Skip to main content

The Escalating Price of Motherhood: Aesthetic Labour in Popular Representations of ‘Stay-at-Home’ Mothers

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Aesthetic Labour

Part of the book series: Dynamics of Virtual Work ((DVW))

Abstract

The devaluation of domestic, reproductive, emotional and maternal labour has been extensively critiqued by feminist scholars and activists. Women’s domestic labour is normalised as ‘housework’, considered to have no material or economic recognition (Federici 2012), and childrearing and looking after the home are still often equated with ‘doing nothing’ (Crittenden 2010). Many have argued that cultural and media representations play a constitutive role in normalising the devaluation and thus exploitation of women’s productive and reproductive labour. The media legitimise the continuing lack of social, political and economic recognition and reward of motherhood by symbolically naturalising and masking maternal labour, for example, by representing mothers’ work as ‘natural’ and a product of intrinsic maternal love (Douglas and Michaels 2004). Building on this scholarship about the cultural construction of maternity, in this chapter we highlight aesthetic labour as a new(ly) added, previously unrecognised dimension of contemporary maternal labour that has emerged under neoliberalism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Allen, K., & Taylor, Y. (2012). Placing Parenting, Locating Unrest: Failed Femininities, Troubled Mothers and Riotous Subjects. Studies in the Maternal, 4(2), 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baraitser, L. (2009). Maternal Encounters: The Ethics of Interruption. East Sussex/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyer, K. (2014). Neoliberal Motherhood: Workplace Lactation and Changing Conceptions of Working Motherhood in the Contemporary US. Feminist Theory, 15, 269–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crittenden, A. (2010). The Price of Motherhood: Why the Most Important Job in the World is Still the Least Valued. New York: Picador.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Souza, C. (2015). She’s a Knockout. The Sunday Times. [online] Retrieved from http://www.thesundaytimes.co.uk/sto/style/living/Wellbeing/article1506137.ece

  • Danuta, S. W., & Harrison, L. (2014). Not Ready to Make Nice: Aberrant Mothers in Contemporary Culture. Feminist Media Studies, 14, 38–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dolan, J., & Tincknell, E. (2013). Representing Older Women in the Media: Key Issues. Labour Party, House of Commons. [online] Retrieved from http://eprints.uwe.ac.uk/21953/3/Labour%20Commision%20Media%20-%20final.pdf

  • Douglas, S. J., & Michaels, M. (2004). The Mommy Myth: The Idealisation of Motherhood and How it Has Undermined Women. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekinsmyth, C. (2013). Mothers’ Business, Work/Life and the Politics of ‘Mumpreneurship’. Gender, Place & Culture, 20, 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Federici, S. (2012). Revolution at Point Zero: Housework, Reproduction and Feminist Struggle. New York: Common Notions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fielding, H. (2013). Bridget Jones: Mad about the Boy. London: Jonathan Cape.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford-Rojas, J. P. (2012). Jools Oliver Says Naming Her Daughter After a My Little Pony Toy Is Nobody Else’s Business. The Telegraph. [online] Retrieved from http://www.telegraph.co.uk/women/mother-tongue/9495117/Jools-Oliver-says-naming-her-daughter-after-a-My-Little-Pony-toy-is-nobody-elses-business.html

  • Gill, R. (2007). Gender and the Media. Cambridge/Malden: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill, R., & Orgad, S. (2015). The Confidence Culture. Australian Feminist Studies, 30(86), 324-344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill, S. (1995). Globalisation, Market Civilisation, and Disciplinary Neoliberalism. Millennium—Journal of International Studies, 24, 399–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodwin, S., & Huppatz, K. (2010). The Good Mother: Contemporary Motherhoods in Australia. Sydney: Sydney University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hochschild, A. with Machung, A. (1989). The Second Shift: Working Families and the Revolution at Home. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuperberg, A., & Stone, P. (2008). The Media Depiction of Women Who Opt Out. Gender & Society, 22, 497–517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lachover, E. (2013). Influential Women: Feminist Discourse in Women’s Business Magazines—The Case of Israel. Communication, Culture & Critique, 6, 121–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Littler, J. (2004). Celebrity and ‘Meritocracy’. Soundings: A Journal of Politics and Culture, 80–81, 118–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Littler, J. (2013). The Rise of the ‘Yummy Mummy’: Popular Conservatism and the Neoliberal Maternal in Contemporary British Culture. Communication, Culture & Critique, 6, 227–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McRobbie, A. (2009). The Aftermath of Feminism: Gender, Culture and Social Change. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • McRobbie, A. (2015). Notes on the Perfect: Competitive Femininity in Neoliberal Times. Australian Feminist Studies, 30(83), 3–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nathanson, E. (2014). Dressed for Economic Distress: Blogging and the ‘New’ Pleasures of Fashion. In D. Negra & Y. Tasker (Eds.), Gendering the Recession: Media and Culture in an Age of Austerity. Durham/London: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, J. (2006). The Diary of an Honest Mum. London: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orgad, S., & De Benedictis, S. (2015). The ‘Stay-At-Home’ Mother, Postfeminism and Neoliberalism: Content Analysis of UK News Coverage. European Journal of Communication, 30, 418–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sawyer, M. (2002). Dish of the Day. The Guardian. [Online] Retrieved from http://www.theguardian.com/theobserver/2002/apr/14/features.magazine4

  • The Daily Mail. (2012). Jools Oliver, Mother of Daisy Boo and Buddy Bear, Urges Parents to Be More Imaginative with Baby Names. The Daily Mail. [online] Retrieved from http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-2192491/Jools-Oliver-mother-Daisy-Boo-Buddy-Bear-urges-parents-imaginative-baby-names.html

  • Tyler, I. (2011). Pregnant Beauties: Maternal Femininities Under Neoliberalism. In R. Gill & C. Scharff (Eds.), New Femininities: Postfeminism, Neoliberalism and Subjectivity. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

De Benedictis, S., Orgad, S. (2017). The Escalating Price of Motherhood: Aesthetic Labour in Popular Representations of ‘Stay-at-Home’ Mothers. In: Elias, A., Gill, R., Scharff, C. (eds) Aesthetic Labour. Dynamics of Virtual Work. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-47765-1_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics