Advertisement

The Subject of Porn Research: Inquiring Bodies and Lines of Resistance

  • Karen Gabriel
Chapter
Part of the Gender, Development and Social Change book series (GDSC)

Abstract

The current status of research into pornography is marked by several rather contradictory tendencies. On the one hand, the volume of research and writing on porn has been steadily increasing, and gaining a degree of academic acceptability within the Western academy—particularly since Linda Williams’ volume on porn, Hard Core: Power, Pleasure, and theFrenzy of the Visible” (1989). In Eric Schaefer’s words, “she made it safe” for scholars to engage with porn “and not face the wrath of steaming administrators, snickering students, and their apoplectic parents” (2005: 8). That is, “within the field of film and media studies adult film and video is now an accepted, and legitimate, area of scholarly inquiry” (2005: 10). On the other hand, work on porn continues to be stigmatized, as Georgina Voss (2012) notes:

Keywords

Sexual Pleasure Feminist Debate Feminist Standpoint Contradictory Tendency Stigma Contagion 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Attwood, Feona & I Q Hunter. 2009. Not Safe for Work? Teaching and Researching the Sexually Explicit. Sexualities Volume 12(5): pp. 547–557. doi:  10.1177/1363460709340366
  2. Attwood, Feona, ed. 2009. Mainstreaming Sex: The Sexualization of Western Culture. London: I B Taurus.Google Scholar
  3. Attwood, Feona. 2002. Reading porn: The paradigm shift in pornography research. Sexualities Volume 5(1): pp. 91–105.Google Scholar
  4. Attwood, Feona. 2011. The Paradigm Shift: Pornography Research, Sexualization and Extreme Images. Sociology Compass, Volume 5, Issue 1, January 2011: pp 13–22.Google Scholar
  5. Boyle, Karen, ed. 2010. Everyday Pornography. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Coopersmith, Jonathan. 1999. The Role of the Pornography Industry in the Development of Videotape and the Internet. International Symposium on Technology and Society. Women and Technology: Historical, Societal, and Professional Perspectives. Conference Proceedings. doi: 10.1109/ISTAS.1999.787327Google Scholar
  7. Cothran, Helen. 2002. Pornography: Opposing Viewpoints. USA: Greenhaven Press, Inc.Google Scholar
  8. Dines, Gail, Robert Jensen, Ann Russo. 1998. Pornography: The Production and Consumption of Inequality. New York & London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Dines, Gail. 2010. Pornland: How Porn has Hijacked our Sexuality. Boston: Beacon.Google Scholar
  10. Ferguson, Frances. 1995. Pornography: The Theory. Critical Inquiry, 21, 3: 670–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Foucault, Michel. 1985. Sexuality and Solitude. In On Signs, Marshall Blonsky, ed., Oxford: Basil Blackwell pp. 365–372.Google Scholar
  12. Gabriel, Karen. 2011. Notes on the Sexual Economy, Homosocial Patriarchy and the Porn Industry. Gendered Sexualed Transnationalisations, Deconstructing the Dominant: Transforming men, “centres” and knowledge/policy/practice, GEXcel Work in Progress Report Volume XV, Spring 2011. pp. 141–153.Google Scholar
  13. Hammond, X. 2014. Experiencing stigma as sex work researchers in professional and personal lives. Sexualities, Vol. 17(3) pp. 329–347. doi:  10.1177/1363460713516333
  14. Hughes, Donna. 2000. Welcome to the rape camp: Sexual exploitation and the Internet in Cambodia. Journal of Sexual Aggression: An international, interdisciplinary Forum for Research, Theory and Practice, Vol. 6, Issue 1–2.Google Scholar
  15. Jeffreys, Sheila. 2009. The Industrial Vagina: The Political Economy of the Global Sex Trade. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. Jensen, Robert. 1998. The Pain of Pornography. In Pornography: The Production and Consumption of Inequality, Gail Dines, Robert Jensen, Ann Russo, eds. New York & London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  17. Kirby, Richard and Jay Corzine. 1981. The Contagion of Stigma: Fieldwork amongst Deviants. Qualitative Sociology Vol 4(1): 3–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kirkham, Pat and Beverley Skeggs. 1996. Pornographies, Pleasures and Pedagogies in U.K and U.S. Jump Cut 40: March, pp. 106–13.Google Scholar
  19. McElroy, Wendy. n.d. A Feminist Overview of Pornography, Ending in a Defense Thereof. Available at http://www.wendymcelroy.com/freeinqu.htm
  20. Rea, Michael. 2001. What is Pornography?. NOÛS 35:1 2001: pp. 118–145.Google Scholar
  21. Rajendran, M. 2015. Ban or no ban, slump-proof porn industry is thriving. The Hindustan Times. 11 August.Google Scholar
  22. Schaefer, Eric. 2005. Dirty Little Secrets: Scholars, Archivists, and Dirty Movies’. The Moving Image Vol 5 (2), Fall, pp. 79–105.Google Scholar
  23. Skoch, Iva. 2010. Special report: Gay-4-Pay in Prague. Global Post, 7 October, available at http://www.globalpost.com/dispatch/commerce/100323/gay-porn-prague Accessed 31 January 2016
  24. Sloan, Paul. 2007. Getting in the Skin Game. CNN Money, 13 February. Available at http://money.cnn.com/magazines/business2/business2_archive/2006/11/01/8392016/index.htm.Accessed 28 January 2016.
  25. Sønderholm, Jørn. 2008. Having Fun with the Periodic Table: A Counterexample to Rea’s Definition of Pornography. Philosophia. 2008, 36(2): pp. 233–236.Google Scholar
  26. Troiden, Richard R. 1987. Walking the Line: The Personal and Professional Risks of Sex Education and Research’. Teaching Sociology, Vol. 15, No. 3 (Jul., 1987), pp. 241–249.Google Scholar
  27. Vance, Carol S. 1991. Anthropology Rediscovers Sexuality: A Theoretical Comment. Social Science & Medicine Vol. 33, No. 8. pp. 875–884.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Voss, Georgina. 2012. “Treating it as a normal business”: Researching the pornography industry. Sexualities Vol 15 (3/4) pp. 391–410. doi:  10.1177/1363460712439650
  29. Weinberg, Martin S, Colin J. Williams, Sibyl Kleiner, and Yasmiyn Irizarry. 2010. Pornography Normalization, and Empowerment. Archives of Sexual Behavior Vol 39: pp. 1389–1401. doi  10.1007/s10508-009-9592-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Williams, Linda. 1989. Hard Core: Power, Pleasure, and theFrenzy of the Visible”. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Karen Gabriel
    • 1
  1. 1.ISSThe HagueThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations