Abstract
This chapter argues that Hicks’s Capital and Growth, and its rewritten version Methods of Dynamic Economics, constitute a critique of both Neo-classical and Classical economics. The critique of the Neo-classical side is explicit: it appears in the series of explanations concerning the necessity to abandon the Temporary Equilibrium method of Value and Capital. Furthermore, the way in which Hicks argues against the assumption of a given aggregate saving ratio takes him straight into the Kaldor-Pasinetti Cambridge Equation. Having jettisoned both the Temporary Equilibrium and the Harrod type Fixprice methods, Hicks ends up with Sraffa type prices of production. By inserting those prices into the saving equation he obtains a model where any change in the natural growth rate implies a change in the distribution of income à la Kaldor with the underlying prices being determined à la Sraffa.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bhaduri, Amit (1975). ‘On the Analogy Between the Quantity and the Price Traverse’, Oxford Economic Papers, 27(3): 455–61.
Findlay, Ronald (1963). ‘The Robinsonian Model of Accumulation’, Economica, 30(117): 1–12.
Foley, Duncan and Sidrauski, Miguel (1971). Monetary and Fiscal Policy in a Growing Economy (New York: Macmillan).
Garegnani, Pierangelo (1970). ‘Heterogeneous Capital, the Production Function and the Theory of Distribution’, Review-of-Economic-Studies; 37(3): 407–36.
Garegnani, Pierangelo (1976). ‘On a Change in the Notion of Equilibrium in Recent Work on Value and Distribution’, in Brown, Murray; Sato, Kazuo; Zarembka, Paul (eds.), Essays in Modern Capital Theory (Amsterdam and New York: North Holland).
Halevi, Joseph (1992). ‘Accumulation and Structural Disequilibrium’, in Halevi, Joseph., Laibman, David., Nell, Edward, (eds.), Beyond the Steady State (London: Macmillan).
Harcourt, Geoffrey C. (1963). ‘A Critique of Mr. Kaldor’s Model of Income Distribution and Growth’, Australian Economic Papers, 1(1): 20–6.
Harcourt, Geoffrey C. (1975). ‘Decline and Rise: The Revival of (Classical) Political Economy’, Economic-Record, 51(135): 339–56.
Hicks, John R. (1939). Value and Capital (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
Hicks, John R. (1965). Capital and Growth (Oxford: Clarendon Press).
Hicks, John (1969). A Theory of Economic History (Oxford: Clarendon Press).
Hicks, John R. (1973). Capital and Time (Oxford: Clarendon Press).
Hicks, John R. (1975). ‘Revival of Political Economy: The Old and the New’, Economic-Record, 51(135): 365–67.
Hicks, John (1985). Methods of Dynamic Economics (Oxford: Clarendon Press).
Hicks, John R. (1990). ‘Ricardo and Sraffa’, in Bharadwaj Krishna and Schefold Bertram (eds.), Essays On Piero Sraffa. Critical Perspectives on the Revival of Classical Theory (London, Boston, Sydney, Wellington: Unwyn Hyman).
Pasinetti, Luigi L. (1966). ‘Changes in the Rate of Profit and Switches of Techniques’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 80: 554–65.
Pasinetti, Luigi L. (1977). Lectures in the Theory of Production (New York: Columbia University Press).
Robinson, Joan (1956). The Accumulation of Capital (London: Macmillan).
Spaventa-Luigi. (1970). ‘Rate of Profit, Rate of Growth, and Capital Intensity in a Simple Production Model’, Oxford-Economic-Papers; 22(2): 129–47.
Copyright information
© 2016 Joseph Halevi, G. C. Harcourt, Peter Kriesler and J. W. Nevile
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Halevi, J. (2016). Capital and Growth: Its Relevance as a Critique of Neo-Classical and Classical Economic Theories. In: Post-Keynesian Essays from Down Under Volume IV: Essays on Theory. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-47529-9_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-47529-9_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-47528-2
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-47529-9
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)