Skip to main content

The Development Industry and the Co-optation of Body Politics

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 1251 Accesses

Part of the book series: Gender, Development and Social Change ((GDSC))

Abstract

The chapter interrogates the co-optation of feminist understandings of body politics in development practices and programs by constructing an ethnoscape of a recent South Asian training on gender, generations and sexuality. In a reflection on the potential of ruptures in the praxis of body politics, the chapter concludes with a consideration of how feminists can act from the ‘privilege of the middle’.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Antrobus, P. 2004. The Global Women’s Movement: Origins, Issues and Strategies, London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Appadurai, A. 1990. ‘Disjuncture and Difference in the Global Cultural Economy’, Theory, Culture, Society, 7: 295–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Appadurai, A. 1996. Modernity at Large. Cultural Dimensions of Globalization, Minnesota: Public Planet Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baksh R. and W. Harcourt eds. 2015. Introduction’, OUP Handbook of Transnational Feminist Movements, Oxford, New York: OUP: 1–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carty, l. and C. T. Mohanty. 2015. Mapping Transnational Feminist Engagements: Neoliberalism and the Politics of Solidarity’ in Baksh R. and W. Harcourt. 2015 OUP Handbook of Transnational Feminist Movements, Oxford, New York: OUP (82–115).

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell, R. 2012. Transsexual women and feminist thought: Toward new understanding and new politics. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society. 37 (4):857–881.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornwall, A., Corrêa, S. and Jolly, S. eds. 2008. Development with a Body: Sexuality, Human Rights and Development. London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornwall, A. and Jolly, S. 2009. Sexuality and the development industry. Development, 52(1) 5–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornwall, A. 2007. Revisiting the Gender Agenda. IDS Bulletin 38 (2) March: 69–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coy, P.G. 2013. Co-optation. The Wiley-Blackwell Encyclopedia of Social and Political Movements. London: Wiley-Blackwell: 280–281.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Jong, S. 2016. Mainstream(ing) has never run clean, perhaps never can: Gender in the Main/Stream of Development. In Harcourt, W. ed. Palgrave Handbook on Gender and Development. London: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Jong, S. 2009. Intersections of Aid: Women NGO workers’ reflections on their work practices. CSSGJ Working Paper Series, University of Nottingham, Centre for the Study of Social and Global Justice. http://www.nottingham.ac.uk/cssgj/WorkingPapers/CSSGJ_workingpapers.php

  • De Jong, S. and S. Kimm. 2015. Co-optation of Feminist Discourses and Practices. unpublished paper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Development 2009. Window on the World. Development ‘Sexuality and Development’ 52 (1). London: Palgrave Macmillan: 124–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Escobar, A. 2012. Encountering Development. The Making and UnMaking of the Third World. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, L. 2015. “This is Our Gender Person”. The Messy Business of Working as a Gender Expert in International Development. International Feminist Journal of Politics 17(3): 380–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, N. 2013a. Fortunes of feminism: From state-managed capitalism to neoliberal crisis. Brooklyn, New York: Verso Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, N. 2013b. How feminism became capitalism’s handmaiden—and how to reclaim it’, The Guardian, Monday 14 October. http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/oct/14/feminism-capitalist-handmaiden-neoliberal (accessed 25 March, 2015)

  • Fraser, N. and N. A. Naples. 2004. To understand the world and to change it: An Interview with Nancy Fraser. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 29:1103–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grewal I. and C. Kaplan. 2000. Postcolonial Studies and Transnational Feminist Practices’. Berkley: San Francisco State University and University of California. http://english.chass.ncsu.edu/jouvert/v5i1/grewal.htm. (accessed 25 March, 2015)

  • Harcourt, W. 2009. Body Politics in Development: Critical debates in gender and development. London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harcourt, W. 2005. The Body Politic in Global Development Discourse: A Women and Politics of Place Perspective. In Harcourt and Escobar A. eds. Women and the Politics of Place. Bloomfield CT: Kumarian Press: 32–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harding, S. 1991. Whose Science? Whose Knowledge? Thinking from Womens Live. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartmann, B. 1995. Reproductive Rights and Wrongs: The Global Politics of Population Control (revised). Massachussets: South End Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jolly, S., A. Cornwall and K. Hawkins eds. 2013. Women, Sexuality and the Political Power of Pleasure. London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kothari, U. 2005. Authority and Expertise: The Professionalisation of International Development and the Ordering of Dissent. Antipode 37 (3): 425–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lind, A. ed. 2010. Development, Sexual Rights and Global Governance. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacKinnon K. 2011. Development Professionals in Northern Thailand, Singapore: National University of Singapore Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, A. M. 2004. Sexuality, Violence Against Women, and Human Rights: Women Make Demands and Ladies Get Protection. Health and Human Rights: An International Journal. 7(2):16–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohanty, C.T. 1988. Under Western Eyes: Feminist Scholarship and Colonial Discourse. Feminist Review 30: 65–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mosse, D. 2004. Is Good Policy Unimplementable? Reflections on the Ethnography of Aid Policy and Practice. Development and Change 35(4): 639–671.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mosse D ed. 2011. Adventures in Aidland: The Anthropology of Professionals in International Development. New York: Berghahn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mukhopadhyay, M. 2004. Mainstreaming Gender or streaming gender away: Feminists Marooned in the Development Business. IDS Bulletin, 35 (4): 95–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naples N.A. 2013. It’s Not Fair!: Discursive Politics, Social Justice and Feminist Praxis SWS Feminist Lecture. Gender &Society, 27 (2): 133–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pereira, C. 2014. Changing Narratives of Sexuality: Contestations, Compliance and Women’s Empowerment, London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petchesky, R. 2002. Global Prescriptions. Gender health and human rights. London: Zed Books in association with UNRISD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prügl, E. 2011. Diversity Management and Gender Mainstreaming as Technologies of Government, Politics & Gender, 7: 71–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, A. 2015. The Political Economy of “Transnational Business Feminism”. International Feminist Journal of Politics, 17 (2): 209–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, G. 1997. Situating Knowledges: Positionality, Reflexivities and Other Tactics. Progress in Human Geography, 21 (3): 305–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shildrick, M. and J. Price. 1998. Vital Signs: Feminist Reconfigurations of the Bio/logical. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spivak, G.C. 2000. Claiming Transformation: Travel Notes with Pictures. In Ahmed, S. et. al.Transformations: Thinking Through Feminism. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stirrat, R.L. 2008. Mercenaries, Missionaries and Misfits: Representations of development personnel. Critique of Anthropology 28(4): 406–425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SWIRCO et. al. 2015. Assessing, engaging and enacting worlds: Tensions in feminist method/ologies. International Feminist Journal of Politics 17 (1):158–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • True, J. 2012. The Political Economy of Violence Against Women. Oxford: OUP.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Truong, T. and W. Harcourt. 2014. Negotiating Global Body Politics. Gender. Technology and Development. 18(1): 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wieringa, S. and H. Sivori eds. 2012. The Sexual History of the Global South: Sexual Politics in Africa, Asia and Latin America. London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodward, A. E. 2012. Building velvet triangles: Gender and informal governance, in Chew, William L. & Mosslemans, B., Vesalius College 25 years of academic excellence in teaching and research, Brussels: Academic & Scientific Publishers.VUB-press: 145–170.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Harcourt, W. (2017). The Development Industry and the Co-optation of Body Politics. In: Harcourt, W. (eds) Bodies in Resistance. Gender, Development and Social Change. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-47780-4_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics