Advertisement

Disability Models: Explaining and Understanding Disability Sport in Different Ways

  • Brett Smith
  • Andrea Bundon
Chapter

Abstract

How we explain and understand disability matters. In this chapter, we examine one way of explaining and understanding disability through a models approach. Two traditional models are first critically attended to. These are the medical model and then the social model. Having problematised these models, the next two more recent models are described, that is, the social relational model and the human rights model of disability. Throughout examples of research using models from sport are noted. We close with a set of future directions for understanding disability, sport, and physical activity. The directions offered for consideration include a focus on critical disability studies, disablism, and ableism.

References

  1. Berger, R. 2009. Hoop Dreams on Wheels. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Braye, S., K. Dixon, and T. Gibbons. 2013. ‘A Mockery of Equality’: An Exploratory Investigation into Disabled Activists’ Views of the Paralympic Games. Disability and Society 28: 984–996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brittain, I. 2004. Perceptions of Disability and Their Impact upon Involvement in Sport for People with Disabilities at All Levels. Journal of Sport and Social Issues 28: 429–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. ———. 2010. The Paralympic Games Explained. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Bundon, A., and L.H. Clarke. 2015. Honey or Vinegar?: Athletes with Disabilities Discuss Strategies for Advocacy Within the Paralympic Movement. Journal of Sport and Social Issues 39: 351–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Darcy, S., and L. Dowse. 2013. In Search of a Level Playing Field—The Constraints and Benefits of Sport Participation for People with Intellectual Disability. Disability and Society 28: 393–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Darko, N., and C. Mackintosh. 2016. ‘Don’t You Feel Bad Watching the Olympics, Watching Us?’: The Influence of the London 2012 Olympics, on Family Sports Participation and Physical Activity. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health 8 (1): 45–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fitzgerald, H. 2012. Paralympic Athletes and “Knowing Disability”. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education 59: 243–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Goodley, D. 2012. The Psychology of Disability. In Routledge Handbook to Disability Studies, ed. N. Watson, A. Roulstone, and C. Thomas, 310–323. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. ———. 2013. Dis/entangling Critical Disability Studies. Disability & Society 28: 631–644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Goodley, D., R. Lawthom, and K. Runswick-Cole. 2014. Posthuman Disability Studies. Subjectivity 7: 342–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Goodley, D., and K. Runswick-Cole. 2015. Critical Disability Studies and Critical Health Psychology: Comrades in Arms? In Critical Health Psychology, ed. M. Murray, 2nd ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  13. Goodwin, D., K. Johnson, and J. Causgrove. 2014. Thinking Ethically About Inclusive Recreational Sport: A Narrative of Lost Dignity. Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 8: 16–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hardin, M., and B. Hardin. 2004. The “Supercrip” in Sport Media: Wheelchair Athletes Discuss Hegemony’s Disabled Hero. Sociology of Sport Online 7: 1–16.Google Scholar
  15. Howe, P.D. 2008. The Cultural Politics of the Paralympic Movement: Through an Anthropological Lens. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. ———. 2011. Cyborg and Supercrip: The Paralympics Technology and the (Dis)empowerment of Disabled Athletes. Sociology 45: 868–882.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Huang, C.J., and I. Brittain. 2006. Negotiating Identities Through Disability Sport: From Negative Label to Positive Self-Identification. Sociology of Sport Journal 23: 352–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hughes, B., and K. Paterson. 1997. The Social Model of Disability and the Disappearing Body: Towards a Sociology of ‘Impairment’. Disability and Society 12: 325–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kitchin, P.J., and P.D. Howe. 2014. The Mainstreaming of Disability Cricket in England and Wales: Integration ‘One Game’ at a Time. Sport Management Review 17: 65–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Legg, D., and R. Steadward. 2011. The Paralympic Games and 60 years of Change (1948–2008): Unification and Restructuring from a Disability and Medical Model to Sport-Based Competition. Sport in Society 14: 1099–1115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Leo, J., and D. Goodwin. 2014. Negotiated Meanings of Disability Simulations in an Adapted Physical Activity Course: Learning from Student Reflections. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly 31: 144–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Martin, J.J. 2013. Benefits and Barriers to Physical Activity for Individuals with Disabilities: A Social-Relational Model of Disability Perspective. Disability & Rehabilitation 35: 2013–2037.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. McPherson, G., H. O’Donnell, D. McGillivray, and L. Misener. 2016. Elite Athletes or Superstars? Media Representation of Para-Athletes at the Glasgow 2014 Commonwealth Games. Disability & Society 31 (5): 659–675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Meekosha, H., and R. Shuttleworth. 2009. What’s so ‘Critical’ About Critical Disability Studies? Australian Journal of Human Rights 15: 47–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Millington, B., and B. Wilson. 2016. Media Research: From Text to Context. In Routledge Handbook of Qualitative Research in Sport and Exercise, ed. B. Smith and A.C. Sparkes, 152–163. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  26. Misener, L., and S. Darcy. 2014. Managing Disability Sport: From Athletes with Disabilities to Inclusive Organisational Perspectives. Sport Management Review 17: 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Norman, M., and F. Moola. 2011. ‘Bladerunner or Boundary Runner’?: Oscar Pistorius, Cyborg Transgressions and Strategies of Containment. Sport in Society 14: 1265–1279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Oliver, M. 1996. Understanding Disability. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Oliver, M., and C. Barnes. 2012. The New Politics of Disablement. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Owens, J. 2015. Exploring the Critiques of the Social Model of Disability: The Transformative Possibility of Arendt’s Notion of Power. Sociology of Health and Illness 37: 385–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Papathomas, A., T.L. Williams, and B. Smith. 2015. Understanding Physical Activity, Health and Rehabilitation in Spinal Cord Injured Population. Shifting the Landscape Through Methodological Innovation. International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-Being 10: 272–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Peers, D. 2009. (Dis)empowering Paralympic Histories: Absent Athletes and Disabling Discourses. Disability & Society 24: 653–665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. ———. 2012. Interrogating Disability: The (De)composition of a Recovering Paralympian. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise and Health 4: 175–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Purdue, D.E.J., and P.D. Howe. 2012. See the Sport, Not the Disability?: Exploring the Paralympic Paradox. Qualitative Research in Sport, Exercise, and Health 4: 189–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Shakespeare, T. 2014. Disability Rights and Wrongs Revisited. Oxford: Routledge.Google Scholar
  36. Shakespeare, T., and N. Watson. 2001. The Social Model of Disability: An Outdated Ideology? Research in Social Science and Disability 2: 9–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. ———. 2010. Beyond Models: Understanding the Complexity of Disabled People’s Lives. In New Directions in the Sociology of Chronic and Disabling Conditions: Assaults on the Lifeworld, ed. G. Scambler and S. Scambler, 57–87. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  38. Shildrick, M. 2012. Critical Disability Studies: Rethinking the Conventions for the Age of Postmodernity. In Routledge Handbook to Disability Studies, ed. N. Watson, A. Roulstone, and C. Thomas, 30–41. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  39. Smith, B. 2013a. Disability, Sport, and Men’s Narratives of Health: A Qualitative Study. Health Psychology 32: 110–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. ———. 2013b. Sporting Spinal Cord Injuries, Social Relations, and Rehabilitation Narratives: An Ethnographic Creative Non-Fiction of Becoming Disabled Through Sport. Sociology of Sport Journal 30: 132–152.Google Scholar
  41. Smith, B., and N. Caddick. 2015. The Impact of Living in a Care Home on the Health and Wellbeing of Spinal Cord Injured People. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 12: 4185–4202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Smith, B., A. Bundon, and M. Best. 2016a. Disability Sport and Activist Identities: A Qualitative Study of Narratives of Activism Among Elite Athletes’ with Impairment. Psychology of Sport and Exercise 26: 139–148.Google Scholar
  43. Smith, B., M.-J. Perrier, and J.J. Martin. 2016b. Disability Sport: A Partial Overview and Some Thoughts About the Future. In Routledge International Handbook of Sport Psychology, ed. R. Schinke, K.R. McGannon, and B. Smith, 296–303. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  44. Smith, B., and A.C. Sparkes. 2008. Changing Bodies, Changing Narratives and the Consequences of Tellability: A Case Study of Becoming Disabled Through Sport. Sociology of Health and Illness 30: 217–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. ———. 2012. Disability, Sport and Physical Activity. A Critical Review. In Routledge Handbook to Disability Studies, ed. N. Watson, A. Roulstone, and C. Thomas, 336–347. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  46. Thomas, C. 2007. Sociologies of Disability and Illness. London: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Townsend, R.C., B. Smith, and C.J. Cushion. 2016. Disability Sports Coaching: Towards a Critical Understanding. Sports Coaching Review 4 (2): 80–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Tregaskis, C. 2004. Applying the Social Model in Practice. Some Lessons from Countryside Recreation. Disability and Society 19: 601–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. UN General Assembly. 1993. Standard Rules on the Equalization of Opportunities for Persons with Disabilities: Resolution/Adopted by the General Assembly, 20 December 1993, A/RES/48/96. http://www.refworld.org/docid/3b00f2e80.html. Accessed 29 December 2016.
  50. United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. 2006. United Nations: New York, USA.Google Scholar
  51. Vehmas, S., and N. Watson. 2014. Moral Wrongs, Disadvantages, and Disability: A Critique of Critical Disability Studies. Disability and Society 29 (4): 638–650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Wendell, S. 1996. The Rejected Body: Feminist Philosophical Reflections on Disability. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  53. World Health Organisation (WHO). 2001. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: ICF. Geneva: WHO.Google Scholar
  54. Young, K., W. McTeer, and P. White. 1994. Body Talk: Male Athletes Reflect on Sport, Injury, and Pain. Sociology of Sport Journal 11 (2): 175–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Young, K., and P. White. 1995. Sport, Physical Danger, and Injury: The Experiences of Elite Woman Athletes. Journal of Sport and Social Issues 19 (1): 45–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Brett Smith
    • 1
  • Andrea Bundon
    • 2
  1. 1.University of BirminghamSchool of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation SciencesEdgbaston, BirminghamUK
  2. 2.University of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada

Personalised recommendations