Skip to main content

Reconceptualizing Youth Political Socialization: A Theoretical Framework

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

The conventional views of political socialization of youth have been largely limited to the impact of immediate family and what is learned within school curriculum (Gordon & Taft, 2011; van Deth, Abendschön, & Vollmar, 2011). Traditionally, it was held that children will almost always duplicate their parents’ or caregivers’ political views, especially as related to political party affiliation, voting patterns, and political involvement (Allen & Bang, 2015; McDevitt & Chaffee, 2002; Schulman & DeAndrea, 2014). However, this conventional or “traditional” model of youth political socialization is antiquated, as research has shown that there are several other factors at play. Political socialization is in fact a dynamic process and youth respond to it by forming their agency. Youth are part of multiple realities and influenced by a variety of factors, including family, community, and location in which they live; education, schools, and peers; gender; religious elements; and media (all of these are discussed more in depth in subsequent chapters). Youth are not passive recipients of political stimuli but play an active role in shaping their own political perspectives as they are “reflective agents growing up within specific and historical contexts…” (Yates & Youniss, 1998, p. 496). This chapter will deconstruct the traditional model of political socialization that mutes youth political agency and illustrate the different ways youth are politically socialized, with particular focus on the multiple agents, realities, and relationship between local and global discourses that assist in forming youth’s perspectives and actions, keeping in mind that all of these elements are closely interrelated.

Today I met one of my classmates. Her father is in an Israeli jail as are many Palestinians. She has many brothers and sisters. I asked her about her life, she said: I miss my father. Sometimes I listened to the prisoners’ families when they talked on the radio and TVs. Families do that to assure prisoners, and it is a type of communication because they can’t visit them. In my opinion this is all invalid; a phone call couldn’t replace a mother seeing and hugging her son. Or could not replace a married father seeing his wife and children. Israel deprived those children from their fathers. And they deprived youth from building their own future. Palestinian youth's fight for their homeland is perceived by Israel as a threat to its security. I want all prisoners to be free, because freedom is wonderful. I wish everyone to be free.

– 15-year-old female from a city

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aitken, S. (1994). Putting children in their place. Association of American Geographers. Washington, DC: Edwards Bros.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen, L., & Bang, H. (2015). Ecological contexts and youth civic and political engagement in Paris, France. Journal of Applied Development Psychology, 39, 34–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amna, E., Ekström, M., Kerr, M., & Stattin, H. (2009). Political socialization and human agency. The development of civic engagement from adolescence to adult-hood. Statsvetenskaplig Tidskrift, 111(1), 27–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloemraad, I., & Trost, C. (2008). It’s a family affair: Intergeneration mobilization in the spring 2006 protests. American Behavioral Scientist, 52(4), 507–532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cammaerts, B., Bruter, M., Banaji, S., Harrison, S., & Anstead, N. (2013). The myth of youth apathy: Young Europeans’ critical attitudes toward democratic life. American Behavioral Scientist, 58(5), 645–664. doi: 0002764213515992.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dinas, E. (2013). Why does the apple fall far from the tree? How early political socialization prompts parent-child dissimilarity. British Journal of Political Science, 44(4), 827–852.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, H. R., & Taft, J. K. (2011). Rethinking youth political socialization: Teenage activists talk back. Youth and Society, 43(4), 1499–1527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habashi, H., & Worley, J. (2008). Child geopolitical agency: A mixed methods case study. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 3,42–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habashi, J. (2011). Children’s agency and Islam: Unexpected path to solidarity. Children Geographies, 9(2), 129–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habashi, J. (2013). Palestinian children: Authors of collective memory. Children and Society, 27(6), 421–433.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, A., Wyn, J., & Younes, S. (2010). Beyond apathetic or activist youth. Journal of Youth Research, 18(1), 9–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins, P., & Pain, R. (2007). Geographies of age: Thinking relationally. Area, 39(3), 287–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hörschelmann, K. (2008). Populating the landscapes of critical geopolitics—Young people’s responses to the war in Iraq (2003). Political Geography, 27(5), 587–609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James, A., Jenks, C., & Prout, A. (1998). Theorising childhood. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jennings, K. M., Stoker, L., & Bowers, J. (2009). Politics across generations: Family transmission reexamined. Journal of Politics, 71(3), 782–799.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kallio, K. P. (2008). The body as battlefield: Approaching children’s politics. Geografiska Annaler Series B, Human Geography, 90(3), 285–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kallio, K. P., & Häkli, J. (2011). Tracing children’s politics. Political Geography, 30(2), 99–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katz, C. (2004). Growing up global: Economic restructuring and children’s everyday lives. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine, P. (2003). The civic mission of schools. National Civic Review, 92(4), 63–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manning, N. (2014). The relational self and the political engagements of young adults. Journal of Sociology, 50(4), 486–500. doi:1440783312467094.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDevitt, M., & Chaffee, S. (2002). From top-down to trickle-up influence: Revisiting assumptions about the family in political socialization. Political Communication, 19(3), 281–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDevitt, M., & Kiousis, S. (2015). Active political parenting: Youth contributions during election campaigns. Social Science Quarterly, 96(1), 19–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mortimore, R., & Tyrrell, C. (2004). Children’s acquisition of political opinions. Journal of Public Affairs, 4(3), 279–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Östman, J. (2014). The influence of media use on environmental engagement: A political socialization approach. Environmental Communication, 8(1), 92–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrown, R. (2014). A deterioration of democracy?: Corruption, transparency, and apathy in the Western World. SAIS Review of International Affairs, 34(1), 41–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandell, K., & Ostroff, D. (1981). Political information content and children’s political socialization. Journal of Broadcastings and Electronic Media, 25(1), 49–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sapiro, V. (2004). Not your parents’ political socialization: Introduction for a new generation. Annual Review of Political Science, 7, 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schulman, H. C., & DeAndrea, D. C. (2014). Predicting success: Revisiting assumptions about family political socialization. Communication Monographs, 81(3), 386–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Secor, A. (2001). Toward a feminist counter-geopolitics: Gender, space and Islamist politics in Istanbul. Space and Polity, 5(3), 191–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spellings, C., Barber, B., & Olsen, J. (2012). Political activism of Palestinian youth: Exploring individual, parental, and ecological factors. Journal of Marriage and Family, 74(5), 1084–1100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations. (2007). World youth report 2007: Young people’s transition to adulthood: Progress and challenges. New York: United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Deth, J. W., Abendschön, J. S., & Vollmar, M. (2011). Children and politics: An empirical reassessment of early political socialization. Political Psychology, 32(1), 147–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warren, R., & Wicks, R. H. (2011). Political socialization: Modeling teen political and civic engagement. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 88(1), 156–175.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watts, M. (1999). Are there typical age curves in political behavior? The “age invariance” hypothesis. Political Psychology, 20(3), 477–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yates, M., & Youniss, J. (1998). Community service and political identity development in adolescence. Journal of Social Issues, 54(3), 495–512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Youniss, J., Bales, S., Christmas-Best, V., Diversi, M., McLaughlin, M., & Silbereisen, R. (2002). Youth civic engagement in the twenty-first century. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 12(1), 121–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Habashi, J. (2017). Reconceptualizing Youth Political Socialization: A Theoretical Framework. In: Political Socialization of Youth. Palgrave Macmillan, New York. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-47523-7_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-47523-7_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, New York

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-137-47522-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-137-47523-7

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics