Abstract
In preparing this chapter I have been greatly helped by hearing and then reading Bob Rowthorn’s speech to the King’s Economists on 17 April; Paul Omerod’s dissection of modern macroeconomics in the February 2010 issue of 21st Society, the Journal of the Academy of the Social Sciences; Heinz Kurz’s paper, “On the dismal state of a dismal what?”, on the deficiencies of mainly Lucasian theory in the light of the current prolonged crisis, together with his careful gathering together of Lucas’s more outlandish and extraordinary claims for his approach and contributions and those of his tribe of admiring followers, especially when Keynes’s contributions as they see them and which Keynes never claimed to have made, are used as his and their numeràire; Lance Taylor’s “tome for our times”, Maynard’s Revenge (2010), published by Harvard University Press; Robert Skidelsky’s, The Return of the Master (2009); Joe Stiglitz’s many criticisms of the extreme versions of modern theory which served to justify the Washington Consensus and its implications for universal policy proposals, see, for example, Freefall (2010); Ben Friedman’s review of recent books by John Cassidy and John Lancaster; Tony Judt’s article, “Ill fares the land”, in a recent issue of the New York Review of Books, April-May 2010; and John Quiggin’s Zombie Economics (2010). I would also like to mention a most effective critique-from-within by Ricardo Caballero (2010).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Arestis, Philip, Michelle Baddeley and John S. L. McCombie (eds) (2007), Economic Growth. New Directions in Theory and Policy, Cheltenham, UK, Northhampton, USA: Edward Elgar.
Buiter, W.H. (1980), “The macroeconomics of Dr Pangloss: A critical survey of the new classical macroeconomics”, Economic Journal, 90, 34–50.
Caballero, Ricardo J. (2010), “Macroeconomics after the crisis: Time to deal with the pretense-of-knowledge syndrome”, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 24, 85–102.
Cassidy, John (2009), How Markets Fail: The Logic of Economic Calamities, Farrar, Straus and Giraux.
Dimand, Robert W., Robert A. Mundell and Alessandro Vercelli (eds) (2010), Keynes’s General Theory after Seventy Years, Houndmills, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
Fiewel, G.R. (ed.) (1985), Issues in Contemporary Macroeconomics and Distribution, London: Macmillan.
Friedman, Benjamin M. (2010) “Two roads to financial catastrophe”, New York Review of Books, LVII, April–May, 27–29.
Godley, Wynne and Marc Lavoie (2007), Monetary Economics. An Integrated Approach to Credit, Money, Income, Production and Wealth, Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hants.: Palgrave Macmillan.
Hahn, F.H. and R.M. Solow (1995), A Critical Essay on Modern Macroeconomic Theory, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Harcourt, G.C. (1995), “Lorie Tarshis 1911–1993: An appreciation”, Economic Journal, 105, 1244–55.
Harcourt, G.C. (2007), “The relevance of the Cambridge — Cambridge controversies in capital theory for econometric practice”, in Arestis, Baddeley and McCombie (eds) (2007), 117–35.
Hicks, John (1974), The Crisis in Keynesian Economics, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Judt, Tony (2010), “Ill fares the land”, New York Review of Books, LVII, April–May, 17–19.
Kahn, R.F. (1954), “Some notes on liquidity preference”, Manchester School of Economic and Social Studies, 22, 229–57.
Keynes, Milo (ed.) (1975), Essays on John Maynard Keynes, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Kurz, Heinz (2010), “On the dismal state of a dismal what?”, mimeo, University of Graz, now published in Homo Oeconomicus, 27, 2010, 369–89.
Lancaster, John (2009), I. O. U.: Why Everyone Owes Everyone and No One Can Pay, Simon and Schuster.
Lucas, R.E. (1988), “On the mechanics of economic development”, Journal of Monetary Economics, 22, 3–42.
Meade, J.E. (1975), “The Keynesian revolution” in Milo Keynes (ed.) (1975), 82–88.
Omerod, Paul (2010), “The current crisis and the culpability of macroeconomic theory”, 21st Society. Journal of the Academy of Social Sciences, 5, 5–18.
Quiggin, John (2010), Zombie Economics. How Dead Ideas Still Walk Among Us. New Jersey, USA: Princeton University Press.
Ramsey, F.P. (1928), “A mathematical theory of saving”, Economic Journal, 38, 543–59.
Robinson, Joan (1952), The Rate of Interest and Other Essays, London: Macmillan.
Robinson, Joan (1964), “Pre-Keynesian theory after Keynes”, Australian Economic Papers, 3, 25–35.
Robinson, Joan (1966), “Comment on Samuelson and Modigliani”, Review of Economic Studies, 33, 307–8.
Robinson, Joan (1980, 1985), “Spring cleaning”, mimeo, Cambridge; published as “The theory of normal prices and the reconstruction of economic theory” in Fiewel (ed.) (1985), 157–65.
Rogers, Colin (2006), “Doing without money: A critical assessment of Woodford’s analysis”, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 30, 293–306.
Rowthorn, R.E. (2010), “King’s Speech 17 April 2010”, mimeo, Cambridge.
Skidelsky, Robert (2009), Keynes. The Return of the Master, London: Allen Lane.
Stiglitz, Joseph E. (2010), Freefall. Free Markets and the Sinking of the Global Economy. USA: W.W. Norton and Co.; London: Allen Lane.
Tarshis, Lorie (1947), The Elements of Economics. An Introduction to the Theory of Price and Employment, Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 2nd Edition, 1966.
Taylor, Lance (2010), Maynard’s Revenge, Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
Copyright information
© 2016 Joseph Halevi, G. C. Harcourt, Peter Kriesler and J. W. Nevile
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Harcourt, G.C. (2016). The Crisis in Mainstream Economics. In: Post-Keynesian Essays from Down Under Volume IV: Essays on Theory. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-47529-9_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-47529-9_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-47528-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-47529-9
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)