Skip to main content

Capital and Growth: Its Relevance as a Critique of Neo-Classical and Classical Economic Theories

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Post-Keynesian Essays from Down Under Volume IV: Essays on Theory
  • 278 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter argues that Hicks’s Capital and Growth, and its rewritten version Methods of Dynamic Economics, constitute a critique of both Neo-classical and Classical economics. The critique of the Neo-classical side is explicit: it appears in the series of explanations concerning the necessity to abandon the Temporary Equilibrium method of Value and Capital. Furthermore, the way in which Hicks argues against the assumption of a given aggregate saving ratio takes him straight into the Kaldor-Pasinetti Cambridge Equation. Having jettisoned both the Temporary Equilibrium and the Harrod type Fixprice methods, Hicks ends up with Sraffa type prices of production. By inserting those prices into the saving equation he obtains a model where any change in the natural growth rate implies a change in the distribution of income à la Kaldor with the underlying prices being determined à la Sraffa.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bhaduri, Amit (1975). ‘On the Analogy Between the Quantity and the Price Traverse’, Oxford Economic Papers, 27(3): 455–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Findlay, Ronald (1963). ‘The Robinsonian Model of Accumulation’, Economica, 30(117): 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foley, Duncan and Sidrauski, Miguel (1971). Monetary and Fiscal Policy in a Growing Economy (New York: Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Garegnani, Pierangelo (1970). ‘Heterogeneous Capital, the Production Function and the Theory of Distribution’, Review-of-Economic-Studies; 37(3): 407–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garegnani, Pierangelo (1976). ‘On a Change in the Notion of Equilibrium in Recent Work on Value and Distribution’, in Brown, Murray; Sato, Kazuo; Zarembka, Paul (eds.), Essays in Modern Capital Theory (Amsterdam and New York: North Holland).

    Google Scholar 

  • Halevi, Joseph (1992). ‘Accumulation and Structural Disequilibrium’, in Halevi, Joseph., Laibman, David., Nell, Edward, (eds.), Beyond the Steady State (London: Macmillan).

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Harcourt, Geoffrey C. (1963). ‘A Critique of Mr. Kaldor’s Model of Income Distribution and Growth’, Australian Economic Papers, 1(1): 20–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harcourt, Geoffrey C. (1975). ‘Decline and Rise: The Revival of (Classical) Political Economy’, Economic-Record, 51(135): 339–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, John R. (1939). Value and Capital (Oxford: Oxford University Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, John R. (1965). Capital and Growth (Oxford: Clarendon Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, John (1969). A Theory of Economic History (Oxford: Clarendon Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, John R. (1973). Capital and Time (Oxford: Clarendon Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, John R. (1975). ‘Revival of Political Economy: The Old and the New’, Economic-Record, 51(135): 365–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, John (1985). Methods of Dynamic Economics (Oxford: Clarendon Press).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, John R. (1990). ‘Ricardo and Sraffa’, in Bharadwaj Krishna and Schefold Bertram (eds.), Essays On Piero Sraffa. Critical Perspectives on the Revival of Classical Theory (London, Boston, Sydney, Wellington: Unwyn Hyman).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pasinetti, Luigi L. (1966). ‘Changes in the Rate of Profit and Switches of Techniques’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 80: 554–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pasinetti, Luigi L. (1977). Lectures in the Theory of Production (New York: Columbia University Press).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, Joan (1956). The Accumulation of Capital (London: Macmillan).

    Google Scholar 

  • Spaventa-Luigi. (1970). ‘Rate of Profit, Rate of Growth, and Capital Intensity in a Simple Production Model’, Oxford-Economic-Papers; 22(2): 129–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Copyright information

© 2016 Joseph Halevi, G. C. Harcourt, Peter Kriesler and J. W. Nevile

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Halevi, J. (2016). Capital and Growth: Its Relevance as a Critique of Neo-Classical and Classical Economic Theories. In: Post-Keynesian Essays from Down Under Volume IV: Essays on Theory. Palgrave Macmillan, London. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-47529-9_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-47529-9_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-137-47528-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-47529-9

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics