Abstract
The contextualization of the social and political conditions of the environment in social studies has been a tradition that necessitates the understanding of the issue at hand. Demographic factors such as ethnicity, religion, race, education level, geographic location, participant age, gender, sexuality, and cognitive ability are social identifiers significant to describing the research subjects. Providing information about individual identifiers is considered a standard exercise that serves in framing the research. Data on social identifiers is no longer part of any specific academic field; rather, they are also incorporated in hard science. The information on social identifiers is included because an individual and his or her agency has multiple social identifiers that shape the interaction and relationship with events and social issues. Linkedin and O’Loughin (2015) emphasized that “Political behaviors such as voting decisions, conflict about territorial control, political boundary delineation and demarcation, and public good provision and allocation are a function of constellation of influences and mix aggregate and individual factors at scale ranging from the locality to the national and international” (pp. 189–190). Therefore, the contextualization of the mutable environment characteristics perceived in poverty, war, school safety, access to nutrition, health, education, geopolitics, and others is to recognize how participants experience the local and global environmental conditions according to their social identifiers (Caughy et al., 2013; Fiddian-Qasmiyeh, 2013; Habashi & Worley, 2014; Marshall, 2014; Netland, 2012). The different layers in an individual’s environment coupled with the unique, varied social identifiers particular to that individual create a diversity of experiences that can lead to multiple reactions and ways in which that individual uses his or her agency. Social identifiers embedded in the intersectionality of the nature of age make us who we are while interacting with the environment, events, and intergenerationality (Hopkins & Pain, 2007). Political agency is predicated on the interaction between different social identifiers with the diverse environments/events settings and with different age groups in each context. The ecological theory suggests that youth political agency is shaped by the environment, by which youth are subjugated (Hörschelmann, 2008); however, the relationship is contingent on individual social identifiers (Habashi, 2013). The interaction between the environment and who we are is dynamic and dialectic in nature, as one shapes the other. Social identifiers interact with events and create meaning dependent on responses of environment and the connotation associated with each social identifier. For example, political agency of minority youth differs in accessing the power structure compared to youth belonging to mainstream culture (Allen & Bang, 2015; Gordon & Taft, 2011; Lay, 2005). However, the outcome might also be different if the youth is a minority that belongs to upper middle class. Each youth constitutes multiple social identifiers that provide nuances of meaning to the subject and subjugated political agency. Alternatively, the dynamic relationship between social identifiers, intergenerationality, and events in the ecological theory creates a complex meaning of youth political socialization; thus, social identifiers and the interactions in the ecological theory challenges homogeneity of youth political agency. Therefore, this chapter focuses on several social identifiers (gender, social class, location, and culture/ethnicity) as they help to define the evolution of youth agency and its interaction with the environment. It is critical to show the multiple layers of social identifiers to understand how youth interact with their socio/political/cultural environments and how this impacts their agency. This would decode political socialization and provide an alternative view of youth political agency.
I want to share an example: a girl goes out at night. If the family needs bread at night, what is the problem if the girl goes and gets it from the supermarket. In my opinion, there are a lot of people against that [girls leaving the house on their own at night] and even during daylight she should go with her brother, why [do they] restrict her; this will lead to her [getting angry and resisting] and she will not listen to her parents. This happened here, 30 girls from Hebron fled from their houses monthly, this was expected because of [the restrictions imposed]. If they give girls freedom and trust them, they [the girls] will be trustworthy.
—15-year-old female from a city
Many Palestinian women were killed as a reason due to family honor. This is without hearing the victims’ perspective, these innocent women. These actions are still [part of] the Palestinian traditions as part of shame-washing and cleansing the family. A man in Gaza killed his daughter because her breach of family honor. He strangled her… then he called the police. After an investigation the police proved that she is virgin, she was innocent. This is one story, there are many stories of innocent women who were killed without any sin.
—15 -year-old female from a city
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Abu-Lughod, L., Yegenoglu, M., Arat, Z., Hoodfar, H., Tucker, J., Moghissi, H., et al. (2001). “Orientalism” and Middle East feminist studies. Feminist Studies, 27(1), 101–113.
Allen, L., & Bang, H. (2015). Ecological contexts and youth civic and political engagement in Paris. Journal of applied Development Psychology, 39, 34–43.
Amna, E., Ekström, M., Kerr, M., & Stattin, H. (2009). Political socialization and human agency. The development of civic engagement from adolescence to adulthood. Statsvetenskaplig Tidskrift, 111(1), 27–30.
Attar-Schwartz, S., & Ben-Arieh, A. (2012). Political knowledge, attitudes and values among Palestinian and Jewish youth in Israel. The role of nationality, gender and religiosity. Children and Youth Services Review, 34(4), 704–712.
Bardi, A. S. (2016). The “architectural cleansing” of Palestine. American Anthropologist, 118(1), 165–171.
Bloemraad, I., & Trost, C. (2008). It’s a family affair: Intergeneration mobilization in the spring 2006 protests. American Behavioral Scientist, 52(4), 507–532.
Bowers, M., & Preuhs, R. (2009). Collateral consequences of collateral penalty: The negative effect of felon disenfranchisement law on the political participation of nonfelons. Social Science Quarterly, 90(3), 722–743.
Caughy, M., Leonard, T., Beron, K., & Murdoch, J. (2013). Defining neighborhood boundaries in studies of spatial dependence in child behavior problems. International Journal of Health Geographic, 12, 24–36.
Cho, W. K. T., Gimpel, J. G., & Wu, T. (2006). Clarifying the role of SES in political participation: Policy threat and Arab American mobilization. Journal of Politics, 68(4), 977–991.
Chong, D., & Kim, D. (2006). The experiences and effects of economic status among racial and ethnic minorities. American Political Science Review, 100(3), 335–351.
Cicognani, E., Zani, B., Fournier, B., Gavray, C., & Born, M. (2011). Gender differences in youths’ political engagement and participation. The role of parents and of adolescents’ social and civic participation. Journal of Adolescent, 35(3), 561–576.
Edlund, L., & Pande, R. (2002). Why have women become left-wing? The political gender gap and the decline in marriage. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117(3), 917–961.
Fiddian-Qasmiyeh, E. (2013). The inter-generational politics of ‘traveling memories’: Sahrawi refugee youth remembering home-land and home-camp. Journal of Intercultural Studies, 34(6), 631–649.
Fisher, R. (2012). Youth political participation: Bridging activism and electoral politics. Annual Review of Sociology, 38, 119–137.
Flanaga, C. A., Syverten, A. K., Gill, S., Gallay, L., & Cumsille, P. (2009). Ethnic awareness, prejudice and civic commitments in four ethnic groups of American adolescents. Journal of Youth Adolescence, 38(4), 500–518.
Fluri, J. (2015). Feminist political geography. In J. Agnew, V. Mamadouh, A. J. Secor, & J. Sharp (Eds.), The Wiley Blackwell companion to political geography (pp. 189–205). Chichester: Wiley Blackwell Press.
Fridkin, K. L., Kenney, P. J., & Crittenden, J. (2006). On the margins of democratic life: The impact of race and ethnicity on political engagement of young people. American Politics Research, 34(5), 605–626.
Giacaman, R., & Johnson, P. (2013). “Our life is prison” the triple captivity of wives and mothers of Palestinian political prisoners. Journal of Middle East Women’s Studies, 9(3), 54–80.
Godfrey, E., & Grayman, J. (2014). Teaching citizens: The role of open classroom climate in fostering critical consciousness among youth. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 43(11), 1801–1817.
Gordon, H. R., & Taft, J. K. (2011). Rethinking youth political socialization: Teenage activists talk back. Youth and Society, 43(4), 1499–1527.
Gray, T. (2003). Electoral gender quotas: Lessons from Argentina and Chile. Bulletin of Latin American Research, 22(1), 52–78.
Habashi, J. (2013). Palestinian children: Authors of collective memory. Children and Society, 27(6), 421–433.
Habashi, J., & Worley, J. (2014). Children’s projected political preference: Transcending local politics. Children’s Geographies, 12(2), 205–218.
Hart, D., Donnelly, T., Youniss, J., & Atkins, R. (2007). High school community service as a predictor of adult voting and volunteering. American Educational Research Journal, 44(1), 197–219.
Hart, D., & Kirshner, B. (2009). Civic participation and development among urban adolescents. In J. Youniss & P. Levine (Eds.), Engaging young people in civic life (pp. 102–120). Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press.
Hart, J. (2002). Children and nationalism in a Palestinian refugee camp in Jordan. Childhood, 9(9), 35–47.
Holt, M. (2003). Palestinian women, violence, and the peace process. Development in Practice, 13(2–3), 223–238.
Hooghe, M., & Stolle, D. (2004). Good girls go to the polling booth, bad boys go everywhere. Gender difference in anticipated political participation among American fourteen year olds. Women and Politics, 26(3–4), 1–23.
Hopkins, D., & Williamson, T. (2012). Inactive by design? Neighborhood design and political participation. Political Behavior, 34(1), 79–101.
Hopkins, P., & Pain, R. (2007). Geographies of age: Thinking relationally. Area, 39(3), 287–294.
Hörschelmann, K. (2008). Populating the landscapes of critical geopolitics—Young people’s responses to the war in Iraq (2003). Political Geography, 27(5), 587–609.
Htun, M. (2004). Is gender like ethnicity? The political representation of identity groups. Perspectives on Politics, 2(3), 439–458.
Jad, I. (2010). Palestinian women contesting power in chaos. IDS Bulletin, 41(5), 81–88.
Jean-Klein, I. (2001). Nationalism and resistance: The two faces of everyday activism in Palestine during the intifada. Cultural Anthropology, 16(1), 83–126.
Jeffrey, C. (2012). Geographies of children and youth II: Global youth agency. Progress in Geography, 36(2), 245–253.
Jennings, K. M., Stoker, L., & Bowers, J. (2009). Politics across generations: Family transmission reexamined. Journal of Politics, 71(3), 782–799.
Jones, M. (2008). Gender quotas, electoral laws, and the election of women. Comparative Political studies, 42(1), 56–81.
Krook, M. L. (2006). Reforming representation: The diffusion of candidate gender quotas worldwide. Politics and Gender, 2(3), 303–328.
Lay, C. J. (2005). Learning about politics in low-income communities. American Politics Research, 34(3), 319–340.
Lelieveldt, H. (2004). Helping citizens help themselves neighborhood improvement programs and the impact of social networks, trust, and norms on neighborhood-oriented forms of participation. Urban Affairs Review, 39(5), 531–551.
Levinson, M. (2010). The civic empowerment gap: Defining the problems and locating solutions. In L. R. Sherrod, J. Torney-Purta, & C. A. Flanagan (Eds.), Handbook of research on civic engagement in youth (pp. 331–361). New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons. Inc.
Linkedin, A. A., & O’Loughlin, J. (2015). Spatial analysis. In J. Agnew, V. Mamadouh, A. J. Secor, & J. Sharp (Eds.), The Wiley Blackwell companion to political geography (pp. 189–205). Chichester: Wiley Blackwell Press.
Mankiw, N. G. (2013). Defending the one percent. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 27(3), 21–34.
Marshall, D. J. (2014). Save (us from) the children: Trauma, Palestinian childhood, and the production of governable subjects. Children’s Geographies, 12(3), 281–296.
Marshall, D. J. (2015). Existence as resistance: Children and politics of play in Palestine. In K. P. Kallio, S. Mills, & T. Skelton (Eds.), Political, citizenship and rights, geographies of children and youth people (Vol. 7, pp. 245–262). London: Spring.
Nall, C. (2015). The political consequences of spatial policies: How interstate highways facilitated geographic polarization. The Journal of Politics, 77(2), 394–406.
Netland, M. (2012). Exploring ‘lost childhood’: A study of the narratives of Palestinians who grew up during the first intifada. Childhood, 20(1), 82–97.
Nguyen, K. N., & Garand, J. C. (2009). Partisan strength and nonpartisanship among Asian Americans. American Politics Research, 37(3), 375–408.
Pacheco, J., & Plutzer, E. (2008). Political participation and cumulative disadvantage: The impact of economic and social hardship on youth citizen. Journal of Social Issues, 64(3), 571–593.
Paxton, P., & Hughes, M. (2016). Women, politics, and power: A global perspective (3rd ed.). London: Sage.
Pfaff, N. (2009). Youth culture as a context of political learning: How young people politicize amongst each other. Young: Nordic Journal of Youth Research, 17(2), 167–189.
Quintelier, E. (2009). The political participation of immigrant youth in Belgium. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 35, 919–937.
Ravensbergen, F., & Vander Plaat, M. (2010). Barriers to citizen participation: The missing voices of people living with low income. Community Development Journal, 45(4), 389–403.
Richter-Devroe, S. (2008). Gender, culture, and conflict resolution in Palestine. Journal of Middle East Women’s Studies, 4(2), 30–59.
Rosenthal, C., Rosenthal, J., & Jones, J. (2001). Preparing the elite political participation: Simulations and the political socialization of adolescent. Social Science Quarterly, 82(3), 633–646.
Sapiro, V. (2004). Not your parents’ political socialization: Introduction for a new generation. Annual Review of Political Science, 7, 1–23.
Segal, L. (2005). Why feminism?: Gender, psychology, politics. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
Talo, C., Mannarini, T., & Rochira, A. (2014). Sense of community and community participation: A meta-analytic review. Social Indicator Research, 117(1), 1–28.
Traft, J. K. (2006). “I’m not a politics person”: Teenage girls, oppositional consciousness, and the meaning of politics. Politics and Gender, 2(3), 329–352.
Van Deth, J., Abendschön, S., & Vollmar, M. (2011). Children and politics: An empirical reassessment of early political socialization. Political Psychology, 32(1), 147–174.
Walsh, K. C. (2012). Putting inequality in its place: Rural consciousness and the power of perspective. American Political Science Review, 106(3), 517–532.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Copyright information
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Habashi, J. (2017). Social Identifiers: Making Meaning of Intersectionality. In: Political Socialization of Youth. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-47523-7_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-47523-7_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York
Print ISBN: 978-1-137-47522-0
Online ISBN: 978-1-137-47523-7
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)