Hoppeler. 2012. Justifying Anti-Doping: The Fair Opportunity Principle and the Biology of Performance Enhancement. European Journal of Sport Science 12 (4): 347–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. McNamee, M.J. 2015. Paralympism, Paralympic Values and Disability Sport: A Conceptual and Ethical Critique. Disability and Rehabilitation 39 (2): 201–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. McNamee, M.J., J. Savulescu, and S. Willick. 2014. Ethical Considerations in Paralympic Sport: When are Elective Treatments Allowable to Improve Sports Performance? PM&R 6 (8): S66–S75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Mill, John Stuart. 2016. On Liberty. CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform.Google Scholar
  19. Mills, P.B., and A. Krassioukov. 2011. Autonomic Function as a Missing Piece of the Classification of Paralympic Athletes with Spinal Cord Injury. Spinal Cord 49: 768–776.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Müller, Sabine. 2009. Body Integrity Identity Disorder (BIID) – Is the Amputation of Healthy Limbs Ethically Justified? The American Journal of Bioethics 9 (1): 36–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Nordenfelt, Lennart. 2007. The Concepts of Health and Illness Revisited. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 10 (1): 5–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Reid, G., and A. Prupas. 1998. A Documentary Analysis of Research Priorities in Disability Sport. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly 15: 168–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Tweedy, S. 2002. Taxonomic Theory and the ICF: Foundations for a United Disability Athletics Classification. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly 19: 220–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Tweedy, S., and Y. Vanlandewijck. 2011. International Paralympic Committee Position Stand – Background and Scientific Principles of Classification in Paralympic Sport. British Journal of Sports Medicine 45: 259–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Tweedy, S., E. Beckman, and M. Connick. 2014. Paralympic Classification: Conceptual Basis, Current Methods, and Research Update. Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation 6: S11–S17.Google Scholar
  26. Weyand, P.G., M.W. Bundle, C.P. McGowan, A. Grabowski, M.B. Brown, R. Kram, and H. Herr. 2009. The Fastest Runner on Artificial Legs: Different Limbs, Similar Function? Journal of Applied Physiology 107 (3): 903–911.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Wiener, M., and B. Bateman. 2014. Behind the Door: The Oscar Pistorius and Reeva Steenkamp Story. London: Pan Macmillan.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mike J. McNamee
    • 1
  • Richard J. Parnell
    • 1
  1. 1.Swansea UniversitySwanseaUK

Personalised recommendations